In new period of AI, course now explores transhumanism and its implications for immortality
Transhumanism is the concept people and expertise can merge to make us a longer-living species—or perhaps a new one. Photo by way of iStock/yucelyilmaz
Classes
In new period of AI, course now explores transhumanism and its implications for immortality
The motion known as transhumanism embraces technology-enhanced human talents, together with—for some advocates—our merging with synthetic intelligence (AI) to create a brand new, immortal species. Boston University college students ponder this potential paradise, and whether or not it might be all its boosters promise, in Yair Lior’s Religion and Science class.
Make no mistake: this visionary tech-topia has spiritual overtones, regardless of most transhumanists’ secular and atheist leanings. “[Transhumanists] endow technology with religious significance,” Lior, a College of Arts & Sciences senior lecturer in comparative faith, stated in a latest class session. “There’s something about technology that has the promise of salvation, immortality,” with some futurists forecasting the day that we’ll add our consciousness into eternally replaceable machines. “Humans do have a tendency to need a God [to create] some kind of predictability.”
But would possibly AI makers who warn the expertise truly may flip malicious be proper?
Lior’s college students cut up between frightened and meh. Samuel Tauer (CAS’29) amused his classmates with what historical past might report as a gap skirmish within the revolt of the robots: He recalled how, over spring break in Miami, an autonomous supply robotic blocked his path on the sidewalk and refused to budge. “It was expecting me to move,” he stated. “It was in that moment when I kind of realized we’ve got, like, a potential issue on our hands.”
There’s one thing about expertise that has the promise of salvation, immortality.
Alika Grigorova (CAS’26), who makes use of AI giant language fashions for her analysis group in arithmetic and statistics, doubted the expertise would activate us, since folks determine which datasets to make use of in coaching these fashions. “We’re controlling this as humans,” she stated. Ava Shimkus (CAS’28) agreed, however added, “We also know that humans don’t always act in other humans’ best interest.”
Lior has taught iterations of the category for a decade, tracing the interaction between science and faith from antiquity to right now. He covers such matters as St. Augustine reconciling biblical doctrine with purpose; spiritual reactions to the discoveries of Copernicus, Galileo, and Darwin; and trendy flash factors, together with clever design (the notion that the advanced, exact legal guidelines holding the universe collectively counsel a purposeful creator) and New Age spiritualities.
With the rise of AI, the course consists of transhumanism as effectively. Lior exhibits slides on the classroom’s flat-screen TV with quotes from advocates like the pc scientist and futurist Ray Kurzweil, who years in the past predicted that, with our identities uploaded to computational expertise, “Our immortality will be a matter of being sufficiently careful to make frequent backups.”
In an period of polarization—over faith, science, and, effectively, virtually every thing else—the category truly has a optimistic takeaway, Lior instructed BU Today: we should and can smash the stereotypes and preconceptions that college students on every bench (science or faith) harbor in regards to the different.
Loads of extraordinarily clever folks subscribe to non secular traditions [with] very refined notions of God.
He has had nonbelieving, STEM-oriented college students who disdain spiritual folks as “superstitious,” he stated, whereas some conservative spiritual college students imagine science is out to undermine Christian values. Both are improper, Lior stated: “A lot of extremely intelligent people subscribe to religious traditions [with] very sophisticated notions of God,” together with trailblazing historic and medieval scientists. A scholarly notion from a century or so in the past that science and faith are conflicted has yielded to the concept the science-religion relationship is nuanced, Lior stated: “not conflict, but complexity.”
The message resonates for a number of of his college students, together with Brian Song (ENG’29), who stated he’s an atheist who attended a Catholic highschool: “I’ve always been generally pretty open-minded.”
Jasmine Sabol (Sargent’28) took the category as a part of her minor in faith in science and medication. Her blended Christian-Buddhist household observes Christmas, Easter, and some Buddhist practices; she stated the course has taught her the historical past of “integration” between faith and science, as effectively. “Originally, I came into the class thinking it’s a conflict model,” Sabol stated, “where it’s, like, they’re always at odds with each other.”
But finding out, for instance, what number of spiritual believers settle for science’s massive bang concept as God’s method of creation “was something I thought was really cool, and it changed my perspective.”