International collaboration is a cornerstone of contemporary scientific analysis, and rising proof of problematic actions has led to rising scrutiny of how collaborations might be misused. Research safety is important for guaranteeing scientific progress throughout worldwide collaboration whereas mitigating dangers to nationwide safety, financial competitiveness, and moral requirements. Effective analysis safety practices acknowledge the rising interconnectedness of world analysis together with the heightened vulnerabilities of such analysis, particularly in high-tech fields, together with synthetic intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, and aerospace. Without correct safeguards, resembling export controls, cybersecurity protocols, disclosure necessities, and due-diligence mechanisms, worldwide partnerships might function avenues for espionage, financial exploitation, or unethical functions of analysis.
This paper describes analysis safety, gives a framework structured round three pillars (safety of outcomes and merchandise of analysis, transparency and disclosure, and governance), and lists particular ways used to undermine every pillar. Researchers, analysis establishments, and analysis funders can use this framework when figuring out, assessing, and managing dangers related to international scientific collaborations.
This publication is a part of the RAND knowledgeable insights collection. The knowledgeable insights collection presents views on well timed coverage points.
This doc and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by legislation. This illustration of RAND mental property is supplied for noncommercial use solely. Unauthorized posting of this publication on-line is prohibited; linking on to this product web page is inspired. Permission is required from RAND to breed, or reuse in one other type, any of its analysis paperwork for business functions. For info on reprint and reuse permissions, please go to www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit establishment that helps enhance coverage and decisionmaking via analysis and evaluation. RAND’s publications don’t essentially mirror the opinions of its analysis shoppers and sponsors.