A brand new Executive Order doesn’t change the legislation in the present day, however it sends a transparent message: the manager department is pushing for a nationwide overhaul of student-athlete compensation, transfers, eligibility, and identify, picture, and likeness (NIL) associated practices.
On April 3, 2026, President Trump issued an Executive Order titled “Urgent National Action to Save College Sports” (the “Order”). The Order doesn’t impose new laws or create new legislation, however it’s prone to face authorized challenges to the extent the Trump administration seeks to implement its phrases. But by stating the administration’s priorities, the Order encourages Congress, athletic organizations, and different personal actors to develop a uniform nationwide commonplace for the way and when student-athletes ought to be permitted to revenue from their NIL by their involvement in school sports activities, which may have downstream penalties for third events contemplating NIL makes use of that implicate a student-athlete’s rights of publicity.
The Order strongly encourages Congress to go laws that addresses these points and instructs companies that contract with, or present grants to, increased training establishments to evaluate guidelines based mostly on 4 key points: eligibility limits, transfers between establishments, income sharing, and the propriety of monetary actions.
More notably, the Order states that earlier than August 1, 2026, interstate intercollegiate athletic governing our bodies ought to, in session with student-athletes, replace or make clear their guidelines, “including by establishing the following”:
- Limiting participation in school athletics to 5 years (with sure exceptions for navy and different service in the general public curiosity) and barring skilled athletes from returning to school athletics;
- Limiting the flexibility of student-athletes to switch colleges to at least one time in a five-year interval, plus one extra time if the student-athlete obtains a four-year diploma;
- Providing medical take care of student-athletes for sports activities accidents throughout their time of enrollment and for an inexpensive time frame thereafter;
- Implementing income sharing between colleges and student-athletes in a fashion that preserves or expands scholarships and alternatives in ladies’s and Olympic sports activities;
- Prohibiting using federal funds for (i) student-athlete NIL or revenue-sharing funds or (ii) teaching or athletic compensation;
- Prohibiting third-party pay-for-play funds; and
- Creating a nationwide student-athlete agent registry and protections for student-athletes from extreme agent commissions.
The Order additional instructs the secretary of training, the chairman of the FTC, and the lawyer normal to take acceptable measures to help in its implementation.
In transient, the Order makes an attempt to impose a nationwide answer to the assorted efforts by federal and state courts and legislators to deal with the fallout from NCAA v. Alston, 594 U.S. 69 (2021), in which the Supreme Court struck down the NCAA’s limits on student-athlete compensation on antitrust grounds.
Since that call, a number of states, athletic organizations, and colleges have proposed and (in some circumstances) applied quite a lot of insurance policies and proposals, most notably, by allowing student-athletes to monetize their NIL rights. In addition, the June 6, 2025 settlement in House v. NCAA granted $2.8 billion to Division I student-athletes who competed from 2016 ahead, and will permit Division I colleges to supply their athletes pay in addition to scholarships and different advantages. Considering these occasions collectively, some have recommended that the shortage of complete guidelines governing states, athletic organizations, and colleges has led to the exploitation of student-athletes and inspired a “race to the bottom” amongst states and colleges.
Even so, an Executive Order could also be a lower than supreme method to deal with this concern, because it doesn’t in itself impose any new laws, create new legislation, or invalidate any present legal guidelines, laws, or authorized choices. Moreover, to the extent the present administration makes an attempt to implement or implement its provisions unilaterally in the long run (for instance, by conditioning or withholding future federal funding based mostly on compliance with its phrases), it’s prone to face authorized challenges on varied substantive, procedural, and Constitutional grounds.
So, to some extent the Order might be seen as an try and “strongly encourage[]” Congress “to expeditiously pass legislation that satisfactorily addresses these issues,” for instance, the Student Compensation and Opportunity by Rights and Endorsements Act (“SCORE Act”), H.R. 4312 – 119th Congress (2025–2026). The SCORE Act, which was meant to “protect the name, image, and likeness rights of student athletes and to promote fair competition with respect to intercollegiate athletics, and for other purposes,” would have fulfilled most of the similar functions because the Order, however it was pulled previous to a vote on December 3, 2025 due to criticism that it favored the NCAA and different large conferences over student-athletes.
In different phrases, this new Executive Order might be construed as another step in an prolonged technique of addressing the growing professionalism and profitability of faculty sports activities, and making an attempt to succeed in a good steadiness among the many pursuits of faculties, student-athletes, interstate intercollegiate athletic organizations, and the general public. Although the Order makes an attempt to expedite that course of, given the billions of {dollars} at stake and the assorted events with competing pursuits which are concerned, the problem is probably not resolved for years to come back.
[View source.]