By Katelyn Polantz, NCS
(NCS) — A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump adviser Peter Navarro’s try to overturn his contempt of Congress felony conviction.
The unanimous opinion of three judges on the DC US Circuit Court of Appeals marks the newest failure of Trump advisers to unwind authorized fallout over their actions across the January 6, 2021, US Capitol riot.
The choice additionally leans closely into Navarro’s failures to show in court that Trump wished to protect him from congressional testimony.
Navarro was discovered responsible in 2023 of defying congressional subpoenas associated his public claims of plotting to dam Congress from certifying Trump’s loss within the 2020 presidential election. The House Select Committee investigating the Capitol riot sought each data Navarro had and his testimony, however he refused.
Navarro has already served a federal jail sentence, however he has been attempting to argue in court for years that Trump advised him he didn’t want to answer the House’s calls for, citing what he mentioned was a proper assertion of government privilege.
But the DC Circuit panel, comprised of Judges Patricia Millett, Nina Pillard and Michelle Childs, decided this was a fig leaf.
“Dr. Navarro first asserted executive privilege unilaterally without consulting with or receiving direction from President Trump,” the opinion, authored by Millett, mentioned.
The appeals court mentioned Navarro had no documentation displaying Trump had advised him in a 3-minute cellphone name to defy the committee’s subpoena. Both an legal professional and an adviser for Trump who had testified to a grand jury against Navarro additionally mentioned Trump by no means formally determined Navarro needs to be shielded.
“Dr. Navarro immediately and categorically asserted executive privilege without consulting anyone … He did so before even seeing the subpoena and its cover letter that made clear the subpoena sought some information that Dr. Navarro concedes is not privileged because he had discussed it publicly” in his guide and in interviews, the court wrote. “That all cuts against Dr. Navarro’s purported good-faith defense, not in favor of it.”
The court additionally highlighted that when Navarro was indicted and tried for his crime, each the manager department – in the course of the Biden administration – and Congress sought accountability. The Trump administration has let the Navarro enchantment play out.
“As it turns out, the Political Branches are entirely in accord this time. Congress held Dr. Navarro in contempt,” Millett wrote within the opinion. “And the Executive both informed Dr. Navarro that his assertion of executive privilege was unjustified and exercised its exclusive authority to bring this prosecution.”
All three judges on the panel have been appointed by Democratic presidents.
Navarro, who now’s a White House commerce adviser, and Steve Bannon, one other longtime Trump confidant, have each been attempting to reverse their convictions by means of the court. Both served time in federal jail in 2024 for defying House subpoenas relating to January 6.
At the time Congress subpoenaed each to testify and the Justice Department prosecuted them, Bannon and Navarro have been non-public residents, and Trump was now not president, between his two phrases in workplace.
Yet even as soon as Trump retook the presidency final yr, neither man has obtained a presidential pardon, regardless of the widespread clemency Trump has given to January 6-associated defendants and different allies.
With their appeals nonetheless ongoing, the Justice Department advised courts this yr it wished the costs against Bannon dismissed.
Navarro’s legal professional has mentioned they are not looking for the costs dismissed as Bannon’s was.
“The decision today from the D.C. Circuit panel was not surprising and Peter Navarro knew that it would be one step in a battle to correct decades of incorrect DC Circuit precedent,” Navarro legal professional Abhishek Kambli mentioned in a press release supplied to NCS on Tuesday. “He intends to move swiftly with his appeal because his case affects every senior presidential advisor, regardless of political party, who believes in good faith they cannot comply with a congressional subpoena based on executive privilege.”
The-NCS-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.