NCS
By Issy Ronald, NCS
(NCS) — When US forces struck the Venezuelan capital and ousted the nation’s president Nicolás Maduro on Saturday, it turned considered one of President Donald Trump’s rhetorical threats into actuality.
In the times since, his frequent musings about different gadgets on his overseas coverage wishlist have rung with renewed power, particularly his repeated want for the US to take over Greenland – the huge autonomous Arctic territory dominated by Denmark.
In the wake of such a brazen show of US navy energy in Venezuela, this rhetoric has taken on a special character, straining Washington’s relationship with its NATO ally.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen reiterated Monday that she had already “made it very clear where the Kingdom of Denmark stands, and that Greenland has repeatedly said that it does not want to be part of the United States.”
She even warned that it may result in the demise of the NATO alliance.
So why would possibly Trump hold turning his consideration to this distant, sparsely populated island – and why is it inflicting tensions with Europe?
Here’s what you must know.
What is Greenland like?
Greenland, a resource-rich island of 836,000 sq. miles (2.16 million sq. kilometers) is a former Danish colony and now an autonomous territory of Denmark, located within the Arctic.
It’s the world’s least densely populated nation and is so distant that its 56,000 residents journey by boat, helicopter and airplane between its cities, that are predominantly scattered alongside the island’s western coast. Nuuk, the territory’s capital metropolis, is emblematic of these cities, that includes brightly coloured homes crowed collectively between a jagged shoreline and inland mountains.
Outside the cities, Greenland is principally wilderness with 81% of its land underneath ice. Nearly 90% of its inhabitants is of Inuit origin and the territory’s financial system has lengthy revolved round fishing.
Why is it so essential strategically?
Greenland occupies a strategic geopolitical place, sitting between the US and Europe and astride the so-called GIUK hole – a maritime passage between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK that hyperlinks the Arctic to the Atlantic Ocean.
Its wealthy deposits of pure sources, together with oil, fuel and uncommon earth minerals, make it much more strategically essential, particularly as China has leveraged its domination of the uncommon earth business to exert strain on the US. These uncommon earth minerals are more and more essential to the worldwide financial system since they’re required to fabricate every part from electrical automobiles and wind generators to navy tools.
Greenland’s trove of minerals could turn into extra accessible because the local weather disaster melts Arctic ice, a phenomenon which additionally makes northern transport routes navigable for extra time all year long, doubtlessly reorienting commerce and making the area much more essential, regardless of Trump calling the local weather disaster “the greatest con job.”
Trump has downplayed the importance of Greenland’s pure sources, telling reporters final month: “We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals.”
But his former nationwide safety adviser Mike Waltz instructed in January 2024 that Trump’s focus was on pure sources, telling Fox News that the administration’s give attention to Greenland was “about critical minerals” and “natural resources.”
What does Venezuela must do with it?
The day after US forces snatched Maduro from his dwelling, Trump repeated that the US wants Greenland “from the standpoint of national security,” earlier than White House deputy chief of employees for coverage Stephen Miller reiterated these claims on Monday, additional sharpening the highlight on the Arctic territory.
“We need Greenland…it’s so strategic right now. Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place,” Trump advised reporters aboard Air Force One Sunday regardless of at first saying he didn’t want to speak about it. “We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it.”
Doubling down on Tuesday, the White House stated it is “discussing a range of options” to accumulate Greenland and that utilizing the US navy is not off the desk.
What has Trump stated earlier than?
Trump inquired about the potential of shopping for Greenland throughout his first time period and, regardless of being advised by the island that “Greenland is not for sale,” he revived these calls in December 2024, saying in a social media submit: “For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity.”
He claimed that the US wants Greenland for “economic security,” earlier than Vice President JD Vance traveled to the island in March 2025 the place he stated it was “the policy of the United States” to see modifications to the island’s Danish management however acknowledged that Greenlanders ought to determine their future.
Polling in Greenland reveals clear opposition to turning into a part of the US, with 85% of Greenlanders in opposition to American rule, Reuters reported.
What does this imply for NATO?
If the US makes use of navy motion to grab Greenland – one thing Trump has pointedly refused to rule out – it may fracture the NATO alliance.
Frederiksen stated Monday that “if the US chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, everything stops, including NATO and thus the security that has been provided since the end of World War II.”
On Tuesday, leaders from main European powers expressed assist for Denmark and Greenland, including that Arctic safety have to be upheld collectively with NATO allies, together with the US.
“Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland,” leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark stated in a joint assertion.
“NATO has made clear that the Arctic region is a priority and European Allies are stepping up.”
What do Greenlanders suppose?
Trump’s frequent posturing about Greenland strikes proper on the coronary heart of the territory’s politics, which has lengthy been formed by Denmark’s colonial legacy and a push for independence.
Greenland was included into Denmark in 1953, as a tide of decolonization swept the globe following World War II. In 1979 it was granted dwelling rule; in 2009 it achieved self-government however its overseas, safety, protection and financial coverage are all nonetheless managed by Denmark.
During current election campaigns, Greenland’s politicians have promised to take steps in direction of independence however haven’t supplied a concrete timeline to do so. While not all Greenlanders want independence from Denmark, few want to commerce Danish for US management.
Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen referred to as the US’s rhetoric “completely unacceptable.”
“When the President of the United States speaks of ‘needing Greenland’ and links us to Venezuela and military intervention, it is not just wrong. It is disrespectful,” he stated in a press release.
“No more fantasies of annexation,” Nielsen added. “We are open to dialogue. We are open to discussions. But they must take place through the proper channels and in respect of international law … Greenland is our home and our territory. And it will remain so.”
According to Kuno Fencker, a member of parliament for the extra pro-US Naleraq social gathering, a few of Trump’s feedback have been “received quite well.”
“If he says Greenland has the right to self-determination or they could join the United States, it’s a big offer from the United States president,” Fencker advised NCS.
“But if journalists are putting words in his mouth about annexing or taking Greenland military, that’s not been taken well,” he added.
The-NCS-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.