What to know about RFK Jr., the MAHA movement and vaccines in a pivotal week: Analysis

A model of this story appeared in NCS’s What Matters e-newsletter. To get it in your inbox, join free here.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s marketing campaign to change how US youngsters are vaccinated in opposition to severe illnesses faces a number of main exams this week.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director he ousted final month, Dr. Susan Monarez, will testify on Capitol Hill about her abrupt firing and her allegation that he’s undercutting vaccine requirements.

Separately, a key CDC advisory panel Kennedy reconstituted together with his personal picks —a few of whom have made unproven claims about vaccines — will maintain a assembly that might lead to drastic adjustments in vaccine suggestions.

For all the questions raised about Kennedy’s stance on vaccines, he maintains some broad bipartisan help for his Make America Healthy Again efforts to change the approach Americans eat.

I spoke with NCS well being coverage and politics reporter Sarah Owermohle about the dichotomy of Kennedy and what to anticipate from this week.

Our dialog, performed by phone and edited for size, is beneath.

WOLF: Kennedy’s agenda is MAHA – Make America Healthy Again. What does that imply in apply?

OWERMOHLE: While the MAHA agenda is that this big tent of various individuals coming in with completely different priorities, I might put it into three buckets: meals, prescription drugs and the setting.

On the meals half, Kennedy has spearheaded calls to part out synthetic dyes, crack down on ultraprocessed meals, enhance college lunches and enhance SNAP, our meals stamp program. That’s the hottest and approachable a part of this.

Then there’s the prescription drugs and vaccine aspect. I believe a lot of individuals affiliate Kennedy most with the anti-vaccine rhetoric. He’s been very energetic on questioning whether or not sure vaccines are secure and whether or not youngsters particularly must be required to have them.

And then there’s the environmental aspect, which is one other one that’s divisive. He was an environmental lawyer for a very long time earlier than pivoting to MAHA, this broader concept that every one of those elements are inflicting the rise in power illness.

I don’t know how many individuals know that, however earlier than this, he was a lawyer. He was a part of the authorized group that received a big case against Monsanto for a man who had terminal most cancers.

That third leg is this concept that there’s all these items we’re uncovered to in the setting —from farming chemicals to ceaselessly plastics — that he desires to take a more durable take a look at.

The difficulty with that third half is that’s not below his purview as HHS secretary.

WOLF: What are the particular issues he’s achieved with regard to vaccines which have public well being consultants so frightened?

OWERMOHLE: Dismissing an advisory panel, CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, this June. These are consultants who advise CDC on who ought to get vaccines and when they need to get them, and CDC typically takes up what that panel recommends — he dismissed all these individuals, and fairly quickly after changed them together with his handpicked appointees, a lot of whom have made essential remarks in the previous, questioning the security of Covid-19 vaccines, MMR vaccines, hepatitis B vaccines.

That new panel is ready to convene this week to speak about these three vaccines.

What suggestions they make there, particularly since now Kennedy has ousted the CDC director and has put in his deputy there, might have actual ramifications for entry to these vaccines.

One of the most important issues that has occurred to date below his tenure has been the changes around Covid-19 vaccines. The FDA and CDC made adjustments that basically imply that you just and me, as wholesome individuals, can’t go into a pharmacy to get them. Even although the eligibility is now 65 and up, our mother and father may nonetheless have to go to the physician’s workplace.

We’re discovering out from reporting that a few of our colleagues have achieved that a lot of medical doctors should not stocking these vaccines. There’s ton of confusion about, if I did need to get a Covid-19 booster shot, might I get it? And how might I get it?

In phrases of his future plans, Kennedy has talked about reassessing how many individuals have been injured by vaccines and whether or not they need to be compensated for these accidents. He talks about making the childhood vaccine schedule the most splendid it may be for youngsters, which a lot of individuals interpret to imply lowering the quantity of vaccines that youngsters get in first six months to few years of their life.

I believe the finish purpose right here, he actually laid out in the second MAHA report that got here out final week. In the half below vaccines, they wrote that that is about making certain medical freedom. I believe that’s the general ethos right here. What he would inform you, if he was in entrance of you proper now, is, “I’m not trying to take away your vaccines. I’m just trying to give people a choice about vaccines.”

WOLF: Lots of people most likely don’t know there already is a federal system – the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program —to compensate the very small minority of people that endure severe uncomfortable side effects from vaccines. Does he need to broaden that or change it, or has he even talked about, has he gotten that particular?

OWERMOHLE: He has gotten fairly particular about that, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. He believes it’s too slim a system that ignores a lot of the claims that individuals make, or opinions them in a biased approach.

One of his huge targets is the concept that vaccine producers are shielded from liabilities in a lot of circumstances.

This is a parallel to the pesticides difficulty. MAHA individuals have additionally railed in opposition to the concept that pesticide producers might presumably get these identical type of legal responsibility shields in laws that’s in Congress proper now, and he hasn’t weighed in on that, however the exact same factor legal responsibility shields that they rail in opposition to with vaccine producers might occur for pesticide producers.

WOLF: What does the proof really say about the variety of individuals injured by vaccines?

OWERMOHLE: There are two completely different ways in which we monitor that. The FDA has the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, which is a self-reporting system. So if I went in and I fainted, or one thing extra severe occurred, myocarditis or one thing like that, I might report myself into the system.

Then there’s a Vaccine Safety Datalink, which is that this big repository of various well being programs and affected person data. That’s not a self-reporting system. That’s an outline of everyone in the system. If sure uncommon issues begin to pop up, like myocarditis — is that this linked to a vaccine or to one thing else?

We have already got these two reporting programs, and what we know from these is that severe accidents, severe uncomfortable side effects, are exceedingly low from vaccines. What Kennedy has argued is that the people who find themselves reviewing that information should not giving us the full extent of it, basically, and that there are flaws in the approach that these are being reported and analyzed.

WOLF: Kennedy made some fairly clear guarantees to Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Louisiana Republican, who’s a medical physician and chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. Has Kennedy achieved something particularly to violate these assurances that he made?

OWERMOHLE: It would depend upon who you ask. Sen. Cassidy had a fairly prolonged record of issues that he mentioned he received assurances on.

One was that they might carefully collaborate and speak all the time. I do suppose that they speak pretty usually. From what I’ve heard, even from Sen. Cassidy, when sure issues have occurred, he has mentioned, you know, “I spoke to the secretary about this.” Cassidy has mentioned Kennedy would ask for his enter into hiring choices, that he would work inside the vaccine approval course of and not create like his personal parallel processes.

Importantly, the two issues that everybody that everybody’s watching, although, are:

WOLF: Hep B, particularly?

OVERMOHLE: That was simply an instance, however I believe as we go into that committee’s assembly, in the event that they suggest issues that change the suggestions for longtime, broadly used vaccines, that that could possibly be the pink line that truly breaks the promise to Cassidy.

WOLF: I suppose in case you preserve the system however fireplace everyone on the advisory panel, you haven’t modified the system, however you’ve modified how it’s going to function.

OVERMOHLE: Exactly. That’s why it’s up to interpretation whether or not Kennedy has damaged a promise to Cassidy. I believe Cassidy is in fairly a bind now, as a result of he’s the chair of the HELP Committee, and they’re going to have a listening to with Dr. Susan Monarez, which shall be attention-grabbing to see how Cassidy navigates it. But he has the authority to deliver Kennedy in entrance of him once more and ask, “Are you breaking your promises?” He hasn’t achieved that but, and he’s prevented questions about whether or not he’s going to.

WOLF: He has not turned on Kennedy.

OWERMOHLE: Notably, no, he hasn’t. MAHA voters have expressed long-term frustration with Cassidy. He’s up for reelection subsequent yr. I believe he’s in a politically tenuous place, and he’s making an attempt to navigate how to preserve individuals glad but additionally not return on what he mentioned he would do.

WOLF: Part of what he desires to do, like getting dyes out of foods, whenever you hear him speak, it sounds very very similar to he would mandate these items. But nothing that he’s achieved to date can be any type of requirement for meals firms. He’s not taking a extra collaborative strategy. How is he influencing meals firms?

OWERMOHLE: One of the humorous issues to me is he put out this plan, or the FDA did below his management, to part out certain artificial food dyes by 2026. There have been two that they wished out of all meals by 2026, and others had a longer runway. And that begins this wave of firms being like, “Well, we’re going to do this. We already have a plan.” They had this occasion in entrance of USDA the place they celebrated with ice cream firms. And the complete huge announcement was that the ice cream firms have been going to part these out by 2028. OK, in order that they purchased themselves two years by holding an occasion. Is that a win? I don’t know, however it’s principally been voluntelling individuals to “do this, and then we won’t crack down on you.”

WOLF: The conundrum of Kennedy is that he’s pushing for these standard issues. I believe everyone would love to see dyes out of those ultraprocessed meals. At the identical time, he’s doing issues which can be genuinely scary to public well being professionals. How do you separate these two tracks of his agenda? Or ought to we separate them?

OWERMOHLE: That’s the most attention-grabbing a part of this complete MAHA part. There’s such a extensive coalition of individuals. It brings in all these completely different people who find themselves motivated by possibly one factor to begin, and then they get into the others or they resent the others for taking extra consideration from the precedence that they’ve.

The meals and vitamin work is certainly a few of the most bipartisan and broadly standard that you just’ll see. Some those who I’ve talked to from that nook of the movement have expressed frustration about the vaccine rhetoric and fear that it’s distracting from or discrediting the meals and vitamin motivations, or main individuals not to take Kennedy so critically.

WOLF: He has targeted on vaccines to a diploma that his affirmation listening to prompt that he wouldn’t. Is that proper?

OWERMOHLE: Absolutely. He is concentrated most strongly in phrases of actions at HHS on vaccines. We have been simply speaking about the meals side, the place they’re asking firms to be proactive in this enviornment. But they’ve modified vaccine insurance policies. They have modified Covid-19 vaccine labels. There’s actual motion there, and there hasn’t been actual motion a lot in meals.

Democrats particularly are scuffling with that query of, “do we separate these tracks or take MAHA as a whole?” Because the meals side, there’s a lot of bipartisan help for that. And then there’s the complete environmental factor, going again to pesticides and ceaselessly plastics. That has historically been a Democratic precedence, and that’s been an space the place they most likely might work with MAHA individuals if they may abdomen the remainder of this.

What does Kennedy imply by “interventions” and autism?

WOLF: When Kennedy says “interventions” shall be proven to be the explanation for autism, what does he imply by that? Is that a phrase that has been generally used, or did it catch individuals off-guard?

OWERMOHLE: The use of the phrase “intervention” caught me a little bit abruptly, as a result of medically, the phrase intervention means a remedy or remedy. The very first thing I might consider if I heard the phrase “intervention” would have been a pharmaceutical drug, possibly much more a drug than a vaccine He might have been utilizing it extra broadly. He might have been referring to environmental toxins, however that’s not fairly a medical intervention.

These previous couple of weeks, there was some swirling about Tylenol during pregnancy. Tylenol can be one thing that a physician would inform you is an intervention. It’s a ache intervention. So is that what he was referring to?

SSRIs (antidepressants) have been a actually huge point of interest for him, and the potential dangers that he sees there. Those are interventions. With that remark, he expanded it past vaccines.

WOLF: Back to meals. The final one that launched a public effort to get individuals to eat more healthy was then-first woman Michelle Obama. But she bumped into a lot of opposition on the proper, significantly with college lunches. What’s the distinction between her plan 15 years in the past and Kennedy’s plan at the moment?

OWERMOHLE: There actually should not that many variations. Her plan possibly wasn’t fairly as formidable in the issues it was going to deal with. But they’re remarkably comparable, down to how they began. Michelle Obama began by working with manufacturers to say, “Can you improve your food labels, and can you reduce fat and sugar in school foods?” Brands have been proactively doing that simply the approach that issues are occurring with Kennedy and these manufacturers proper now. Exact identical factor.

Hers began to get that Republican backlash as soon as regulatory motion began. There was this 2010 regulation that imposed new federal requirements for milk and complete grains and sodium in college lunches. And that’s actually when the rhetoric round her “Let’s Move” initiative kicked into overdrive.

There have been a lot of subsequent Republican efforts to soften these requirements, at the same time as just lately as 2018. In the first Trump administration, Sonny Perdue, the USDA secretary, tried to roll again that commonplace, though it was it was thrown out in court. It speaks to how this has modified politically, however I additionally suppose it speaks to the enchantment that Kennedy has had to deliver all these completely different individuals into the fold with him and make this now a Republican precedence. It’s additionally a reminder that Kennedy was a Democrat.

WOLF: He’s additionally a superstar. Have we ever had a superstar HHS secretary earlier than? (No offense to Kathleen Sebelius, Tom Price, Alex Azar or Xavier Becerra.)

This is a a part of the authorities that has such nice significance, however having Kennedy there has really upped its profile.

OWERMOHLE: It’s so true. He’s positively the most high-profile HHS secretary in current historical past, possibly ever. When I speak to MAHA voters, they are saying that they received Trump the presidency. Whether or not that’s true, that’s what they imagine. And they may inform you they’re not loyal to a political occasion; they’re loyal to Kennedy. I can’t consider one other Cabinet secretary that has that kind of pull in any administration.