The nice ongoing American dialog escalated into an excellent American bar battle this summer time, as a protracted and more and more unhinged nationwide back-and-forth about race, politics, sexuality, the nature of each the Trump administration and fame itself was triggered by … a jeans advert.
What occurred? American Eagle launched a marketing campaign starring the exceedingly charismatic actress Sydney Sweeney. In one advert, she is seen clad in a revealing model of the Canadian tuxedo, assuredly busting out of a probably not buttoned jean jacket. But although the mere info of her bodily existence have ignited a number of nationwide debates beforehand, on this case, the purpose individuals are speaking (and speaking!) is that the advert’s script had her making puns about genes and jeans.
“Genes are passed down from parents to offspring,” she says in a single advert. In one other lower, wherein the digicam aggressively zooms in on her cleavage, she claims: “My body’s composition is determined by my genes.”
Some viewers instantly linked the genetics commentary to her sensible blue eyes and blonde, fantastic hair. After all, it was just last October that Donald Trump was figuring out “bad genes” as a reason for invented or actual crime dedicated by immigrants. Many felt that the advert was enjoying into this darkish, not-very-concealed dialog about genetics in America.
“This is intentional. This is pointed, and you’re calling out to the consumers that you hope to attract here,” mentioned Cheryl Overton, a long-time model strategist and communications government. “If American Eagle is really out there trying to target Americans to the right or to the far right, so be it. If that’s who the product is designed for now, that is their right as a company to do that. But you have to know that folks are educated, folks are nuanced, and folks are willing to call brands out.”
The story of Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle advert
That calling-out was shortly adopted by a louder and nastier wave of disdain that folks would dare counsel the advert was deliberately about race — or that everybody was being silly for speaking about jeans anyway. “There’s been a lot of conservative finger-wagging, like, ‘This is just a jeans ad,’ said Emma McClendon, a fashion historian and assistant professor of fashion studies at St. John’s University, who literally teaches a class on denim. “But I think that that just plays also on stereotypes of fashion being frivolous, and this just being jeans. The reality is that there’s nothing more intimate to our identity than how we outfit our bodies.”
At the starting of this week, a spokesperson for the White House weighed in, saying that each one this ruckus was why Trump obtained elected, calling the criticism “cancel culture run amok.” US Vice President JD Vance finally entered the fray at the finish of the week, suggesting that the lesson Democrats “have apparently taken is we’re going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.”
At final, as the week wound down, American Eagle issued a press release that was certain to make everybody a little bit sad. “Great jeans look good on everyone,” they assured us. Do they?
While American Eagle loved a quick $2-a-share surge in its inventory value throughout the controversy, all the remainder of us obtained had been a bunch of questions. Here are some solutions.
“Our leadership team passed around some articles about it, and we were discussing whether we thought the American Eagle team when it first came out, did they understand? Were they trying to do something edgy and sexy that came across racist and didn’t recognize that?” requested Kimberly Jefferson, senior vice chairman of consumer relations at PANBlast, a public relations agency that serves manufacturers in the tech sector. “A quick look at their leadership team: They’re a very white organization. So did they just miss it? Or is this intentionally playing to at best, a conservative, at worst, a racist ideal system that is pervasively growing in America? We went back and forth on that. How intentional was this?”
“It seemed clear to me that they were aligning themselves with a white nationalist, MAGA-friendly identity,” mentioned Shalini Shankar, an anthropology professor at Northwestern University who research youth and promoting. “I think that this is them trying to rebrand themselves for the present moment, and language is very deliberately used here. People don’t invoke genetics casually. It’s just, it’s very, very easy to sell denim without ever referencing it.”
“This one is just the consequences of bad and, dare I say, lazy writing. I don’t think it was funny or clever,” mentioned Alyssa Vingan, fashion writer and former editor of Nylon and Fashionista. “And I do think obviously it’s cheap humor to have somebody like Sydney Sweeney, who’s blonde with large breasts and a small waist, say she has good genes because she’s hot. I don’t think that it was much deeper than that. Unfortunately due to the climate we’re in and things going on in America at large, it does read very, very, very poorly and insensitively.”
“There’s something to the fact that this company is called American Eagle, she’s in jeans, with a car, with a dog,” mentioned McClendon, the trend professor. “In the current political climate, and then with the invocation of genetics, it feels like it’s just playing on this broader, larger cultural social grappling we’re having right now with what it means to be American.”
They completely did imply it, mentioned Emily Keegin, a contract picture director — and many us are simply pretending in any other case. “It’s interesting to see how the news organizations that we consider to be left or more liberal, like the New York Times, The Atlantic, New York Magazine, their op-eds about this from yesterday and the day before are downplaying the situation or saying that it’s not a big deal, or that it was just a mistake, or something, like it was overlooked. It means that the institutions are willing to give a pass to these things that maybe they shouldn’t be.”
Probably not, however do you even remember all that now? “Maybe two weeks ago? It was such a huge thing, and now everyone’s moved past that,” mentioned Hailey Knott, who’s a social media supervisor for a world nonprofit and who labored at American Eagle for 2 years. “You know that CEO stepped down because of all of that controversy. And now nobody even — in my opinion — cares about that anymore.”
Coldplay’s Chris Martin warns concertgoers they may very well be on digicam
“Rarely do you ever see something blow up so quickly as the kiss cam incident,” mentioned Cyndee Harrison, a status and branding strategist and disaster communications specialist. “But their response, I thought it was masterfully done. They had humor and they were creative and they just brought everything back into brand alignment. In my opinion, American Eagle had a perfect opportunity to follow that same playbook: Acknowledge, reframe and move forward with clarity.”
They did not.
“Did it achieve the goal of getting people to talk about them and think about them? It did. The jury is still out on whether it’s good for their business, whether it’s going to increase sales, or whether it’s bad for their business,” mentioned Alison Weissbrot, government editor at Adweek.
“I feel like this is a masterclass in attention economy,” mentioned Sam Gauchier, a vice chairman at Michele Marie PR. “I feel like American Eagle is riding the wave of controversy on purpose, just knowing that the outrage has become a form of its own currency — because everything at the end of the day is about how much money we can make as a brand, the amount of sales, the amount of clicks on an article, all of those things.”
“Advertising is having a really hard time for a reason. You know, people are getting laid off for a reason, and it’s not just AI. It’s incredibly hard to make a dent in our media landscape,” mentioned Keegin, the picture director.
“This is the modern formula for outrage marketing,” mentioned Molly McPherson, disaster and status strategist. “You spark debate, you drive engagement, you ride the wave. And then when the dust settles, American Eagle gets the clicks, the coverage and also the crash.”
“This wasn’t a mistake per se as much as a kind of provocation that I think landed as it was intended to and that we should expect to probably see more of this type of messaging, given how — in many ways — successful this one was,” Shankar mentioned.
“I’m honestly not a believer in all press is good press,” mentioned Knott, the former American Eagle worker. She means as a result of somebody all the time has to scrub up the penalties. “This is a PR crisis for them, and it’s coming at them from social media. The senior leadership team, they don’t have to see that. The social media team does. So they’re the ones taking the brunt of that.”
Until Friday’s firm assertion, the firm’s high publish on Instagram, for round 5 days, was of a Black lady in American Eagle clothes. Some of the feedback had been “keep it white ❤️ ❤️🇺🇸” and “Love me some lib tears” and lots of people saying “damage control.”
“I think it’s extremely telling that American Eagle hasn’t posted on social media since Sunday or said anything, because in my experience, when I worked there, they’re posting at least three times a day on social media platforms,” mentioned Knott, of the week earlier than Friday night’s assertion. “So if they’re scaling back to zero times a day, it’s a problem.”
Not posting was most likely smart. “I think if this had been a client of mine, I feel like the first thing I would say is don’t rush — take a beat, read the room, get curious about what people are upset about,” mentioned Gauchier. She additionally discovered it telling. The model silence “also helps me think that this is calculated,” she mentioned.
“I think we’re all so sick of these brand apologies that feel very AI-written or written by the law firm, and don’t really have any heart or soul. I think what people want to hear is: How’d you get here? Do you hear why folks are concerned? What will you do moving forward to make sure that your storytelling is welcoming to all? But if this is a strategy to give the middle fingers up to those of us who are quote, unquote, woke, message received. Mission accomplished,” mentioned Overton.
But what in the event that they had been simply attempting to do one thing attractive and daring and tousled alongside the means?
“They are immediately very clearly pulling directly from the visual vocabulary of the Brooke Shields ad,” mentioned McClendon, referencing the controversial 1980 Calvin Klein ad marketing campaign. But “the Brooke Shields ads were really purely about sex. The whole genes/jeans thing –– that’s new,” she mentioned. (Interestingly, Shields herself mentioned she did not see her Calvin Klein advertisements as overly sexualized.)
Reputation strategist on why Sydney Sweeney’s jeans advert sparked controversy
“You can absolutely celebrate someone’s body, and I mean, she is a beautiful specimen of humanity. But you can still celebrate that while being mindful of the narrative that you’re shaping,” mentioned Harrison. “This isn’t necessarily ‘woke messaging,’ it’s just modern mindfulness around concepts like identity and beauty and belonging.”
Highly sexualized advertisements are on model for the second, mentioned Adweek’s Weissbrot. “We’re kind of seeing a return of male gazey advertising,” she mentioned. “So I do think that, as the country kind of grapples with this rightward shift, advertisers are trying to figure out: What is the mood of the country? Do we appeal to what is the current zeitgeist, for better or worse? Or are we still going to try to meet different groups where they are?”
American Eagle would possibly, nevertheless, have scared different manufacturers off attractive campaigns, or at the least might need put a fork on this campaigns ’90s-basement barely porny aesthetic. “If I was Gap and I had a campaign coming out and someone was like, ‘Wow, that looks just like the Sydney Sweeney campaign,’ I’d be like, ‘Okay, no, like, we gotta redo this. We gotta, like, rethink this,’” mentioned Keegin.
Can America deal with it if we must undergo this once more?
Surprise, we already are. Dunkin’ posted an advert this week with a sexy youthful star saying “This tan? Genetics.” (Among many linking that marketing campaign to the American Eagle marketing campaign was a Dunkin’ account Instagram commenter, who wrote: “I’ll be walking into Dunkin’ sporting my AE jeans.”)
“Whenever I’m working with clients and they have a new campaign coming, I always ask them, like, ‘Okay, what is the goal of your campaign? Do you want more visibility? Do you want more sales? Do you want more conversion? Like, what is it exactly?’ And if visibility is what they’re looking for, then, you know, obviously I wouldn’t gear them towards this specific strategy. But I wouldn’t be surprised if other brands say visibility is what we’re looking for, and someone might have the idea of doing something that blurs the line,” mentioned Gauchier.
Experts agree that Sydney Sweeney is all the time profitable. She emerges from this nationwide dust-up solely extra highly effective than ever.
“Certainly, it makes me very uncomfortable to think that Sydney Sweeney, this particular human being, should be targeted,” mentioned Sayantani DasGupta, a senior lecturer in narrative drugs at Columbia University who went to TikTok to speak about the advertisements. “It’s not about blaming or pointing fingers. It’s about saying, we all live in this society. We all are both creating and perceiving these images, and we’re all ultimately going to be impacted by them.”
“She is a massive movie star who is very smart about who she positions herself next to, the business decisions she makes, and also she is not really a public-facing figure in any way. She remains enigmatic in a way that if she was more personally online, if she expressed her feelings more, then I think she could easily get herself into trouble with stuff like this. But she’s not,” mentioned Sam Bodrojan, a contract movie critic. “She is able to create conversation around her and create controversy around her, while also fundamentally never being a subject of ire directly. She is a subject of jealousy or envy or a broader symbol of something else — but nobody is ever really asserting that she is a bad person, and if they are, it just makes her more marketable.”
” class=”image__dam-img image__dam-img–loading” onload=’this.classList.remove(‘image__dam-img–loading’)’ onerror=”imageLoadError(this)” height=”1080″ width=”1920″/>American Eagle ‘Great Jeans’ advert sparks on-line debate
” class=”image__dam-img image__dam-img–loading” onload=’this.classList.remove(‘image__dam-img–loading’)’ onerror=”imageLoadError(this)” height=”1080″ width=”1920″ loading=’lazy’/>These advertisements are a throwback to promoting that’s confirmed to work due to causes we may not like. Much of this kind of promoting went out of trend, however the success of this marketing campaign means we would possibly see extra once more.
Rachel Rodgers, an affiliate professor of utilized psychology at Northeastern University, did a study on the advertisements for American Eagle’s flagship model, Aerie, and the way these advertisements impacted physique picture in 2019. The reply was: It made them be ok with themselves! They appreciated the “best friend vibe” and seeing girls whose various our bodies appeared like their very own. Her perception was that the new advertisements that includes Sweeney would succeed — by making girls really feel dangerous and ugly. “We know that typically, idealized and sexualized media images are detrimental to body image and to mood,” she mentioned. “They typically make people feel worse about themselves and are designed to do so, because that’s one of the things that drives consumption.”
For the marketing campaign, the model additionally made a restricted run of jeans for Sweeney for which the proceeds would go to profit the Crisis Text Line. “The thing that has been lost, for me, is that this whole initiative is to benefit domestic violence and a domestic violence charity,” mentioned Overton. “That is something that has really been lost in the sauce with all of the accolades and criticism. If that was the talent’s intention, if that was the brand’s intention, they’re failing on that.”
No. We are accomplished. May we counsel subsequent studying about the demise of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting or the sport of wife-carrying?