Ukraine’s strategy is to kill 50,000 Russian soldiers a month. A sign of confidence or an indicator of weakness?


Volodymyr Zelensky has been speaking up Russia’s battlefield fatalities and has requested his new protection minister to make it a precedence.

In December alone, greater than 35,000 Russian soldiers had been killed or significantly wounded, Ukraine’s chief says, and the purpose needs to be to elevate the quantity even greater – to 50,000 monthly.

“Make the cost of war for Russia one it cannot sustain, thereby forcing peace through strength” – this was the duty set him by the president, Mykhailo Fedorov instructed reporters in his first briefing as Defense Minister.

The suggestion that Russia is struggling heavy losses is not new. A new report final week estimated that 1.2 million Russians have both been killed, wounded or are lacking because the full-scale invasion of Ukraine virtually 4 years in the past – the best casualty determine suffered by a main navy energy since World War II. The report put the quantity of Ukrainian casualties between 500,000 and 600,000.

“The data suggests Russia is hardly winning,” the report’s authors wrote.

Maybe not, however as senior officers from Ukraine, Russia and the United States put together for the following spherical of direct talks in Abu Dhabi on Wednesday, it could be a mistake for Ukraine’s supporters to get carried away.

“Highlighting the huge numbers of Russian fatalities is an indicator that Ukraine’s main strategy is attrition. But we need more than that if we are going to move the war dynamics in a better direction,” a former Ukrainian official instructed NCS.

On the one hand, specializing in headline-grabbing numbers provides necessary perspective on Ukraine’s refusal to surrender Donetsk as half of any “peace” cope with Russia.

The logic behind Kyiv’s place is easy: Very few Ukrainians consider Putin has any purpose aside from the full subjugation of their nation. So, why hand over territory for nothing if Ukraine can anticipate to kill a whole lot of 1000’s of Russian soldiers whereas Moscow retains making an attempt to seize Donetsk by pressure?

Ukrainian soldiers nonetheless maintain about 20% of the jap area, which incorporates closely fortified cities like Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, and newest estimates by the Institute for the Study of War counsel it could possibly be one other 18 months earlier than Russia captures all of it.

If these Russian soldiers will not be killed combating – the logic continues – they’ll stay in occupied Ukrainian territory prepared to restart the struggle, from a extra advantageous place, simply as quickly because the Kremlin has contrived a pretext to achieve this.

Very few in Ukraine consider Putin will drop his territorial calls for, and most have misplaced religion that US President Donald Trump will apply crucial strain to make him change his thoughts.

“Despite the government negotiating in good faith, many think the whole process is done to ensure US government support,” the previous Ukrainian official stated.

“People are exceedingly skeptical about the negotiating process.”

But if there is no confidence that negotiations are headed anyplace, what about Ukraine’s battlefield strategy? Is piling up the opposite aspect’s physique luggage one of the simplest ways ahead?

An American former fighter, Ryan O’Leary, who led an worldwide volunteer unit referred to as Chosen Company, believes not, triggering a vigorous debate after he laid out his arguments in a social media post.

He took subject with the a lot vaunted “e-points” scheme, whereby Ukraine’s items earn factors for every Russian soldier killed or piece of materiel destroyed. The factors are exchanged for brand new tools, and the Defense Ministry says the scheme gives a wealth of information that helps form future plans.

But O’Leary advised they create the incorrect incentives, inflicting Ukrainian commanders to prioritize extra easy drone strikes towards infantry targets across the line of fight, quite than harder however extra important deep strikes towards Russian logistics – like autos and communication hubs, in addition to Russian drone crews working from rear positions.

“Drone warfare is not about who hits more soldiers today … Operational depth is where wars are decided. If the enemy can move fuel, ammo, drones, crews, and repair vehicles 10 to 40 km behind the line without fear, they own depth even if they lose 5x the men in trenches,” O’Leary wrote on X.

Ukrainian soldiers at a drone command center watching a fatal drone strike on a Russian soldier in eastern Ukraine, on October 7, 2025.

In reality, his accusation lays naked Ukraine’s two key structural challenges.

Firstly, in drone know-how, working techniques and countermeasures, Russia has caught up and is fairly presumably forward.

Writing on Facebook, Oleksandr Karpyuk, an aerial reconnaissance officer within the 59th Separate Assault Brigade, complained that Ukraine had failed to capitalize on its early benefit on this house, notably by not diversifying the quantity of radio frequencies utilized by its drones to transmit indicators.

Consequently, as soon as Russia improved its digital warfare (EW) applied sciences, it wanted to jam simply two frequencies to put a important dent in Ukraine’s potential to fly drones behind Russian strains.

In addition, Karpyuk writes, Russia’s tactical air protection crews are a lot improved, and Moscow continues to profit from taking a lead in creating fiber-optic drones, that are impervious to Ukraine’s personal EW countermeasures, as a result of they don’t transmit indicators.

And then there is Ukraine’s manpower subject.

The infantry scarcity is well-known. Rob Lee of the Foreign Policy Research Institute estimates there are fewer than ten Ukrainian infantry soldiers per kilometer of entrance line. He additionally estimates that the majority brigades have at most 10% of their whole personnel within the infantry. Traditionally, that quantity could be upwards of 30%.

Lee instructed KI Insights, a strategic intelligence unit powered by the Kyiv Independent, that even these low numbers have been sufficient to stop a main breakthrough by Russian forces, which have succeeded solely in making small, incremental advances.

Newly appointed Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, seen here attending Ukraine's parliament in Kyiv on January 14, 2026, has acknowledged the scale of the country's manpower challenges.

But in a struggle the place drones – not infantry – matter most, it is Ukraine’s shortfalls in drone crews which can be most urgent, particularly in the important thing battle for operational depth – the destruction of targets up to 25 miles (40 kilometers) behind the road of fight.

In a forthright protection of the fighters below his command, the top of Ukraine’s Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Forces, Robert Brovdi, stated final week there wanted to be a threefold enhance within the quantity of drone operators. Just 30% of the frontline – which stretches 745 miles – is presently lined, he wrote on his Facebook web page.

Fedorov, the brand new protection minister, acknowledges the size of the issue, telling the Ukrainian parliament some 2 million individuals are ignoring their call-up papers, whereas 200,000 others have abandoned.

Much now rests on his potential to tackle the manpower subject and to regain Ukraine’s technical edge, all of the whereas guaranteeing he is hitting Zelensky’s targets.

“Unless we constantly stay ahead of Russians in technology and battle tactics, I cannot say the chance we will prevail is high,” cautioned the previous Ukrainian official.

NCS’s Victoria Butenko and Daria Tarasova-Markina in Kyiv contributed to this report.



Sources