Maddy Olcott plans to begin a profession as soon as she graduates from school. But the junior on the State University of New York-Purchase College is to date not planning to begin a household — even with the Trump administration dangling inducements like thousand-dollar “baby bonuses” or cheaper infertility medicine.
“Our country wants us to be birthing machines, but they’re cutting what resources there already are,” stated Olcott, 20. “And a $1,000 baby bonus? It’s low-key like, what, bro? That wouldn’t even cover my month’s rent.”
The Trump administration wants Americans to have more infants, and the federal authorities is debuting coverage initiatives to reverse the falling U.S. fertility price. In mid-October, the White House unveiled a plan to increase access to in vitro fertilization remedy. President Donald Trump has heralded such initiatives, calling himself “the fertilization president.”
But reproductive rights teams and different advocacy organizations say these efforts to buttress the beginning price don’t make up for broader administration priorities geared toward chopping federal applications resembling Medicaid, its associated Children’s Health Insurance Program, and different initiatives that assist girls and kids. The pro-family focus, they say, isn’t nearly boosting procreation. Instead, they say, it’s being weaponized to push a conservative agenda that threatens girls’s well being, reproductive rights, and labor drive participation.
Some predict these efforts might deter parenthood and lead to will increase in maternal mortality.
“The religious right wants more white Christian babies and is trying to curtail women’s reproductive freedom in order to achieve that aim,” stated Marian Starkey, a spokesperson for Population Connection, a nonprofit that promotes inhabitants stabilization by elevated entry to contraception and abortion. “The real danger is the constant whittling down of reproductive rights.”
The White House didn’t reply to repeated interview requests.
A slate of federal applications which have lengthy helped girls and kids are additionally being focused by Trump and Cabinet members who say they champion pronatalist policies.
Medicaid work necessities, as an example, put in place by the Republicans’ One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a finances regulation enacted in July, will lead to further paperwork and different necessities that, in accordance to the Congressional Budget Office, will trigger millions of eligible enrollees to lose protection. Medicaid covers more than 4 in 10 births within the U.S.
The measure additionally cuts federal funding for a nationwide program that gives month-to-month meals advantages. Almost 40% of recipients in fiscal 2023 had been youngsters.
GOP spending cuts and staffing freezes have hampered Head Start, a federal schooling program that gives day care and preschool for younger, low-income youngsters, at the same time as U.S. adults implore the federal government to curtail ballooning child care costs.
And the GOP halted Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood of America for one yr as a result of it supplies abortion companies, forcing roughly 50 clinics across the nation to shut for the reason that starting of 2025. Planned Parenthood supplies a variety of ladies’s well being companies, from wellness exams to breast most cancers screenings and initial prenatal care.
Groups that advocate for ladies’s well being and reproductive rights say the actions by the administration and congressional Republicans to assault these applications are making it tougher for households to get the assist and medical care they want.
“There is a lot of rhetoric about who is worthy of public assistance, and to many policymakers, it’s not the single mother,” stated Allyson Crays, a public well being regulation and coverage analyst on the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University.
The pronatalist perspective typically helps authorities intervention to encourage procreation and is rooted in a perception that trendy tradition has failed to have a good time the nuclear household. The motion’s supporters additionally say policies to encourage childbearing are an financial necessity.
The national birth rate has largely been on a downward trajectory since 2007, with the variety of births declining by a mean 2% per yr from 2015 by 2020, in accordance to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, though the speed has fluctuated since.
The ideas that form the motion could be present in Project 2025, a political initiative led by the conservative Heritage Foundation that has seen lots of its proposals adopted by Trump. The doc asserts that children fare best in a “heterosexual, intact marriage.”
“Married men and women are the ideal, natural family structure because all children have a right to be raised by the men and women who conceived them,” it says.
Project 2025 additionally contains many proposals that critics say aren’t pleasant towards girls’s well being. For occasion, it requires eliminating entry to mifepristone, a drug generally utilized in abortions in addition to within the administration of miscarriages, and encourages states to block Planned Parenthood services from receiving Medicaid funding.
The “more babies” mantra is being embraced on the highest ranges of the federal authorities.
“I can’t remember any other administration being so tied to the pronatalist movement,” stated Brian Dixon, Population Connection’s senior vp for presidency and political affairs.
Just days after he was sworn in, Vice President JD Vance declared, “I want more babies in the United States of America.” He has additionally criticized the decision-making of ladies and men who decide not to begin households.
The White House in October did announce a reduction on sure medicine utilized in IVF treatments by TrumpRx.gov, a yet-to-debut authorities web site that goals to join customers with lower-priced medicine. Mehmet Oz, who heads Medicare and Medicaid, heralded a doable way forward for “Trump babies,” ensuing from the lower-priced infertility medicine.
The administration additionally introduced it might encourage employers to transfer to a brand new mannequin for offering fertility benefits as a stand-alone choice through which staff can enroll. But that’s removed from Trump’s earlier pledge to make infertility therapies free and is probably not sufficient to overcome different long-term monetary worries that usually information choices about whether or not to have youngsters.
Angel Albring, a mom of six, says her dream of getting a giant household all the time hinged on her means to work and keep away from little one care prices. Her profession as a contract author enabled her to achieve this whereas nonetheless contributing to the household’s earnings, working throughout nap instances and at night time, whereas the remainder of her family slept.
“The whole thing of ‘sleep when the baby sleeps’ never applied to me,” Albring stated.
Some of her buddies, although, aren’t so lucky. They worry they can not afford youngsters due to climbing prices for day care, groceries, and housing, she stated.
The Trump administration, in the meantime, has superior one other coverage geared toward giving youngsters a future monetary increase.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act establishes a tax-advantaged “Trump Account” seeded with $1,000 in federal funds — typically known as a “baby bonus” — on behalf of each eligible American little one. The preliminary deposits are scheduled to begin in 2026 with the federal authorities robotically opening an account for youngsters born after Dec. 31, 2024, and earlier than Jan. 1, 2029.
Parents might contribute up to $5,000 a yr initially to the account, with employers in a position to yearly contribute up to $2,500 of that quantity. The accounts reportedly can be autos for long-term financial savings. Details are nonetheless being ironed out, however funds couldn’t be withdrawn earlier than the kid turns 18. After that, the accounts would doubtless turn into conventional IRAs.
Pronatalism extends to different elements of the federal authorities, too.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, who has nine children, instructed his division to prioritize federal funds for communities with high marriage and birth rates, although it has not but introduced any initiatives instantly associated to the initiative. For a time, the administration thought-about bestowing national medals on moms with six or more youngsters.
Except there’s one hitch: Data suggests the policies and applications the Trump administration has proposed won’t essentially work.
Other nations have provided more strong applications to encourage childbearing and ease parenting however haven’t seen their beginning charges go up, famous Michael Geruso, an economist for the University of Texas-Austin who hopes to see the worldwide inhabitants enhance. Israel, for instance, has provided free IVF remedy for roughly three a long time, but its beginning charges have stayed statistically stagnant, at slightly below three youngsters for each lady, he stated.
France and Sweden have in depth social safety-net applications to assist households, together with paid break day and paid paternity and maternity depart, and backed little one care and well being care, however their fertility charges are additionally falling, stated Peggy O’Donnell Heffington, a University of Chicago assistant senior tutorial professor within the historical past division who wrote a e book on non-motherhood.
“Nobody yet knows how to avoid depopulation,” Geruso stated.
Some level to a distinct resolution to reverse the United States’ declining inhabitants: boost immigration to guarantee a youthful labor drive and stronger tax base. The Trump administration, nevertheless, is doing the alternative — revoking visas and creating an setting through which immigrants who’re within the U.S. legally really feel more and more uncomfortable due to heavy-handed policies, analysts say.
The nation’s immigrant population this yr fell for the first time for the reason that Nineteen Sixties, in accordance to a Pew Research Center evaluation.
Meanwhile, to critics of the administration, the concentrate on encouraging childbirth permits the Trump administration and Republicans to sound as in the event that they assist households.
“You’re not seeing policies that support families with children,” stated Amy Matsui, vp of earnings safety and little one care on the National Women’s Law Center, a nonprofit targeted on gender rights. “It’s a white, heterosexual, fundamentalist Christian, two-parent marriage that’s being held up.”
KFF Health News is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is likely one of the core working applications at KFF — the unbiased supply for well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism.