Trump lays bare his contempt for Europe in blistering new national security plan


“America Alone” is likely to be the best précis of the White House’s new National Security Strategy, a unprecedented doc launched Friday that starkly lays out the administration’s broad international coverage priorities.

In a 33-page wall of phrases and grievances that self-summarizes as “America First,” it manages to reject European allies with a borderline racist swipe, concede the United States should share power with China and search for new allies in the Western Hemisphere, the place at the moment Washington has few. At occasions, it could be facile sufficient to be humorous, however the stakes are something however.

“The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over,” the paper declares early on, though it’s unclear if it is a assertion of previous truth, or a new coverage. The place sought for the US in this new world is not any clearer both: not prime canine, extra snarling at different rising hounds.

“As the United States rejects the ill-fated concept of global domination for itself, we must prevent the global … domination of others,” it says. “The outsized influence of larger, richer, and stronger nations is a timeless truth of international relations.” The meteoric ascent of China, it says, got here on the expense of the US (with little point out of the position low cost items performed in rising US dwelling requirements for many years) however can solely be checked, not stopped.

The White House sees potential for buddies nearer dwelling in the Americas, however dangers disappointment. The “Trump Corollary” it declares to the Monroe Doctrine of the 1820s supplies an appendix to an ages-old proposal the US ought to dominate nearest its personal shores, fairly than offering a new concept for 2026. It additionally fails to say how few potent allies the United States truly has to its south, because it threatens to bomb narco-networks at will, whereas pardoning the previous corrupt president of drug-plagued Honduras.

Repeatedly, the technique rides excessive on weighty, critical rhetoric, but lacks concepts to match the second. There is typically mild aid, notably in the phrase: “Conflict remains the Middle East’s most troublesome dynamic,” as if it has simply narrowly overwhelmed sizzling climate to the highest spot. But just a few sentences later, the reductive trope: “the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains thorny,” is a reminder of what number of hundreds of lives are in the sway of this wobbly, dismissive considering on the helm of the world’s army superpower.

It reads like a fortified, tutorial translation of President Donald Trump’s longer Oval Office soliloquies. There are moments that borrow prejudices and gripes extra generally related to the darker corners of X.com, earlier than the entire effort tails off considerably abruptly after 210 phrases suggesting Africa’s sources are about all it’s value.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance gives a speech at the Munich Security Conference (MSC) in Munich, Germany February 14, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis

But the paper’s most annoying considering is reserved for the US’ favourite bete noir: Europe. The echoes of Vice President JD Vance’s corrosive speech in February on the Munich Security Conference run via two pages which accuse – with out proof – European allies of suppressing free speech and democracy, whereas crippling their very own economies via over-regulation. It claims a majority of Europeans are denied democratic expression of their need for peace with Russia – a reductive tackle a continent desperate to keep away from one other conflagration, and seeing the Russian risk present itself in sabotage throughout their capitals.

The technique borrows from these on Europe’s extremities when it dips into the racist “great replacement” concept to state that Europe faces “civilizational erasure.”

“It is more than plausible that within a few decades at the latest, certain NATO members will become majority non-European.” In different phrases, Europe can be much less White, will due to this fact activate America’s alliances when they’re “unrecognizable in 20 years or less” and never essentially “strong enough to remain reliable allies.” It goes additional, to recommend the treatment of “cultivating resistance to Europe’s current trajectory within European nations” – a nod to overt interference.

US President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he meets with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2025.

Russia is spared, unsurprisingly, comparable criticism, and deemed a relationship worthy of “strategic stability.” The US is familiarly forged not as a NATO ally to Europe, however a mediator “to mitigate the risk of conflict between Russia and European states.” It slams “European officials who hold unrealistic expectations for the war perched in unstable minority governments,” the place in style need for peace is trampled by censorship and the suppression of democracy (a false premise).

A scarcity of self-awareness is current in its subsequent criticism of Europe as being a army energy afraid to defend itself. “This lack of self-confidence is most evident in Europe’s relationship with Russia,” it notes, ignoring Trump’s red-carpet welcome for Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose financial system is smaller than Italy’s and whose army nonetheless can’t conquer its weaker neighbor.

The precedence? “An expeditious cessation of hostilities in Ukraine,” reestablishing “strategic stability” with Russia, and Ukraine’s “survival as a viable state.” The path to this enduring and elusive Trump purpose will not be addressed, but the phrases “survival” and “viable” don’t recommend anybody forward can be sort to Kyiv. Putin even will get an simple reward, once they name for “ending the perception, and preventing the reality, of NATO as a perpetually expanding alliance.” There are few viable candidates now, however the level is to not spell that out.

It is a profoundly unserious doc, for a profoundly critical time, describing Trump’s coverage as “pragmatic without being ‘pragmatist,’ realistic without being ‘realist,’ principled without being ‘idealistic,’ muscular without being ‘hawkish,’ and restrained without being ‘dovish.’”

Fittingly in a time of tolerating tradition wars, the White House appears to have taken an offended crimson Sharpie to the adjectival type of some concepts, however relishes in a phrase salad promoting its retreat and dismissal of decades-old values, and allies.



Sources