London — 

US President Donald Trump has requested European allies for quite a bit recently – the use of army bases, the potential relocation of missile protection programs and customarily stronger help for US army motion towards Iran.

Many responses have been lukewarm, with allies providing restricted defensive help but in addition repeatedly calling for de-escalation. But more and more, White House requests have been met with a agency “no.” Or nie, non, rifiuto.

This week, Italy denied a US request for plane to land at a army base in Sicily, in line with state broadcaster RAI on Tuesday.

RAI reported that “the (US) plan had been communicated while the aircraft were already in flight, and checks revealed that these were not normal or logistical flights and therefore not covered by the treaty with Italy.” An Italian protection ministry spokesperson confirmed the stories to NCS however declined to remark additional.

The workplace of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – one of Trump’s key allies in Europe – mentioned Italy was “acting in full compliance with existing international agreements.” Reading between the traces of the official statements, it seems that means Italy considers any offensive actions associated to assaults on Iran not in compliance.

Along with the United Kingdom, France and Germany, Italy has joined efforts to ship air protection help to Gulf allies. But with regards to the offensive marketing campaign, Meloni has joined the refrain of European leaders calling the battle in Iran unlawful, or as she put it, “outside the scope of international law.”

Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni arrives for a press conference during the EU Summit in Brussels, on March 19, 2026.
Police officers stand outside Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily, Italy, on March 15, 2026, during a protest outside the base against US and Israeli strikes in the Middle East.

“One key issue for European countries is the issue of legality,” mentioned Kamil Zwolski, a fellow on terrorism and battle research at the UK-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). “What Europeans mean when they say that this war has no legal basis is that the United Nations has not approved it – there was no resolution. They also mean that this is not a war of self-defense, because there was no evidence of imminent attack of Iran against the US or Israel.”

“At the minimum, what they also mean is that this war was not agreed by NATO allies. They were not consulted,” Zwolski advised NCS.

Against that backdrop, different examples of European refusals and hesitations are mounting.

Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has maybe been the most outspoken – doubling down on his condemnation of US strikes and his place of not authorizing the use of Spanish army bases or airspace for any exercise referring to battle in Iran.

Rather than tread evenly, Spain’s protection minister Margarita Robles Fernández has referred to as the battle launched by the US and Israel “profoundly illegal and profoundly unjust.”

Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, who has been particularly outspoken against the war on Iran, addresses parliament regarding the war on March 25.

Meanwhile, Poland’s protection minister has mentioned the nation is not going to relocate any of its Patriot missile batteries, which it’s utilizing to guard NATO’s japanese flank amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The minister’s feedback come as Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita reported on Tuesday that the US requested that the nation contemplate redeploying one of its Patriot missile batteries to the Middle East throughout unofficial talks with Polish representatives. Other media reported that the US posed the identical query to all NATO allies. NCS couldn’t independently verify these stories however has requested NATO for remark.

The UK mentioned on Tuesday that it’s sending extra air protection programs to Persian Gulf nations to help the “collective defense of allies” as “Iran’s aggressive missiles and drone attacks” proceed throughout the area. But even that hasn’t guarded Britain towards Trump’s frequent criticism.

On Tuesday, Trump lashed out broadly at European allies for not getting extra concerned within the battle, saying that the United States wouldn’t be there to help them sooner or later.

“All of those countries that can’t get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you: Number 1, buy from the US, we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just TAKE IT. You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us,” Trump mentioned in a submit on Truth Social.

“Iran has been, essentially, decimated. The hard part is done. Go get your own oil,” Trump mentioned.

In a later submit, he added: “The country of France wouldn’t let planes headed to Israel, loaded up with military supplies, fly over French territory,” saying that France has been “very unhelpful” and warning the US would keep in mind.

“Trump has been astonishingly inconsistent in his criticism,” RUSI analyst Zwolski mentioned. “He is going from ‘we don’t need the support of European allies’ to ‘why won’t they help us, they are ungrateful.’”

Zwolski additionally argued that Trump’s feedback concerning the NATO alliance have been astonishing, as the US president signifies that his nation is not going to be as keen to defend its allies sooner or later.

“The only country that has directly benefited from NATO military action is the United States, when NATO’s Article Five was invoked for the first time after the September 11 attacks,” Zwolski mentioned. “And European leaders in this case are right to point out that NATO is a collective self-defense organization … It’s not an organization to be used as a toolbox for foreign interventions that were not even consulted.”

Of course, not all of Europe is aligned of their response on the Iran battle. Some international locations, just like the Baltic nations, can be unwilling to upset Trump given their proximity to the battle in Ukraine. And some, together with the UK, will almost certainly proceed making an attempt to stroll a effective line to protect their good relations with the US.

But it’s telling that even a perceived shut ally, just like the right-wing Italian authorities, has denied a US army request.

“Meloni’s relationship with Trump has always been based more on politics than on policies,” mentioned Riccardo Alcaro, head of analysis and coordinator of the Global Actors program at the Rome-based suppose tank Institute of International Affairs (IAI).

Alcaro famous that the 2 leaders share an opposition to migration, however Trump’s actions on tariffs, commerce, help for Ukraine, and extra broadly on worldwide safety don’t align with Italy’s pursuits.

The analyst additionally mentioned he believes that Trump “holds the Europeans in little regard, because he sees them as free riders … In his view, the United States is providing security to the Europeans. But the Europeans are starting to have doubts about it.”

It is true that the United States stays “the main guarantee against territorial aggression against any of the NATO member states,” Alcaro advised NCS. But it’s additionally true that Europeans have been paying for army help for Ukraine with out help from the Trump administration, and that “the rhetoric coming out of Washington is not really reassuring for the Europeans.”

NCS’s Antonia Mortensen, Sana Noor Haq and Tim Lister contributed to this report.



Sources

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *