Human evolution’s largest mystery, which emerged 15 years in the past from a 60,000-year-old pinkie finger bone, lastly began to unravel in 2025.
Analysis of DNA extracted from the fossil electrified the scientific neighborhood in 2010, when it revealed a beforehand unknown human inhabitants that had, within the distant previous, encountered and interbred with our personal species, Homo sapiens. This enigmatic group grew to become often called the Denisovans after Denisova Cave in Siberia’s Altai Mountains, the place the pinkie finger was discovered.
Despite intimate information of this inhabitants’s genetic make-up, traces of which tens of millions of individuals carry right now, scientists knew nothing concerning the look of the Denisovans, or the place they lived or why they disappeared. The discovery, and the questions it unleashed, galvanized a technology of geneticists, archaeologists and paleoanthropologists.
Some of that work paid off this year, and scientists ultimately put a face to the Denisovan title by extracting new clues from one other well-known fossil: a prehistoric human cranium that didn’t appear to suit with any identified group. Now, different jigsaw items have begun to fall into place.
When the cranium got here to mild in Harbin in northeastern China in 2018 after being stashed for safekeeping on the backside of a properly for many years, some scientists had a hunch that it is likely to be Denisovan.
DNA sequences from the group had been detected within the genomes of present-day Asians, however not Europeans, suggesting that this area was the place the Denisovans predominantly lived.
Based on its distinctive form, the researchers attributed the cranium to a newfound species they called Homo longi or “Dragon Man.” The dozen or so Denisovan fossils that had been recognized since 2010 utilizing DNA have been too small and fragmentary to warrant an official species title.
Getting historic DNA from the cranium, which was estimated to be 146,000 years outdated, was the important thing to understanding whether or not there was a hyperlink between Dragon Man and the Denisovans. However, it proved to be tough.
A staff led by Qiaomei Fu, a geneticist and professor on the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, a part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, examined six bone samples from Dragon Man’s lone surviving tooth and the skull’s petrous bone, a dense piece on the base of the cranium that’s usually a wealthy supply of DNA in fossils. However, the samples yielded no outcomes.
But Fu, who as a younger researcher had been a part of the staff on the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, that first found the Denisovans, reported in June that her staff had been able to retrieve Denisovan genetic material from an sudden supply: Dragon Man’s dental calculus — the gunk left on enamel that may over time kind a laborious layer and protect DNA from the mouth.
That info wasn’t a slam-dunk outcome. The genetic materials researchers had retrieved was mitochondrial DNA, which, not like nuclear DNA, is just inherited by the maternal line, offering an incomplete image of a person’s genomic ancestry. This discovering meant, doubtlessly, that Dragon Man may have been a mixture of two species, one thing that’s not unprecedented. In 2018, scientists revealed a fossilized bone from Denisova Cave that belonged to a lady with a Neanderthal mother and a Denisovan dad.
However, the staff additionally recovered protein fragments from the petrous bone samples, which — although much less detailed than DNA — advised the Dragon Man cranium belonged to a Denisovan inhabitants.
Together, the 2 traces of proof “cleared up some of the mystery surrounding this population,” Fu instructed NCS in June when the analysis was printed. “After 15 years, we know the first Denisovan skull.”
The DNA discovering makes it seemingly that Homo longi will turn out to be the official designation for the dozen or so different Denisovan fossils, Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist and analysis chief in human evolution at London’s Natural History Museum, stated in an e-mail.
Ryan McRae and Briana Pobiner, paleoanthropologists on the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, agreed, though they stated the title Denisovan would seemingly persist as a well-liked title, very like how most individuals name Homo neanderthalensis Neanderthals right now.
“While more work needs to be done to build the body of evidence and give scientists a more complete view of Denisovan anatomy, habitat, and behavior, being able to link complete fossils with the molecular evidence is a huge step forward,” McRae and Pobiner wrote in an annual list of the top stories in human evolution.
Additional proof could possibly be in hand, ready to be recognized, researchers counsel, and with it 2026 could possibly be set for extra groundbreaking revelations.

A cranium fossil, with its telltale bumps and ridges, can reveal a nice deal about what a person regarded like, in line with John Gurche, a paleoartist who creates reconstructions of historic human ancestors for museums, together with the Smithsonian and the American Museum of Natural History. He recreated Dragon Man’s face for National Geographic.
Assuming the Dragon Man cranium belonged to a typical Denisovan particular person, scientists stated the traditional human would have had pronounced forehead ridges, giant enamel and lacked our excessive foreheads. But, if wearing fashionable apparel, this prehistoric relative could not have drawn too many stares on a subway prepare.
Gurche stated that he makes use of identified relationships between gentle and bony tissue in people and apes to recreate facial options, such because the breadth of the eyeball, dimensions of nasal cartilage and the thickness of sentimental tissue in some components of the face. More difficult have been options about which the cranium “offers little information,” together with the type of the lips and ears, and placement of the hair.
With molecular proof now linking Dragon Man to the Denisovans, will probably be simpler for paleoanthropologists to determine different potential Denisovan stays, together with cranium fossils from sites in China that have long defied classification.
More revelations may come from one other cranium fossil found in China in 2022, which hasn’t been formally described in scientific literature. It’s the third cranium to be unearthed on the website often called Yunxian in China’s Hubei province and is assumed thus far again round 1 million years. The different two craniums have been present in 1990.
A digital reconstruction published in September of the second skull, which was badly squashed, from the location advised it was an early ancestor of Dragon Man, which means the lineage may have originated a lot sooner than beforehand thought.
The researchers’ wider evaluation, based mostly on the reconstruction and greater than 100 different cranium fossils, additionally considerably pushes again the timeline for the emergence of species reminiscent of our personal, Homo sapiens, and Homo neanderthalensis, by 400,000 years.
However, the findings attracted some skepticism. More particulars concerning the third Yunxian cranium would allow the staff to check the accuracy of the reconstruction and its placement inside the human household tree.

A 200,000-year-old tooth, comparable in look to the molar nonetheless hooked up to Dragon Man’s cranium, could also be set to shake up what’s identified concerning the Denisovans and the human household tree extra broadly subsequent year and past. Researchers discovered the tooth throughout an excavation of Denisova Cave in 2020.
Stéphane Peyrégne, a researcher on the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, and his colleagues have since analyzed the molar and from it recovered a Denisovan’s full genome — a extremely detailed set of genetic info that may reveal previous genetic range and evolution.
It’s solely the second time scientists have been capable of sequence a “high coverage” genome from a Denisovan fossil — the primary was from the finger fossil that exposed the Denisovans’ existence.
The scientists shared the genome evaluation in October on what’s often called a preprint server, which permits examine authors to submit early variations of their work on-line, and is present process peer assessment by different researchers. Peyrégne declined to comment on the paper till it’s formally printed subsequent year. Stringer described the findings as “very important.”
The genome permits additional investigation of Denisovan organic traits which will affect human well being right now. For instance, a study published in August advised that a Denisovan gene variant concerned within the manufacturing of mucous and saliva could have helped Homo sapiens adapt to new environments.
The new genome can also be a lot older than the primary and permits geneticists to probe extra deeply into Denisovan historical past and reconstruct relationships between completely different historic populations.
The genome represents a Denisovan man who lived in a small group 200,000 years in the past in Denisova Cave. The group’s evaluation revealed that not solely had his ancestors apparently interbred with early Neanderthals, however the person additionally had ancestry from an unknown “super archaic” group for which there’s at the moment no historic DNA match.
McRae on the Smithsonian stated traces of those “ghost lineages” have been discovered within the DNA of recent people as properly, and scientists aren’t positive who they’re. They may symbolize different extinct hominins reminiscent of Homo erectus or Homo floresiensis, typically often called the “hobbit.”
“Or, it could represent hominins that we genuinely haven’t found in the fossil record. They’re ghosts until we have something to trace them back to,” he stated through e-mail.
Figuring out the identification of this group can be a recent mystery for specialists in human evolution to ponder in 2026.
Sign up for NCS’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with information on fascinating discoveries, scientific developments and extra.

