Republicans are ratcheting up their extraordinary efforts to tip the scales of the 2026 midterm elections by redistricting new GOP-leaning US House seats in the center of the decade.
Such efforts have now proceeded apace in Missouri and North Carolina. Indiana and Kansas are weighing it, too, with stress from the Trump White House. And Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis mentioned Tuesday that his state would join the fray if the Supreme Court opens the floodgates to extra partisan gerrymandering.
All would be a part of Texas, whose gambit so as to add 5 GOP seats set off this redistricting arms race and drew California Democrats to try to offset these positive aspects.
It’s a putting energy seize — one Democrats will attempt to match but can’t.
And it’s all the extra outstanding given Americans don’t appear to love it, with polls displaying they don’t assume this is how the people’s enterprise ought to be carried out.
The GOP appears to have reasoned that this bare-knuckle tactic will be price it, as a result of individuals simply don’t care sufficient.

As all this was occurring this week, North Carolina state House Speaker Destin Hall on Monday supplied a outstanding justification.
“@POTUS’s victory sent a clear message: the voters are with him,” Hall posted on X. “NC won’t allow radical Dems like @CAgovernor to redraw districts and undermine the will of the people.”
Hall made no point out of Texas getting the ball rolling by undermining “the will of the people.”
He additionally failed to say that California Gov. Gavin Newsom will solely succeed with “the will of the people” expressly on his aspect. That’s as a result of California, in contrast to these pink states, requires voters to move a poll measure earlier than Democrats can redraw their districts. (Voters will make that alternative this fall.)
That dynamic reinforces what a cynical energy seize the GOP’s efforts are.
Pretty a lot each different state that’s doing this seems to be violating the will of the individuals based mostly on nationwide polling that reveals Americans don’t like gerrymandering, particularly mid-decade gerrymandering. (There’s restricted state-level knowledge on the challenge that meets NCS requirements.)
A CBS News-YouGov poll final month gave individuals a sequence of decisions for the way this mid-decade redistricting battle ought to play out.
Just one-quarter thought their most popular aspect ought to draw extra favorable districts. Three-quarters needed both extra aggressive districts (32%) or for everybody to attend to attract new districts after the subsequent census, like regular (43%).
(Indeed, that’s what’s extraordinary right here. Both sides gerrymander extensively after censuses are carried out, but it surely’s very rare to take action in the center of the decade when courts haven’t ordered it. In the few instances that’s been finished, it’s been Republicans leading the charge, as in Texas.)
A Yahoo News-YouGov poll round the similar time confirmed Americans taking a dim view of the GOP’s gambit.
Americans as a complete disapproved of what Texas did by an almost 2-to-1 margin, 49%-25%. They disapproved of President Donald Trump encouraging different GOP-controlled states to imitate Texas by the same margin, 52%-25%.
In each instances, independents have been 3-to-1 opposed.
And that’s the place issues get fascinating. Given all of this, you would possibly count on Americans to additionally take a dim view of what California Democrats are doing.
But they didn’t. The Yahoo News-YouGov survey famous that Newsom has pitched this as a “hardball” response to the GOP’s energy seize — which it actually is. And Americans have been truly about evenly cut up on whether or not it was a reputable response. While 39% authorized, 37% disapproved.
That appears to echo polls in California, which counsel November’s poll measure permitting the state to attract extra Democratic districts is more likely to move.
In different phrases, Americans appear to see a distinction between what the GOP is doing and what Democrats are doing.
And there is actually a distinction, each in who began it and the magnitude of their efforts.

The query from there is how a lot Americans care. Yes, they could regard gerrymandering as icky and mid-decade gerrymandering as even ickier, however that doesn’t imply it will swing many votes.
Indeed, a NCS poll final month confirmed simply 25% American adults mentioned the challenge of “efforts to redraw the lines for congressional House districts” was “extremely important” to them. That was far lower than many different points like the financial system (60%), well being care (53%) and crime (42%). Though it did notably eclipse international coverage (21%) and gender-identity and transgender points (16%).
Republicans making an attempt to keep up their slender grip on the US House appear to have reasoned that nonetheless a lot Americans would possibly view their gambit as a cynical ploy, it’ll be price the handful of extra favorable districts.
It is likely to be a great wager, however that doesn’t imply they’ve “the will of the people” on their aspect.