Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg supplied $100 million signing bonuses to prime OpenAI staff.
David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images
The synthetic intelligence arms race is heating up, and as tech giants scramble to return out on prime, they’re dangling millions of dollars in entrance of a small talent pool of specialists in what’s develop into referred to as the AI talent warfare.
It’s seeing Big Tech companies like Meta, Microsoft, and Google compete for prime AI researchers in an effort to bolster their synthetic intelligence divisions and dominate the multibillion-dollar market.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg not too long ago launched into an costly hiring spree to beef up the corporate’s new AI Superintelligence Labs. This included poaching Scale AI co-founder Alexander Wang as half of a $14 billion funding into the startup.
OpenAI’s Chief Executive Sam Altman, in the meantime, not too long ago stated the Meta CEO had tried to tempt prime OpenAI talent with $100 million signing bonuses and even larger compensation packages.
If I’m going to spend a billion dollars to construct a [AI] mannequin, $10 million for an engineer is a comparatively low funding.
Alexandru Voica
Head of Corporate Affairs and Policy at Synthesia
Google can be a participant within the talent warfare, tempting Varun Mohan, co-founder and CEO of synthetic intelligence coding startup Windsurf, to hitch Google DeepMind in a $2.4 billion deal. Microsoft AI, in the meantime, has quietly employed two dozen Google DeepMind employees.
“In the software engineering space, there was an intense competition for talent even 15 years ago, but as artificial intelligence became more and more capable, the researchers and engineers that are specialized in this area has stayed relatively stable,” Alexandru Voica, head of company affairs and coverage at AI video platform Synthesia, informed CNBC Make It.
“You have this supply and demand situation where the demand now has skyrocketed, but the supply has been relatively constant, and as a result, there’s the [wage] inflation,” Voica, a former Meta worker and presently a marketing consultant on the Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, added.
Voica stated the multi-million greenback compensation packages are a phenomenon the business has “never seen before.”
Here’s what’s behind the AI talent warfare:
Building AI fashions prices billions
The inflated salaries for specialists come hand-in-hand with the billion-dollar worth tags of constructing AI fashions — the expertise behind your favourite AI merchandise like ChatGPT.
There are differing kinds of AI corporations. Some, like Synthesia, Cohere, Replika, and Lovable, construct merchandise; others, together with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta, construct and prepare giant language fashions.
“There’s only a handful of companies that can afford to build those types of models,” Voica stated. “It’s very capital-intensive. You need to spend billions of dollars, and not a lot of companies have billions of dollars to spend on building a model. And as a result, those companies, the way they approach this is: ‘If I’m going to spend a billion dollars to build a model, $10 million for an engineer is a relatively low investment.'”
Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei informed Time Magazine in 2024 that he anticipated the cost of training frontier AI models to be $1 billion that 12 months.
Stanford University’s AI Institute not too long ago produced a report that confirmed the estimated cost of building select AI models between 2019 and 2024. OpenAI’s GPT-4 price $79 million to construct in 2023, for instance, whereas Google’s Gemini 1.0 Ultra was $192 million. Meta’s Llama 3.1-405B price $170 million to construct in 2024.
“Companies that build products pay to use these existing models and build on top of them, so the capital expenditure is lower and there isn’t as much pressure to burn money,” Voica stated. “The space where things are very hot in terms of salaries are the companies that are building models.”
AI specialists are in demand
The common wage for a machine studying engineer within the U.S. is $175,000 in 2025, per Indeed knowledge.
Pixelonestocker | Moment | Getty Images
Machine studying engineers are the AI professionals who can construct and prepare these giant language fashions — and demand for them is excessive on either side of the Atlantic, Ben Litvinoff, affiliate director at expertise recruitment firm Robert Walters, stated.
“There’s definitely a heavy increase in demand with regards to both AI-focused analytics and machine learning in particular, so people working with large language models and people deploying more advanced either GPT-backed or more advanced AI-driven technologies or solutions,” Litvinoff defined.
This features a “slim talent pool” of skilled specialists who’ve labored within the business for years, he stated, in addition to AI analysis scientists who’ve accomplished PhDs on the prime 5 or 6 universities on this planet and are being snapped up by tech giants upon graduating.
It’s resulting in mega pay packets, with Zuckerberg reportedly offering $250 million to a 24-year-old AI genius Matt Deitke, who dropped out of a pc science doctoral program on the University of Washington.
Meta directed CNBC to Zuckerberg’s feedback to The Information, the place the Facebook founder stated there’s an “absolute premium” for prime talent.
“A lot of the specifics that have been reported aren’t accurate by themselves. But it is a very hot market. I mean, as you know, and there’s a small number of researchers, which are the best, who are in demand by all of the different labs,” Zuckerberg informed the tech publication.
“The amount that is being spent to recruit the people is actually still quite small compared to the overall investment and all when you talk about super intelligence.”
Litvinoff estimated that, within the London market, machine studying engineers and principal engineers are presently incomes six-figure salaries starting from £140,000 to £300,000 for extra senior roles, on common.
In the U.S., the common wage for a machine studying engineer is $175,000, reaching almost $300,000 on the larger finish, according to Indeed.
Startups and conventional industries get left behind
As tech giants proceed to guzzle up one of the best minds in AI with the lure of mammoth salaries, there is a threat that startups get left behind.
“Some of these startups that are trying to compete in this space of building models, it’s hard to see a way forward for them, because they’re stuck in the space of: the models are very expensive to build, but the companies that are buying those models, I don’t know if they can afford to pay the prices that cover the cost of building the model,” Voica famous.
Mark Miller, founder and CEO of Insurevision.ai, recently told Startups Magazine that this talent warfare was additionally making a “massive opportunity gap” in conventional industries.
“Entire industries like insurance, healthcare, and logistics can’t compete on salary. They need innovation but can’t access the talent,” Miller stated. “The current situation is absolutely unsustainable. You can’t have one industry hoarding all the talent while others wither.”
Voica stated AI professionals could have to choose. While some will take Big Tech’s larger salaries and paperwork, others will lean in the direction of startups, the place salaries are decrease, however workers have extra possession and influence.
“In a large company, you’re essentially a cog in a machine, whereas in a startup, you can have a lot of influence. You can have a lot of impact through your work, and you feel that impact,” Voica stated.
Until the value of constructing AI fashions comes down, nonetheless, the excessive salaries for AI talent are more likely to stay.
“As long as companies will have to spend billions of dollars to build the model, they will spend tens of millions, or hundreds of millions, to hire engineers to build those models,” Voica added.
“If all of a sudden tomorrow, the cost to build those models decreases by 10 times, the salaries I would expect would come down as well.”