‘Taylor Swift Tax’ on high-end vacation homes spreads to more states

A model of this text appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth e-newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly information to the high-net-worth investor and client. Sign up to obtain future editions, straight to your inbox.

A brand new push by states to tax the actual property of the rich has sparked a backlash amongst brokers and potential consumers, who say the taxes punish an important native spenders.

From tax hikes on expensive second homes in Rhode Island and Montana to Cape Cod’s proposed switch tax on homes over $2 million and the L.A. mansion tax, state and native governments see a income gold mine within the expensive properties of the rich.

“It’s a smack in the face to people who just spend money here,” mentioned Donna Krueger-Simmons, gross sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s International in Watch Hill, Rhode Island.

The tax hikes are being pushed by tighter state budgets and populist anger over housing prices. States are wanting to offset finances cuts anticipated from the brand new tax and spending invoice in Washington. At the identical time, the housing market has turn out to be a story of two consumers, with the center class and youthful households struggling to afford homes whereas the luxurious housing market thrives from rich all-cash consumers.

The resolution for a lot of states: tax the homes of the wealthy.

Rhode Island’s new levy, nicknamed “The Taylor Swift Tax,” is among the many most excessive. The popstar purchased a seashore home within the state’s elite Watch Hill neighborhood in 2013.

The measure imposes a brand new surcharge on second homes valued at more than $1 million. For non-primary residences, or these not occupied for more than 182 days a yr, the state will cost $2.50 for each $500 in assessed worth above the primary $1 million. That cost is on high of current property taxes and can add up to huge will increase for luxurious homes in Newport, Watch Hill and different well-heeled, summer time communities within the state.

Swift’s home, as an example, is assessed at round $28 million, in accordance to native actual property information. Her present property taxes are estimated at round $201,000 a yr. The new prices will add one other $136,442 to her annual taxes, bringing her yearly whole to $337,442 – though locals say she not often visits.

Real property brokers say the rise targets the very taxpayers who already contribute essentially the most. Wealthy second-homeowners pay hefty property taxes however do not use many native providers, since their major residences are in New York; Boston; Palm Beach, Florida; or different locales. Their children sometimes do not attend the native colleges, and so they’re rare customers of the police, hearth, water and different municipal providers since most keep for less than 10 to 12 weeks out of the yr.

“These are people who just come here for the summer, spend their money and pay their fair share of taxes,” mentioned Krueger-Simmons. “They’re getting penalized just because they also live somewhere else.”

Brokers and longtime residents say the summer time residents of Newport, Watch Hill and different seasonal seashore cities are the financial engines for native companies, eating places and motels.

“You’re just hurting the people who support small business,” mentioned Lori Joyal, of the Lila Delman Compass workplace in Watch Hill. “You’re chasing away the people who spend most of the money in these towns.” 

Rhode Island can also be mountaineering its conveyance tax on luxurious actual property beginning in October. The tax on actual property gross sales will probably be a further $3.75 for every $500 paid above $800,000 for an actual property buy. At the identical time, the state’s steep property tax deters lots of the ultra-wealthy from residing there full-time.

Brokers say some second-home homeowners are contemplating promoting and plenty of would-be consumers are pausing their purchases. While the tax hike alone is not anticipated to lead to any important wealth flight, Joyal mentioned potential consumers in Rhode Island are already coastal cities in Connecticut as alternate options.

“It’s always about choices,” she mentioned. “At the end of the day it’s about how they can choose to spend their discretionary dollars. Connecticut has some beautiful coastal towns without some of these other high taxes.”

Montana has handed an identical tax. The inflow of Californians and different prosperous newcomers who poured into the state throughout Covid has led to hovering residence costs and rising resentment over gentrification. Meanwhile, the state’s low revenue tax fee and lack of a gross sales tax has left it little room for income will increase to deal with the required improve in providers.

In May, the state handed a two-tier property tax plan, reducing charges for full-time residents and elevating taxes on second homes and short-term leases. For major residences and long-term leases valued at or beneath the state’s median residence worth, the tax fee will probably be 0.76%. Homes price more than that may face a tiered-rate system of up to 1.9% on any worth over 4 occasions the median worth.

The Montana Department of Revenue expects the modifications, which can begin subsequent yr, will hike second-home taxes by a median of 68%. Brokers say some consumers are ready to see the tax payments subsequent yr earlier than making any selections about whether or not to purchase or promote.

“I’ve heard about some buyers who have put on the brakes to wait for the dust to settle and see what happens,” mentioned Valerie Johnson, with PureWest Christie’s International Real Estate in Bozeman, Montana.

Johnson mentioned that whereas the tax was touted by legislators as hitting rich second-home homeowners, it can additionally hit longtime locals who personal funding homes and hire them out for revenue.

“These are small businesses for many people,” she mentioned.

Manish Bhatt, a senior coverage analyst on the Tax Foundation, mentioned tax hikes aimed toward rich second-home homeowners could also be common politically, however they not often make for profitable or environment friendly tax coverage. Real property tax reform ought to be broad primarily based, somewhat than targeted on taxpayers who’re singled out simply because they do not dwell in a neighborhood full-time, he mentioned.

“There is a grab to find revenue right now,” he mentioned. “But taxing second-home owners could have the opposite impact – dissuading people from owning a second home or continue to own in those communities.”

While the brand new taxes alone may not drive out the rich, “we do know that taxes are important to businesses and individuals and could cause people to make a decision to buy in another nearby state,” Bhatt mentioned.

The projected income from the brand new taxes may disappoint. When Los Angeles handed its so-called “mansion tax” in 2022, proponents touted income projections of between $600 million to $1.1 billion a yr. The tax, imposed on actual property gross sales over $5 million, has solely raised $785 million after more than two years, in accordance to the Los Angeles Housing Department.

Higher rates of interest that damage the housing market have performed a task, specialists say. Yet Michael Manville, professor of city planning on the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, mentioned rich consumers and sellers additionally decreased transactions in response to the tax.

“The lower revenue is a reason to be concerned because it suggests that the tax might actually be reducing transactions, which in turn can reduce housing production and property tax revenue,” he mentioned.