By Allison Morrow, NCS
New York (NCS) — New York’s high prosecutors are elevating an alarm on the crypto trade’s first legislative milestone, the GENIUS Act, alleging that the law fails to shield victims of fraud and provides authorized cowl to corporations which are “profiting from fraud.”
In a letter solely seen by NCS and signed by New York Attorney General Letitia James and 4 district attorneys, together with Manhattan’s Alvin Bragg, the prosecutors say the law has supplied the “imprimatur of legitimacy” for a form of cryptocurrency generally known as stablecoins, whereas permitting firms that challenge stablecoins to “avoid significant regulatory requirements that are needed to combat financing terrorism, drug trafficking, money laundering, and especially cryptocurrency fraud.”
The GENIUS Act is a broad bipartisan effort, signed into law in July, to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins, a form of cryptocurrency that has exploded in reputation within the largely unregulated marketplace for digital belongings. The law creates reserve necessities for coin issuers related to guidelines that guarantee banks maintain sufficient belongings to cowl their liabilities — that means firms that challenge stablecoins should again their digital choices one-for-one with liquid belongings like US {dollars} or brief-time period Treasuries.
But James and Bragg take challenge with what the GENIUS Act lacks — specifically, language that might compel corporations to return stolen funds to victims of fraud.
That absence, they write, “will embolden stablecoin issuers, and even provide legal cover, when they affirmatively decide to keep stolen funds and proceeds under their control rather than returning them to victims.”
Already, they declare, the 2 most dominant stablecoin issuers — Tether and Circle — have throttled law enforcement efforts to seize and return funds to victims whereas profiting off the crimes that the prosecutors say stay distinguished in stablecoin markets.
Tether, the biggest stablecoin issuer by quantity, has the power to freeze suspicious transactions of its USDT coin, the prosecutors write. But they say that it has solely finished so on an advert-hoc foundation, and solely when working with federal-stage law enforcement.
“The reality for many victims, therefore, is that funds stolen in or converted to USDT will never be frozen, seized, or returned,” the letter states. “They currently decide on a case-by-case basis when they will assist law enforcement in recovering funds for victims, and nothing prevents them from stopping all reissuance entirely.”
Tether stated in a press release to NCS that the corporate “takes fraud, consumer harm, and the misuse of USDT extremely seriously and maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward illicit activity.”
The firm, which relies in El Salvador, stated that it “does not have a blanket legal obligation to comply with state-level civil or criminal processes in the way a US-regulated financial institution would. That said, Tether voluntarily works closely with US law enforcement at the federal, state, and local levels and routinely assists investigations aimed at protecting victims and preventing further harm.”
Prosecutors allege that Circle, the second-largest stablecoin issuer, which is publicly traded and headquartered in New York, “claims to be an ally in the fight against financial fraud.” But its insurance policies “are significantly worse than those of Tether for victims of fraud,” the letter states.
Even when Circle does agree to freeze funds, the prosecutors say, the corporate hoards them relatively than return them to victims, accumulating curiosity on the underlying belongings.
That creates a “crystal clear” monetary incentive to reject requests from law enforcement, the prosecutors say. “It is financially preferable to only freeze cryptocurrency deemed to have been stolen, but not return the underlying asset to law enforcement or any fraud victim, because Circle can continue to collect the interest through investment of the underlying funds.”
In a press release to NCS, Dante Disparte, Circle’s chief technique officer stated the corporate “has always prioritized financial integrity and advancing US and global regulatory standards for stablecoins.” The GENIUS Act, Disparte stated, “makes clear that stablecoin issuers must abide by applicable financial integrity rules for combating illicit activity, while enhancing clear consumer protection norms. We have followed prevailing rules as a U.S. regulated financial institution, and we will continue to advance these standards.”
The letter, reviewed by NCS, marks one of the crucial forceful criticisms of the GENIUS Act from law enforcement officers since President Donald Trump signed it in July. While the invoice obtained broad bipartisan assist, critics have stated it lacks enough protections for shoppers and raises critical issues about crypto volatility spilling into the mainstream monetary system. And it comes as another landmark, industry-backed crypto regulation effort works its manner by way of Congress.
Proponents, together with main crypto corporations that lobbied for its passage, touted the GENIUS Act as part of the trade’s aim of building, in President Donald Trump’s phrases, “a clear and simple regulatory framework,” for stablecoins, which have develop into the lifeblood of the crypto ecosystem.
The prosecutors’ letter is addressed to Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer, Kirsten Gillibrand — the lead Democratic senator supporting the GENIUS Act — and Mark Warner, who serves on the intelligence and banking committees.
Sens. Schumer and Gillibrand didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. In a press release, a spokesperson for Sen. Warner stated “stablecoin issuers have a responsibility to comply with lawful court orders under the GENIUS Act and to cooperate fully with law enforcement to help victims recover stolen funds… Protecting victims is paramount, and Congress is continuing to evaluate whether additional legislative tools are needed to ensure issuers and law enforcement can act quickly to stop criminal activity and return stolen funds to their rightful owners.”
In June, when the laws cleared the Senate, Gillibrand touted its potential to “enable US businesses and consumers to take advantage of the next generation of financial innovation.”
Stablecoins, as their identify suggests, are designed to maintain a gentle worth by mirroring one other asset, often US {dollars}. One stablecoin ought to all the time equal roughly one greenback — a helpful perform for buyers who need to maintain their cash inside the crypto ecosystem with out exposing their holdings to the wild swings that bitcoin, ether and different tokens are recognized for. They’re additionally seen as a form of on- and off-ramp between crypto and mainstream monetary markets which have traditionally had little overlap.
Last 12 months, stablecoin transaction volumes soared 72% to $33 trillion, in accordance to Bloomberg News, which cited information compiled by Artemis Analytics. While bitcoin stays the most well-liked crypto token, its buying and selling quantity is eclipsed by greenback-pegged stablecoins.
That relative stability, mixed with the anonymity of crypto transactions, has additionally confirmed in style amongst criminals. Stablecoins now account for 63% of the illicit transactions that happen in crypto, in accordance to Chainalysis, a crypto analysis agency.
And whereas the crypto trade has been trying to shed its longtime affiliation with scams, cybercrime, drug trafficking and cash laundering, the crime downside is much from resolved. Since 2020, Chainalysis estimates illicit exercise on the blockchain — crypto’s core infrastructure — has grown by a mean of 25% a 12 months. Thieves and scammers have moved an estimated $28 billion into the world’s most distinguished crypto exchanges over the previous two years, in accordance to a current report from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
The New York prosecutors stated they “regularly investigate criminal enterprises which use stablecoins to commit cryptocurrency fraud and launder stolen proceeds” and try to “freeze and seize” stolen funds to return them to victims.
But the GENIUS Act, they say, hamstrings these operations whereas emboldening stablecoin issuers to resist law enforcement efforts to return stolen funds to victims.
“Unlike any other type of cryptocurrency, Circle and Tether have the ability to freeze stablecoins” and “immediately halt the flow of stolen funds and criminal proceeds,” the letter says.
Instead, they argue, “Tether has provided assistance only in limited circumstances, and Circle has chosen to actively thwart law enforcement and to profit from victims’ losses.” The prosecutors estimate that in 2024 Circle and Tether every made $1 billion in income from investing their reserve funds, together with reserve funds backing stolen and frozen stablecoins. As of November, they say, Circle had greater than $114 million in frozen funds.
For crypto critics, the GENIUS Act’s lack of fraud and restitution provisions level to an ongoing downside for the trade, the place even fundamental shopper protections are lacking.
“All of that mundane stuff that has sort of been sorted out for traditional finance through decades of trial and error – it’s not there in the GENIUS Act,” Hilary J. Allen, a law professor at American University who focuses on banking and cryptocurrency, instructed NCS. “It was always open to the crypto industry to operate under the traditional rules… the laws were never incompatible with the technology. The laws were incompatible with the crypto business model.”
The-NCS-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.