‘Skincare’: The celebrity facialist’s murder-for-hire case that inspired a Hollywood thriller


Editor’s notice: This story accommodates delicate spoilers about “Skincare.”



NCS
 — 

When former “facialist to the stars” Dawn DaLuise obtained a sudden stream of textual content messages in late June, it triggered reminiscences of the months-long stalking marketing campaign that derailed her magnificence profession and landed her in jail charged with soliciting murder.

A decade earlier, the messages might need contained threats from unknown senders, or responses to fliers providing “free” intercourse that had been printed together with her contact particulars (alongside pictures of her and her daughters’ faces superimposed onto X-rated pictures) and distributed on Santa Monica Boulevard.

As it occurred, nevertheless, the texts had been from pals and shoppers informing DaLuise of the newest chapter in a life story that got here to resemble a Hollywood thriller: She was being portrayed by Elizabeth Banks in a new film.

Hitting theaters at the moment, “Skincare” tells the semi-fictional story of LA esthetician Hope Goodman (Banks), who turns into satisfied that rival salon proprietor Angel Vergara (Luis Gerardo Méndez) is out to spoil her. Her tires are slashed, she receives creepy movies and nighttime cellphone calls, and a man exhibits up at her clinic after a categorised advert invitations strangers to satisfy her office rape fantasies.

Dawn DaLuise pictured in court in Los Angeles on March 19, 2014.

“My phone was a receptacle for all sorts of harassment… during my ordeal, so when (all these messages) popped up, and the first thing I see is a trailer about my life, it caused me to revisit a bit of that trauma,” DaLuise informed NCS in a video interview forward of the film’s launch.

“Reputation is everything in this business,” Goodman observes within the film, and hers is left in tatters by an specific sexual electronic mail despatched to her whole contact e-book from her account. Once-loyal prospects flock over the road to Vergara’s booming salon, whereas an more and more hysterical Goodman buys a gun for self-defense and follows her rival to his residence. A pal’s supply of safety then takes a dramatic flip — as does her suspicion of who is absolutely behind the harassment.

Described within the film’s opening credit as being “fictional” however “inspired by true events,” the story shares important similarities with DaLuise’s.

Now 65, the esthetician as soon as counted Jennifer Aniston and Sarah Michelle Gellar among the many shoppers at her Hollywood clinic, Skin Refinery. Best-known for “galvanic” facials, which use small electrical currents to assist magnificence merchandise penetrate the pores and skin, DaLuise — very similar to the character Goodman — launched a skincare vary and developed a media profile of her personal.

In addition to the aforementioned fliers and texts, DaLuise’s tires had been additionally slashed. She obtained lots of of undesirable calls and a number of Craigslist adverts had been posted in her identify claiming she was in search of a man to fulfill her sexual fantasies.

She, too, got here to (erroneously) consider that an esthetician who opened a clinic subsequent to hers, Gabriel Suarez, was behind the unsettling incidents.

“I was stunned and in awe of how precise everything (was), from the location (to) the mannerisms and the way in which our salons were both decked out,” DaLuise mentioned of the manufacturing. “Somebody really did their homework and did it well.” (Banks, in the meantime, told Entertainment Weekly final month that she didn’t know the film was inspired by a true story till “way later into the process.”)

Dawn DaLuise erroneously believed Gabriel Suarez (pictured in 2014), who owned a neighboring skin care salon, had been behind a campaign of unsettling incidents.
In

But the film’s plot subsequently deviates from actuality in essential methods — notably relating to the crime DaLuise was accused of committing.

In March 2014, DaLuise was arrested and accused of a murder-for-hire plot against Suarez. The case centered on a textual content she despatched to then-friend, Edward Feinstein, saying she had “found someone who is going to take Gabriel out.” DaLuise argued that the message had not been severe (she described it to NCS as “venting”).

The man she was accused of approaching concerning the hit, former NFL participant Chris Geile, testified in court docket that he barely knew DaLuise and she or he had by no means requested him to kill Suarez. The jury took lower than an hour to acquit her —  however not earlier than she spent 10 months in jail awaiting trial, throughout which period she developed colorectal most cancers. (She later sued the LA Sheriff’s Department for wrongful imprisonment, amongst different issues, and settled with the county for failing to diagnose her most cancers whereas in custody.)

DaLuise believed she had been framed, and a spotlight quickly turned to the police’s informant, Feinstein. Authorities suspected that he and his pal (and considered one of DaLuise’s shoppers) Nick Prugo, a member of the notorious “Bling Ring” thieving gang that had focused high-profile celebrities’ houses, had been behind the nefarious acts, not Suarez.

In 2016, Los Angeles County Superior Court sentenced Feinstein and Prugo to 350 hours of neighborhood service and three years of probation every on stalking misdemeanor prices. The pair had been ordered to steer clear of DaLuise and her two daughters, and to stop contact with each other for 10 years.

Feinstein and Prugo had been additionally accused of posting a web based advert soliciting males to go to DaLuise’s residence to rape her, although the choose dismissed that felony cost, saying there was inadequate proof.

The pair’s conviction adopted a plea deal, and an alleged motive for his or her crimes was not revealed by the court docket. Offering her clarification in a 2015 episode of “Dr. Phil,” DaLuise mentioned of Feinstein: “I just think it’s pathological, I think it’s sadistic and I think it’s psychotic.”

Despite DaLuise’s reward for the manufacturing, she is “disappointed” to not have been consulted by the writers or director, Austin Peters — and even invited to a preview screening (although she mentioned she managed to “tag along” with different invitees to see the film twice forward of the discharge). Having explored the opportunity of taking authorized motion towards the studio, IFC Films, the still-practicing esthetician mentioned she is now of a “if you can’t beat them, join them” mindset.

Dawn DaLuise praised Elizabeth Banks' performance as Hope Goodman (pictured), telling CNN she was

“I have no choice but to accept it, because the various attorneys who were vested in trying to assist me said there’s no real legal foundation for me claiming any kind of harm was done.”

“I feel like a mother figure wanting to shake my finger in (the writers’) faces and say, ‘You should have asked me for help, (the movie) would have been better than it is,’” she added.

IFC Films declined to touch upon why it didn’t contain DaLuise within the mission.

DaLuise hopes revived consideration in her case will assist her promote a documentary to a main community or streaming service, telling NCS she signed a “top director” for the mission inside days of the “Skincare” trailer’s launch. (She has beforehand leaned into the controversy, making her 2018 comeback to the wonder trade using the brand name “Killer Facials”).

And whereas the varied court docket proceedings have lengthy concluded, particulars of the case proceed to be debated on-line. Various social media accounts have been arrange in DaLuise’s identify claiming to reveal the “truth” about her. Feinstein, who on the time reportedly informed investigators that DaLuise was faking the harassment to discredit Suarez, continues to query the esthetician’s model of occasions, saying in a 2021 YouTube video he regrets taking a plea deal and claiming she fabricated stalking incidents.

DaLuise mentioned she selected to stay “silent” over Feinstein’s claims, including “I want him just to go away.” But seeing “Skincare” additionally left her eager to set the report straight once more, saying of the film: “It was a bit of a rollercoaster ride, and it was enjoyable, but it wasn’t fact-based in any real way.”

“That movie was probably about 20% of my whole ordeal,” she added. “The audience has no idea about the follow up — the incarceration and whatnot. So, I’m a little bit more comfortable knowing that when my documentary comes out, people won’t even recognize it from the movie they saw. That’s my hope, because it’s so different.”



With information from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *