By Devan Cole, NCS
(NCS) — A federal prosecutor in Washington, DC, told a judge this month that his workplace didn’t have evidence of any crimes by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell in a costly renovation of the central financial institution’s headquarters – regardless of subpoenas over the matter, which the judge later quashed.
At a excessive-stakes listening to on March 3, the prosecutor, George A. Massucco-LaTaif, was requested, “What evidence is there of fraud or criminal misconduct in relation to the renovations?”
“We do not know at this time,” Massucco-LaTaif responded, in accordance to a now-unsealed transcript of the court docket proceedings. “However, there are 1.2 billion reasons for us to look into it.”
The Department of Justice’s criminal investigation into Powell in January got here after months of railing by President Donald Trump in opposition to Powell for not reducing rates of interest quicker. Trump’s complaints ranged from private insults in opposition to the banker to accusations of impropriety and incompetence in value overruns in the $2.5 billion Fed renovation.
The DOJ probe heightened fears that the administration needs to erode the Fed’s independence, which might go away the door open for political interference in setting rates of interest for the world’s largest economic system.
Massucco-LaTaif pushed again strongly on March 3 when Boasberg, an appointee of President Barack Obama, requested whether or not prosecutors might submit such evidence of against the law to him below seal. Massucco-LaTaif argued such a transfer was pointless as a result of “you don’t need this grand suspicion of illegal activity,” in accordance to the court docket transcript.
“It can be something as simple as a tip or a rumor or something that just doesn’t seem right,” he mentioned, including later: “I would submit to the Court that a $1.2 billion overrun of cost… doesn’t seem right.”
Massucco-LaTaif told Boasberg: “$1.2 billion, that’s the GDP of some smaller countries, yet we are going to overlook it as, oh, it’s just overrun because it’s a historical building? That doesn’t seem right.”
“And are we prohibited from looking into it? That would seem to, you know, put a chilling effect on any investigation the government ever did,” he added, in accordance to the transcript.
Powell had stayed principally mum within the face of Trump’s assaults, however only a few days after he was served with a subpoena in early January, the Fed chief released a remarkable video calling the investigation a part of political stress marketing campaign.
The week after Massucco-LaTaif’s remarks, Boasberg quashed the subpoenas. In a stinging ruling, he mentioned the federal government “produced essentially zero evidence to suspect Chair Powell of a crime.”
“Indeed, its justifications are so thin and unsubstantiated that the Court can only conclude that they are pretextual,” he wrote.
Powell’s time period as chair expires in May, and Trump in January nominated former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh to run the central financial institution. But Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, a key vote on the Senate Banking Committee that might verify the nomination, has mentioned the committee mustn’t contemplate a vote till the prison probe of Powell is resolved.
The Washington Post first reported the prosecutors’ remarks from a court docket transcript Tuesday.
The-NCS-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.