New study casts doubts on RFK Jr.'s reasons for gutting vaccine panel


U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks as he attends a press convention with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz to debate medical health insurance reform, on the Department of Health and Human Services in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 23, 2025.

Kevin Mohatt | Reuters

A model of this text first appeared in CNBC’s Healthy Returns e-newsletter, which brings the newest health-care information straight to your inbox. Subscribe here to obtain future editions.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lately gutted a key government vaccine panel, saying it was essential to eradicate what he known as “persistent conflicts of interest” on the committee. 

But new research from the USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics seems to problem that argument. Conflicts on that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel had been at “historic lows for years” earlier than Kennedy restacked it with new members, a few of whom are broadly recognized vaccine critics, the researchers discovered.

The study, printed within the medical journal JAMA on Monday, additionally discovered that the kind of battle thought-about to be the “most concerning” – revenue from vaccine makers – had been nearly eradicated amongst members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP. 

Conflicts of rates of interest have been additionally low on a separate panel of advisors to the Food and Drug Administration known as the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, or VRBPAC, in keeping with the analysis. 

Both teams are essential to shaping U.S. vaccine coverage: While the FDA committee advises the company on whether or not to approve pictures, the CDC panel determines who’s eligible for jabs and whether or not insurers ought to cowl them. The panels are sometimes made up of high consultants in infectious illnesses, pediatrics, immunology and public well being.

Kennedy has lengthy contended that the advisors on these panels have shut ties to the pharmaceutical business. At his first Senate affirmation listening to in January, Kennedy claimed that 97% of the CDC panel members had conflicts of curiosity.

“Before he was confirmed, I saw this 97% number and thought, wow, that’s some serious stuff. But after looking at the vaccine data myself, I certainly couldn’t see anything at that scale,” stated the study’s lead creator Genevieve Kanter, an affiliate professor of public coverage on the University of Southern California, in an interview.

“I think it will be reassuring to the public and to the [Trump] administration that issues that we thought were pretty serious or in the past were serious are not anymore,” she added. 

The analysis comes as Kennedy, a distinguished vaccine skeptic himself, overhauls federal well being companies and pursues efforts that would change immunization coverage and undermine vaccine uptake within the U.S. 

The USC researchers analyzed reported monetary conflicts of curiosity amongst consultants on the 2 vaccine panels between 2000 and 2024. 

Here’s how conflicts of curiosity disclosures work on the panels, which meet a number of occasions a yr to overview vaccines: For every product being mentioned, members should say if they’ve a tie to the vaccine maker or a competitor and disclose the character of the connection. People on the panel with conflicts both obtain a waiver to take part if they’re deemed to offer important experience, whereas these with conflicts thought-about too vital are recused. 

Since 2016, a mean of 6.2% of ACIP members and 1.9% of VRBPAC members have reported a monetary battle of curiosity at any given assembly, in keeping with the paper. During that interval, lower than 1% of reported conflicts on each panels have been tied to private revenue from vaccine makers, together with consulting charges, inventory, royalties or possession. 

Rates of reported conflicts amongst ACIP members fell to five% by 2024, and stayed beneath 4% amongst VRBPAC members since 2010, together with 10 years the place there have been no reported conflicts in any respect. 

Conflict of rates of interest have been considerably greater within the early 2000s, peaking at round 43% for ACIP in 2000 and 27% for VRBPAC in 2007, the researchers discovered. 

The study stated the decline over time could also be resulting from coverage modifications in 2007 that cracked down on conflicts of curiosity on the FDA panel, and “greater awareness and scrutiny” of conflicts in company decision-making. It’s not clear when precisely the CDC committee started to do the identical. 

Across the study interval, probably the most steadily reported battle of curiosity was analysis help, which is usually thought-about much less of a priority than monetary ties related to private revenue. Kanter stated that is a mirrored image of the panel members’ areas of experience which can be related to evaluating the protection, efficacy and applicability of pictures. 

“The dominant conflicts were grant support for research. In a way that makes sense because, who do we want on these committees? It’s people with expertise on how to conduct research on these vaccines,” Kanter stated. 

“These conflicts are not about personal gain, but related to measures of expertise.” 

While a few of the charges look like greater with ACIP members than with folks on the VRBPAC panel, Kanter stated it’s not comparable as a result of the CDC offers “far less granular” information on conflicts of curiosity. She added that the FDA panel sometimes evaluations one product at a time throughout a gathering, whereas the CDC committee evaluates a number of. 

Kanter stated you will need to study conflicts of curiosity and the affect of the pharmaceutical business in lots of points of health-care regulation. 

But she added that “if we do want to focus on conflicts of interest, there may be other areas where the prevalence is a greater concern than what we’ve seen here with these vaccine panels.” 

Feel free to ship any ideas, ideas, story concepts and information to Annika at [email protected].

Latest in well being care: UnitedHealth’s Buffett bounce holds for now

Warren Buffett was simply what the physician ordered to stabilize UnitedHealth Group shares. 

Berkshire Hathaway’s 13F submitting revealing a brand new stake of greater than 5 million shares has helped carry the inventory again above $300 — a far cry from the 52-week low of underneath $235 that it hit earlier this month.

This marks Berkshire’s first foray into the sophisticated space of managed care. David Tepper’s Appaloosa Fund additionally supplied a vote of confidence within the embattled well being care large’s inventory, boosting its stake to 2.5 million shares. 

For each, it is a wager on restoration, however analysts say the wait may take effectively over a yr.When assessing the purchases, Baird analyst Michael Ha invoked Warren Buffett’s personal phrases about “complicated, uncertain investments” which belong within the “too hard pile.” 

In a be aware to shoppers, Ha wrote that UnitedHealth’s points prolong past pricing in its Medicare Advantage plans to actual structural issues with its Optum well being doctor unit that are not as simply fastened. Ha added that “near-term execution risk is high and we see potential for the situation to worsen over the next 12-18 months before improving.”

For now, on a technical foundation, UnitedHealth shares are buying and selling above their 50-day shifting common for the primary time because the firm first lowered steerage in April.

Feel free to ship any ideas, ideas, story concepts and information to Bertha at [email protected].

Latest in health-care tech: Epic touts new AI instruments at annual Users Group Meeting

Epic’s campus in Verona, Wisconsin

Courtesy: Epic

This is Ashley, reporting dwell from Verona, Wisconsin.

It’s that point of yr once more! I’m attending Epic’s annual Users Group Meeting, the place hundreds of health-care executives flock to the corporate’s 1,670-acre headquarters to be taught concerning the firm’s newest merchandise and options. 

Epic is a health-care software program firm greatest recognized for its digital well being document, or EHR software program. An EHR is a digital model of a affected person’s medical document that is maintained by medical doctors and nurses over time. Epic is the dominant EHR vendor within the U.S., and its expertise is utilized in 3,300 hospitals and 73,000 clinics and by 325 million sufferers across the globe, in keeping with the corporate.

Artificial intelligence was entrance and heart at UGM this yr, very like it was last year. During a three-hour-long government tackle Tuesday morning, Epic executives shared updates concerning the roughly 200 new AI options it has been growing for sufferers, clinicians and payers. Keep a watch out for extra protection from CNBC that explains a few of these upcoming options in additional element. 

Epic confirmed that it’s growing its personal AI-powered scientific documentation software, which was some of the anticipated bulletins of this yr’s occasion. These instruments, which are sometimes known as AI scribes, are capable of draft scientific notes in actual time as medical doctors consensually document their visits with sufferers. 

A fiercely aggressive AI scribing market has taken off as health-care executives search for options to assist scale back workers burnout and daunting administrative workloads. Some AI scribing startups like Abridge and Ambience Healthcare have raised a whole lot of tens of millions of {dollars} from traders, and there was numerous hypothesis about whether or not Epic would in the end be part of the fray. 

The firm stated it’s working on this function in partnership with Microsoft, and that it is going to be accessible for restricted use early subsequent yr. 

“AI is here, it’s accelerating, you can’t wish it away, you’ve got to keep up with it,” Epic’s President Sumit Rana stated in the course of the tackle. 

The shows came about in Epic’s 11,400-seat underground auditorium known as Deep Space, which is simply one of many many unique facilities on campus. Epic’s workplace buildings are themed, with many impressed by science fiction and tales like “The Wizard of Oz,” the Harry Potter collection and “Alice in Wonderland.” 

UGM conferences are additionally themed, and Epic executives famously take the stage wearing costume. This yr’s theme was “sci-fi,” and Epic’s 82-year-old founder and CEO Judy Faulkner wore a purple wig, vivid inexperienced footwear and a metallic vest that appeared impressed by the fictional character, Buzz Lightyear. 

CNBC had the chance to sit down down with Faulkner earlier this summer season in a rare interview, the place she mirrored on her 46 years on the firm’s helm. During her presentation on Tuesday, Faulkner mentioned Epic’s AI initiatives and roadmap. 

“We are combining the intelligence and curiosity of the human being with the investigative capabilities of gen AI,” she stated. 

Many of the brand new options Epic teased on Tuesday are nonetheless a number of months, or over a yr, away. But it is clear that Epic is leaning in on AI, they usually did not let this yr’s UGM attendees overlook it. 

Read extra about CNBC’s interview with Faulkner here.

Feel free to ship any ideas, ideas, story concepts and information to Ashley at [email protected].