Los Angeles
—
For years, social media giants have argued against claims that their platforms harm younger individuals’s mental health. Starting Tuesday, they’ll for the primary time have to defend against these claims earlier than a jury in a court docket of legislation.
A 19-year-old recognized as KGM and her mom, Karen Glenn, are suing TikTok, Meta and Google’s YouTube, alleging that the businesses knowingly created addictive options that harmed her mental health and led to self-harm and suicidal ideas. (Snap, additionally a defendant, settled final week underneath undisclosed phrases.)
Parents, advocates, health specialists, tech whistleblowers and teens themselves have for years anxious that that social media platforms can get younger individuals hooked on scrolling, allow bullying, disrupt their sleep and ship them down harmful content rabbit holes. Tech executives have repeatedly been hauled earlier than Congress, at one level even apologizing to dad and mom who say their youngsters died or had been harmed due to social media. But the businesses have nonetheless confronted few penalties or rules in the United States.
KGM’s case seeks unspecified financial damages. The final result may affect how greater than 1,000 comparable private harm circumstances against Meta, Snap, TikTok and YouTube are resolved.
Top executives from Meta, TikTok and YouTube are anticipated to take the witness stand in the course of the trial, which takes place in Los Angeles and is about to final a number of weeks.
In current years, TikTok, Meta, YouTube and Snap have rolled out security options and insurance policies, in addition to parental management instruments, that they are saying defend younger customers.
The 4 social media corporations are concerned in different circumstances this yr as nicely, together with some introduced by faculty districts and state attorneys normal. Losses may put the tech corporations on the hook for billions of {dollars} in damages and power them to change their platforms.
“For parents whose children have been exploited, groomed, or died because of big tech platforms, the next six weeks are the first step toward accountability after years of being ignored by these companies,” stated Sarah Gardner, CEO of the non-profit Heat Initiative, which advocates for little one security on-line. “These are the tobacco trials of our generation, and for the first time, families across the country will hear directly from big tech CEOs about how they intentionally designed their products to addict our kids.”
KGM’s lawsuit alleges that the social media giants deliberately designed their platforms to be addictive, regardless of realizing the dangers to younger individuals.
KGM, a California teen, began utilizing social media at age 10, regardless of her mother’s makes an attempt to use third social gathering software program to block entry to the platforms, in accordance to court docket paperwork. “Defendants design their products in a manner that enables children to evade parental consent,” the grievance states.
The “addictive design” of Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat and frequent notifications led her to use the platforms compulsively, the go well with alleges, which corresponded with a decline in her mental health.
Features that suggest different customers to join with on Snapchat and Instagram “facilitated and created connections between minor Plaintiff K.G.M. and complete strangers, including predatory adults and others she did not know in real life,” the grievance states. Instagram and TikTok additionally allegedly “targeted” KGM with “depressive” and “harmful social comparison and body image” content material.
On Instagram, KGM alleges she was bullied and sextorted — a rip-off the place a foul actor threatens to share specific photographs of an individual in the event that they don’t ship cash or extra photographs. It took two weeks and “K.G.M.’s friends and family spamming and asking other Instagram users to report the persons targeting” her for Meta to tackle the issue, in accordance to the grievance.
“Defendants’ knowing and deliberate product design, marketing, distribution, programming and operational decision and conduct caused serious emotional and mental harms to K.G.M. and her family,” the grievance states. “Those harms include, but are not limited to, dangerous dependency on their products, anxiety, depression, self-harm, and body dysmorphia.”
KGM’s is one among a number of bellwether circumstances in a bigger multi-district litigation consolidating round 1,500 private harm circumstances alleging comparable harms due to TikTok, YouTube, Meta and Snap.
In 2024, then-US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy called on Congress to mandate a tobacco-style warning label on social media platforms in gentle of the “mental health crisis” amongst younger individuals, one thing state attorneys general have additionally advocated for. And a Pew Research Center study revealed final yr indicated that almost half of US teenagers imagine social media has “mostly negative” results on individuals their age.
But tech leaders have for years rejected the concept that social media harms younger individuals’s mental health. They level to a lack of conclusive research on the topic and argue that their platforms present advantages reminiscent of leisure and connection to mates.
Tech giants have additionally repeatedly relied on Section 230, a federal legislation that shields them from legal responsibility over content material that their customers submit, as a protection against security claims. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl, who’s overseeing the KGM and associated circumstances, said last year that jurors ought to think about whether or not design options applied by the businesses, like endlessly scrolling feeds, have contributed to mental health harms moderately than content material alone.
Snap has previously said that Snapchat was “designed differently from traditional social media — it opens to the camera, not a feed, and has no public likes or social comparison metrics.”
Snapchat’s youth security measures embrace parental management instruments, message warnings desgined to stop sextortion and mechanisms for eradicating age-inappropriate content material.
Asked for remark, a Meta spokesperson pointed NCS to an internet site devoted to its response to the youth mental health lawsuits, the place the corporate claims the fits “misportray our company and the work we do every day to provide young people with safe, valuable experiences online.”
“We have listened to parents, researched the issues that matter most, and made real changes to protect teens online,” Meta states. “Despite the snippets of conversations or cherry-picked quotes that plaintiffs’ counsel may use to paint an intentionally misleading picture of the company, we’re proud of the progress we’ve made, we stand by our record of putting teen safety first, and we’ll keep making improvements.”
Meta’s teen security options embrace “teen accounts,” which launched in 2024 to present default privateness protections and content material limits for teen customers on Instagram. It additionally gives parental supervision instruments and makes use of AI to attempt to establish minor customers whatever the age they supply once they join Meta’s platforms.
In a press release to NCS, YouTube spokesperson José Castañeda stated the allegations within the youth mental health lawsuits are “simply not true.”
“Providing young people with a safer, healthier experience has always been core to our work. In collaboration with youth, mental health and parenting experts, we built services and policies to provide young people with age-appropriate experiences, and parents with robust controls,” he stated within the assertion.
YouTube’s youth security measures embrace restrictions on sure sorts of delicate content material, reminiscent of violent or sexually suggestive movies, in addition to AI identification of minor customers. It additionally presents parental management instruments and last week rolled out an choice for folks to restrict or block their children from scrolling by means of its short-form video feed, amongst different new choices.
TikTok didn’t reply to a request for touch upon this story.
The youth safety and parental control features TikTok has rolled out lately embrace including default privateness settings and disabling late-night notifications. Last yr, it launched a “guided meditation” characteristic purportedly aimed toward getting teenagers to in the reduction of on scrolling.
Despite these efforts, many dad and mom and advocates say social media platforms have nonetheless failed to defend younger customers. Soon, a jury may have an opportunity to resolve in the event that they agree.