Lawyers argue that Instagram and YouTube intentionally addicted and harmed teen in landmark social media trial


By Clare Duffy, Samantha Delouya, NCS

Los Angeles (NCS) — Lawyers for a now-20-year-old lady are arguing that addictive options harmed her psychological well being in opening statements in a landmark trial towards Meta and YouTube, the primary of tons of of comparable instances to go to trial.

The plaintiff — recognized by her first identify, Kaley, or her initials, KGM — and her mom accused the tech firms of intentionally creating addictive platforms that brought on her to develop anxiousness, physique dysmorphia and suicidal ideas. Lawyers for Meta and YouTube have indicated they are going to argue that a troublesome household life, not social media, was liable for her psychological well being challenges.

Speaking on Monday in entrance of a jury in state courtroom in Los Angeles, Kaley’s lawyer Mark Lanier known as social media apps like YouTube and Instagram “digital casinos,” saying the app’s “endless scroll feature” creates dopamine hits that can result in dependancy.

“This case is about two of the richest corporations who have engineered addiction in children’s brains,” Lanier mentioned in his opening assertion. “The swipe, for a child, like Kaley, this motion is a handle of a slot machine. But every time she swipes, it’s not for money, but for mental stimulation.”

Parents and security advocates, who for years have known as for extra on-line guardrails, say the trial is an important second of accountability. Executives together with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri and YouTube CEO Neal Mohan are anticipated to testify in the approaching weeks.

The end result of Kaley’s lawsuit might assist information how round 1,500 comparable lawsuits towards social media firms are resolved. Losses might put the tech corporations on the hook for billions of {dollars} in damages and power them to vary their platforms.

Kaley additionally sued Snap and TikTok. Both firms agreed to settle the case forward of the trial, though they continue to be defendants in different instances.

The tech giants have lengthy denied that their platforms hurt younger customers, and they’ve rolled out security options resembling parental management instruments, “take a break” reminders and content material restrictions.

A Meta spokesperson mentioned, “we strongly disagree with these allegations and are confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” A YouTube spokesperson told NCS the lawsuit’s claims are “simply not true” and that “providing young people with a safer, healthier experience has always been core to our work.”

Plaintiff claims platforms create addictive ‘loop’

In his opening assertion, Lanier introduced inside paperwork from Meta and YouTube that he mentioned confirmed the social media platforms’ objective to draw younger children and teenagers.

One decade-old inside technique doc from Meta mentioned that if the corporate wished to “win big with teens,” it should “bring them in as tweens.” Another inside doc Lanier confirmed from YouTube advised that the video streaming platform be used as a short-term digital babysitter whereas mother and father prepare dinner, clear or do laundry.

Lanier argued the apps use a number of ways to hook younger customers together with “infinite scroll and autoplay,” the “like” button, which Lanier equated to a “chemical hit” that teenagers on the lookout for validation from their friends develop to crave, and so-called magnificence filters that can alter a person’s face.

Kaley started utilizing YouTube on the age of 6 and Instagram on the age of 9, Lanier mentioned. YouTube lawyer Luis Li mentioned throughout jury choice that Kaley claims that, at some factors, she used YouTube for “six to seven hours a day.” Meta lawyer Paul Schmidt mentioned that, at occasions, she used Instagram “for several hours a day.”

That was regardless of Kaley’s mom’s makes an attempt to make use of third-party software program to dam entry to the platforms, based on her criticism.

Kaley additionally alleges that on Instagram she skilled bullying and sextortion, a rip-off the place a foul actor threatens to share specific pictures of an individual in the event that they don’t ship cash or extra pictures.

Kaley skilled a troublesome upbringing. Her mom divorced her abusive father when Kaley was 3 years outdated and raised three kids primarily as a single mother, Lanier mentioned throughout jury choice.

Jury choice additionally underscored how broadly the impacts of social media — each good and unhealthy — are felt amongst disparate teams of individuals. Potential jurors expressed a spread of opinions on social media throughout jury choice questioning, with some showing involved in regards to the firms’ impression on society, their kids and their older mother and father. Still, different potential jurors mentioned they believed mother and father have a duty to watch their kids’s social media use.

Members of the ultimate 18-person jury panel might be allowed to keep up their regular social media use all through the trial. But Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl, who’s overseeing the trial, has instructed them to not seek for or view any info associated to the case or to vary their settings to judge claims made throughout trial.

Tech giants have repeatedly relied on Section 230, a federal legislation that shields them from legal responsibility over content material that their customers put up, as a protection towards security claims. Kuhl said last year that jurors ought to have the possibility to think about whether or not design options applied by the businesses, like endlessly scrolling feeds, have contributed to psychological well being harms, fairly than content material alone.

On Monday, the jury was instructed to not maintain Meta and YouTube chargeable for permitting third-party content material, failing to take away third-party content material or recommending third-party content material.

Correction: A earlier model of this story incorrectly attributed the declare that Kaley as soon as watched YouTube for hours every day. YouTube lawyer Luis Li was repeating a declare made by Kaley.

This story has been up to date with extra developments.

The-NCS-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.