Los Angeles
The man accused of sparking the lethal Palisades Fire in Los Angeles was upset that he didn’t have plans for New Year’s Eve and ranted about being angry at the world earlier than the preliminary blaze was sparked, in line with court docket paperwork filed by prosecutors.
Jonathan Rinderknecht, 29, has pleaded not responsible to beginning what turned one of the most destructive wildfires in California historical past. It started January 7, 2025, in hillside neighborhoods of Pacific Palisades and Malibu and killed 12 individuals. Prosecutors say Rinderknecht began a hearth on January 1 that burned undetected deep in root techniques earlier than flaring again up every week later.
Rinderknecht’s trial is about to start June 8. His attorneys say he’s getting used as a scapegoat for the Los Angeles Fire Department’s failure to totally extinguish the earlier blaze.
An define of the prosecutors’ technique — with particulars about the defendant’s alleged mind-set on the evening earlier than the first fireplace started — seems in an April 29 pretrial memo filed by the US Attorney’s Office.
Witnesses reported that Rinderknecht had been driving erratically whereas on Uber routes round the Palisades on New Year’s Eve, mentioned prosecutors. His passengers described him as “angry, intense, driving erratically, and ranting about being ‘pissed off at the world,’” the memo mentioned.

According to court docket filings, Rinderknecht ranted to passengers about accused UnitedHealthcare CEO shooter Luigi Mangione, capitalism and vigilantism. In an interview with investigators on January 24, when requested why somebody may commit arson in the Palisades, Rinderknecht “responded that it would be out of resentment of the rich enjoying their money as ‘we’re basically being enslaved by them,’” and once more referenced Mangione’s alleged crime, the paperwork mentioned.
In addition, prosecutors mentioned Rinderknecht was distraught over a failed relationship and upset about thwarted plans for New Year’s Eve.
“My client maintains his innocence as he has from the beginning and we look forward to clearing his name at trial,” Rinderknecht’s legal professional Steve Haney mentioned in an e mail Sunday. “The offered motive that my client started a fire on NYs Eve because he did not have a date speaks for itself.”
Haney held a information convention in March to name for Rinderknecht’s launch from jail in mild of proof he mentioned exhibits he’s not answerable for the blaze. Haney pointed to a deposition in which a firefighter testified that he seen the floor was nonetheless smoldering from the fireplace on January 2 and alerted a supervisor that there have been scorching spots. That testimony was gathered as a part of a lawsuit filed by fireplace victims in opposition to the metropolis.
A battalion chief had testified that he walked the perimeter of the burn space 4 instances all through the day and ensured all scorching spots have been out.
Fire Department Chief Jaime Moore, who was appointed in October, has mentioned he’s involved about the variations in the firefighters’ testimonies and commissioned an unbiased report on how the January 1 fireplace was dealt with.
Haney has mentioned this proof was not obtainable to the protection when Rinderknecht was indicted.