The Italian diaspora continued the battle in opposition to the federal government’s restrictions on citizenship by descent this week, as three instances had been scrutinized by Italy’s supreme court.
On Tuesday, the Corte di Cassazione, Italy’s highest court, met to guage citizenship restrictions for descendants of Italian residents born overseas that had been imposed by the federal government in October 2024.
The so-called ‘minor issue,’ launched through a authorities round, preceded the controversial March 2025 law change which reduce citizenship by descent to 2 generations and successfully banned twin citizenship for Italians overseas.
It stipulated that if a dad or mum of an Italian youngster born overseas naturalized whereas their youngsters had been nonetheless underage, that may “cut” the road of descent — until it will in any other case render the kid stateless.
The rule instantly disqualified Italo-descendants in international locations such because the US, that grant citizenship to these born within the nationwide territory. The sudden implementation, with no provision made for these whose citizenship requests had been already in progress, led to complicated conditions for those who had already moved to Italy.
Now, the United Sections civil panel of the Corte di Cassazione, has begun an analysis of whether or not the federal government’s coverage change was authorized. While the listening to was unrelated to the sweeping restrictions, attorneys hope a ruling on the “minor issue” might open the door for challenges to the 2025 regulation.
The Cassazione judges examined three instances of citizenship by descent which had been rejected at preliminary trial and subsequent attraction.
These concerned two American households who traced their ancestry again three and 4 generations respectively. The third case was a Venezuelan whose Italian mom had naturalized when he was 10 years outdated. The Venezuelan plaintiff’s brother had already been granted citizenship by descent earlier than the “minor issue” hit, resulting in a discrepancy within the authorized standing between siblings.
The Procuratore Generale — a put up which advises the Cassazione judges — additionally gave her authorized interpretation, which was in favor of the plaintiffs, in opposition to the federal government restrictions.
Although the instances heard preceded the 2025 regulation change, attorneys for the plaintiffs had been hopeful that the Procuratore Generale’s authorized analysis — which emphasised that citizenship can’t be misplaced involuntarily — might bode nicely for future challenges to the March 2025 regulation, which stripped thousands and thousands of the precise to recognition.
“It was important that she said that citizenship can only be lost by a voluntary act,” mentioned Monica Restanio, lawyer for the Venezuelan household.
The lawyer for the American plaintiffs, Marco Mellone, explicitly requested the court to rule on whether or not citizenship is a everlasting proper acquired at beginning, of their judgment. Should they accomplish that, that may give an avenue for the decrease courts to ignore the 2025 citizenship restrictions.
Speaking after the listening to, Mellone mentioned he was “absolutely confident” that the court would rule the “minor issue” unlawful, primarily based on earlier case regulation.
The Cassazione has intervened in citizenship regulation simply twice within the twenty first century, he added. Each time, it retroactively re-established citizenship for individuals who had misplaced it involuntarily.

If the Cassazione guidelines in favor of the plaintiffs on the grounds that citizenship is acquired at beginning, it might open the door for a judicial dismantling of Italy’s controversial citizenship regulation, which was launched by emergency decree on March 28, 2025.
Regional judges have already referred Law 74/2025, as it’s recognized, to the Constitutional Court, which guidelines on perceived infringements of the Italian Constitution. In the primary of 4 hearings, held in March, the court dominated in favor of the federal government, although it has but to difficulty the authorized reasoning for doing so. The subsequent three challenges can be heard on June 9. Mellone mentioned he’s “not so confident” about that listening to.
If the 2 high courts difficulty conflicting rulings, these looking for citizenship could possibly be compelled to sue the federal government for recognition somewhat than going the standard route of making use of by means of consulates.
Meanwhile, these within the diaspora who hope to regain the precise to citizenship had been on tenterhooks for the decision. “We’re holding our breath,” mentioned Jacqueline Matwick, whose household moved to Italy and was within the means of requesting citizenship when the ‘minor issue’ disqualified them. “I am really hoping the interpretation gets reversed — both for people with pending applications and for people like us who made irreversible life changes based on the old legal interpretation.”
Karen Bonadio, a third-generation Italian-American, flew from San Diego to Rome to attend the listening to, sporting a photograph of her as a baby along with her great-grandfather, who had moved to New York State from Basilicata in southern Italy. Bonadio had deliberate to maneuver to Italy as soon as she had her citizenship acknowledged, however is now barred by the brand new laws. “I came because it means so much to me,” she mentioned.

At the identical time, as the federal government slammed the door on the diaspora, Italy’s beginning price in 2025 dropped to a brand new low, in response to figures launched on March 31 by ISTAT, the nationwide statistics institute. The common variety of youngsters per lady in Italy is now 1.14, down from 1.18 in 2024, whereas in Sardinia, the fertility price has remained under one youngster per lady for the final six years. The nation now has the bottom variety of “young people” within the European Union and the very best variety of over-65s, in response to ISTAT, which cited Italy’s “long-standing decline in fertility.” One in eight 2025 births had been to international nationals.