President Donald Trump claimed with out proof that the large revisions to the newest jobs report constituted a “scam,” accusing one of the prime overseers of authorities statistics of cooking the books in a vendetta towards his presidency.
“In my opinion, today’s Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,” Trump stated in a message on Truth Social Friday.
As a consequence, he fired Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Trump, in a message posted to Truth Social Sunday, incorrectly claimed McEntarfer “had the biggest miscalculations in over 50 years.” In reality, the revisions the BLS made to latest jobs experiences have been neither historic nor proof of corruption.
Established in 1884, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is an independently operated physique inside the US Department of Labor. The Labor Secretary, a member of the president’s cupboard, has oversight of the BLS, however it’s run by a Senate-appointed commissioner.
The BLS collects data on a quantity of key financial considerations and produces vital experiences regularly. Those embody data on costs, inflation, productiveness, spending, pay, office accidents, employment and unemployment.
More than 2,000 folks work for the BLS, together with a quantity of skilled economists and survey takers who often contact companies and staff. The economists analyze the data and produce experiences for the public and the authorities.

The BLS collects jobs data in two separate surveys. The first is completed partly with old style door knocking. Survey takers go residence to residence all through the nation asking folks for his or her employment standing and their demographic info.
A second survey, identified as the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey, is collected from 1000’s of companies and authorities businesses utilizing a spread of strategies: through phone, web surveys, and – for giant firms – by means of an automatic data switch. By regulation, participation in the CES survey is voluntary, however state legal guidelines in New Mexico, Oregon and South Carolina require companies to supply data for the survey. A regulation in Puerto Rico additionally requires the territory’s companies to submit data to the BLS.
CES survey respondents submit month-to-month employment, hours, and earnings data for all paid employees to the BLS from their payroll data. The data is collected for the pay interval that features the twelfth of the month.
BLS economists first edit the data to detect processing and reporting errors. If errors are detected, BLS staff contact the enterprise for clarification.
Then, BLS workers put together the data for a month-to-month report by estimating America’s employment, hours labored and earnings. To extrapolate the data for the total nation, BLS economists add in some educated guesswork, based mostly on seasonal hiring developments. The BLS additionally smooths out the data with calculations identified as seasonal changes to keep away from big spikes and dips in data every month.
The BLS additionally protects the uncooked data and its estimates by processing them by means of statistical exams, so people can’t acquire entry to any explicit employer’s data.
Every month, usually on the first Friday, the BLS produces its Employment Situation Summary, identified colloquially as the month-to-month US jobs report.
The report is generated from the two surveys: The family survey offers demographic data and the unemployment charge. The enterprise survey offers data on pay, hours labored, and the quantity of jobs the US economic system added or subtracted.
In addition to that exact month’s jobs info, the report additionally revises up or down the earlier two months’ jobs totals.

The BLS considers its preliminary jobs numbers to be preliminary once they’re first printed, as a result of some respondents fail to report their payroll data by the BLS’ deadline. Low survey responses could make the report more difficult to estimate. But the BLS continues to gather the payroll data as it’s reported, and it revises the data accordingly.
The data are additionally revised as a result of of the seasonal changes. If the extra full data is available in effectively above or under the preliminary data, revisions might be exacerbated by the BLS’ seasonal changes, which typically must be recalculated.
The data is revised a number of occasions: in every of the two months following the preliminary report, and then a preliminary annual revision in August and a last annual revision in February.
The July report, issued Friday, included revisions for May and June that have been traditionally giant, however they have been not unprecedented.
May’s jobs complete was revised decrease to 19,000, down from an preliminary estimate of 139,000 – a complete revision of 120,000 jobs. For the June jobs complete, the BLS on Friday stated the US economic system added simply 14,000 jobs, down from a preliminary estimate of 147,000 – a revision of 133,000 jobs.
The BLS tracks each month’s revisions relationship again to 1979, however the BLS launched a brand new probability-based pattern design for revisions in 2003. Between 1979 and 2003, the common month-to-month revision was 61,000 jobs. Since 2003, the common month-to-month revision is just a barely extra correct 51,000 jobs.
But you don’t have to look up to now again to search out bigger revisions than the ones the BLS reported over May and June. In 2020 and 2021, jobs numbers have been throughout the map as a result of of the pandemic: Revisions in 4 months throughout these years have been greater than the revisions from final month’s report – together with the largest-ever 679,000-job revision in March 2020, attributed to significantly poor survey responses throughout a nationwide lockdown.
There have been greater revisions exterior of the pandemic, too, together with a 143,000-job revision in January 2009.
Trump has complained a few preliminary annual revision that was issued in August 2024, that confirmed the US economic system had added 818,000 fewer jobs over the previous 12 months than beforehand reported. Trump in a Truth Social post on Friday incorrectly known as that revision a “record”: A 902,000-job revision in 2009 was larger. And the last 2024 revision, issued in February, confirmed that the 2024 data was overestimated by 589,000 jobs. The BLS stated the distinction between the preliminary and last annual revisions was because of info obtained in US tax returns.
Trump additionally accurately noted on Friday the the BLS revised decrease preliminary jobs totals in August and September 2024 by a mixed 112,000 positions earlier than final 12 months’s presidential election. But that revision was not out of the atypical – a number of revisions have been bigger earlier in the 12 months and in earlier years. And October’s jobs numbers, reported simply days earlier than the election, constituted the worst month for jobs since the pandemic.
Many companies and authorities organizations depend on the BLS data for his or her decision-making about funding, pay and hiring choices. The Federal Reserve, particularly, depends on the BLS data to assist information its financial coverage and rate-setting.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell final week stated the total economic system depends on robust data.
“Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but also helps the private sector,” Powell stated at a press convention final week. “It’s very hard to accurately capture in real time the output of a $20-plus trillion economy, and the United States has been a leader in that for 100 years, and we really need to continue that, in my view.”
In June, Powell instructed Congress he was involved about the “trajectory” of weaker data.
In addition to the Fed and the personal sector, the BLS notes its survey data is utilized by the National Bureau of Economic Research to find out whether or not or not the economic system is in a recession. It’s utilized by the Conference Board to supply financial indexes that assist firms higher perceive the present enterprise cycle. And it helps the BLS produce a number of different experiences about jobs and the economic system all through the 12 months.
Alternatives to the BLS data have confirmed restricted. Payroll processing firm ADP produces a month-to-month personal payrolls report that fails to seize authorities hiring and is notoriously out of sync with the BLS report. Its inconsistencies have led economists to largely ignore the report.
Other surveys, such as a layoffs report from outsourcing and placement providers agency Challenger, Gray and Christmas, is typically instructive however far much less sturdy than the BLS report.
The BLS report has its challenges too. For instance, the family survey that features the month-to-month unemployment charge and demographic data is taken into account quite risky as a result of of its smaller pattern measurement and declining response charges. But the enterprise and authorities employment survey is broadly thought-about by economists to be the gold commonplace.
“BLS is the finest statistical agency in the entire world, it’s numbers are trusted all over the world,” former Commissioner for the Bureau of Labor Statistics William Beach instructed Kasie Hunt on NCS’s “State of the Union” Sunday.
“I do believe, though, that the president’s attack on the commissioner and on the bureau is undermining that infrastructure, could undermine that trust over the long term,” he added.