Brisbane, Australia
—
For a long time, the Grimmer household by no means spoke about Cheryl.
“We weren’t allowed to mention her name,” mentioned Paul Grimmer, who was simply 4 years outdated when his little sister vanished.
Cheryl’s disappearance in 1970 throughout a household outing to an Australian seashore triggered a main search, appeals for witnesses, and headlines half a world away in Britain, from the place they’d lately moved. Her physique has by no means been discovered.
With no solutions, her dad and mom’ intense grief settled into silence, and her three brothers grew up not understanding what occurred to their 3-year-old sister.
In the final decade, the household has found stunning particulars about Cheryl’s disappearance – together with that a 17-year-old confessed to killing her 15 months after she went lacking however wasn’t charged.
Police reinvestigating the chilly case introduced him in for questioning in 2017 and charged him with homicide, however the case was discontinued, and he was once more freed.
Under Australian law, the man’s title can’t be printed, as a result of he was a minor at the time of the alleged crime.
Publicly, he’s often called Mercury, the alias police gave him after they recognized him as the writer of the confession.
He maintains his innocence, however Cheryl’s household believes he killed their sister – they usually need justice.
“We want him to come forward and either plead guilty, or explain to us, why did he confess?” Paul Grimmer mentioned.
In current months, a native lawmaker has come to their support, utilizing parliamentary privilege to disclose Mercury’s actual title, his confession, and the alias he’s used for years.
NCS phoned the man named in Parliament. He confirmed his title, however when requested about Cheryl Grimmer, he mentioned he “didn’t want to talk,” and hung up.

On a sizzling January day in 1970, Carole Grimmer took her 4 younger youngsters to Fairy Meadow Beach in Wollongong, a coastal metropolis simply over an hour’s drive south of Sydney.
(*55*)
Carole took the youngsters for a swim, however after lunch, a sturdy southerly wind swept in, so she referred to as time and shortly began packing up their belongings.
Her eldest son, Ricki, guided his youthful siblings – Stephen, Paul and Cheryl – to the bathe block to clean off the salt and sand. Ricki was 7, nearly 8, and form of in cost, although his playful little sister didn’t suppose so.
In a scene he’s replayed numerous occasions in his head, Ricki remembers Cheryl teasing him from inside the ladies’s bathe block, as he stood in the doorway, imploring her to come back out.
She laughed as he told her it was time to return to their mother, and in the finish, he took his brothers again to the seashore, so their mom might take care of her.
But after they went again to the bathe block, Cheryl was gone.
What ought to’ve been a enjoyable day trip has was a lifelong nightmare for the brothers – now adults – who query each determination of their younger lives at the time, and people made in subsequent years by police, detectives, and attorneys.
Most of all, they query why a probability to see Mercury face justice in 2019 was thrown out by a decide – a determination that has led to their inconsolable anger and grief.
That day at the seashore, Carole Grimmer alerted lifeguards that Cheryl was lacking simply after 2 p.m., and when nobody might discover her, they phoned police.
Within hours, based on information stories, round 1,000 folks had been combing thick scrub and shallow creeks for the small woman. “Height 3 feet 9 inches, small build, blonde short hair cut square around the back of the head, full fringe in front, fair complexion, blue eyes,” learn the police description.
Cheryl was final seen carrying a royal blue swimsuit. The pores and skin on her nostril was mentioned to have been peeling from the solar.

Three days later newspaper articles reported the “first real lead.” Two boys had seen a “swarthy, small man in a floppy hat” decide up a woman matching Cheryl’s description and carry her away.
The following day, a ransom be aware was despatched to police demanding 10,000 Australian {dollars} for Cheryl’s protected return – or one other youngster can be kidnapped. Police mentioned handwriting evaluation revealed it was most certainly written by a teenager. They suspected it was a hoax.
Cheryl wasn’t discovered. The search was scaled down, and her bereft dad and mom, Carole and Vince, went dwelling to their three boys.
More than a yr later, a teenager had a story to inform police.
Mercury confessed that he’d been at Fairy Meadow Beach on the morning Cheryl disappeared and noticed a group of youngsters close to the bathe block.
The teenager mentioned he lined the woman’s mouth, tied her fingers with shoelaces, took her to a secluded space, and when she began screaming, put his fingers on her throat.
He mentioned he lined Cheryl’s physique with bushes, leaves and filth, and thought of taking her swimsuit dwelling.
He mentioned he threw her towel in a drain.
Days after making the confession, the teenager took police to the place he mentioned he left Cheryl’s physique. He told them he’d seen a cattle grid and a tubular fence – however when police made inquiries to corroborate his claims, they couldn’t match them.
Mercury was already recognized to police as a troubled youth who’d continuously absconded from dwelling and detention facilities. A psychological evaluation in the weeks after he confessed discovered that his habits was “attention-seeking” and “highly influenced by his previous experiences under drug addiction,” based on courtroom paperwork.
Authorities opted to not cost him over Cheryl’s disappearance, and the case remained open.
More than 40 years after Cheryl’s disappearance, no hint of her had been discovered. Persons of curiosity had been interviewed, however no credible suspects had emerged, and the lacking individuals chilly case was referred to the coroner for an inquest.
So little was mentioned about the confession throughout the 2011 inquest hearings, that Carole Grimmer didn’t understand that somebody had claimed duty for killing her toddler.
“She was old and frail at the time and quite ill… I don’t think it totally computed with her, because it was rushed over so fast,” her son Ricki Nash mentioned. Cheryl’s father had died years earlier, not understanding that somebody had confessed.
A New South Wales Police investigator told the inquest a confession existed, however they hadn’t been capable of finding its writer, and the data they’d instructed inconsistencies remained. The coroner in the end discovered that Cheryl had died the similar day she was kidnapped however recorded an open discovering on the “manner and cause” of loss of life.
The case was referred to the unsolved murder squad and in 2016 two NSW detectives – Detective Sergeant Damian Loone and Senior Constable Frank Sanvitale – began sifting by reams of typed pages and handwritten notes sure into books.
Though nicely organized, none of the materials had been digitized. There had been so many paperwork, they needed to break up up the work.
It was Loone who rediscovered the confession.
“It was explosive… I was at a loss as to why he hadn’t been charged,” Loone told NCS.
The two detectives then tried to show Mercury had been mendacity to police, however their inquiries, which stretched to the United Kingdom, as a substitute resulted in them concluding “that everything that he had said was the truth,” mentioned Loone, who has since retired.
That “bloke” was Peter Goodyear, now deceased.
His spouse Mavis Goodyear corroborated the 1971 confession, based on Loone, telling the detectives that she knew her late husband had been exterior the altering room as a result of she might odor the smoke from his Camel cigarettes wafting by the Besser block wall.
In his confession, the teenager additionally told police he noticed the youngsters drink water from a faucet.
That boy was Cheryl’s brother Ricki, who had told police at the time that he remembered lifting Cheryl as much as assist her drink from the fountain. He repeated the similar story to investigators in 2016.
While police in 1971 mentioned they couldn’t discover the cattle grid Mercury described in his confession, detectives Loone and Sanvitale recognized a witness who might testify that it was there.
“We found the son of the owner of that property who actually had built that cattle grid, and he said it was there in 1970,” Loone mentioned.
In 2011, investigators told the coroner they couldn’t discover Mercury. Loone mentioned it took “five minutes” to trace him down.
During a 2017 police interview, Mercury was proven the confession and agreed that his signature was on the backside of all “eight pages of that record of interview,” mentioned Loone.
But when it got here time to ask the “hard questions,” Loone mentioned Mercury “categorically denied that he had anything to do with taking Cheryl.”
Mercury additionally denied that he’d ever been to Fairy Meadow Beach, regardless of having accompanied officers to the seashore a few days after confessing.
“So, he was lying,” Loone told NCS.
In 2017, Mercury was extradited throughout state borders the place he spent two years in jail awaiting trial for homicide. He pleaded not responsible, then throughout a pre-trial listening to in 2019, the entire case fell aside.
The impending trial in what had been a chilly case generated main information protection in Australia, and media crews jostled to movie Mercury, a bigger man with graying hair, as he arrived at courtroom.
Duty attorneys argued that his confession was inadmissible due to a 1987 law that acknowledged an grownup must be current throughout the questioning of a youngster.
NSW Supreme Court decide Robert Hulme then dominated that the law utilized retrospectively, and with out the confession to rely on, the director of public prosecutions dropped the cost.
It left Loone grappling with a troubling query: “How do I tell the family of a legal loophole that (meant) this person – who I believe was responsible for (Cheryl’s) abduction and subsequent murder – was to walk free from court that afternoon?”
The senior detective phoned the nearest police station asking for additional officers to be assigned to the courthouse to guard Mercury from the household’s inevitable fury when he was allowed to stroll free.
“As soon as it was announced that he was getting off. He just looked at me and smirked,” mentioned Paul Grimmer, whose spouse Linda needed to cease him from lunging at the man in the dock.
By prior association, Mercury slipped out by a aspect door to return to his life.
Ricki Nash was so livid that Loone took out a restraining order on behalf of Mercury to maintain him protected. And when Nash was served the papers advising him to steer clear of sure places, he realized Mercury had been residing in the similar Melbourne suburb as him for years.
Nash told NCS he needed to go away Australia to place a protected distance between him and the man who he says ruined his household’s life.
“If I didn’t move to the Philippines, he’d be dead now, and I’d be in a cell,” mentioned Nash, on the telephone from Manila.
Cheryl Grimmer chilly case timeline
- Jan. 1970: Cheryl Grimmer disappears from Fairy Meadow Beach in New South Wales, Australia.
- April 1971: A 17-year-old boy “Mercury” provides a detailed confession to abducting and killing the 3-year-old woman. He was not charged.
- May 2011: A coroner concludes Cheryl Grimmer is useless; delivers an open discovering on the method and trigger.
- 2016: NSW detectives discover the 1971 confession and search to determine “Mercury.”
- March 2017: “Mercury,” then 63 years outdated, is arrested and extradited to NSW to face one rely of homicide.
- Feb. 2019: At a pre-trial listening to, Justice Robert Hulme guidelines that the confession is inadmissible; “Mercury” is freed.
- Jan. 2020: NSW Police provide a 1 million Australian greenback reward for data resulting in a conviction.
- Oct. 2025: NSW lawmaker Jeremy Buckingham reveals “Mercury’s” actual title and confession below parliamentary privilege.
- Feb. 2026: Buckingham returns to NSW parliament to disclose the different title “Mercury” has been utilizing for years.
Now 71, Mercury lives in regional Victoria, in a four-bedroom home on a neat suburban road along with his spouse, who he married not lengthy earlier than his arrest. Sources say she stood by him all through the two-year watch for trial.
Now that his varied names are all on public report, the Grimmer household says it shouldn’t take lengthy for folks to seek out out the untried, alleged youngster killer resides of their suburb.
The brothers say it didn’t want to come back to this. Last October, they gave Mercury a midnight deadline to fulfill them to elucidate his confession.
When he didn’t reply, New South Wales lawmaker Jeremy Buckingham publicly named him for the first time by studying aloud the 1971 confession in state parliament.
Paul Grimmer makes a assertion in October 2025
Mercury maintained his silence.
“You are a coward, a slug and a murderer, and you should do the right thing now and hand yourself in,” Buckingham mentioned, addressing Mercury below the safety of parliamentary privilege once more earlier this month.
Buckingham told NCS his intention in naming Mercury was to not set off vigilante motion however a response from lawmakers to make it potential for the confession to be submitted as proof – even when that entails a law change.
The brothers say they don’t need Mercury to come back to any hurt and are begging authorities to take him again to courtroom, so the correct course of may be adopted.
Loone, the retired detective, would love a coroner to name a second inquest, given Mercury’s id was not recognized throughout the 2011 proceedings, and make a new advice that the case go to trial.
But a coroner can’t do that unilaterally, the NSW Coroner’s Court told NCS –– an inquest must be requested by police or a celebration with new proof or compelled by the Supreme Court or the lawyer common.
NSW Attorney General Michael Daley mentioned in a assertion that, whereas he empathized with the household’s “pain and suffering,” the case had been topic to cautious and detailed consideration by the state’s public prosecutions workplace and Supreme Court.
Tim Roberts, president of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties, mentioned the case highlights the issues with creating retrospective legal guidelines – on this case, one to guard youngsters who’re being grilled by police.
“If there’s a lesson to be learned here, it’s that, despite the best intentions, we should not be passing retrospective laws, because even though it seems uncomplicated, it can produce unintended results that undermine justice in some situations,” he mentioned.
Then final week got here a small glimmer of hope.
The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions wrote to the household providing to overview the determination to drop the fees – utilizing new proof if any is obtained by the NSW Police.
“Detectives remain committed to reviewing and assessing any new evidence or witness information that may emerge,” NSW Police told NCS in a assertion.
The household had already began their very own investigation in the hope that any proof they discovered could possibly be used to justify recent fees.
In October, canines specifically skilled in human stays detection scanned the space the place Mercury had confessed to leaving Cheryl’s physique.
The space was narrowed down utilizing aerial mapping and landmarks talked about in the confession – a cattle grid, farm gate and bushes nonetheless standing after greater than 50 years.
“It’s not only human bones that we’re looking for, but we’re also looking for the potential of human remains held in the soil itself,” mentioned Chris D’Arcy from Search Dogs Sydney.

Two canines confirmed a explicit curiosity in a single website, so soil samples had been despatched to the University of Technology Sydney, the place Dr. Alicia Haines, a senior lecturer inside the Centre for Forensic Science, is testing them for indicators of human DNA.
Haines told NCS that after so many years, it’s unlikely that any hint will likely be discovered, however she mentioned that, if her evaluation helps the household to reply no less than one query, “It’s worth doing.” The household is protecting the fundamental price of testing supplies, however the time spent analyzing the soil has been supplied in form.
With few agency solutions about the ultimate moments of Cheryl’s life, her brothers maintain turning again to the man who mentioned he killed her.
They know time will not be on their aspect.
Memories are fading, potential witnesses are dying and the essential individual of curiosity is now in his 70s.
“Time is running out. But… I want to hear what he has to say,” mentioned Nash.
Mercury’s silence in the face of the household’s ache is “excruciating,” he mentioned.
“It’s just ripping us apart.”
And if Mercury didn’t do it, the query stays – what occurred to Cheryl?

