Fort Stewart shooting: How US military bases guard against internal threats


Fort Stewart in Georgia homes the US Army’s vaunted third Infantry Division, a premier preventing drive roughly 20,000 troopers robust.

It was on the headquarters of the division’s 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, described by the Army as its “most lethal and fit” armored brigade fight unit — formidably outfitted with tanks and fashionable artillery techniques — the place 5 troopers had been wounded Wednesday when authorities mentioned a 28-year-old active-duty sergeant pulled out a private weapon and opened hearth.

The newest capturing at a US military fortress lengthy accustomed to guarding against exterior threats demonstrates that no quantity of bodily safety can completely shield troopers when the menace comes from inside, in keeping with specialists.

“I just don’t think there’s any way to ever prepare for every single possible insider threat,” mentioned Robert Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and associate in a legislation agency representing present and former service members.

Still, the violence has renewed issues in regards to the security of American service members at services the place they dwell, prepare and work. And, when coupled with other high-profile shootings at military bases lately, the rarity of such incidents presents little solace to the victims and households of troopers harm or killed by different service members.

For Nichole Hillman — whose husband Nathan, an Army sergeant with the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, was shot and killed by another soldier at Fort Stewart in 2022 — the newest capturing was “terrifying and completely heartbreaking.” Nathan Hillman and the alleged gunman each served within the 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, nicknamed the Spartan Brigade.

“I was sick over it, as it brought back so much pain and fear, and had me reliving one of the absolute worst days of my life,” she informed NCS through Facebook Messenger.

“Our soldiers shouldn’t have to fear going to work. They should be able to know 100% for a fact they are safe.”

Sgt. Quornelius Radford, a suspect in the shooting of five soldiers at Fort Stewart, is escorted by military police into a booking room at the Liberty County Jail in Hinesville, Georgia, on Wednesday. (AP Photo/Lewis M. Levine)

The military has mandated lively shooter and “insider threat” coaching following a collection of lethal mass shootings at American bases, together with one in 2009 at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, through which 13 folks and an unborn youngster had been killed and greater than 30 others wounded.

At Fort Stewart on Wednesday, authorities mentioned, unarmed troopers ran towards the sound of gunshots and tackled the suspect, subduing him and halting a capturing Army Secretary Dan Driscoll mentioned might have been far more extreme had been it not for his or her bravery.

“Under duress and fire, they ran into battle to the sound of the gunfire, took down the assailant, and then took care of their comrades. And that made all the difference,” Driscoll mentioned Thursday at Fort Stewart, the place he awarded six troopers the Meritorious Service Medal for his or her actions.

“We commit to you that anything we discover during the investigation that can make this base and other bases like it safer, we will act on as quickly as possible,” Driscoll added.

“We are constantly looking at our security protocols at all of our bases … We absolutely will want to learn from this investigation. We do not want something like this to ever happen again at an Army base.”

Last yr, Fort Stewart’s military police simulated an lively shooter and hostage rescue train. The drills have been routine at US military bases for years and embrace subjects comparable to what to do earlier than, throughout and after an lively shooter incident. On Wednesday, Fort Stewart was briefly placed on lockdown.

“The fact that the base was put on lockdown so quickly shows that the installation had practiced this kind of an event, and they knew what procedures they needed to implement in order to minimize the impact of this active shooter incident,” mentioned Cedric Leighton, a retired Air Force colonel and NCS military analyst. “The response clearly had been practiced.”

The motive for the capturing was not recognized. A legislation enforcement official briefed on the case informed NCS the shooter, recognized as Quornelius Samentrio Radford, had a disagreement with one of many victims on Tuesday. He adopted that coworker to a upkeep space and shot him within the chest earlier than capturing 4 others on Wednesday. It’s unclear what the disagreement was about.

Law enforcement responded at 10:56 a.m. ET, in keeping with a Facebook submit from Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield. Less than 10 minutes later, the bottom was locked down. Emergency personnel had been despatched to deal with the victims at 11:09 a.m., the submit mentioned.

The unarmed troopers who intervened “prevented further casualties” by tackling Radford, permitting police to arrest him, mentioned Brig. Gen. John Lubas, Fort Stewart’s senior commander.

The troopers dealt with the scene like a “battle drill,” in keeping with Lt. Col. Mike Sanford, the commander of the 703rd Brigade Support Battalion.

Active shooter training instructs troopers on what to do earlier than, throughout, and after shootings — together with serving to others evacuate, not transferring the wounded, creating barricades and, as a final resort, utilizing “whatever means possible to overpower the subject to save further lives.”

Military bases have strict regulations on the possession and storage of non-public weapons.

“I’m not sure by allowing soldiers to carry their personal firearms with them in a professional capacity while they’re doing their jobs prevents what happened at Fort Stewart,” Capovilla mentioned.

“Our military personnel that live and work on military installations, by and large, I would consider them to be in highly secure and safe facilities.”

Army Secretary Dan Driscoll awarded medals to soldiers who helped halt Wednesday's shooting by subduing the suspect at Fort Stewart.

The November 5, 2009, capturing at Fort Hood by an Army psychiatrist with radical Islamist beliefs pressured the military to guage “not just the tactical-level response that happened at Fort Hood specifically, but also the processes and systems and policies that were in place for the Department of Defense as a whole that could have led to what happened,” Mary “Chris” Frels, deputy provost marshal for US Army North mentioned one yr after the capturing.

After Fort Hood, Frels mentioned, the military reevaluated its danger evaluation course of to contemplate each internal and exterior threats.

An enormous a part of the coaching entails teaching service members to identify behaviors in colleagues who could also be spiraling — which may very well be early warning indicators of a possible “insider threat.” The danger indicators vary from declining efficiency ranking to demotions, from threats of violence to suicidal ideation to prison habits.

Authorities this week wouldn’t speculate about Radford’s motives. He had not deployed to a fight zone and had no recognized behavioral incidents on his military file, Lubas mentioned.

The basic acknowledged Radford was arrested on suspicion of driving underneath the affect in May. Radford’s chain of command was unaware of the arrest previous to Wednesday’s capturing, Lubas mentioned.

The suspect’s father, Eddie Radford, informed The New York Times he had not seen uncommon habits by his son not too long ago. He didn’t know what may need motivated the capturing, however mentioned his son had complained about racism at Fort Stewart and had been in search of a switch, in keeping with the Times, which didn’t cite any specifics. NCS has reached out to Eddie Radford for extra info.

Fort Stewart declined to touch upon the racism allegation and whether or not Radford had requested a switch. “The circumstances that led to the events today are currently under investigation,” a spokesperson for the third Infantry Division informed NCS.

Authorities are uncertain how Radford acquired his private firearm by means of the bottom’s excessive safety earlier than finishing up the capturing, though personnel with licensed entry are usually not searched en masse until an set up has increased its security posture in response to potential threats. Carrying private firearms on base is often prohibited.

“From a company, battalion, or brigade commander’s perspective, I think it would be very hard to enforce good order and discipline if the soldiers were allowed to carry their personal weapons with them at all times,” Capovilla mentioned.

Radford had texted his family not less than 20 minutes earlier than he began shooting, his uncle, Joe Mitchell, informed NCS affiliate WTLV: “I just want y’all to know that I love y’all, and I tried my hardest to be the best I could be.”

Radford’s military profession started in 2018. Around the identical time, he began being bullied over his stutter, two former coworkers informed NBC. Sneh Patel, an legal professional who represented Radford throughout his DUI case, additionally confirmed to NCS that Radford “has a stuttering condition,” though he wouldn’t disclose far more because of client-attorney privilege, he mentioned.

“He got bullied a lot,” Sgt. Cameron Barrett, who turned mates with Radford throughout an Army coaching program, informed NBC. “It was very bad to the point where he could barely talk.”

In a video coaching course by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, which handles safety and danger administration throughout the Defense Department workforce, the narrator warns: “It is up to all of us to be aware of potential signs and report what we see. You are your organization’s first line of defense against someone who could do harm.”





Sources