A model of this story appeared in NCS’s What Matters publication. To get it in your inbox, join free here.
The pendulum of energy is swinging increasingly continuously within the United States.
In the 100 years between 1900 and 2000, management of the House, Senate or White House modified fingers in Washington with relative infrequency and by no means in additional than two elections in a row.
In the 25 years since 2000, the social gathering controlling the White House and/or at the least one chamber of Congress modified in all however two US elections.
It is an unprecedented interval of political turnover by which voters have pulled the lever for some sort of change – both choosing a president from a new social gathering or flipping the bulk within the House or Senate – almost each time they’re given the prospect in recent times.
At least one lever of energy has flipped between Republicans and Democrats in Washington in every of the final six elections, probably the most consecutive energy adjustments going again to earlier than the Civil War.
In 5 of the final seven presidential elections, voters opted for a president from the opposite social gathering. In the identical time interval, voters elected a new Senate majority 5 occasions and picked a new House majority 4 occasions.
The solely elections this century by which the House, Senate and White House all remained beneath management of the identical social gathering have been the one two profitable presidential reelection campaigns, for George W. Bush in 2004 and Barack Obama in 2012. Those are additionally the one occasions the identical social gathering held on to the White House this century.
Today’s politicians have come to anticipate frequent shifts in energy.
The final 4 presidents have all assumed workplace with unified management of Washington and labored as rapidly as attainable to take advantage of it. Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Joe Biden and Trump once more in his second time period all utilized reconciliation to get across the roadblock of the filibuster within the Senate and go some form of sweeping agenda merchandise with out assist from the opposite social gathering.
For Obama, it was the Affordable Care Act. For Trump, it was tax cuts in his first time period; in his second, it was a sweeping tax minimize and agenda invoice that pared again social security web spending. For Biden, it was the Inflation Reduction Act, which had a lot extra to do with clear vitality and local weather change than it did with lowering inflation.
We’ll see if Trump breaks this mould — one thing he is desperately trying to do by redrawing congressional maps in quest of extra Republican seats. But every of these different three administrations instantly misplaced the House.
President George W. Bush defied political gravity and picked up House seats after his first two years in workplace, however that had a lot to do along with his recognition after the 9/11 terror assaults.
Bush misplaced the House 4 years later, after his reelection, when the general public had turned on the wars.
Bill Clinton misplaced the House in his first midterm, the 1994 Republican revolution. It was the primary time Republicans had gained management of the House for the reason that Nineteen Fifties. They’ve misplaced and regained the House twice within the years since.
Clinton picked up seats within the 1998 midterm, when the nation turned towards Republican efforts to question him.
Sarah Binder, a senior fellow in governance research on the Brookings Institution, stated these elections change the steadiness of energy, however a higher technique to view them is as “nationalized elections.”
Voters are much less continuously splitting their tickets between a senator or consultant from one social gathering and a president from the opposite as they have an inclination extra usually to stay with one nationwide social gathering.
“We’ve had nationalized elections, but we didn’t have them back to back to back all the time,” Binder stated.
The closes corollary to as we speak is most likely the late nineteenth century, Binder stated.
“It was similarly a period of high partisanship and ideological disagreement,” she defined, however as we speak there is the added aspect of a lot slimmer majorities — even in presidential elections. Trump, Bush and Clinton all received the White House with out profitable a majority of the favored vote of their first time period.
Not all energy adjustments are equal, however all of them have an effect on how issues work within the US authorities.
If Democrats can wrest management of the House from Republicans subsequent yr – which is extra possible than the prospect they might flip the Senate – it can permit them to face in the best way of Trump’s legislative agenda, examine his administration and achieve extra energy in spending debates.
The common indicator for a way a president’s social gathering will do in a midterm election is the president’s personal approval ranking. Trump’s, because it has been, is underwater.
Only twice up to now 20 midterm elections going again to 1938 – for W. Bush in 2002 and Clinton in 1998 – has the president’s social gathering not misplaced seats in a midterm. In each circumstances, the president had approval scores over 60%. Today, Trump’s is beneath 50%.
This yr, Republicans are attempting to change the map to attract extra Republican seats. They’ve already modified the map in Texas to create 5 new seats to win, though it’s a technique that may not repay if teams like Hispanic voters don’t vote with the social gathering in the identical approach they did in 2024.
Republicans are additionally seeking to redraw maps in Missouri and Ohio. Democrats are stymied by legal guidelines and state constitutional obstructions to such shenanigans in lots of states they management, however they’re looking for seats in California.
Democrats of the Seventies and Eighties routinely had 80-plus-seat majorities. In the newest elections, House majorities have been decided by a handful of the 435 voting members.
So whereas the ability adjustments are occurring extra continuously, they’re not accompanied by giant swings within the dimension of majorities. Trump’s Republicans misplaced 40 seats after the 2018 midterm and ceded management of the House. Biden’s Democrats misplaced simply 9 seats after the 2022 midterm, however additionally they ceded management of the House.
The margins within the House are tight sufficient that in a shut midterm, Republicans’ redistricting efforts may repay and permit them to take care of management of the House. But if there’s a riptide towards President Donald Trump and his insurance policies, no quantity of gerrymandering is prone to save Republicans’ House majority.