Wera Rodsawang | Moment | Getty Images
To the common investor, mutual funds and exchange-traded funds may not seem very different.
After all, they’re each comparatively liquid baskets of shares, bonds and different belongings overseen by skilled cash managers, and will help investors diversify their portfolios.
But there are some key differences which will make one a greater monetary selection than the opposite for sure investors, in line with consultants.
How they commerce
Perhaps the obvious distinction is how investors commerce ETFs and mutual funds.
ETFs commerce like shares: Investors purchase or promote them on a inventory change. By comparability, mutual fund investors transact instantly with the fund itself.
While investors can place mutual fund trades through the enterprise day, they will not know their transaction’s precise worth per share till the tip of the day. However, ETF investors know their precise buy worth after they transact.
These differences typically matter extra for day merchants however not the common buy-and-hold investor, stated Gloria Garcia Cisneros, a licensed monetary planner and wealth supervisor based mostly in Los Angeles, and a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.
Investors can harm themselves financially by buying and selling too often, consultants stated.
“Even in a scenario where you’d want to sell intraday, it’s [often] emotion-based and usually not a good way to invest,” stated Bryan Armour, director of ETF and passive methods analysis for North America at Morningstar.
ETFs are ‘far more tax-efficient’
Taxes and charges are far more consequential differences for on a regular basis investors, consultants stated.
For instance, ETFs can save certain investors from an enormous year-end tax invoice that mutual fund shareholders would possibly in any other case incur.
In this case, the taxes are capital features, that are taxes owed on funding income. Fund managers can generate such taxes inside a fund after they purchase and promote securities. Those capital features then get handed alongside to all of the fund shareholders, who owe a tax invoice even if they reinvest these distributions.
However, ETF investors not often owe these tax payments: Just 6.5% of U.S. inventory ETFs distributed capital features to investors in 2024, in comparison with 78% of U.S. inventory mutual funds, in line with Morningstar.
The development was comparable for worldwide inventory funds: About 6% of ETFs distributed capital features, versus 42% of mutual funds, in line with Morningstar.
“Sometimes, [mutual fund investors] get a bit of a nasty surprise in the form of capital gains and a tax bill,” stated Lee Baker, a licensed monetary planner based mostly in Atlanta, and a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.
While mutual fund managers use money to purchase and promote securities, ETF managers use a unique mechanism referred to as an “in-kind” transaction to facilitate a commerce. This principally entails buying and selling securities as a substitute of money; the strategy does not set off a sale, and due to this fact does not create capital-gains tax.
“ETFs are way more tax-efficient,” Armour stated. “That’s a huge advantage over the long term.”
However, there are specific instances when ETFs cannot make in-kind transfers, and will due to this fact create a taxable occasion: for instance, many sorts of derivatives, foreign money trades and when dealing with securities from sure worldwide jurisdictions (like India, South Africa and Brazil), Armour stated.
Also, ETFs’ tax benefit solely exists for investors who maintain their funds in a taxable brokerage account. It disappears for those that maintain their funds in a tax-sheltered account, like a 401(okay) or particular person retirement account.
ETFs cheaper ‘in just about each means’
Oliver Helbig | Moment | Getty Images
ETFs additionally are usually considerably cheaper for investors to personal than mutual funds, consultants stated.
The common asset-weighted funding price for ETFs was 0.42% in 2024, in contrast with 0.57% for mutual funds, in line with Morningstar.
These charges, referred to as expense ratios, signify a share of investor belongings in a fund. They are charged yearly and withdrawn instantly from investor accounts.
Some of this price differential is as a result of a bigger share of ETFs are index funds, which are usually cheaper than actively managed ones, Armour stated. It’s due to this fact pure that mutual funds can be dearer if a bigger share of them is actively managed.
However, many asset managers have debuted equivalent funding methods in each an ETF and mutual fund — and, when evaluating their charges, the ETFs are nonetheless usually cheaper for retail investors, Armour stated.
He gave the instance of the T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth fund, which prices a 0.57% annual price for the ETF model and 0.69% for the investor share class of the mutual fund model.
“In pretty much every way, ETFs are cheaper than mutual funds,” Armour stated.
May not have a selection
There could also be instances when it is higher for investors to purchase mutual funds.
For instance, the universe of mutual funds is far bigger, which means investors could solely be capable to entry sure funds in a mutual fund construction, consultants stated.
The ETF universe is increasing, although.
“ETFs are growing in popularity,” Cisneros stated. “Even mutual fund managers are launching ETF versions of their strategy.”
Additionally, ETFs aren’t available in 401(okay) plans, so investors could not have a selection.
Certain brokerages could not permit for dollar-cost averaging into an ETF, Baker stated. Investors who need to schedule computerized contributions right into a fund regularly could have to decide on mutual funds, relying on their brokerage, he stated.