Former election clerk Tina Peters’ jail sentence has lengthy been a rallying cry for President Donald Trump and different 2020 election deniers. Now, her attorneys are heading back to court to attraction her conviction as Colorado’s Democratic governor has signaled a new openness to letting her out of jail early.
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis lately mentioned he’s contemplating clemency for the 70-year-old Peters – who was convicted in a 2020 election-related information breach scheme – as a result of she is “elderly” and acquired a “harsh” punishment. While Trump’s symbolic federal pardon of Peters final month has no impact on her state fees, Polis’ current feedback are the strongest indication that he would possibly commute the rest of her 9-year sentence.
“We’re looking at this across a number of people – people in their 70s and 80s in our system, how much of a threat to society are they?” Polis, who’s in his remaining yr in workplace, informed CBS Colorado final week. “We balance that in a way that makes sure that they can spend their last few years at home.”
Colorado officers have confronted an intense strain marketing campaign from the White House over Trump’s calls for that they launch Peters from jail, with Trump taking a number of actions towards the state in his first yr back in workplace. Both Democratic and Republican election clerks in Colorado have raised considerations about Polis’ feedback, arguing that releasing Peters would undermine confidence in elections.
“Ms. Peters’ sentence was not harsh by any reasonable standard,” mentioned Matt Crane, a former GOP clerk who now runs the Colorado County Clerks Association. “Granting clemency to an unrepentant convicted criminal who deliberately sought to undermine our democratic system would be deeply concerning and risks further eroding public trust in the institutions Americans rely on for free and fair elections.”

Peters was convicted in 2024. She’s serving her sentence at a girls’s jail in Pueblo and is the one Trump ally presently behind bars for 2020-related crimes. She denies wrongdoing, and a listening to in her attraction is slated for Wednesday afternoon in Denver.
“The Governor takes the responsibility of clemency very seriously, and his team reviews all applications submitted,” Polis spokesperson Shelby Wieman informed NCS in an electronic mail Tuesday night. “He will review this inmate’s application just like he would any other.”
Peters is listed as having a parole listening to anticipated in September 2028, in accordance to the Colorado Department of Corrections web site. But with Colorado’s parole eligibility guidelines, and if Peters earns break day for good habits, she might change into eligible to transfer into a midway home or a related association this November, in accordance to Alondra Gonzalez, communications director for the corrections division.
One of Peters’ attorneys, Patrick McSweeney, informed NCS on Tuesday that Peters was overjoyed by Trump’s symbolic federal pardon, which he believes will assist overturn her responsible verdicts regardless that the president can’t erase state fees. He additionally mentioned he wasn’t concerned in Trump’s different strikes towards Colorado.
“They could be helpful, or they could antagonize Colorado officials, I just don’t want to weigh in on that,” McSweeney mentioned. “We’re content that she has the better legal arguments, and she will prevail in the Colorado Court of Appeals.”
He mentioned Polis’ public feedback appeared optimistic for Peters, however time will inform.
“I don’t tend to get caught up with statements from governors and politicians until they happen, especially when you’re in litigation,” McSweeney mentioned.
Polis has described himself as supporting “pro-freedom” insurance policies and has a historical past of bucking the Democratic Party on some nationwide points. Freeing Peters from jail can be one among Polis’ sharpest breaks but from his social gathering throughout Trump’s second time period.
The governor has drawn consideration for celebrating Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s appointment to lead the Department of Health and Human Services and extra lately praising Trump’s ouster of Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro as different Democrats within the state questioned the legality of the army operation.
An individual lively in Democratic politics within the state mentioned a few of Polis’ fellow Democrats have been confounded by the governor’s current statements that seem to help leniency for Peters. The particular person mentioned they concern that releasing the previous clerk from jail would embolden the 2020 election denier motion that continues to rage across the nation.
Trump lately called Polis a “Scumbag” who ought to “rot in Hell” for not bending to his calls for on Peters. And he has additionally focused Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat who opposes clemency for Peters and spoke out towards Polis’ current feedback.
These posts from Trump often led to an uptick in threats towards the Colorado officers, in accordance to a particular person conversant in the matter who spoke on situation of anonymity.
Weiser, who’s searching for the Democratic nomination on this yr’s governor race, has accused Trump of finishing up a “revenge campaign” and filed a federal lawsuit asking a choose to cease the administration from persevering with to “unlawfully punish the State of Colorado” over Peters’ continued imprisonment.

In an up to date federal lawsuit filed final week, Weiser pointed to a string of current actions by the administration that he forged as linked to the administration’s ire over Peters’ continued incarceration. They embody closing a Colorado-based climate lab, denying federal disaster assistance requests from the state, yanking federal transportation funds and threatening to withhold federal cash for low-income households.
Trump additionally vetoed a invoice for a Colorado water undertaking and moved US Space Command from Colorado Springs to Alabama.
Polis in a assertion alleged that Trump’s actions are “making life more difficult for the people of our state.”
In an electronic mail to NCS, the White House sought to refute the lawsuit’s particular person claims, arguing, as an example, that there’s “no politicization” in Trump’s decision-making on catastrophe reduction and that Trump was restoring US Space Command to a location he had chosen throughout his first time period.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson described Trump as exercising “his lawful and discretionary authority to ensure federal dollars are being spent in a way that aligns with the agenda endorsed by the American people when they resoundingly reelected the President.”
Weiser’s new allegations amend a lawsuit that he first filed in October, that seeks to overturn Trump’s resolution relocating the US Space Command to Huntsville, Alabama. In saying that transfer, Trump cited Colorado’s use of mail-in voting as a think about his resolution.
In the lawsuit, Weiser mentioned Colorado has “sovereign authority” over the way it administers elections and prison justice inside its borders.
As the drama builds outdoors of court, Peters’ attorneys will face off Wednesday on the Colorado Court of Appeals towards Weiser’s workforce. A 3-judge panel will weigh whether or not to uphold the responsible verdicts, although they may not announce their resolution for months.

The case originates from Peters’ involvement in an effort by fellow pro-Trump election deniers to breach voting methods in Mesa County, the place she was the clerk, in 2021. She was found guilty in 2024 by a jury in her ruby-red county of a number of felonies, together with first-degree official misconduct and making an attempt to affect a public servant.
The state trial choose who sentenced Peters referred to as her “a charlatan” who was “as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen.” Even from behind bars, Peters has continued via allies to put up debunked conspiracy theories on her X account about supposed vote-rigging tied to Venezuela throughout the 2020 election.
Peters’ attorneys preserve that she didn’t break the regulation however fairly was making an attempt to uphold the regulation. In their view, the info breach was not a breach in any respect – it was a good-faith try to comply with federal legal guidelines requiring that election officers protect information of federal elections.
“The law is well-settled,” McSweeney informed NCS. “Anyone acting pursuant to a federal law, if they’re acting within the scope of their authority, and doing what is necessary and proper, then they enjoy immunity from any state prosecution.”
Her workforce additionally took difficulty with a number of selections by the trial choose that, of their view, unconstitutionally hampered her from having the ability to “mount a meaningful defense.”
“The district court compounded this error during the trial by blocking Ms. Peters’ efforts to explain her conduct, depriving the jury of evidence that Ms. Peters lacked criminal intent, a centerpiece of her defense,” Peters’ attorneys wrote in a court submitting final yr.
The prosecution was initiated by a Republican prosecutor, however the lawyer common’s workplace, led by Weiser, is liable for defending the responsible verdicts throughout the appeals course of.
The lawyer common’s workforce additionally lately defeated a longshot effort by Peters to persuade a federal choose to launch her from jail whereas her state-level appeals play out.
“Attorney General Weiser believes the sentence for Tina Peters is appropriate, it is important for her to be held accountable for her crimes, and it would be a grave injustice to reduce her sentence,” Weiser spokesman Lawrence Pacheco mentioned in a assertion.