In the spring of 2024, Li Hongxing, who runs a social media advert company, took on a consumer he believed to be a rising star in China’s electric car market.
A advertising veteran within the auto trade, Li went as far as to borrow to cowl the fee of advertisements for Ji Yue, anticipating cost later from the EV startup he thought had every thing it wanted to succeed: effectivity, rising gross sales, and deep-pocketed backers.
But it didn’t.
Within half a yr, the carmaker collapsed, turning Li’s gamble right into a nightmare, saddling him with debt of 40 million yuan ($5.6 million).
“It was a feeling of sheer despair,” Li mentioned.
Ji Yue’s downfall is hardly distinctive in China’s auto trade, the place a whole lot of brands have gone beneath in a brutal race to the underside over the previous few years. The nation’s EV increase not solely gave rise to international leaders like BYD; it has additionally led to in depth overcapacity through which a crowd of carmakers are scrambling for market share.
The Chinese authorities has lengthy dealt out subsidies and different assist for EV makers – half of a technique that helped catapult the nation to its place as the most important EV market globally and spur development on the planet’s second-largest economic system.
Relentless price wars have ensued, depleting earnings and straining carmakers and suppliers. Even front-runners are squeezing elements makers to promote under price, whereas extending cost phrases for months, in line with a dozen suppliers, carmakers, and trade specialists who spoke to NCS.
It’s an instance of what Chinese officers decry as “disorderly” competitors – and it extends past the EV sector to different Chinese industries like photo voltaic panels, e-commerce and meals supply.
This all comes as EV brands together with BYD, Chery, Geely and Changan have gone international, driving Chinese auto exports to almost 6 million final yr, greater than every other nation. But the flood of automobile exports has raised alarm overseas, prompting pushback like tariffs and restrictions from Europe, Mexico and Canada.
Hoping to stabilize an embattled economic system weighed down by deflationary stress – pushed partly by these overcrowded sectors slashing costs – Beijing is making an attempt to pacify the industrial battles royale.
In a Communist Party magazine article revealed this month, Chinese chief Xi Jinping known as for “cracking down on chaotic, cut-throat price wars among companies.”
In current months, Beijing has rolled out a collection of measures to handle the difficulty. Authorities have summoned auto leaders to warn them towards initiating price wars, issued guidelines on shortening the cost cycle for the trade, and launched pointers urging native governments to reduce subsidies and eradicate overcapacity.
But economists and trade specialists doubt the measures thus far will ship a fast repair, and there seems to be no simple solution to eradicate extra capability. For years, Beijing has fueled development by means of funding and subsidies. Simply axing extra capability and permitting an setting the place solely a handful of brands survive – even when now fascinating to Beijing – could set off sizable job losses and threat dragging additional on financial development, specialists mentioned.
“Those are definitely good starting steps, and that needs to happen,” Chetan Ahya, chief Asia economist at Morgan Stanley, mentioned of the current efforts. “But just cutting capacity will not be a perfect solution, there is going to be a social stability problem if you just decide to stop investing.”
Employment sits at the core of social stability – the cornerstone of Communist Party rule. And China’s auto manufacturing trade employs greater than 4.8 million folks, in line with figures from earlier this yr from CEIC, an information supplier.

Ji Yue’s fast rise and fall exemplified the brutal actuality dealing with an trade suffering from extreme competitors.
Founded in 2021 as a three way partnership between Chinese web champion Baidu and main automaker Geely, the startup rapidly drew market consideration.
Li started supplying social media advertisements for Ji Yue in May final yr. Impressed by his early dealings with the corporate, he felt assured sufficient to signal a long-term contract – even permitting prolonged cost phrases to assist the automaker.
By late October, nevertheless, he realized the agency might need run into liquidity points. Weeks later, Ji Yue announced a restructuring to hunt new capital amid “fierce market competition” – successfully marking the top of its transient life.

“For a large company backed by two major shareholders, with sales on the rise and several positive indicators in place, the fact that it could suddenly collapse was something I simply could not have anticipated,” Li mentioned, including that he has but to obtain reimbursement from the corporate.
NCS has reached out to Baidu and Geely for touch upon the collapse of their three way partnership.
China’s EV increase was born out of an enormous guess that Beijing made on the then area of interest expertise within the 2000s. By the early 2010s, the federal government declared it a strategic sector, showering it with the ample monetary incentives that bred some of the world’s high EV makers like BYD, whose sales last year eclipsed Tesla’s. It additionally resulted in practically 500 home auto brands at their peak round 2019.
The increase, nevertheless, quickly turned a massacre.
“With limited market growth, products becoming more and more alike, and more competitors crowding in, the competition just keeps getting tougher,” mentioned Bo Yu, nation supervisor for China at Jato Dynamics, an automotive market intelligence agency.
This has led China’s auto trade to endure what some trade gamers known as “knock-out rounds.” Today, greater than 150 Chinese brands and over 50 EV makers proceed to battle for survival, in line with HSBC’s analysis.
“Some companies are bound to go under – if not you, then them,” Li mentioned.
Many of the automakers and their suppliers nonetheless within the battle are biding their time to see who folds subsequent.
“A lot of EV makers are actually running at a loss right now. Most of their money comes from industrial funds or social capital, and they just keep raising new rounds to cover those losses,” mentioned Shen Hong, an economics researcher at a Peking University assume tank that advises the federal government.
The common revenue margins of China’s automotive firms plummeted to 4.3% final yr, from practically 8% in 2017, knowledge from the China Passenger Car Association confirmed. All the whereas, the utilization charge of its manufacturing capability continues to face at round 50%, in line with Morningstar, a monetary providers and analysis agency.
Years of price wars have trapped the trade in a vicious cycle with squeezed margins, declining high quality and a provide chain plagued with cost delays, in line with the dozen trade gamers and specialists. Many of the carmakers and suppliers declined to be named as a result of of the sensitivity of the matter.
One consequence of the cut-throat competitors is that automakers have made cost-cutting and effectivity the core of their operations, as a substitute of specializing in innovation, mentioned Carl Cheng, an insurance coverage supervisor for an EV maker. Suppliers advised NCS that auto brands would typically request suppliers to ship at least 10% reductions on their costs yearly.
“Suppliers have little choice but to quietly accept unfavorable terms,” Cheng mentioned. “If you walk away, there are plenty of others ready to step in.”
The general high quality of elements of cars has undeniably declined, he added.

In one excessive case, a coating supplies provider based mostly within the central metropolis of Wuhan mentioned they have been pressured to decrease costs by greater than 40% simply to remain within the sport.
“If you can’t cut costs anywhere else, what’s left? You cut wages. You bring in temporary workers, push overtime, squeeze out more efficiency – that’s basically all you can do,” the particular person mentioned, including that they needed to minimize employees’ pay by round 30%.
Even after providing hefty reductions, suppliers face lengthy waits to receives a commission. Many main Chinese carmakers make use of provide chain financing that leads to prolonged cost cycles, shifting monetary threat onto companions, suppliers advised NCS.
In recognition of the potential drag on financial development, China has stepped up coverage efforts, declaring an “anti-involution” marketing campaign. “Involution,” or “neijuan” in Chinese, is an anthropological time period that has come to explain extreme, self-defeating competitors yielding little to no progress within the nation.
China’s high automotive regulator, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, in May vowed to curb “involution-style” competition within the auto sector, saying it undermines sustained funding in analysis and improvement, and erodes product high quality and efficiency.
In July, China’s high financial policymaking physique, the Central and Financial Affairs Commission, chaired by Xi, made the “governing of disorderly low-price competition” a coverage focus.
And to ease the cost ache for suppliers, Beijing has issued guidelines forcing carmakers to pay up inside 60 days.
But trade gamers and specialists are skeptical that the measures thus far introduced can be sufficient.
For instance, on the cost deadlines, the fact is that carmakers can nonetheless lean on the use of promissory notes, as many of them already do, specialists mentioned.
“Compared with before, I don’t think the current price war has eased much at all,” Cheng mentioned. “The reality is that newly launched models with lower prices draw in plenty of orders… at the end of the day automakers have to focus on survival.”

Price competitors could additionally exist in different varieties, though rising authorities scrutiny could restrain carmakers from making materials price cuts, mentioned Claire Yuan, a director and lead analyst specializing in China’s auto trade at rankings company S&P Global.
“With affordability key to gaining market share, they could still engage in stealth competition, such as launching new models at lower price ranges or upgrading existing models while keeping prices unchanged or offering other benefits,” she mentioned.
Vincent Sun, senior fairness analyst at Morningstar overlaying China’s auto sector, additionally believes price competitors will doubtless stay within the quick time period.
“It may take a while, or more efforts than just anti-involution to solve this issue,” he mentioned.
For now, specialists anticipate the price wars to proceed till most brands go the way in which of Ji Yue, leaving solely a handful standing.
“When it comes to price wars, it’s just not very realistic to think they can be completely curbed through administrative measures,” mentioned Shen, the researcher.
Ahya of Morgan Stanley mentioned tackling oversupply in sectors like EVs can be tougher given the bigger presence of non-public enterprises in contrast with state-owned ones, making consolidation extra advanced. Structural reforms are wanted to essentially tackle overcapacity, he added.
On a Chinese podcast in late August, He Xiaopeng, founder and CEO of one of the main EV makers in China, Xpeng, mentioned no Chinese carmaker is out of the woods but.
“I think the knock-out rounds in China’s auto industry will go on for another five years,” he mentioned.
“There will likely be only five of them left.”