This story was initially revealed by ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of energy. Sign up for Dispatches, a publication that spotlights wrongdoing across the nation, to obtain its tales in your inbox each week.
Last 12 months, when Utah lawmakers handed the nation’s first statewide ban on group water fluoridation, they included a provision making it simpler for individuals to get fluoride dietary supplements with out having to go to a dental supplier.
This would make fluoride out there by particular person selection, reasonably than “mass public dosing,” as a Utah House of Representatives webpage put it — a part of the rising rhetoric of skepticism that’s led to rollbacks of water fluoridation, a confirmed methodology to scale back tooth decay.
“It’s what I like to refer to as the win-win, right?” Speaker Mike Schultz stated on a June episode of the “House Rules” podcast from the Utah House. “Those that want fluoride can now get fluoride easier, and those that don’t want fluoride in their drinking water don’t have to have that.”
But at the same time as critics level to fluoride dietary supplements instead — together with fluoride toothpaste, rinses and varnishes — many are creating boundaries to these identical merchandise.
Under U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s oversight, the Food and Drug Administration stated it issued notices to four businesses about their ingestible fluoride dietary supplements for kids and additionally put out new steerage for health professionals.
In Texas, Attorney General Ken Paxton launched investigations into two giant corporations over their advertising of fluoride toothpaste to dad and mom and youngsters.
And adjustments to Medicaid in President Donald Trump’s so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act threaten to make it more durable than it already is for essentially the most susceptible individuals to entry any oral well being care in any respect, not to mention fluoride remedies at a dentist’s workplace.
More than something, specialists say, alarmist language from high-profile officers is trickling down to the general public, main extra individuals to query whether or not any type of fluoride — in ingesting water or in other remedies — is a good suggestion.
Scott Tomar, a professor and affiliate dean on the University of Illinois Chicago College of Dentistry, is amongst those that have watched with dismay because the dialog about fluoride has been affected by arguments doubtless to scare individuals.
“I’m certain that the net result of all of this is going to be a greater reluctance on the part of parents and providers to prescribe fluoride supplements,” Tomar stated.
Low, constant publicity to fluoride is broadly credited for dramatic declines in decaying tooth. But long-simmering skepticism about its use gained extra affect in latest years, particularly with Kennedy’s credibility and affect because the nation’s chief well being officer.
“The evidence against fluoride is overwhelming,” he stated as he stood alongside Utah lawmakers at a press convention in Salt Lake City final April.
Even although the science to help his conclusions is restricted, he claimed that fluoride “causes IQ loss, profound IQ loss,” and he linked water fluoridation to ADHD, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, and kidney and liver points.
Lee Zeldin, who leads the Environmental Protection Agency, spoke on the Utah occasion, too, crediting Kennedy for serving to to spur the company’s overview of its normal for fluoride in ingesting water. An EPA spokesperson, in an announcement to ProPublica, stated that the company’s “next analysis of new scientific information on potential health risks of fluoride in drinking water was not due until 2030, but this agency is moving at Trump Speed.”
Meanwhile, the FDA is partnering with other federal businesses to develop what it called “a fluoride research agenda.” And, as a part of a collection of drastic cutbacks final spring, the Division of Oral Health on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was eradicated.
In an announcement emailed to ProPublica, an HHS spokesperson argued that fluoride’s “predominant benefit to teeth comes from topical contact with the outside of the teeth, not from ingestion. There is no need, therefore, to ingest fluoride.”
Fluoride’s opponents cite a hotly debated “state of the science” report from the National Toxicology Program in 2024, saying that it reveals an affiliation between fluoride publicity and a lowered IQ in youngsters.
But these findings aren’t broadly embraced due to the overview’s limitations. It analyzed research carried out outdoors the U.S., with completely different water situations, and involving fluoride ranges at greater than twice the usual for ingesting water right here. The report itself states, in daring kind, that it doesn’t tackle “whether the sole exposure to fluoride added to drinking water” on the beneficial degree in the United States and Canada “is associated with a measurable effect on IQ.”
In this ambiance, as ProPublica has reported, there’s been widespread wavering on water fluoridation, even in Michigan, the place the therapy debuted greater than 80 years in the past.
Florida joined Utah in banning fluoridation statewide. Bills to do the identical had been launched in at the very least 19 other states final 12 months, and that momentum is carrying ahead, with statewide bans lately proposed in Arizona and South Carolina. Meanwhile, local debates over fluoridation are turning raucous.
Utah’s dental professionals are involved about how to stave off an anticipated hit to oral well being, as other communities skilled after they minimize off fluoridation.
“We get heartburn over the situation,” stated James Bekker, a pediatric dentist and previous president of the Utah Dental Association.
Bekker and others are piecing collectively methods to present other types of fluoride therapy to Utahns. But he’s fearful, he stated, about “all these susceptible, vulnerable children in underserved populations that don’t have a choice and don’t have a voice, but they are going to suffer.”
Shortly after Utah banned fluoridation, the FDA took goal on the form of dietary supplements that lawmakers had introduced as a key various. The company introduced that it was working to take away sure ingestible fluoride merchandise for kids from the market. Its press release described associations with adjustments to the intestine microbiome, thyroid issues, weight acquire “and possibly decreased IQ.”
More than 4,600 public comments poured into the FDA, together with many from individuals fearful about dropping entry to dietary supplements whereas concurrently dropping water fluoridation.
“Now that fluoride has been removed from much of Utah’s water, it is imperative to provide supplementation through other means,” one orthodontist wrote. A dentist in South Florida criticized the scare techniques and dangerous science main states like hers to ban fluoridation and stated that prescribing fluoride drops and lozenges is without doubt one of the few options for pediatric sufferers.
On Oct. 31, the FDA announced efforts to “restrict the sale of unapproved ingestible fluoride prescription drug products for children.” The company stated it despatched notices to 4 corporations about advertising the dietary supplements for kids beneath 3 and older youngsters with average or low danger for tooth decay. It additionally stated it issued letters to well being care professionals “warning about the risks associated with these products.”
Even although the FDA landed wanting a ban, Stuart Cooper, govt director of the Fluoride Action Network, referred to as the company’s shift a “major victory.” He stated he believes it’s simply the beginning of federal motion to restrict using fluoride merchandise that FAN has lengthy campaigned towards.
Fluoride dietary supplements, which emerged in the Nineteen Forties alongside water fluoridation, by no means went by an FDA overview. A decade in the past, Cooper stated, FAN submitted a residents petition that referred to as for the company to pull ingestible fluoride dietary supplements from the market. “What we’re seeing is that come to fruition,” he stated, “because we finally have FDA employees who were willing to look at the issue.”
The FDA’s stance on dietary supplements is now at odds with a number of well being organizations, together with the American Dental Association, the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Several of them collectively support a graduated fluoride supplementation schedule that begins at six months for high-risk youngsters.
Johnny Johnson, a retired pediatric dentist in Florida, questions the FDA’s danger parameters. “If you don’t have fluoride at appropriate levels in your water, by definition, you are at high risk” of tooth decay, stated Johnson, who heads the nonprofit American Fluoridation Society.
The FDA’s letter to health professionals recommends topical fluoride instead, reminiscent of toothpaste. But even that methodology faces scrutiny. The Texas lawyer basic’s workplace launched investigations into Colgate-Palmolive and Procter & Gamble, which promote Colgate and Crest fluoride toothpastes.
Their advertising to dad and mom and youngsters is “misleading, deceptive and dangerous,” Paxton’s workplace stated in a press release. Referencing the NTP report on fluoridation, the discharge stated the investigation got here “amid a growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating that excessive fluoride exposure is not safe for children.”
In September, Paxton’s workplace announced a “historic agreement” with Colgate-Palmolive. When its packaging and promotional materials for kids’s fluoride toothpaste reveals the paste on a brush, the corporate will show a pea-sized quantity, reasonably than the standard swirl. This month, Paxton’s workplace reported a similar settlement with Procter & Gamble.
A consultant from Colgate-Palmolive stated in an announcement to ProPubica that Paxton’s press launch acknowledged that “we already provide directions on our packaging that complies with U.S. FDA requirements for how our children’s fluoride toothpastes should be used.” Procter & Gamble stated in an announcement that “the Texas Attorney General acknowledged in the settlement that our products comply with all laws and regulations regarding directions for use.”
Another software for fluoride therapy is varnish utilized throughout a dental checkup, which can be supplied at free or diminished price by insurance coverage packages. But even with well being protection, there are boundaries that always make it troublesome to see the dentists and pediatricians offering such therapy. Recent research discovered that insurance coverage denials for fluoride varnish purposes can add one other layer of complication for sufferers and suppliers.
Supplemental fluoride remedies are restricted, in contrast with the effectiveness, attain and price of fluoride in ingesting water, stated Johnson, the retired pediatric dentist, however “it is the only option that we have in Florida and in Utah.”
“Nothing replaces fluoridated water,” he added. “Nothing comes close.”