The National Intelligence Council assessed that the progress made during the last twenty years “probably owes more to external pressure than domestic support, suggesting it would be at risk after coalition withdrawal, even without Taliban efforts to reverse it.”

“Although the Taliban’s fall officially ended some policies (restricting the rights of women), many continue in practice even in government-controlled areas,” it said.

The two-page report, declassified at the request of Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, affords a grim evaluation as fears mount in regards to the potential degradation of hard-won women’s rights in Afghanistan as US and NATO forces start their withdrawal after almost twenty years on the bottom. Bipartisan lawmakers, activists and girls on the Afghan authorities negotiating workforce have expressed concern that beneficial properties could possibly be undercut, particularly if the withdrawal is accomplished with out a political settlement in place, even because the Biden administration has pledged that the United States will stay a diplomatic presence on the bottom.

“Afghanistan’s progress since the end of Taliban rule toward meeting broadly accepted international standards for the conditions of women has been uneven, reflecting cultural norms and conflict,” the report’s authors wrote, noting that progress that was largely centered “in cities and ethnic minority enclaves, where violence is lower and women had more freedom before Taliban rule.”

“Gains are less pronounced in rural areas, where roughly 70 percent of Afghans live,” the report said. “Nationwide, child marriage and stoning for adultery persist, and rape victims are killed by relatives for shaming their families.”

Foreign Policy was first to report on the NIC evaluation.

A previous US intelligence report assessed that the Afghan authorities would battle to take care of management with out the assist of the worldwide army coalition, which President Joe Biden mentioned would go away by September 11.

Biden administration officers have warned that the Taliban wouldn’t obtain worldwide legitimacy by seizing energy by drive or by limiting the rights the rights of ladies.

“If the Taliban has any expectation of getting any international acceptance, of not being treated as a pariah, it’s going to have to respect the rights of women and girls,” Secretary of State Tony Blinken mentioned in an interview with ABC News in mid-April. “Any country that moves backwards on that, that tries to repress them, will not have that international recognition, will not have that international status, and indeed, we will take action to make sure to the best of our ability that they can’t do that.”

However, the NIC report discovered that whereas the Taliban’s “desires for foreign aid and legitimacy might marginally moderate its conduct over time,” it’s probably that “in the early days of reestablishing its Emirate, the Taliban probably would focus on extending control on its own terms.”

Report says Taliban’s strategy to women’s rights has not modified

It assessed the Taliban’s strategy to women’s rights has not modified, and “if the Taliban were again Afghanistan’s dominant power, we assess that any prospect for moderating the group’s policies toward women would lie with ethnic minorities’ ability to maintain local variation and technological development since the Taliban’s previous rule.”

Last week, bipartisan senators on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voiced considerations a couple of potential backslide in women’s rights in Afghanistan in a listening to with US Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad final week,

“We have worked for two decades alongside our allies to advance the rights of not just women and girls, but other ethnic minorities in Afghanistan. And we can’t let those two decades of hard work be ignored in peace talks. We owe it to the women and girls to ensure that their hard-fought rights are preserved,” mentioned Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat and the one girl on the committee. “Sadly, I believe an arbitrary deadline for … our withdrawal of forces in Afghanistan risks those efforts.”

Khalilzad mentioned the matter was “important to (him) personally,” having performed “a small role as ambassador to Afghanistan in the early 2000s in encouraging the adoption of constitutional provisions that have helped the rights of women” and preventing “for the inclusion of women on the Islamic Republic’s negotiating team.”

As Afghan women, we finally have a seat at peace talks. Don't abandon usAs Afghan women, we finally have a seat at peace talks. Don't abandon us

“We are likewise pressing for women’s inclusion in any future peace efforts,” he mentioned.

In a NCS opinion piece revealed after Biden’s withdrawal announcement, three girls members of the Afghan authorities negotiating workforce warned that “if the Taliban does not believe the United States is firmly committed to a stable and democratic Afghanistan, that could spell trouble for our future talks.”

“While the Taliban may deride women as tokens of a human rights agenda set in Western capitals, they are wrong. And the threat they, and their allies, pose to us remains quite real,” Dr. Habiba Sarabi, Fawzia Koofi and Sharifa Zurmati wrote.

“We press on because we know that an inclusive Afghanistan is the only path to a lasting, just peace and end to the war. We are not alone: Women of all walks of life do not want to return to an era in which their fundamental rights counted for nothing,” they wrote.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *