“There’s nothing illegal about it, there’s nothing immoral. But I don’t think you build a society around people doing it,” he mentioned.
Buffett is just not a fan of the corporate’s enterprise mannequin, he added. The app permits folks to make a number of inventory trades a day without cost, as a substitute making a living from choices buying and selling and order circulate income that huge market makers pay Robinhood to execute trades.
Munger went a step additional, saying that it’s “God-awful that something like that would draw investment from civilized men and decent citizens. It’s deeply wrong.”
Robinhood rapidly fired back.
“There is an old guard that doesn’t want average Americans to have a seat at the Wall Street table so they will resort to insults,” mentioned the corporate in an announcement Saturday that didn’t point out Buffett or Munger by title.
“Adversaries of this future and of change are usually those who’ve enjoyed plentiful privileges in the past and who don’t want these privileges disrupted,” Robinhood added, saying that the “criticisms are unfortunate” and the “new generation of investors aren’t a ‘casino group.'”
“Two of the most iconic investors insulted a new generation this weekend. Why? Because we are doing things a new way,” wrote Jacqueline Ortiz Ramsay, Robinhood’s head of public coverage communications, within the publish.
Ramsay added that “people are tired of the Warren Buffetts and Charlie Mungers of the world acting like they are the only oracles of investing. And at Robinhood, we’re not going to sit back while they disparage everyday people for taking control of their financial lives.”
She famous that “Robinhood has made investing simpler and more accessible to more people” and that “it is clear that the elites benefited from a stock market that kept many families sidelined from participating while they amassed huge wealth from decades of investing.”
The feedback are one other signal of how Robinhood has been on the defensive as of late.