Hours later, he was now not at his law firm.
After the Supreme Court dominated, Clement’s now-former law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, introduced in a information launch that it’ll “no longer represent clients with respect to matters involving the interpretation of the Second Amendment.”
The information will come as a shock to the insular world of appellate litigation, the place Clement is taken into account among the best Supreme Court advocates within the nation and Kirkland is a prime law firm and breeding floor for appellate attorneys.
In a press release, Clement and Murphy mentioned they’re beginning a brand new firm.
“In light of Kirkland & Ellis’ announcement that the firm will no longer handle cases implicating the Second Amendment, including ongoing representations of individual plaintiffs we have maintained for years, we have decided to leave the firm and establish our own firm where we will continue to serve the full range of our diverse clients,” Murphy mentioned.
“We do not take this step lightly. Kirkland is a storied firm, and we have many friends and valued colleagues there,” mentioned Clement. “Unfortunately, we were given a stark choice: either withdraw from ongoing representations or withdraw from the firm.”
He added: “We could not abandon ongoing representations just because a client’s position is unpopular in some circles.”
A supply with data mentioned that a number of companions at the firm had expressed discomfort with persevering with representations of Second Amendment-related instances following the Uvalde, Texas, faculty bloodbath. In the previous couple of days it turned obvious that the break was irreparable and that Clement and Murphy would depart out of loyalty to their purchasers.
“Many businesses drop clients or change suppliers as convenience dictates. To others, the firm’s decision will seem like one more instance of acceding to the demands of the woke,” they wrote. “But law firms aren’t supposed to operate like ordinary businesses. Lawyers owe a duty of loyalty to their clients.”
Kirkland & Ellis described the 2 attorneys as “valued colleagues.”
“We wish them the best of luck in the future and we look forward to collaborating with them in the future in matters not involving the Second Amendment,” mentioned Jon A. Ballis, chairman of Kirkland’s Executive Committee.
The petitioners within the case resolved Thursday had been Robert Nash, Brandon Koch and the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association — an NRA affiliate.
Nash and Koch had handed the required background checks and obtained licenses to hold weapons for searching and goal observe, however they’d not been capable of set up a particular want for self-defense that’s required underneath the New York state law to obtain an unrestricted license.
Clement mentioned at oral arguments final 12 months that the law makes it nearly unattainable for an odd particular person to acquire a license as a result of the “proper cause” commonplace is so demanding and is left to the “broad discretion” of the licensing officer.
“Good, even impeccable, moral character plus a simple desire to exercise a fundamental right is,” Clement mentioned, “not sufficient.” “Nor is living or being employed in a high crime area.”
NCS’s Dan Berman contributed to this report.