New York officials react to the US Supreme Court ruling on handgun law


“It is outrageous,” she stated on Twitter, “that at a moment of national reckoning on gun violence, the Supreme Court has recklessly struck down a New York law that limits those who can carry concealed weapons.”

The state is “closely reviewing our options — including calling a special session of the legislature,” the governor stated, vowing to “keep New Yorkers safe from gun violence.”

The choice, in a case introduced by an NRA-backed group and two people, might doubtlessly permit extra weapons to be carried in public. Critics say the ruling will impair wise options they assume can curb gun violence.

“Put simply, this Supreme Court ruling will put New Yorkers at further risk of gun violence,” New York City Mayor Eric Adams said in his own statement.

But the metropolis will proceed to do no matter potential, Adams stated, together with conducting a “comprehensive review of our approach to defining ‘sensitive locations’ where carrying a gun is banned, and reviewing our application process to ensure that only those who are fully qualified can obtain a carry license.”

“We will work together to mitigate the risks this decision will create once it is implemented,” the mayor stated, “as we cannot allow New York to become the Wild West.”

Decision ‘undermines public security,’ Manhattan DA says

The law in query ruled licenses to carry hid handguns in public for self-defense and required a resident acquiring a license to carry a hid pistol or revolver reveal that “proper cause” exists for the allow. But the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 majority, struck down the law in a ruling issued as the US continues to grapple with gun violence and mass shootings.

Officials across New York state have been anticipating the ruling, fearful it might make entry to weapons simpler and gun crime extra frequent — a sentiment echoed Thursday by the Manhattan and Brooklyn district legal professional’s places of work.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg criticized the choice in an announcement, saying it “severely undermines public safety not just in New York City, but around the country.”

However, Bragg stated he was “committed to doing everything in my power to fight for the safety everyone in this city deserves.”

New York leaders worry that a Supreme Court ruling overturning state's gun restrictions would cause a jump in gun crime

“New York still has some of the toughest gun laws in the country on the books,” Bragg stated, “and we will continue to use these statutes to hold accountable those who commit gun violence.”

Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez additionally condemned the ruling by the nation’s highest courtroom, calling it a “nightmare for public safety.”

“New York’s strong gun laws have saved lives for more than a century, and the Supreme Court’s decision to open the door for millions of New Yorkers to carry a concealed weapon is a nightmare for public safety,” he stated. “Evidence is overwhelming that states with permissive gun laws see much higher rates of gun deaths — from accidents to suicide, domestic incidents to street crime.”

New York lawmakers react

New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, a Democrat who represents the state’s tenth Congressional District, criticized the six conservative justices who voted to strike down the state’s law, saying they’d “endangered New Yorkers” and made them “less safe.”

“With gun violence skyrocketing across the nation, we should be making our communities safer,” he stated. “This decision is shameful.”

Rep. Yvette Clarke, Democrat of the ninth Congressional District, used comparable language, describing the Supreme Court’s choice as an “absolutely shameful decision.”

The Supreme Court has “decided that guns are more important than lives in this country,” Andrea Stewart-Cousins, the majority chief of the state Senate, stated, evoking latest mass shootings like the one in Buffalo, New York, the place an 18-year-old man focused Black customers, capturing 13 folks, 10 fatally.

“In these devastating times, when the nation is reeling from mass shootings that have shaken Americans to their core, we must stand united to address the laws that keep allowing guns to fall into the wrong hands,” Stewart-Cousins stated. “New York will rise up to this latest challenge to pass additional gun safety legislation.”

Across the aisle, there have been New York Republicans who praised the choice, together with Rep. Elise Stefanik of the twenty first Congressional District, who stated the ruling was a “win for the Constitution” in an interview with Fox News.

“Today’s Supreme Court ruling upholds the Constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms,” she stated in an announcement issued by her workplace, “and correctly declares New York’s shameful attempt to shred Second Amendment rights of New Yorkers unconstitutional.”

Rep. Lee Zeldin, who represents the 1st Congressional District, equally portrayed the ruling as a victory for law abiding New Yorkers, whose Second Amendment rights, he stated, “are under constant attack.”

And twenty second Congressional District Rep. Claudia Tenney stated the Supreme Court had “at last righted a wrong against all New Yorkers, affirming that no government has the right to trample on our constitutionally protected rights.”

NCS’s Peter Nickeas and Mark Morales contributed to this report.





Sources

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.