In reality, it is not quite a bit like that proposal. It is that proposal.

Go to the language of the laws, which handed the House in May with 35 Republican votes (in addition to each Democratic vote). It makes clear that the commission would have 10 members, with Democratic leaders in Congress appointing 5 folks and Republican leaders appointing 5. The commission can be helmed by two co-chairs — one every chosen by the speaker of the House and the House minority chief.

As for who these members can be? Well, the laws is fairly particular about that too. (Bolding is mine.)

“An individual appointed to the Commission may not be an officer or employee of any instrumentality of government,reads the texts of the bill. “It is the sense of Congress that individuals appointed to the Commission should be prominent United States citizens, with national recognition.”

It’s proper there within the invoice! No sitting members of Congress!

The 1/6 commission proposal was expressly modeled on the independent panel Congress created to study the September 11, 2001, terror assaults. That group was chaired by two former elected officers — former New Jersey governor Tom Kean and former Indiana Rep. Lee Hamilton — however had all kinds of different members together with Fred Fielding, a former White House counsel, and former Secretary of the Navy John Lehman.

Comer is, not to put too fantastic a degree on this, completely and fully mistaken. He voted towards a bit of laws that may have accomplished precisely what he mentioned he wished on Wednesday!

What then explains Comer’s assertion? There are two choices:

1) He merely did not know what was within the invoice he voted towards.

2) He is taking us all for fools — assuming we won’t or will not return and examine the report of his vote.

Neither one is a superb look, though I suppose the primary possibility is marginally higher; Comer was misinformed moderately than malicious.

The finish end result, nonetheless, is identical. Comer voted towards a measure that may have accomplished precisely what he’s now saying he thinks would have been one of the best ways to handle the riots of January on the Capitol.

It’s staggeringly dangerous.



Sources

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *