According to a post attributed to James Star, who claims to be a Tesla employee, the decision to discontinue production of the Cybertruck is "the saddest news! However, it remains unclear whether this statement reflects an official company stance or simply individual sentiment. As of now, Tesla has chosen not to comment on the matter.

The Cybertruck's unique stainless steel body, which was touted as a key selling point for the vehicle, appears to have been a double-edged sword. While it provides exceptional strength and durability, some owners have reportedly experienced rust issues with their trucks. This problem may have contributed to the truck's poor sales performance, with Tesla shifting less than 50,000 units in total by March last year.

The Cybertruck is exclusively manufactured at Gigafactory Texas, which is equipped with specialized machinery capable of producing the vehicle's distinctive body. Recent data suggests that Tesla sold a mere 11,586 Cybertrucks in the US during the first three quarters of this year, representing a significant decline of 28 percent compared to the same period last year.

The launch of the Tesla Cybertruck was marred by a series of mishaps and design flaws that raised questions about its readiness for production.

A leaked report from January 25, 2022, revealed that the pre-production alpha version of the Cybertruck struggled with several issues, including suspension problems, poor body sealing, excessive noise levels, handling difficulties, and braking concerns.

The car's debut in November 2019 was also marked by a memorable demonstration of its supposedly unbreakable" glass windows. Elon Musk attempted to showcase their strength by hurling a steel ball at them, but the windows shattered twice, leaving onlookers stunned.

More recently, the Cybertruck has faced additional challenges, including an April recall due to concerns that the accelerator pedal pad could become loose and get trapped by interior trim, potentially causing the car to accelerate uncontrollably.

The Cybertruck's woes continue, with another recall issued for the Rear Wheel Drive (RWD) model due to concerns about faulty brake rotors. This is the eleventh recall for the electric vehicle, highlighting ongoing issues with its reliability.

The problem could cause RWD Cybertruck owners to experience a sudden and unexpected loss of control while driving, as their own wheels may overtake them. Such an incident would be both alarming and disorienting, putting drivers at risk of accidents. The faulty brake rotors are a critical issue that needs to be addressed urgently.

The Cybertruck's reputation has been marred by numerous recalls and controversies since its launch. Despite these issues, Tesla CEO Elon Musk attempted to showcase the vehicle's potential by setting up an impromptu showroom on the White House South Lawn in an effort to interest President Donald Trump in purchasing one of his electric vehicles.

A recent analysis by iSeeCars found that the Cybertruck's six recalls made it worse than 91% of all other vehicles launched in 2024. This stark statistic underscores the challenges facing Tesla as it tries to establish its brand and products in a competitive market.

Tesla's CEO Elon Musk has confirmed that production of the Cybertruck will be discontinued, a move seen by many as a surprise given the vehicle's underwhelming popularity and reliability issues.

However, Musk claims that this decision is not driven by these concerns, but rather by his desire to focus on other projects. Specifically, he wants to ramp up production of the Cybercab, an autonomous electric vehicle (EV) that forms a key part of Tesla's plans for robotaxis.

Musk sees the Cybercab as pivotal in shaping the company's future and has even stated that Tesla should no longer be regarded as simply an automaker, but rather as a leader in robotics and autonomous vehicles.

According to Musk, the first Cybercab came off the production line in February, with plans to rapidly scale up output from its current limited capacity. Currently, the vehicle is only available in Austin, where it operates with a fleet of just hundreds of units.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/rip-cybertruck-you-were-unloved-unwanted-and-utterly-absurd/

The group, known as Capytistas, claims to be made up of grassroots activists, researchers, journalists, and artists who are working together in secret "silos to protect each other's identities. This collective effort has yielded extensive research on hundreds of individuals, including Elon Musk and one trillionaire whose identity remains undisclosed.

The group's intentions were outlined in a recent press release, which stated that they will be publishing over 150 previously unreported home addresses in the coming weeks. The move is part of their efforts to expose what they see as the hidden lives of these influential individuals.

Capytistas has adopted the capybara as its mascot, symbolizing the group's goal of promoting harmony and transparency among those in power.

The term oligarch is often associated with Russian tycoons who accumulated wealth after the Soviet collapse, but the concept of extreme wealth and power has a broader application in the United States. With the country's growing income inequality, some argue that individuals like Elon Musk have become modern-day oligarchs.

Musk, now a trillionaire, has been accused of wielding significant influence over federal politics through his donations to politicians. Since 2023, he has contributed more than $700 million to elections, equivalent to approximately 15 million individual online donations. This level of investment in the political system raises questions about the potential for undue influence.

The tactic of doxing, which involves publicly revealing personal information about individuals, has gained popularity among activist groups and self-proclaimed state informants. In March 2025, an anonymous website called DOGEQuest posted what it claimed were the addresses of Tesla owners and employees.

The concept of doxing has expanded significantly in recent years, with even government agencies adopting a broad definition that encompasses various forms of surveillance. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is a prime example, having redefined doxing to include the act of videotaping law enforcement officers. This stance has led to public campaigns targeting DHS employees and contractors.

In a striking example of this trend, hackers recently released the names and work contacts of over 40,000 DHS personnel and contractors. The hackers justified their actions by pointing out that the DHS collects data on the general public while keeping its own officers' identities hidden. This move has sparked debate about whether the DHS's strategy amounts to doxing.

The Capytistas, a group of anti-oligarchy activists, have been at the forefront of this issue. When asked if their efforts could be considered doxing, they responded that they had no qualms with describing their work in this way. The Capytistas' primary method involves researching public records, court filings, and financial documents related to wealthy individuals' properties.

In addition to property research, the Capytistas occasionally employ other tactics, including physical surveillance, human infiltration, and purchasing location and profile data from online ad markets. This diverse range of methods allows them to gather a wealth of information about those in positions of power.

The activists have compiled a vast amount of information about Elon Musk's properties, including 32 home addresses tied to him and his executives. This data is part of a larger dossier that categorizes individuals into different tiers based on their level of significance.

Some investors, such as Vanguard and BlackRock, are considered tertiary targets due to their indirect connections to the billionaire elite. These entities are listed only by corporate office or facility location, rather than being tied directly to specific individuals.

Musk's inclusion in the dossier is significant because he serves as a kind of gateway for those who have yet to join the activists' class war efforts. Despite his relatively small file size and designation as one of the least important" targets, Musk was chosen first due to his high public profile and widespread anger towards him among some groups.

According to law enforcement records obtained by our investigation, a wave of anti-Tesla violence swept across at least nine US states within months of Elon Musk's arrival in Washington last year.

Intelligence analysts warned cops nationwide that calls to boycott the electric vehicle manufacturer and protests against Musk were escalating alongside the attacks. This was revealed in a joint FBI-DHS bulletin released under public records law, which highlighted the growing tensions surrounding Musk's presence in the nation's capital.

The situation prompted authorities in Nevada to issue formal guidelines for first responders on how to tackle fires involving Tesla vehicles. Analysts warned that these fires can be particularly challenging to extinguish, requiring up to 8,000 gallons of water to put out.

As part of their campaign against perceived oligarchs, anti-oligarchy activists are now planning to release sensitive information about the personal lives of high-profile targets like Musk, in an effort to bring public attention and pressure on these individuals.

Activists targeting high-net-worth individuals are now looking to strip them of their most prized possession: privacy. This move is seen as a way to level the playing field and hold these individuals accountable for their actions.

The escalation in tactics comes after tech executives' homes have already become targets, with one notable incident involving an attempted arson attack on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's residence in April. A 20-year-old man was arrested and charged with throwing an incendiary device at the property, causing a fire to break out on the exterior gate. Fortunately, no one was injured during the incident.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/anti-oligarchy-activists-plan-to-dox-elon-musk-and-hundreds-of-billionaire-linked-homes/

A major exception to this trend can be found in cities that have already introduced fully automated transportation systems, such as Honolulu's existing line and the planned new lines in Washington D.C. and Los Angeles.

These projects are ambitious but face significant challenges, including financial hurdles and technical issues that must be overcome before they can become a reality.

Cities across the world are ahead of the US in implementing automated mass transit, with numerous examples found in Europe, Asia, Canada, Australia, South America, and the Middle East.

The push for automation is long overdue, according to some experts, who argue that the benefits of reduced labor costs outweigh the upfront expenses required to implement such systems.

The push for automation in transit systems has been slow to materialize in the US, despite rapid advancements in self-driving cars. While companies like Waymo and Tesla have made significant strides in on-road vehicle automation, the transportation sector using tracks has lagged behind.

One notable example is the Washington D.C. Metro system, which initially introduced automated features when it opened 50 years ago. However, these were disabled after a fatal crash in 2009 and only recently reinstated over the past two years.

Efforts to automate transit systems are now underway in various cities across the US. In Los Angeles, an environmental review is currently being conducted for an automated track on a new underground line of its heavy-rail system. This project aims to reduce costs by cutting through the challenging terrain of the Santa Monica Mountains.

In contrast, Honolulu has already implemented a comprehensive driverless transit system, which will stretch 19 miles when completed. This elevated line surpasses earlier pilot projects in Detroit and Miami, as well as smaller systems in Las Vegas and other cities.

Several automated monorails have been introduced in US cities over the years, but unfortunately, some have failed to succeed. For instance, an automated monorail in Memphis was shut down due to operational issues, while a driverless system in Jacksonville will soon be discontinued due to budget constraints.

The 2009 train collision on the D.C. Red Line that killed nine people and injured many others highlights the importance of reliable automation systems in transit infrastructure. The National Transportation Safety Board attributed the crash to a maintenance problem in the automated signaling system, emphasizing the need for effective safety protocols.

The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's CEO Randy Clarke emphasized that the recent crash at Fort Totten was unrelated to the restoration of an automated signaling system on the Red Line in 2024 and other Metro lines last year.

Clarke acknowledged that the incident had a significant impact on the authority's plans for further automation, effectively putting them on hold for many years. He described the current system as highly regulated, well-documented, and proficient.

A major upgrade to the Red Line is currently underway, with a nearly $1 billion plan approved by Metro's Board of Directors in April to enhance safety features. This includes the installation of protective barriers that prevent passengers from accessing the tracks.

Clarke noted that while automated trains may become a reality as early as 2033, human workers will still be required to maintain the tracks and respond to emergencies.

John Samuelsen, international president of the Transport Workers Union, has expressed concerns about automation efforts in New York and elsewhere. He believes that passengers would be left vulnerable during self-evacuations from a third-rail system.

The Skyline automated light metro transit system in Honolulu has been operational for three years and has undergone expansion last year to alleviate traffic bottlenecks for commuters.

Project director Vance Tsuda attributes the lack of incidents involving automation to the absence of human error, highlighting that even hybrid systems are less safe than completely automated ones. According to Tsuda, a human's oversight can lead to serious consequences, such as an open door being overlooked and a train cleared for departure prematurely.

Tsuda's stance is in contrast to David King, an associate professor of urban planning at Arizona State University, who emphasizes the importance of maintaining a perfect success rate to maintain public trust. The Fort Totten crash and other incidents involving automation have set back the technology, according to King.

King points out that while private industry is allowed to experience some level of failure, the same tolerance does not apply when it comes to government-run projects. He cites Elon Musk's SpaceX as an example, where several rocket failures would be catastrophic for NASA's budget if they occurred in a public sector context.

The ambitious transit automation effort underway in Los Angeles aims to address one of the country's most notorious traffic congestion areas - beneath the Santa Monica Mountains. This region separates the bustling Westside employment hub from the San Fernando Valley, creating significant travel difficulties for residents and commuters.

The proposed new subway line in Los Angeles would be an automated system, unlike the existing one under the same mountain range near Hollywood, which still requires a human driver on board. According to Cecily Way, who oversees planning for the Sepulveda Project at LA Metro, the new proposal envisions shorter and more frequent trains.

The new line would also feature station doors designed to protect passengers waiting on the platform from approaching trains, mirroring a similar design element in the Washington project. This attention to safety features reflects an effort to prioritize passenger well-being in the development of these automated transit systems.

The successful implementation of driverless trains in Los Angeles or Washington could serve as a catalyst for other cities to adopt similar technology, according to experts. As one observer noted, such a breakthrough would send a clear signal that automation is not only technologically feasible but also desirable for major transit lines.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/24/transit-innovation-driverless-trains-subways-monorail-people-movers/

The engineering prowess behind this vehicle is undeniable, with innovative design features that set it apart from its competitors. However, the key question remains whether Tesla can successfully commercialize even the base model of this car. This version boasts some impressive features, including a fan-powered suction system, but lacks the advanced thrusters and capabilities that make the Roadster truly remarkable.

In contrast to America's efforts in the EV sector, Chinese manufacturers have been gaining momentum worldwide, particularly in Britain where they are leveraging their state-supported supply chains and generous R&D incentives. In September, a Chinese-built SUV called the Jaecoo 7 became the best-selling new vehicle in Britain, accounting for nearly a quarter of the country's new-car market that month.

Chinese automakers have been making significant strides globally, outpacing American manufacturers in terms of affordability and innovative technology. The challenge facing America lies not in its ingenuity but rather in converting this innovation into affordable products at scale, an area where China has excelled.

The United States government has taken steps to protect domestic EV production by imposing a 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles, effectively closing the market to them since 2024. The intention behind this policy was to prevent heavily subsidized Chinese vehicles from undercutting American manufacturers and gaining an unfair advantage in the market.

American automakers have struggled to compete with foreign manufacturers, particularly those from Japan, who gained an edge in fuel efficiency and quality decades ago. By the time American companies caught up, it took them around 10-15 years to match Japanese production efficiency.

This experience has led policymakers to recognize that simply protecting domestic industries is not enough to drive innovation and competitiveness. The federal research and development tax credit was introduced in 1981 as a response to declining private-sector R&D spending and concerns about U.S. competitiveness.

The success of this policy suggests that providing incentives for companies to invest in innovation can be crucial in staying ahead in the global market. However, China's entry into the electric vehicle (EV) market is making it increasingly difficult for American manufacturers to keep pace.

China has established itself as the world's largest EV manufacturing hub, according to the International Energy Agency. In 2024, Chinese-made vehicles accounted for 40% of global electric-car exports, a significant share of the global market.

The Chinese government's support for its domestic industry has also given it a cost advantage in battery production. While global battery pack prices fell by around 15% in 2024, China saw a steeper decline of about 30%. This disparity highlights the challenge facing American automakers as they strive to compete with their Chinese counterparts.

China's dominance in EV manufacturing is not limited to vehicle exports alone; it also extends to the entire battery supply chain. The country's state-directed industrial system has enabled its manufacturers to gain a significant lead over their American rivals, making it increasingly difficult for them to catch up.

The cost advantage enjoyed by China's manufacturers in the electric vehicle (EV) sector has been largely preserved due to tariffs imposed on imported goods, preventing American consumers from benefiting from this disparity.

As a result, the US is struggling with commercialization issues, where cutting-edge research and engineering capabilities are not being leveraged effectively to bring innovative products to market. This discrepancy is evident in various industries beyond EVs, where the country's record of translating ideas into successful products has been less impressive.

This problem was starkly illustrated during my tenure on the board of Polaroid, a pioneering technology firm that faltered despite its groundbreaking expertise in digital photography. The company's scientists had foreseen the future of imaging, but failed to deliver a market-ready product, allowing competitors to seize the opportunity and leave Polaroid facing bankruptcy.

The success of US manufacturers relies not only on large corporations with access to vast resources, but also on smaller, agile firms that can innovate and take risks. These companies are essential for developing new intellectual property and solving production challenges that larger manufacturers can then scale up.

To foster this ecosystem, smaller businesses need better access to capital, which is currently hindered by state-level policies that opt out of federal rules allowing immediate deduction of domestic research costs. This decision prioritizes state budgets over business investment opportunities, leaving companies within these states with less financial flexibility to invest in engineers, prototypes, and equipment.

The financial burden of taxes on businesses can have a direct impact on their ability to invest in research and development. A dollar paid in tax cannot be used to fund an engineer's salary or set up new production lines, limiting companies' financial flexibility.

In contrast, China has deliberately used its tax policy to encourage sustained research and development. Its R&D super-deduction provides a different approach compared to the American credit system, making it difficult to directly compare their headline percentages.

To stay competitive in the automotive industry, manufacturers need more than just research incentives. They also require efficient production capabilities, which can be achieved through investments in robotics and advanced equipment. Smaller suppliers often lack the capital to invest in these technologies.

The investment environment is crucial for companies like Tesla to thrive. The new Roadster's affordability will depend on advances across the automotive supply chain, including contributions from smaller manufacturers willing to take calculated risks that larger companies may shy away from.

Chinese automakers have already made significant strides in Britain, demonstrating that consumers will quickly consider a new competitor when they offer a product that meets quality and value standards.

Protectionist measures may temporarily delay competition from foreign electric vehicle manufacturers, but ultimately cannot determine the winner of the market. For America to remain competitive, it must improve its ability to turn breakthrough ideas into affordable products that can be sold globally.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/24/rick-lazio-we-lost-auto-race-to-japan-china-should-alarm-us/

Tesla's unveiling of the Rocket" EV has sparked renewed interest in the potential for consumers to own and operate flying vehicles, but not everyone is convinced that this technology is near-term. Some experts remain skeptical about the practicality of flying cars, raising questions about their safety and usability on public roads.

A poll conducted by Live Science asked readers whether they believe flying cars will be available to consumers in the next five years. The results show a mixed response from the public, with some expressing optimism about the prospect of flying vehicles becoming a reality soon.

The largest voting group in the poll, making up 34% of respondents, said no, they do not think flying cars will be available in the next five years. This sentiment was echoed by another 23% who are even more skeptical, stating that flying cars will never become a practical solution for transportation.

Some readers expressed their concerns about the potential risks and challenges associated with flying cars, including safety on public roads and the added complexity of navigating through three-dimensional space.

Some commenters remained skeptical about the feasibility of flying cars, dismissing them as a cheap alternative to traditional vehicles.

The idea of relying on air currents to propel vehicles is seen as impractical by many, who argue that it would be difficult to navigate through livable areas without causing damage or disruption. The thought of protests erupting if flying cars were allowed in populated areas only adds to the concerns. The sheer scale of potential disruptions to cities and towns is a major consideration.

However, not all opinions are negative. Some commenters have been impressed by Tesla's technological advancements, citing the company's ability to push the boundaries of what is thought possible. For instance, Elon Musk's successful development of the flying roadster has demonstrated the potential for innovation in transportation.

The fact that Mr. Musk has single-handedly revolutionized both the car industry and space travel in a relatively short period of time (since 2008) is a testament to his vision and expertise. This achievement has raised expectations about what can be accomplished with technology, and some people are eager to see where this innovation will lead next.

The concept of flying cars has sparked a mix of excitement and skepticism among readers, with many questioning whether humans are ready for such technology. A significant portion of respondents expressed concerns about safety, citing the complexity of navigating three-dimensional space as a major hurdle.

Several experts have pointed out that even driving in two dimensions can be challenging, especially when it comes to judging distances and speeds. This achievement has raised expectations about what can be accomplished with technology, and some people are eager to see where this innovation will lead next. The future of transportation is likely to involve significant technological advancements, but for now, the focus remains on developing practical solutions that prioritize public safety.

Live Science: https://www.livescience.com/technology/most-people-cant-handle-driving-in-2-dimensions-let-alone-3-readers-respond-to-our-poll-about-flying-cars

Investors are becoming increasingly risk-averse, seeking out safe-haven assets like Treasury bonds amidst the turmoil. Demand for these bonds has increased significantly, with yields on the 10-year note falling below 5% - its lowest level since late September. This trend bucks recent weeks' patterns, where investors had been showing a preference for higher-risk investments.

The US military and diplomatic personnel are being evacuated from several countries in the Middle East, in preparation for possible military action against Iran. According to reports, key targets could include Iran's energy infrastructure and nuclear sites, sparking concerns about potential retaliation from Iranian officials.

The market volatility continues as concerns about an impending war with Iran and high artificial intelligence (AI) spending weigh heavily on investor sentiment. Tech stocks are leading the declines in equity markets, with Meta and Tesla experiencing significant drops following their quarterly earnings reports.

Meta's earnings exceeded forecasts, but only after accounting for massive legal penalties paid by the company last quarter, which totaled billions of dollars. The tech giant also warned investors that it plans to increase its spending next year to accommodate growing demands for computing power. This move comes on top of a separate regulatory filing that revealed Meta intends to allocate an additional $825 billion towards contracts related to its AI infrastructure development.

Tesla's quarterly earnings report, however, fell short of investor expectations as the company announced plans to rein in capital expenditures, dampening hopes for more aggressive expansion strategies.

The technology sector's struggles continued to weigh on global markets as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang warned that capital to finance AI investments is becoming increasingly scarce due to higher interest rates and existing spending commitments.

Meanwhile, European stocks have been declining in recent weeks, partly due to a significant sell-off in French government debt. This development has added to the overall market uncertainty, contributing to Thursday's downturn.

The S&P 500 remains near its all-time high set earlier this month despite the current market volatility, but a prolonged stumble could still impact President Donald Trump's economic argument ahead of the November midterm elections.

NBC News World: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/markets/iran-war-ai-spending-oil-prices-selloff-rcna604994

The company still managed to report a profit, but the numbers were lower than expected, coming in at around $5 billion. This figure was slightly below analysts' estimates, indicating that Tesla's financial performance is under pressure despite its strong sales figures.

Tesla has been investing heavily in AI and other R&D initiatives, which are driving up operating expenses. The company pointed to these costs as a major factor contributing to the decline in profitability. Lower regulatory credit revenue and weaker energy storage gross profit also weighed on the company's bottom line.

The impact of lower vehicle prices on revenue was another significant factor affecting Tesla's financial performance. Despite delivering 486,532 vehicles in the third quarter, the company struggled to make the same amount of money from each sale as it had previously.

Tesla's financial struggles continue as it grapples with declining profit margins. Despite delivering 486,532 vehicles in the third quarter, the company struggled to make the same amount of money from each sale as it had previously.

However, there is some good news for Tesla's bottom line. The company reported adjusted earnings per share of 48 cents, exceeding analyst expectations of 44 cents. This suggests that Tesla's financial performance remains solid, at least in terms of profitability.

The company also sees opportunities for growth in areas such as autonomy subscriptions and region-specific product mixes. Analysts are optimistic about these developments, with one noting that autonomy subscriptions are trending up and AI is already a significant source of revenue at SpaceX.

Anticipation surrounding a potential merger between Tesla and SpaceX has reached new heights this year, building momentum since Elon Musk's companies went public.

The hype is not without reason, as both companies have been making significant strides in their respective fields. Just last week, Tesla showcased its latest innovation - the Roadster - with an impressive high-flying demo that left onlookers in awe. The sports car performed a series of daring stunts, including a brief jump into the air and a twirl over a lineup of other Tesla vehicles.

This demonstration marked a major milestone for the company, coming nine years after it first announced plans to relaunch the Roadster.

Business Insider: https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-profits-under-pressure-ai-2026-10

Independent board members from both companies have formed special committees to discuss the possibility of combining forces, with Musk stating that he cannot be part of these discussions due to his roles as CEO at both firms.

Musk acknowledged the sensitivity of the topic, likening it to navigating a minefield during the Q&A session with Wall Street analysts.

Tesla's stock saw a modest increase in after-hours trading, rising by over 1%, while SpaceX shares surged above 5% following Musk's comments on the potential merger.

The independent committees have yet to reach an agreement on the terms of any possible transaction, and Musk emphasized that no guarantee exists for such a deal.

Musk's absence from merger talks has been noted, with him describing it as an "odd kabuki dance where he is unable to participate in conversations between independent committees representing Tesla and SpaceX.

The collaboration between the two companies on various projects, including AI software and chip design, robotics, and connectivity, has been highlighted by Musk as a potential benefit of a merger. The planned Terafab chip plant, a joint development project, is also seen as an area where combining resources could yield significant gains.

The independent committees were established at the request of shareholders, according to Musk, who noted that any deal would require support from a majority of outstanding shares - a quite high hurdle he acknowledged. This suggests that while there may be enthusiasm for a merger, securing approval from key stakeholders will not be easy.

Despite the ongoing speculation about a potential tie-up between Tesla and SpaceX, no formal proposal has yet been put to shareholders. The companies' financial ties are already significant, with Tesla having invested $2 billion in SpaceX, as confirmed by their joint proxy statement filed earlier this week.

The combined market value of a merged Tesla-SpaceX would be approximately $3.5 trillion at current prices, based on the Tuesday closing values of the two companies. This estimate puts SpaceX's valuation at around $2 trillion and Tesla's at nearly $1.5 trillion, with Musk holding about a third of the combined entity.

The overlap between Tesla and SpaceX's boards is more extensive than initially thought. Ira Ehrenpreis, chairman of DBL Partners, plays a crucial role in both companies' governance structures. He chairs SpaceX's compensation and nominating committee, which serves as a single entity at the space exploration firm. Additionally, he also heads two separate committees at Tesla.

Ehrenpreis is not the only connection between the two boards. James Murdoch, a long-time director at Tesla, has previously invested in SpaceX. This detail emerged during his testimony in a previous legal challenge over Elon Musk's pay package at Tesla. The intersection of interests and expertise on both boards could potentially facilitate a closer alignment between the companies.

In other news, SpaceX reported its first operating profit since going public in June. Revenues for the third quarter fiscal 2027 year skyrocketed by 161% to $14.58 billion, significantly surpassing analysts' expectations of $12.86 billion. Operating revenue reached $2.79 billion, while net income was a substantial $4.4 billion.

The AI business at SpaceX, rebranded as Super Intelligence," has experienced explosive growth. Revenue from this division nearly tripled from the second quarter to an impressive $7.56 billion. For the first time since going public, Starlink's revenue of $5.25 billion was eclipsed by Super Intelligence. This significant increase in AI-related revenue underscores the company's commitment to innovation.

As SpaceX continues to expand its operations, Elon Musk has made a bold claim about the company's future prospects. He estimates that annual recurring revenue could reach $500 billion to $1 trillion by the end of 2027, based on the breakneck buildout pace. Meanwhile, Johnsen reaffirmed Tesla's target of achieving $100 billion in annualized revenue by the end of this year.

To achieve its ambitious goal of $100 billion in annualized revenue by year's end, Tesla will need to significantly ramp up sales in the final quarter. With its third-quarter pace translating to around $58 billion a year, SpaceX would have to bring in roughly 70% more revenue than its average month last quarter in December.

SpaceX's annual revenue estimate is based on its current quarterly performance, and if it were to maintain this pace, it would fall short of the target by about $42 billion to $83 billion per month.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/20/elon-musk-tesla-and-spacex-weighing-merger/

The four-hour film, directed by Alex Gibney, is based on extensive research into Musk's life and features in-depth interviews with people who have been close to him over the years. These include his ex-wife Justine Musk, social media influencer Ashley St. Clair, and his father Errol Musk.

Gibney's film presents a damning picture of Tesla's business practices, alleging that the company has manipulated key data on its cars, including battery mileage, and exaggerated the capabilities of its full self-driving mode. This could have potentially deadly consequences for drivers who rely on these features.

Musk's relationship with government funding is also scrutinized in the documentary. Despite his vocal criticism of wasteful spending, Gibney argues that Musk has benefited greatly from government investment, often through a process he calls "reward hacking." This refers to the way artificial intelligence agents can find loopholes in their prompts to deliver results that score well but don't actually achieve the intended goal.

Gibney's documentary also delves into Musk's personal life, including his many children with various women. Some of these women were involved in contractual arrangements with non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), which St. Clair attests to in an interview.

The film's investigation into Tesla's practices has been met with resistance from the company, but Gibney is undeterred. He argues that Musk's actions have real-world consequences and that it's essential to hold him accountable for his decisions.

Gibney's team was unable to secure access to Musk himself, so they opted for a creative workaround. They gathered audio recordings of Musk speaking and created an animated avatar of him to speak directly to the audience. This bold choice helps to bring the viewer into Musk's world.

The documentary also explores Musk's fascination with the idea that our reality might be a simulation. Gibney uses video game-style graphics and sequences to create a surreal atmosphere, plunging the audience into a world inspired by Musk's musings on this topic.

The documentary film about Elon Musk delves into the consequences of unchecked power and wealth in American society and politics.

A key aspect of the film is its exploration of the Great Man Theory, which posits that an individual with unique qualities can have a profound historical impact.

Director Alex Gibney acknowledges the validity of this theory, citing examples such as Stalin, Mao, and FDR, who all wielded significant influence within their respective contexts.

However, Gibney also emphasizes that these individuals operated within a broader framework of social forces that ultimately shaped their actions and decisions.

The film suggests that Musk's rise to power coincided with a vulnerable moment in history, making him particularly adept at exploiting existing systems for his own gain.

In this sense, the documentary can be seen as a profile not just of Musk, but also of the society that enabled him to accumulate such vast influence.

As I delved deeper into Elon Musk's world, I found myself drawn to his charisma and conviction. I recall installing Tesla solar panels and a Powerwall at my own home, thinking it was a superior solution to traditional gas-burning generators in case of power outages.

Musk's early days were marked by an impressive ability to inspire loyalty and dedication from those around him. He reminded me of Steve Jobs before the latter refined his public persona, with Musk still finding his footing as a leader.

Over time, however, I noticed that individuals like Musk often justify extreme measures in pursuit of their goals, believing that any means can be justified if it helps achieve their noble objectives.

This mindset is closely tied to Musk's notion that the world may exist only as a simulation. While this idea comes up later in the film, it highlights his tendency to think outside conventional boundaries and question established norms.

One area where Musk has been remarkably successful is in attracting top talent to his companies. His sense of mission has proven to be a powerful draw for skilled engineers who share his vision for revolutionary technologies like electric cars and space exploration.

For instance, many individuals at Tesla and SpaceX were initially motivated by a desire to make a difference, whether it was by colonizing Mars or creating sustainable energy solutions. They saw Musk's companies as more agile and effective than traditional institutions like NASA.

Musk has also benefited from significant government support throughout his career, with an estimated $38 billion in contracts, subsidies, and loans secured according to the Washington Post.

The film portrays Musk as a complex figure who has exploited his genius for reward hacking, a term coined by author Cory Doctorow, to build his vast fortune.

This wealth is largely built on taxpayer support, with an estimated $38 billion in government contracts, subsidies, and loans secured throughout his career.

While some libertarians interviewed in the film view Musk as a master con artist who has duped the public, others acknowledge his innovative spirit and ability to drive technological advancements.

However, as Tesla's fortunes rise, so does the suspicion that the public is not getting a fair return on its investment. The documentary suggests that taxpayer dollars are being used to prop up Musk's companies without sufficient benefits for the broader population.

One of the most striking aspects of the film is its portrayal of Musk's detachment from the collective society and his employees. He is shown lavishly praising his SpaceX workers in early footage, but as his fortunes grow, so does his sense of self-importance and isolation.

Musk's disregard for worker safety during the COVID-19 pandemic is a stark example of this attitude, with hundreds of Tesla employees reportedly testing positive for the virus after the company reopened its Fremont factory despite local orders to the contrary.

The documentary raises questions about the role of companies in society, suggesting that their primary purpose is not just to enrich shareholders but also to serve customers and protect employees.

As we allow wealthy individuals like Elon Musk to accumulate vast power and influence, we often tell ourselves a story about their greatness. We see them as symbols of success and genius, and believe that they will lead us to a brighter future.

However, this narrative is also driven by our own desires for luxury and innovation. We're drawn to the sleek designs and cutting-edge technology of products like Tesla's electric cars, which make us feel like we're living in the future.

But beneath the surface, this obsession with luxury and status can have unintended consequences. Instead of investing in politicians who will take a principled stand against global warming, we opt for expensive gadgets that give us a false sense of environmental responsibility.

The documentary raises questions about our complicity in perpetuating this narrative. How much do we enable wealthy individuals like Musk by buying into their vision and ignoring the darker aspects of their character?

When researching the film, the team was keenly aware of the need to balance the complexities of Musk's personality with the harsh realities of his actions. They had to navigate a web of contradictory ideas about public responsibility and personal ambition.

The parallels between Musk and other high-profile figures like Steve Jobs are striking. While Jobs was known for his ability to take risks and challenge conventional wisdom, Musk has been criticized for his authoritarian leadership style and willingness to surround himself with sycophants.

As the team delved deeper into their research, they began to see Musk as a symbol of a broader cultural problem, one that prioritizes luxury and status over principle and accountability.

The documentary sheds light on why Elon Musk's public image has such a profound impact on people, making them emotional and invested in his story.

Despite being a businessman, Musk's ability to tap into the public's emotions is noteworthy, particularly when considering how he has been able to navigate the complexities of politics with ease.

Musk's ability to adapt to changing circumstances and switch between supporting different political parties is a testament to his cunning business sense, but also raises questions about accountability and principle.

The documentary explores how Musk has benefited from favorable policies implemented by the Obama administration, which paved the way for Tesla and SpaceX's success.

However, this success comes with its own set of challenges, including concerns about accountability and transparency in the private sector taking over public space programs.

Ultimately, the documentary leaves viewers to ponder whether the efficiencies gained through privatization are worth the risks and uncertainties that come with it.

GQ: https://www.gq.com/story/alex-gibney-elon-musk-interview

The development of the robot's "brain - its AI system - will be a major challenge, taking significant time and effort to get right. Altman noted that while having a humanoid body is crucial, what truly matters is equipping it with an intelligent system capable of controlling its movements and actions effectively.

OpenAI's decision to pursue this project seems surprising given the company's current focus on developing AI models and consumer hardware. However, Altman believes that creating a robot with human-like capabilities will be essential for future innovation in robotics and artificial intelligence.

The success of the humanoid robot project ultimately depends on OpenAI's ability to develop an advanced AI system that can effectively control its movements and interactions. With Altman confirming that the company is committed to building such a robot, it remains to be seen how they plan to overcome the significant technical hurdles involved in creating a truly intelligent machine.

The development of a humanoid robot by OpenAI is still in its early stages, with the company's CEO confirming that it will take time for such a product to become available on the market.

While the physical body of the robot may seem like a significant challenge, the real hurdle lies in creating a truly intelligent machine capable of understanding and interpreting complex instructions. This involves developing advanced algorithms and machine-learning infrastructure to enable the robot to make decisions based on sensory input from its cameras and sensors.

To achieve this goal, OpenAI is recruiting experts with expertise in robotics and artificial intelligence. The company has posted job openings for roles including motion control, state estimation, actuator control, whole-robot behavior, and machine learning infrastructure development.

The creation of a humanoid robot that can perform tasks such as picking up objects requires advanced coordination between the robot's body and its brain". This involves identifying objects, estimating grip force, and exerting precise amounts of pressure to prevent accidents like coffee spills.

The development of OpenAI's humanoid robot is not without precedent, as evidenced by the company's Dactyl research project. This project successfully taught a robotic hand to manipulate real objects through simulation-based training. However, this achievement highlights one of the biggest challenges in robotics: the disconnect between software and hardware.

In reality, a model can only learn what should happen through its software, but ultimately, physics dictates how the world works. This is reflected in the difficulties that OpenAI's Dactyl project faced when it was later applied to a Rubik's Cube. The task of manipulating real objects proved to be much more complex than simulating them.

OpenAI is not treating the hardware aspect as an afterthought, despite CEO Sam Altman's emphasis on intelligence. In fact, the company has job listings that suggest it is working on custom electromechanical actuators, including motors, transmissions, sensing systems, and thermal management. Additionally, other positions cover manufacturing and supply chain development to scale up production.

The field of robotics is not new territory for OpenAI, as several companies have already made significant strides in humanoid robot development. Tesla's Optimus project has been underway for years, while XPENG's IRON robot was able to autonomously walk off the assembly line after being manufactured. These examples demonstrate that even advanced software requires careful calibration of complex motor and joint systems.

OpenAI's long-term vision for its robots extends beyond assisting skilled workers in building infrastructure. The company aims to develop a personal robot that can tackle a broader range of tasks, although specific details on what those tasks might be are scarce.

Currently, OpenAI has not unveiled an actual robot or provided any information on consumer pricing, subscription models, release dates, or privacy frameworks for its potential robots. These practical considerations would likely become more pressing if the company were to develop machines equipped with cameras and microphones that could roam freely in users' homes.

The number of robotics job postings on OpenAI's careers page stands at 27, suggesting a significant investment in developing the technical expertise required to bring these ambitious plans to life.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2285040/openai-humanoid-robot-sam-altman-statement-real-challenge/

The Tesla Roadster has been making headlines for quite some time now, with Thursday's event being just one in a series of announcements about the second-generation sports car. While it may seem like déjà vu, this latest iteration is not without its differences and new features that have piqued the interest of many. The production timeline has also been confirmed by Tesla's CEO Elon Musk.

The original Roadster, released in 2008, was a groundbreaking vehicle that marked an important milestone for the company in its early days. Ideated by one of Tesla's founders, Martin Eberhard, this car was initially met with skepticism but went on to demonstrate impressive capabilities, including reaching 244 miles on a single charge.

The new Roadster promises to build upon the success of its predecessor and deliver even more exciting features. However, concerns have been raised about whether this is just another paper launch for Tesla's embattled second-gen sports car. The company has faced several setbacks in recent times, leaving many to wonder if they can meet their production targets.

Tesla's CEO Elon Musk was present at the event where he confirmed that production would begin in 2028. This marks a significant step forward for the company as it looks to solidify its position in the electric car market.

The redesigned Roadster is set to be released with several high-end features, including rocket boosters and cold-gas thrusters. However, reserving one of these models will come at a steep price, with the "Thrust trim level costing $250,000.

The Tesla Roadster's production timeline has been a subject of much speculation over the years, with initial promises made in 2017 giving way to repeated delays.

When first unveiled in November 2017, the redesigned Roadster was touted as a showcase for Tesla's electric vehicle manufacturing prowess. Elon Musk described it as a hardcore smackdown to gasoline cars," implying that this car would leave traditional gas-powered vehicles in its dust.

The initial plan was to put the Roadster into production by 2020, but that deadline came and went without any sign of the car hitting the market. In fact, Tesla continued to accept deposits for the Roadster, with prices ranging from $50,000 to a whopping $250,000.

Musk's words on the matter have been somewhat contradictory, with him promising at one point that production would begin within 18 months of his July 2020 earnings call. However, the public health crisis that swept the globe in 2020 seemed to add another layer of complexity to Tesla's plans.

As the years went by and delays continued to mount, Musk began to hint that other priorities might be taking precedence. The Cybertruck, which had its own share of production woes, was one such project that seemed to have captured the CEO's attention at least temporarily.

The past few years have been marked by significant turmoil for Elon Musk and Tesla. The CEO's public persona has undergone a dramatic shift, transforming from an environmentalist to a figure associated with far-right politics. This transformation culminated in his involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency under President Donald Trump.

Musk's tenure at the department sparked widespread criticism, including a study published by The Lancet in July 2025, which projected that cuts implemented during this period could lead to over 14 million deaths by 2030. Musk has disputed these numbers, but the reputational damage caused by his stint in government had a lasting impact on Tesla.

The company's reputation suffered further as protests erupted globally against Tesla. As Musk stepped down from the Department of Government Efficiency in May 2025, allegations of substance abuse and family drama followed him out of office. This was not an ideal time for Tesla to be addressing its priorities.

By April of this year, Tesla had recommitted to releasing the Roadster, but many had lost hope that the sports car would ever see production. The project's delays had become a running joke in popular culture, with even some Tesla owners expressing frustration about their reserved vehicles.

Tesla owners such as YouTuber Marques Brownlee have spoken out about the long wait for their Roadsters, which were reserved years ago but remain unsold. Another high-profile figure to voice concerns was Sam Altman of OpenAI, a former business partner and current rival of Musk's.

The Tesla Roadster's production launch event has been announced for 2028, but it remains to be seen whether this timeline will actually come to fruition.

A successful launch requires more than just a launch event, however - potential customers also need to be convinced that investing in the Roadster is a worthwhile decision.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2289475/tesla-roadster-2028-production-dont-get-hopes-up/

The car's aerobatic capabilities are made possible by a system of thrusters that utilize compressed air to propel and stabilize the vehicle in mid-air. This technology may seem cutting-edge, but it has actually been around for decades in experimental missile defense systems.

One notable example is the Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV), which features similar uses of thrusters to target and destroy ballistic missiles. The MKV's design dates back to at least the early 2000s, and its use of thrusters has paved the way for modern applications like Tesla's Roadster.

The Roadster's thruster system consists of two high-pressure air tanks and ten nozzles strategically placed throughout the car. These nozzles fire off compressed air to control the vehicle's movements, allowing it to perform impressive stunts with ease.

Tesla claims that its Roadster can refill its thrusters on its own, although this feature is only available on the Rocket trim of the car. The Thruster and Performance trims do not come equipped with the full thruster setup.

The origins of the MKV project date back to 2004 when Lockheed Martin secured a $760 million contract from the US Missile Defense Agency to develop a system capable of destroying multiple ballistic missile threats and decoys in a single launch.

This ambitious project involved several smaller vehicles designed to collide with missiles, neutralizing them. The system's ability to change direction quickly was made possible by its thrusters, which allowed it to maneuver in mid-air with remarkable agility, much like the Tesla Roadster.

However, finding footage of the MKV in action has proven challenging due to the complex and secretive nature of military projects. The concept of a single missile system capable of taking out multiple threats dates back to the Reagan-era Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), also known as the "Star Wars program.

The line between what was developed by Lockheed Martin and what was part of the SDI is often blurred, especially given that Lockheed Martin itself didn't exist until 1995. The company's involvement in the MKV project was one of several development tracks pursued in conjunction with contractor Raytheon, ultimately leading to the retirement of the original MKV project in 2009 due to military budget cuts.

The Tesla Roadster and Lockheed Martin's MKV share a common trait beyond their use in luxurious transportation and missile defense systems. While both vehicles employ thrusters for propulsion, their underlying technology differs significantly. According to Tesla, its Roadster relies on cold-gas thrusters, which utilize compressed air rather than fuel combustion.

Lockheed Martin's MKV, however, was involved in hot-fire tests" in 2008, indicating that a part of the system burned fuel for propulsion. This distinction highlights a crucial difference between the two vehicles' designs.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2289307/flying-tesla-roadster-lockheed-martin-mokv-technology-comparison/

The remarkable performance was made possible through the use of advanced on-board thrusters, which enabled the vehicle to cushion its rapid descent after driving upside down off a high ramp. This impressive stunt was captured on camera and has been widely shared online, generating significant buzz around the new car.

Tesla's chief designer, Franz von Holzhausen, is responsible for the Roadster 2's angular exterior design, which he also brought to other notable Tesla models such as the Cybertruck, Model S, X, 3, and Y. Von Holzhausen has been leading Tesla's design team since 2008.

The Roadster 2 will be equipped with a rear-wheel drive powertrain, marking a departure from Tesla's usual all-wheel drive configuration for electric vehicles. This change reflects the company's focus on performance and agility in this new model, which is set to make its mark on the automotive world.

The new Tesla Roadster is set to revolutionize the automotive world with its incredible performance capabilities. Two powerful motors will deliver over 1,300 horsepower and more than 1,400 Newton-meters of torque, outpacing even a three-motor Plaid model.

However, this immense power is not evenly distributed across all four wheels, but instead focused on just the rear wheels. This unique setup allows for exceptional agility and responsiveness, making the Roadster an exhilarating drive.

To compensate for its relatively modest range of over 300 miles, Tesla has equipped the Roadster with a cutting-edge battery that can recharge from 15 to 80 percent in just 10 minutes. This rapid charging capability will make long-distance driving a breeze, and mitigate some of the limitations imposed by the car's electric powertrain.

In addition to its impressive performance features, the Roadster also boasts an innovative design element inspired by Elon Musk's personal collection of Bond memorabilia. Four small fans are integrated into the car, mimicking the propellers found on his iconic submarine car from the 1977 film The Spy Who Loved Me.

The Roadster 2's aerodynamic capabilities allow it to produce over two Gs in acceleration even at speeds below 50 mph, according to Tesla's Moravy. This is made possible by the car's advanced system that manipulates air flow around the vehicle.

Similar technologies have been implemented in other high-performance vehicles, such as the McMurtry Spéirling Pure, which uses high-speed electric fans to actively suck air from underneath its chassis and generate up to 2,000 kg of downforce. This extreme suction enables the car to drive uphill at a vertical ramp and maintain traction even when upside down.

The Roadster 2's ability to hover and correct itself is attributed to the car's "SpaceX system, which was developed in collaboration with Musk's aerospace company. This technology utilizes cold gas thrusters that generate thrust through the expansion of pressurized nitrogen gas, a technique commonly used for spacecraft stabilization.

Behind the seats of the Roadster 2 lies a 200-liter carbon-overwrapped pressure vessel (COPV) holding up to 10,000 PSI, which supplies the car's cold gas thrusters with the necessary pressurized nitrogen gas.

The Roadster 2's acceleration is made possible by its advanced launch mode, which combines suction system and thrusters to propel the car from 0 to 60 mph in under a second.

In this mode, the rear thrusters produce more than 80 kilonewtons of thrust, an astonishing figure that matches the thrust of the Dassault Falcon 10X jet. This extraordinary acceleration is achieved in just three seconds, during which time the driver will experience up to 5 Gs.

The car's top speed can reach 210 mph when equipped with the standard package, but for those who opt for the Thrust model, a whole new level of performance becomes available. With this upgraded package, the Roadster 2 can hit an incredible 230 mph.

To support its advanced flight system," the car requires two large carbon-overwrapped pressure vessels (COPVs), one of which is located behind the seats and holds up to 10,000 PSI. However, the system also necessitates a second, larger COPV that occupies the space where the passenger seat would normally be.

Tesla's ambitious plans to produce a high-speed electric car have sparked interest among enthusiasts, but several challenges remain before mass production begins in 2028.

One of these hurdles is the time-consuming process of refilling the vehicle's nitrogen tanks, which currently takes six to seven hours but may be reduced to just 30 minutes with an upcoming improvement.

The Roadster 2 prototypes are being used for further development and refinement, with reservations already open for the Performance variant at a $5,000 fee, followed by an additional payment of $45,000 within 10 days.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/how-tesla-made-its-new-230-mph-car-fly/

The new Roadster bears little resemblance to the curvaceous concept unveiled nearly nine years ago, which promised a 1.9-second 0-60 time and 620 miles of range in production form by 2020. However, these ambitious targets were repeatedly pushed back as Tesla CEO Elon Musk shifted his focus towards other ventures.

The Roadster's unveiling is seen as a showcase of the combined technological prowess of Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, three companies closely tied to Musk through ownership or leadership. The demonstration highlighted the potential for synergies between these entities, with the new Roadster serving as a prime example.

During the event, Tesla Vice President of Engineering Lars Moravy explained how the underbody system generates up to 2Gs of suction, enabling the car to stick to both roads and vertical surfaces. This innovative technology was put on full display when the Roadster drove up a massive ramp and came to rest against a wall, where it remained suspended by suction fans.

The new-look Roadster has been years in the making, with development delayed multiple times as Musk's priorities shifted towards other projects. Despite these setbacks, Tesla's latest offering is poised to make a significant impact on the automotive landscape, combining cutting-edge design and advanced technology to create an unparalleled driving experience.

The Tesla Roadster's latest demonstration at SpaceX has been making waves, but not necessarily for its impressive driving capabilities. In fact, Elon Musk himself panned the vehicle, joking that it could "suck a tennis ball through a hose pipe," implying that it was more suited to aerobatics than actual transportation.

As part of the demo, the Roadster showcased its ability to perform complex maneuvers with the aid of 10 SpaceX cold gas thrusters. These thrusters, which are also used in space applications, allowed the vehicle to drive upside down and then launch into the air, executing a barrel roll with precision. The display continued with the Roadster hopping over a line of Tesla vehicles while performing another impressive aerial stunt.

However, some observers have raised questions about the nature of the vehicle on display. With completely opaque windows and no visible cockpit, it's unclear whether this was a fully functional car or simply a stripped-down remote-controlled prototype. Given its aerobatics and weight, it's possible that the Roadster was not designed for long-range driving, but rather as a testbed for its advanced technology.

The use of cold gas thrusters in the Tesla Roadster raises questions about the feasibility of creating a production "flying car equipped with this tech. While the demo was undoubtedly impressive, it remains to be seen whether such a vehicle could be safely and efficiently powered by an electric motor and battery pack.

The Tesla Roadster's performance capabilities are said to be impressive, with the ability to corner at more than 2 g of lateral acceleration.

To put this in perspective, the car is also expected to accelerate from 0-60 mph in just 1 second, or even faster if the SpaceX thrusters are utilized. However, it's worth noting that these claims have yet to be independently verified by a third party.

The Rocket" trim level of the Roadster will reportedly be a limited-edition model available only to select invitees, and not to the general public. This suggests that the vehicle may not be street-legal, at least in its most advanced form.

Production of the Tesla Roadster is tentatively slated for 2028, with reservations already open for $50,000 apiece on the company's website.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/home/electric-vehicles/tesla-roadster-reveal-spacex-tech/

The Roadster 2 has been a long time coming, first announced in 2017 as a successor to Tesla's original Roadster. It was promised to be the fastest production vehicle on the planet, and it seems that promise is finally being fulfilled. With four thrusters propelling it forward, the car can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in just one second.

Tesla executives said that the production version of the Roadster 2 will have a top speed of up to 230 miles per hour, although Elon Musk is hoping to push that number even higher by cracking halfway to the speed of sound, or around 385 mph. For comparison, modern Formula 1 vehicles typically reach speeds of around 220 mph.

The company also revealed that the vehicle will have a range of over 300 miles on a single charge, which while respectable for a mainstream electric vehicle, is lower than many luxury EVs. Despite this, the Roadster 2 has been eagerly anticipated by fans who are excited to see what this new technology brings to the table.

The Tesla Roadster 2 has been in development for years, and its release is finally here, boasting a revolutionary new feature: flight capability. This achievement is made possible by onboard compressed gas-powered thrusters, which also enable the vehicle to perform sharp turns.

According to Elon Musk, the same technology that allows the car to fly will also create downward force that enables it to take corners at high speeds with ease. He confidently declared that this new feature will "crush every track record" in its class. The Roadster 2's performance capabilities are expected to be a major draw for enthusiasts.

Despite initial promises of a 2020 release, the company has yet to provide a clear timeline for delivery. When asked about the new shipping schedule, Tesla representatives remained tight-lipped, leaving many to wonder when they can expect their pre-ordered vehicles. This lack of transparency is reminiscent of past instances where Musk's ambitious product timelines have fallen short.

The Roadster 2 will be available in three variants: a Performance road-ready version without thrusters; a Thrust variant designed for racing purposes; and an air-ready Rocket variant that features only one seat. Currently, reservations can only be placed for the Performance model. It's worth noting that when initial deposits were taken, some customers were told to expect a $200,000 price tag.

Enthusiasts who put down deposits years ago are still waiting for their vehicles. Some have expressed frustration with the prolonged wait, while others have reported difficulty canceling their reservations. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly shared his own struggles in trying to cancel his reservation on social media last year.

The Tesla Roadster 2's reservation page has undergone a change, reflecting the company's shift in focus towards autonomous technology and robotics. A $5,000 fee is now required to secure a spot on the list, with an additional $45,000 payment due within 10 days.

This development comes as Elon Musk reiterates Tesla's new direction, stating that the company should no longer be viewed solely as a car manufacturer. Instead, it is focused on developing autonomous vehicle technology and robots. This emphasis on innovation has led to significant advancements in electric vehicle design, including the Roadster 2.

The thrusters powering the Roadster 2 are fueled by onboard compressed gas, allowing for efficient flight capabilities. Moreover, Musk claims that this same technology enables rapid cornering due to the creation of downward force. The implications of such a design are substantial, potentially setting new records in vehicle performance.

Despite the Roadster 2's impressive features, the electric vehicle market is currently facing challenges. Sales have stalled in the US following the removal of federal support, while the global energy crisis has led to increased demand for EVs elsewhere. Luxury automakers are now navigating this shift, with some opting out of electric vehicle production altogether.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-roadster-2-launch/