On set, Damon stood out for his unwavering composure, dressed to perfection in a bespoke Norton & Sons jacket and Celine pants that seemed almost otherworldly amidst the desert landscape. It was an image straight from the Bourne movies, where he's made a career of playing characters pushed to their limits. His Odyssean odyssey had reached new heights with The Odyssey.

With three decades in the industry under his belt, Damon has honed his endurance both on and off screen.

Moving to New York for his new role at GQ came with its fair share of challenges. Among them was finding a new home, which proved to be a daunting task in itself. Damon's personal life also underwent significant changes, including relocating his cat from London.

One unexpected hurdle he faced was establishing a credit history in the United States. The process turned out to be more complicated than anticipated, and it left him feeling frustrated. Despite the difficulties, he believes that this experience will ultimately benefit him professionally.

As an editor, Damon emphasizes the importance of creating tension in every issue of GQ. He encourages writers to push boundaries and tackle uncomfortable topics. By doing so, he hopes readers will encounter new ideas and perspectives that challenge their existing views.

The upcoming issue of our publication is not going to let readers off lightly when it comes to uncomfortable topics. The magazine will delve into some life advice from an astronaut who holds a record for traveling deeper into space than anyone else. This includes conversations with Chris Rock about his thoughts on divorce, discomfort, and reclamation.

These discussions will be followed by an in-depth look at Andrew Garfield's portrayal of Sam Altman, described as the modern-day equivalent of J. Robert Oppenheimer. The article will examine the complexities surrounding Altman's character and how they relate to our current times. The exploration of these ideas is intended to spark new perspectives and challenge readers' existing views.

Readers have been responding to a note about not wanting politics in the publication, with some expressing the desire for an apolitical haven amidst these stressful times. However, despite this impulse, the magazine will continue to address current events and issues that are relevant to its audience.

The editorial stance of GQ has long been rooted in a commitment to treating men as multidimensional individuals, capable of handling complex discussions and nuanced perspectives.

This approach is reflected in the magazine's decision to tackle sensitive topics head-on, rather than shying away from uncomfortable subjects. The publication acknowledges that avoiding difficult conversations does not demonstrate nobility or integrity.

A recent package on Cornell University, featuring a report from campus correspondent Savannah Sobrevilla, exemplifies this commitment to tackling tough issues with candor and honesty.

GQ: https://www.gq.com/story/letter-from-the-editor-nov-2026

The group, known as Capytistas, claims to be made up of grassroots activists, researchers, journalists, and artists who are working together in secret "silos to protect each other's identities. This collective effort has yielded extensive research on hundreds of individuals, including Elon Musk and one trillionaire whose identity remains undisclosed.

The group's intentions were outlined in a recent press release, which stated that they will be publishing over 150 previously unreported home addresses in the coming weeks. The move is part of their efforts to expose what they see as the hidden lives of these influential individuals.

Capytistas has adopted the capybara as its mascot, symbolizing the group's goal of promoting harmony and transparency among those in power.

The term oligarch is often associated with Russian tycoons who accumulated wealth after the Soviet collapse, but the concept of extreme wealth and power has a broader application in the United States. With the country's growing income inequality, some argue that individuals like Elon Musk have become modern-day oligarchs.

Musk, now a trillionaire, has been accused of wielding significant influence over federal politics through his donations to politicians. Since 2023, he has contributed more than $700 million to elections, equivalent to approximately 15 million individual online donations. This level of investment in the political system raises questions about the potential for undue influence.

The tactic of doxing, which involves publicly revealing personal information about individuals, has gained popularity among activist groups and self-proclaimed state informants. In March 2025, an anonymous website called DOGEQuest posted what it claimed were the addresses of Tesla owners and employees.

The concept of doxing has expanded significantly in recent years, with even government agencies adopting a broad definition that encompasses various forms of surveillance. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is a prime example, having redefined doxing to include the act of videotaping law enforcement officers. This stance has led to public campaigns targeting DHS employees and contractors.

In a striking example of this trend, hackers recently released the names and work contacts of over 40,000 DHS personnel and contractors. The hackers justified their actions by pointing out that the DHS collects data on the general public while keeping its own officers' identities hidden. This move has sparked debate about whether the DHS's strategy amounts to doxing.

The Capytistas, a group of anti-oligarchy activists, have been at the forefront of this issue. When asked if their efforts could be considered doxing, they responded that they had no qualms with describing their work in this way. The Capytistas' primary method involves researching public records, court filings, and financial documents related to wealthy individuals' properties.

In addition to property research, the Capytistas occasionally employ other tactics, including physical surveillance, human infiltration, and purchasing location and profile data from online ad markets. This diverse range of methods allows them to gather a wealth of information about those in positions of power.

The activists have compiled a vast amount of information about Elon Musk's properties, including 32 home addresses tied to him and his executives. This data is part of a larger dossier that categorizes individuals into different tiers based on their level of significance.

Some investors, such as Vanguard and BlackRock, are considered tertiary targets due to their indirect connections to the billionaire elite. These entities are listed only by corporate office or facility location, rather than being tied directly to specific individuals.

Musk's inclusion in the dossier is significant because he serves as a kind of gateway for those who have yet to join the activists' class war efforts. Despite his relatively small file size and designation as one of the least important" targets, Musk was chosen first due to his high public profile and widespread anger towards him among some groups.

According to law enforcement records obtained by our investigation, a wave of anti-Tesla violence swept across at least nine US states within months of Elon Musk's arrival in Washington last year.

Intelligence analysts warned cops nationwide that calls to boycott the electric vehicle manufacturer and protests against Musk were escalating alongside the attacks. This was revealed in a joint FBI-DHS bulletin released under public records law, which highlighted the growing tensions surrounding Musk's presence in the nation's capital.

The situation prompted authorities in Nevada to issue formal guidelines for first responders on how to tackle fires involving Tesla vehicles. Analysts warned that these fires can be particularly challenging to extinguish, requiring up to 8,000 gallons of water to put out.

As part of their campaign against perceived oligarchs, anti-oligarchy activists are now planning to release sensitive information about the personal lives of high-profile targets like Musk, in an effort to bring public attention and pressure on these individuals.

Activists targeting high-net-worth individuals are now looking to strip them of their most prized possession: privacy. This move is seen as a way to level the playing field and hold these individuals accountable for their actions.

The escalation in tactics comes after tech executives' homes have already become targets, with one notable incident involving an attempted arson attack on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's residence in April. A 20-year-old man was arrested and charged with throwing an incendiary device at the property, causing a fire to break out on the exterior gate. Fortunately, no one was injured during the incident.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/anti-oligarchy-activists-plan-to-dox-elon-musk-and-hundreds-of-billionaire-linked-homes/

According to internal documents reviewed by Fox News Digital, the Pentagon's plan is designed to ensure continuity of critical operations even if external support systems are unavailable. This would include water, fuel, communications, and power generation. The exact nature of the threat that prompted this planning has not been disclosed by the military.

In a related development, British households have been advised to prepare for a potential disruption of essential services by the UK government's Be Ready campaign. Launched on October 22, the initiative urges families to stockpile three days' worth of shelf-stable food, water, and cash in case of an emergency.

The warnings issued by both the US military and the British government are timely reminders that some individuals have been planning for such scenarios for years. High-net-worth individuals, including tech moguls, have invested heavily in backup systems and emergency shelters at their properties.

For instance, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly developed a 1,400-acre compound on Kauai, Hawaii, which includes an underground shelter equipped with its own energy and food supplies. When questioned about the purpose of this facility, Zuckerberg dismissed it as "just like a little shelter" or a basement.

Details of the Pentagon's FORTRESS program are still emerging, but it appears to be focused on ensuring the military can maintain critical operations in the event of a grid collapse. The exact nature and timing of any potential threat remain classified, but the US military is clearly preparing for a worst-case scenario.

The wealthy elite have been quietly preparing for a worst-case scenario, investing in safety measures and emergency plans to ensure their survival in the face of disaster.

Some notable figures have openly discussed their preparations, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who revealed his own stockpiles and backup systems in a 2016 New Yorker profile. He listed an array of essentials, from guns and gold to potassium iodide and antibiotics, as well as a retreat in Big Sur that he can access by air.

LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman has also spoken about the trend among Silicon Valley's billionaires to invest in what is known as "apocalypse insurance." In 2017, he told The New Yorker that more than half of these individuals had secured a private retreat somewhere in the US or abroad.

The people who work behind the scenes for the ultrawealthy confirm that preparations have increased in recent years. Brian Daniel, founder of the Celebrity Personal Assistant Network, says his clients are now prioritizing safety above all else.

Daniel's clients have been installing backup power systems and stockpiling emergency supplies that could last months or even years. Many are also diversifying their bets by owning multiple properties, both domestically and internationally, often in areas far removed from major cities.

Some of these individuals are going to great lengths to ensure their safety, with some purchasing luxury underground bunkers at a cost of millions of dollars. Those worth over $100 million typically maintain full-time security staff on their payroll, providing an added layer of protection against potential threats.

Wealthy individuals are taking proactive steps to ensure their safety and security, even in the face of potential power outages. They're willing to invest heavily in backup generators, escape homes, and stockpiles to mitigate risks.

This emphasis on protection is a common theme in high-end real estate markets. In Palm Beach, for instance, the closure of South Ocean Boulevard due to security concerns related to the Iran war was seen as a positive development by some buyers. The area, known as Billionaires' Beach, has become synonymous with luxury and exclusivity.

Luxury agents like Jessica Julian are noticing that what was once a temporary inconvenience is now being treated as an essential aspect of buying property in these areas. Buyers are willing to overlook minor disruptions if it means gaining access to secure and exclusive communities.

The latest government preparedness campaigns have sparked increased interest from high-net-worth individuals seeking advice on disaster readiness. Firms like Risky Business, which counsels companies and wealthy families on emergency planning, are reporting a surge in client inquiries.

In Miami, the concern about power grid reliability is a major factor for many buyers. Given the city's vulnerability to hurricanes, wealthy individuals are keenly aware of the importance of having reliable backup systems in place. This has led to increased demand for properties with self-sufficient equipment and emergency preparedness features.

Potential clients are also inquiring about a property's elevation and whether it has the capacity to install backup generators.

Impact-resistant glass and windproof construction are now standard expectations for serious buyers who know exactly what to expect during power outages and want their emergency plans pre-arranged from day one.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/30/pentagon-britain-power-outage-ultrawealthy-backup-generators-escape-homes-stockpiles-mark-zuckerberg-sam-altman-reid-hoffman/

In some cases, the consequences have been even more severe. Crooks have used deep fakes of corporate executives to trick employees into sending large sums of money via wire transfers. These schemes can be devastating for companies, causing financial and reputational damage.

A potential solution has emerged with the announcement by World, a company that uses iris scans to create a "proof of humanity verification tool. The company's technology is being adopted by Zoom and several major financial institutions to prevent malicious bots from infiltrating their systems.

The verification process involves clearing security hurdles through World ID, a suite of services developed by the company. According to World, the integration with Zoom uses cryptography to confirm that individuals are verified humans, providing an added layer of security for sensitive conversations.

As part of this integration, participants in Zoom calls who have cleared the security checks will display a blue badge on-screen, signifying their status as a human and confirming their identity. This development aims to mitigate the risks associated with AI-generated bots and deep fakes in online interactions.

The verification badges are designed to be displayed on a user's video feed during Zoom calls, providing an instant visual cue that a person's identity has been authenticated through World ID's iris scanning technology.

Companies can choose when to require this level of verification, reserving it for sensitive or high-stakes interactions where the risk of fraud or deep fakes is particularly acute.

The World ID system relies on advanced cryptography to store and manage users' identities in a decentralized manner, eliminating the need for a central database that could be vulnerable to hacking or data breaches.

This approach has sparked debate about the balance between security and privacy, but proponents argue that it strikes an effective middle ground by minimizing the risk of identity theft while also protecting individuals' sensitive information.

When users are prompted to verify their identities on Zoom or other platforms, they use a mobile app that captures a photo of their iris through their phone's camera, which is then cross-checked against the encrypted record stored on the World ID orb device.

As the technology behind World ID's iris scanning protocol gains traction, some have drawn parallels between it and early forms of biometric security on iPhones. When Apple introduced Touch ID, a fingerprint recognition system, and later facial verification for the iPhone, many users were initially skeptical about the trade-off between convenience and personal data.

However, proponents like Sada argue that World ID's use of open source code can alleviate concerns over the technology's implications on user privacy. The protocol is built on publicly available code, allowing it to be used by anyone, including competitors, which may help ease anxieties among those uneasy about the tie-in with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

In fact, Sada emphasizes that users do not have to provide their photos or any personal data directly to World or its affiliates. The openness of the technology is underscored by the ability for users to audit and inspect the code themselves, which could help build trust in the system's integrity.

The growing adoption of World ID's verification tool is also evident in the financial sector, with several prominent firms joining the ranks of Zoom in utilizing the technology to prevent deep fakes. A company spokesperson revealed that these firms will be placing orb devices in their offices for employees who have not previously used one, allowing them to sign up and scan their irises on site.

World ID's verification tool offers multiple tiers of authentication, including iris scanning through its app, which is not always required for every verification process. This flexibility allows companies to choose the level of security that suits their needs, while also providing users with a range of options to suit their preferences.

The various security tiers offered by World's verification system cater to different levels of risk tolerance and user preferences. The lowest tier, Proof of Attributes, relies on scanned government documents to verify a person's identity. This is followed by the Proof of Presence tier, which requires a selfie in addition to verifying a person's identity through scanned documents.

The highest security setting, Proof of Human, takes verification to a new level by requiring users to prove their identity using both the World app and a selfie. This selfie is then checked against the biometric record registered with the orb device. This rigorous process ensures that only genuine individuals can access high-security features.

As online interactions become increasingly dominated by bots, verifying human presence will be crucial for various activities, including video calls, dating apps, and shopping. In response to this trend, some large companies have already started blocking bots altogether in their online transactions.

Companies like Amazon and JPMorgan have implemented block all bots tactics to prevent automated programs from carrying out transactions on their websites. However, World's Sada argues that such an approach may limit a company's ability to compete in the rapidly growing agentic commerce sector.

To address this limitation, World is providing tools that enable users to assign their verified status to trusted agents under a power-of-attorney type of arrangement. This allows merchants to treat verified agents as their alter-egos, giving them access to high-security features while maintaining control over who can act on their behalf.

The need for secure authentication methods continues to grow as companies seek ways to verify the identity of trusted agents and prevent potential fraud. Cloudflare, an online security firm, has recently announced its own agent ID tool, designed to provide credentials to trusted representatives.

This new development coincides with a shift in perspective on bots, which are increasingly viewed as a business opportunity rather than just a threat. According to Stephanie Cohen, Chief Strategy Officer at Cloudflare, this change reflects the evolving digital landscape where automation and artificial intelligence are becoming more integral parts of our online interactions.

As the use of bots continues to expand rapidly, tools like Proof of Human" badges will likely become an essential component of digital infrastructure, providing a means to verify human identity and prevent potential deceit.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/18/zoom-adds-proof-of-human-feature-to-stop-deep-fakes-toowith-tech/

The development of the robot's "brain - its AI system - will be a major challenge, taking significant time and effort to get right. Altman noted that while having a humanoid body is crucial, what truly matters is equipping it with an intelligent system capable of controlling its movements and actions effectively.

OpenAI's decision to pursue this project seems surprising given the company's current focus on developing AI models and consumer hardware. However, Altman believes that creating a robot with human-like capabilities will be essential for future innovation in robotics and artificial intelligence.

The success of the humanoid robot project ultimately depends on OpenAI's ability to develop an advanced AI system that can effectively control its movements and interactions. With Altman confirming that the company is committed to building such a robot, it remains to be seen how they plan to overcome the significant technical hurdles involved in creating a truly intelligent machine.

The development of a humanoid robot by OpenAI is still in its early stages, with the company's CEO confirming that it will take time for such a product to become available on the market.

While the physical body of the robot may seem like a significant challenge, the real hurdle lies in creating a truly intelligent machine capable of understanding and interpreting complex instructions. This involves developing advanced algorithms and machine-learning infrastructure to enable the robot to make decisions based on sensory input from its cameras and sensors.

To achieve this goal, OpenAI is recruiting experts with expertise in robotics and artificial intelligence. The company has posted job openings for roles including motion control, state estimation, actuator control, whole-robot behavior, and machine learning infrastructure development.

The creation of a humanoid robot that can perform tasks such as picking up objects requires advanced coordination between the robot's body and its brain". This involves identifying objects, estimating grip force, and exerting precise amounts of pressure to prevent accidents like coffee spills.

The development of OpenAI's humanoid robot is not without precedent, as evidenced by the company's Dactyl research project. This project successfully taught a robotic hand to manipulate real objects through simulation-based training. However, this achievement highlights one of the biggest challenges in robotics: the disconnect between software and hardware.

In reality, a model can only learn what should happen through its software, but ultimately, physics dictates how the world works. This is reflected in the difficulties that OpenAI's Dactyl project faced when it was later applied to a Rubik's Cube. The task of manipulating real objects proved to be much more complex than simulating them.

OpenAI is not treating the hardware aspect as an afterthought, despite CEO Sam Altman's emphasis on intelligence. In fact, the company has job listings that suggest it is working on custom electromechanical actuators, including motors, transmissions, sensing systems, and thermal management. Additionally, other positions cover manufacturing and supply chain development to scale up production.

The field of robotics is not new territory for OpenAI, as several companies have already made significant strides in humanoid robot development. Tesla's Optimus project has been underway for years, while XPENG's IRON robot was able to autonomously walk off the assembly line after being manufactured. These examples demonstrate that even advanced software requires careful calibration of complex motor and joint systems.

OpenAI's long-term vision for its robots extends beyond assisting skilled workers in building infrastructure. The company aims to develop a personal robot that can tackle a broader range of tasks, although specific details on what those tasks might be are scarce.

Currently, OpenAI has not unveiled an actual robot or provided any information on consumer pricing, subscription models, release dates, or privacy frameworks for its potential robots. These practical considerations would likely become more pressing if the company were to develop machines equipped with cameras and microphones that could roam freely in users' homes.

The number of robotics job postings on OpenAI's careers page stands at 27, suggesting a significant investment in developing the technical expertise required to bring these ambitious plans to life.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2285040/openai-humanoid-robot-sam-altman-statement-real-challenge/

These milestones have triggered warnings from bears who believe that the AI boom is about to go bust. However, the sector has consistently defied expectations, with earnings continuing to soar and stocks rebounding to record highs. Despite these successes, concerns remain about the sustainability of the current trend.

The borrowing binge by AI hyperscalers, such as those in the field of deep learning, has also raised red flags. Their astronomical capital spending plans have sparked doubts about the necessity of investing so heavily in this sector. The DeepSeek shock in early 2025, which highlighted concerns about the Chinese AI model's performance, further fueled these worries.

The admission by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman that an AI bubble exists has added to the fears on Wall Street. Michael Burry's bearish bets have also contributed to the growing sense of unease. Meanwhile, external factors such as global conflicts and market meltdowns in countries like South Korea have further heightened concerns about the sector's stability.

Despite these warning signs, investors remain committed to riding the AI wave, convinced that the good times will continue for a while longer. However, many acknowledge that eventually, the bubble will burst, leaving traders wondering how long they should hold on before getting out of the market.

The recent turmoil in the tech sector has sparked concerns about the sustainability of the current AI bubble.

One area of focus is CoreWeave, a cloud computing firm that has seen its stock plummet and credit default swaps surge. This decline has raised questions about whether the company's debt will become unmanageable. The firm's struggles have added to the growing unease surrounding the AI sector.

However, some analysts are cautioning against reading too much into these developments. Dan Greenhaus, a strategist at Solus Alternative Asset Management, notes that previous downturns in the market have been followed by new highs. He suggests that the current situation may be just another example of investors overreacting to minor setbacks.

The broader economic landscape is also contributing to the increased scrutiny of the AI sector. Higher borrowing costs and rising bond yields are making it more expensive for companies to issue debt, which has become a key funding mechanism for many AI startups.

The recent downturn in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks has left investors wondering if this is another "head fake or a genuine warning sign for the industry. Some analysts are pointing to CoreWeave's unsecured debt as a prime example of the risks involved.

CoreWeave's high-risk debt has been particularly targeted, with some experts labeling it the riskier of the riskier AI buildout play." This comes at a time when earnings from companies like Taiwan Semiconductor, which supplies chips for AI applications, indicate that demand remains robust.

As interest rates rise, the cost of borrowing for companies like CoreWeave increases. This could potentially put pressure on the entire AI ecosystem to find alternative funding mechanisms or cut costs. The question is whether this will be a gradual process or a sudden breaking point.

CoreWeave's CEO Mike Intrator has sought to reassure employees and investors that the company's deal backlog is sufficient to cover its debt obligations. Meanwhile, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has expressed confidence in CoreWeave's prospects, stating that the company's cost of capital is actually decreasing.

Despite some analysts sounding alarm bells, others on Wall Street remain optimistic about AI's potential for growth. They believe that even if revenue estimates are high, they may not be sufficient to support current levels of spending. Some have compared this situation to a need for AI data center owners to generate $8.5 trillion in revenue by 2030 just to cover costs and provide a return on investment.

The warning signs are growing louder as analysts warn that the AI investment boom may be facing a reckoning. According to Bank of America, the total revenue headed to data centers from enterprise and consumer AI will not meet initial expectations, with estimates now capped at $3.6 trillion.

This shortfall raises concerns about the asset value exposed to write-down risk, with over $4 trillion potentially affected by 2032. The analysts point out that this situation follows a classic capital cycle pattern, where high early profit margins lead to overinvestment and excess capacity. This, in turn, attracts more competition, ultimately resulting in disappointment.

The AI market has indeed seen increased competition from Chinese open-weight models, while business spending on AI is starting to decline as token prices fall despite rising volumes. Bank of America notes that this monetization disappointment in the face of intense competition mirrors past capital cycles, suggesting that the current boom may be unsustainable.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/17/ai-boom-vs-bust-bubble-warning-hyperscaler-spending-debt-coreweave-nvidia/

The films are not science fiction epics or futuristic thrillers, but rather dramatized accounts of real-life scandals and controversies surrounding these tech moguls. The theme of techno-pessimism is still present, but it's now more relevant than ever in today's world.

The changing landscape has created an appetite for stories about the negative impact of Big Tech on society. These movies are not speculative or hypothetical; they're based on actual events and scandals that have made headlines in recent years.

One such film is The Social Reckoning, directed by Oscar-winning screenwriter Aaron Sorkin. He previously explored the story of Facebook with his 2010 film The Social Network, which he also wrote.

Jeremy Strong is set to play Mark Zuckerberg in the upcoming film The Social Reckoning, a role previously portrayed by Jesse Eisenberg in The Social Network.

The film also stars Mikey Madison, Jeremy Allen White, Billy Magnussen, Bill Burr and Betty Gilpin, and hits theaters this Friday.

Meanwhile, another high-profile tech figure is being scrutinized on screen. Alex Gibney's documentary about Elon Musk is nearing release, with the film expected to dissect the life and business empire of the Tesla and SpaceX CEO.

The movie has already sparked a backlash from its subject, who took to social media to label it a "hit piece" and its director a "douchebag.

The documentary series The Dropout provides a detailed account of Holmes' involvement in Theranos, a now-defunct blood-testing company.

A new film, You Can See Everything, is generating significant buzz ahead of its release on October 16th. This nearly three-hour-long documentary delves into the private life of Holmes and her family just before she was set to report to prison.

The movie appears more like a psychological horror film than a traditional nonfiction narrative, likely due to the intense scrutiny and pressure that Holmes faced in the years leading up to her indictment.

You Can See Everything has become one of the most anticipated theatrical releases this fall, with audiences eager to see the inner workings of Holmes' life unfold on screen.

The film's director is Nathan Fielder, who co-directed the project alongside Lance Oppenheim. The movie will offer a unique perspective on Holmes and her family, providing an intimate look at their lives just before she was set to serve time for fraud and conspiracy.

As news about You Can See Everything" continues to spread, it has become clear that this film is not the only one taking on the world of Big Tech. Another upcoming release, Artificial, will focus on the story of OpenAI's Sam Altman, who was fired by the company before being rehired just five days later.

Artificial is a biopic directed by Luca Guadagnino and stars an ensemble cast including Billie Lourd, Monica Barbaro, Chris O'Dowd, Jason Schwartzman, Zoe Zozia Mamet, and Ike Barinholtz. The film takes place in 2023 and has already generated substantial Oscar buzz.

The project was initially set to be distributed by Amazon MGM Studios but was later picked up by Neon after the studio stepped away due to its partnership with OpenAI.

Artificial is one of several upcoming films that will bring the world of Big Tech to the big screen, following in the footsteps of The Social Reckoning.

The film Artificial is set to hit theaters on Christmas Day, offering audiences a cinematic take on the Big Tech world.

In addition to movie releases, streaming platforms are also capitalizing on the trend of portraying Big Tech's scandals and controversies on screen. Netflix has a documentary series called The AI Doc or How I Became an Apocaloptimist, as well as another title, AI Gone Wild, which explores the Hugging Face cyberattack, set for release soon.

AMC will be airing The Audacity, a fictional account of the Silicon Valley tech bubble. On November 19th, Netflix will debut its eight-episode true-crime series, The Altruists, detailing the collapse of FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried's cryptocurrency empire in 2022.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/culture/entertainment/hollywood-movies-ai-tech-zuckerberg-musk/