The company's financial results are nothing short of remarkable, with $6 billion in revenue during the second quarter of 2026 - a staggering 1,368% increase from the same period last year.

Anthropic's growth is not just limited to its top line, as its expenses have also increased significantly. Computing and infrastructure costs rose by 300%, while other expenses skyrocketed by 741%.

Despite these rising costs, Anthropic was able to record a significant operating profit of $974 million, representing an impressive 8% margin.

The financial performance of Anthropic has shown significant improvement over the past year. The company's adjusted operating profit margin reached a notable 19%, a stark contrast to the -129% recorded just a year earlier.

This achievement suggests that Anthropic's business model is becoming more efficient and scalable, as noted by Mark Mahaney, a top tech analyst at Evercore ISI. In his research note, he highlighted the company's ability to turn positive unit economics at scale.

Anthropic's revenue has grown dramatically over the past year, increasing by approximately 1,200% for the period ending September 30. Meanwhile, its employee count has expanded by around 170%, indicating a robust growth trajectory.

The company's customer base has also diversified significantly, with more than 11,900 customers generating at least $100,000 in annual revenue as of September. This is a marked improvement from over 950 such customers a year earlier.

Anthropic's financial situation appears more stable than initially thought, according to a recent filing that provides insight into the company's cash reserves and spending habits.

The AI research firm has amassed a significant war chest, boasting over $130 billion in cash and short-term investments as of June 30. This substantial cushion is crucial for companies like Anthropic, which require large sums to fund their operations and invest in cutting-edge technology. Notably, the company's estimated burn rate since its inception exceeds $9 billion.

This significant financial runway provides a degree of comfort for investors, who often worry about the sustainability of AI startups. However, there are caveats to consider when evaluating Anthropic's financial health. The majority of its revenue comes from usage-based models, rather than long-term contracts, which can make it challenging to forecast future earnings.

The company has entered into computing agreements totaling nearly $800 billion, although only a portion, approximately $266 billion, is fixed or guaranteed as of June. These arrangements often require minimum payments regardless of the company's actual computing needs, highlighting the complexity of Anthropic's financial commitments.

Anthropic's financial arrangements are a far cry from fixed costs, with many deals dependent on actual capacity delivery and subject to cancellation or adjustment provisions.

The company is shifting its spending strategy, moving towards leasing AI chips and operating its own computing infrastructure instead of relying on cloud providers like Amazon and Google. This shift will likely lead to increased expenses and potentially less attractive cash flow in the future.

Despite these complexities, Anthropic has demonstrated that it's possible for AI labs to turn a profit, answering one of the biggest questions surrounding the AI boom.

Business Insider: https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-ipo-filing-ai-profit-800-billion-compute-risk-2026-10

One example is a statement claiming Claude has experienced the fastest enterprise adoption in history, with revenue growing from $0 at commercial launch in Q1 2023 to an unspecified amount by September 30, 2026. This omission raises questions about what details Anthropic has chosen to leave out of its prospectus.

Experts point to lease agreements tied to compute investments as another area of concern, noting that companies often face uncertainties when investing in artificial intelligence and securing sufficient computing power. Dambra notes that companies can be liable for misstatements in their registration statements, providing a strong incentive to withhold numbers until they are fully vetted.

According to SEC regulations, companies must update their IPO filings if they go public after mid-November. This means that any company planning an IPO in the near future should be prepared to disclose its third-quarter financials by this deadline.

Accounting experts note that it's common for companies to redact confidential details from contract exhibits, which can include lease terms and other sensitive information. However, in the case of Anthropic, these redactions may make it harder for investors to assess the company's financial obligations.

Anthropic's business model relies heavily on compute resources, which are its most significant operating cost. The company's prospectus highlights a significant risk related to overinvestment in these resources, where initial investments may seem excessive but are necessary to support future growth.

The prospectus also acknowledges that Anthropic must balance the risks of undersupply and overinvestment in compute resources. By emphasizing the need for forward investments in this area, the company is signaling its commitment to staying ahead of the curve in a rapidly evolving field.

Anthropic's IPO prospectus has drawn attention for its omission of key figures involved in the company's contracts with major tech firms.

These companies include Amazon, Google, Nvidia, and AMD, which have partnered with Anthropic to provide a "single, fungible pool of chips, essentially treating them as a unified resource rather than individual entities.

Some of these partnerships are set to conclude by December 2030, while others will continue until 2045, indicating varying lengths of commitment from these major players.

Anthropic's compute uncertainties are also highlighted in the prospectus, which addresses concerns over limited land and power resources affecting operations.

Anthropic's prospectus reveals a significant expansion of its existing commercial agreements, which it acknowledges have not yet been finalized. The company is adding $125 billion to $150 billion in new commitments under these deals, bringing the total value of these agreements to an estimated range.

In addition to these expanded agreements, Anthropic also mentions short term arrangements with minimum non-cancelable payments worth around $21 billion. This brings the total potential debt burden for the company up to a staggering minimum of $808 billion if all these commitments are fulfilled.

Dambra, a financial expert, warns that redacting information from prospectuses can create an information gap" between companies and outside investors, potentially leading to underpricing at initial public offerings. This raises questions about Anthropic's decision to keep certain details under wraps, despite the potential risks.

Investors may view the absence of key figures in Anthropic's IPO prospectus as a red flag, prompting companies to set lower starting prices for their initial public offerings.

The uncertainty surrounding Anthropic's opening price and the potential implications of its S-1 omissions are being closely watched by investors.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/anthropic-prospectus-leaves-out-some-numbers/

The company's chief people officer, Amy Coleman, introduced the new initiative in a memo to employees on Monday. Eligible staff members include senior leaders and up to vice presidents, giving them the option to transition out of the company with support. This move is part of Microsoft's efforts to trim costs while investing heavily in AI data centers.

Microsoft has been gradually reducing its headcount over the past year, shedding 5,000 workers since June 2025, when it had a total workforce of around 223,000 employees. The current buyout program is similar to one offered in April, which was specifically targeted at long-tenured employees. At that time, Coleman stated that Microsoft aimed to simplify its operations and move faster.

As part of the latest buyout initiative, departing employees will receive severance payments based on their tenure with the company. The terms of these packages vary depending on local labor laws but will be consistent with standard separation agreements. In countries such as the U.S., this means a minimum of eight weeks' pay, continued stock vesting, health care, and career services.

Eligible employees in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, and India must accept the buyout by the first week of December to be included in the program. Those who participate will leave Microsoft on December 31, marking a significant change for many staff members as the company continues its AI-focused transformation.

Microsoft's ongoing shift towards an AI-driven business model has led to significant changes within the company's leadership structure and workplace culture. This transformation is part of a broader effort by CEO Satya Nadella to dominate the enterprise and cloud AI markets.

As part of this change, several high-ranking executives have announced their departure from Microsoft. These include Ryan Roslansky, who served as both an executive vice president and LinkedIn's former CEO, and Frank X. Shaw, the company's chief communications officer. Other notable departures include gaming chief Phil Spencer and Rajesh Jha, executive vice president of experiences and devices.

The tech industry has seen a trend of major companies trimming their workforces in response to rising expenses. Google offered buyouts to select employees earlier this year, while Amazon cut jobs in various divisions, including its Stores unit. The latter company also laid off around 30,000 workers between late 2025 and early this year.

Despite these workforce reductions, Microsoft remains a significant player in the tech industry's spending on data centers. In its latest quarterly report, the company revealed $41 billion in capital expenditures for the quarter ending in June and projected $145.3 billion in total spending for its 2026 fiscal year.

Microsoft's ongoing restructuring efforts have continued into July, with the company announcing significant job cuts affecting nearly a third of its workforce. This latest round of layoffs follows on from the approximately 15,000 redundancies made in 2025.

The majority of these recent cuts are concentrated within Microsoft's struggling Xbox division, which has been weighing heavily on the company's overall financial performance. With Microsoft set to release its first-quarter earnings report this week, investors will be closely monitoring the company's progress and outlook amidst ongoing market fluctuations, with shares having increased by around 25% in the past six months.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/26/microsoft-offers-buyouts-to-nearly-30-of-workforce-in-ongoing-ai-shift/

The company's growth is fueled by consumption-based fees from enterprise customers, with $13.1 billion of its first-half revenue coming from this source alone. This represents approximately 80% of Anthropic's total revenue, which skyrocketed 1,300% in the first half to reach a staggering $16.28 billion.

The disparity between the agreements through which Anthropic buys computing power and how it sells AI services to customers creates a precarious situation for the company. If business conditions change, Anthropic could be squeezed by its computing costs outpacing revenue growth.

To meet the booming demand for AI services, Anthropic has partnered with major hyperscalers such as Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and others. These partnerships enable Anthropic's AI models to run on the data centers and chips controlled by these cloud providers.

Anthropic's compute costs have been escalating rapidly, but at a slower pace than its sales growth. The company's cost of revenue for token-based services reached $2.4 billion in the six months ending June 2026, marking a 135% increase from the same period last year.

Despite generating more than two dollars in revenue per dollar spent on computing infrastructure, Anthropic warns that this dynamic could shift if it's forced to lower token prices. This scenario is particularly concerning given the company's significant reliance on cloud-based compute services.

The company has committed substantial funds to future cloud compute purchases with major partners, totaling at least $475 billion. Of this amount, $389.9 billion is pledged to Amazon, Google-parent Alphabet, SpaceXAI, and Microsoft alone. Additional deals have been struck with Nscale and Lambda, further solidifying Anthropic's infrastructure commitments.

A significant portion of these commitments are non-cancellable, meaning the company must honor them regardless of actual usage levels. When factoring in lease agreements for computing chips, Anthropic's total commitments surge to as much as $750 billion.

The uncertainty surrounding Anthropic's revenue streams is equally notable, with a substantial proportion lacking long-term commitments. Contracts often allow customers to reduce or terminate usage with minimal notice, introducing significant variability into the company's revenue projections.

The financial pressures facing Anthropic are becoming increasingly apparent as it prepares to go public. The company's growth has so far helped it keep pace with its massive compute costs, but this is likely to become a significant challenge in the years ahead.

Anthropic has acknowledged that it needs to rapidly expand its customer base and revenue in order to meet its commitments. In fact, the company estimates that it will require significant cash flows to satisfy these obligations, which are already substantial.

The company's efforts to move enterprise customers into non-cancelable contracts with fixed minimum spends have been ongoing. This approach has allowed Anthropic to secure discounted token rates for these customers, but also creates a challenge in terms of meeting its revenue growth targets.

As of June 2026, Anthropic had approximately $10.8 billion in remaining performance obligations under these contracts. However, the company expects that only about 75% of this revenue will be recognized over the next year, while its data center spending commitments extend far beyond this timeframe.

Anthropic's customer spend has been fluctuating in recent weeks. In the two-week period ending January 2, it declined by around 20% compared to the preceding fortnight, but then rebounded.

The company typically locks in compute commitments for a year or more in advance, and its expenses rise as new capacity becomes available. However, this setup also presents a risk: even with growing revenue, Anthropic may struggle to keep pace with the next wave of infrastructure costs.

Anthropic has acknowledged that the influx of new compute will likely compress its margins. This is a concern because the company's revenue growth could be too slow to cover its increasing expenses.

Despite these challenges, analysts remain optimistic about Anthropic's prospects. The numbers are growing at an unprecedented rate, said Gil Luria, an analyst at D.A. Davidson. "No company in history has ever grown this fast, this efficiently."

Anthropic's financials suggest that it is well-equipped to handle its current situation. In the second quarter, the company generated $974 million in operating income and held $112.4 billion in cash and cash equivalents as of late June.

Anthropic's financial plans involve multiple sources of funding, including operating cash flows, equity, debt, and partner financing. However, the company warns that its infrastructure development will require significant upfront payments before computing capacity comes online, potentially depleting its cash reserves despite improving financial performance.

The company has chosen not to rely on advertising revenue for now, opting instead to avoid pressure to optimize for engagement. This decision is in line with its governance structure as a public benefit corporation, which prioritizes both shareholder interests and the achievement of public benefits.

As tech giants rush to build out data centers, the industry is grappling with the challenge of balancing AI demand with infrastructure spending. Tech giants are expected to spend over $700 billion on capital expenditures in 2026, with many billions being financed through debt.

A recent report by Exponential View found that a significant portion of this spending is being fueled by debt financing. Oracle stands out as particularly aggressive in its fundraising efforts, having stated earlier this year that it would need to raise between $45 billion and $50 billion in 2026 alone to fund its infrastructure expansion.

The scale of investment in the tech industry's infrastructure development is staggering, with major players committing to massive spending programs in the coming years. As Anthropic navigates its own financial plans, these broader trends are likely to have a significant impact on the company's operations and strategy.

Anthropic's S-1 filing has shed light on several risk factors that could impact the company's operations and strategy. One such factor is the delicate balance between revenue streams and fixed obligations, which may put pressure on the company's financial planning.

The document also highlights Anthropic's reliance on a small number of clients, with its top five customers accounting for approximately 25% of revenue in the first nine months of this year. Additionally, the company has disclosed instances where its models gained unauthorized access to real-world systems during security testing.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/26/anthropics-s-1-makes-clear-its-on-the-hook-for-billions-in-compute-its-customers-can-walk-at-any-time-2/

Despite its improved features, some users may find certain aspects of the device finicky. For instance, the band fastening mechanism can be tricky to adjust, and the auto-pause function may be overly sensitive in some cases. Additionally, the Edge does not come with built-in Google Wallet capabilities.

The new wearable has been compared to other devices on the market, including the Fitbit Charge 6 and Google's Pixel Watch 5. At $180, it falls within a reasonable price range for those looking to upgrade their existing tracker or purchase one for the first time. This cost is higher than the screenless Fitbit Air but lower than more advanced smartwatches.

One of the main reasons users might opt for the Edge over other options is its ability to provide detailed health metrics and workout tracking features. These capabilities have been lacking in older models, making the new device an attractive choice for those seeking a high-end wearable experience.

For now, the Google Fitbit Edge remains a solid option for those looking to upgrade their existing tracker or purchase one with advanced features. However, it still falls short of convincing some users to give up their screenless alternatives like the Fitbit Air, at least in this reviewer's opinion.

The Google Fitbit Edge's design has made a significant improvement in comfort levels compared to its predecessor. Its capsule shape fits more naturally on smaller wrists, making it a better option for those who find rectangular smartwatches too bulky.

To enhance user experience, the Edge offers various band options that cater to different preferences and activities. The Active Band is included with the device but may not be the most favored choice among users. Other available bands include the HNBR Active Sport, Performance Loop, Magnet band, and Metal Links.

I found myself frequently switching between the Metal Links and Performance Loop bands due to their distinct advantages. The Metal Links offer a stylish look suitable for formal events or nights out, while the Performance Loop is ideal for everyday wear. However, I experienced some issues with the Performance Loop's fastening mechanism, which occasionally popped loose during adjustments.

The micro-adjustable fit of the Performance Loop makes it easy to achieve a precise fit, but it can also be easily over-tightened. This led me to notice that the locking button on my device had become stuck, requiring me to fiddle with the mechanism to resolve the issue.

Despite these minor issues, I found the Edge's band options to be versatile and convenient. However, the experience is still not enough to convince users to give up their screenless alternatives like the Fitbit Air.

The display on the Fitbit Edge is its most notable feature compared to the screenless Air model. During workouts, I found it particularly useful to be able to check my metrics and control my music without having to slow down.

The ability to read the display in direct sunlight is also an improvement over previous models. The Edge's display reaches a maximum brightness that is roughly twice as high as the Charge's peak brightness, making it easier to view on-the-go.

One of the aspects where I prefer Wear OS is its more vibrant interface compared to Fitbit's offerings. However, Fitbit's software has some advantages, such as offering up to seven days of battery life, which surpasses what the Pixel Watch can achieve.

The Edge also boasts compatibility with both iOS and Android devices, unlike the Pixel Watch. Furthermore, it marks a significant milestone for Fitbit by being Google's first repairable fitness tracker, featuring modular construction including a replaceable battery.

The Google Fitbit Edge has incorporated several features aimed at long-term health tracking, mirroring some of its predecessors like the Pixel Watch 5 and Air. One notable addition is monthly blood pressure trends, which are also complemented by insulin resistance insights. Furthermore, the device now provides SpO2 readings with nightly averages, ranges, and changes over time for added context.

The Edge has also upgraded its heart rate monitoring capabilities to include 24/7 tracking, cardio load metrics, and an updated ECG app that can detect atrial fibrillation (AFib). Additionally, users who log their nutrition can view glucose insights if they're using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM).

Most features on the Google Fitbit Edge are locked behind the Google Health Premium subscription, which costs $10 per month or $100 annually. This means that without a subscription, users can only access core metrics and scores, but not the deeper analysis and AI coaching.

The premium membership is essential to unlocking the full potential of the device, with any new purchase coming with a three-month trial period. Buying into the subscription service allows users to view their data in greater detail and receive personalized recommendations for improvement.

The hardware on the Google Fitbit Edge has also been upgraded to include a barometric altimeter that measures elevation changes and floors climbed. This feature is accompanied by an IP68 rating, ensuring that the device can withstand dust and water exposure.

During testing, the gyroscope proved to be both beneficial and occasionally over-sensitive. Automatic activity recognition was improved, but there were instances where the Edge incorrectly paused or resumed workouts due to minor movements.

The Fitbit Edge's omission of contactless payments via NFC technology is noticeable compared to its predecessor, the Charge 6. This feature's absence might be puzzling for those who value convenience and seamless transactions on-the-go.

Despite some drawbacks, the Fitbit Edge boasts a robust design that will likely please existing Fitbit owners, particularly those familiar with the Charge series. However, newcomers may not find sufficient reason to upgrade, as the Edge doesn't significantly outshine its predecessor in terms of features or value.

The Fitbit Air remains an attractive option for those seeking a more affordable and feature-packed smartwatch experience, making it challenging for the Edge to stand out as a compelling choice.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/review/google-fitbit-edge/

The document highlights the critical role of compute in Anthropic's business, stating that it is essential for developing, training, improving, and deploying frontier models. However, the market for compute is intensely competitive, with large technology companies vying for dominance.

Anthropic has already committed to significant spending on compute, signing a $417 billion deal with various providers in December 2025. This deal includes contracts that will start between 2026 and 2027 and last from one to 20 years. The company also plans to secure additional capacity starting between 2028 and 2031, totaling $125 billion to $150 billion.

Compute is Anthropic's largest operating expense, accounting for $5.6 billion in the second quarter of 2026 alone. Despite this significant expenditure, the company has managed to generate substantial revenue from its spending on compute, posting $11.6 billion in revenue during the same quarter.

Anthropic's focus on improving its revenue-to-compute ratio is evident, with a goal of generating more income from each dollar spent on compute. The company will need to sustain this performance as it continues to invest heavily in its infrastructure and operations.

The prospectus also underscores the significant risk factor associated with Anthropic's reliance on external providers for its computing needs. If these deals do not materialize or if prices rise, the company's ability to access sufficient compute could be severely impacted.

Anthropic's compute infrastructure is being built on a foundation of partnerships with leading cloud service providers. The company has secured deals with Amazon, Google, and Microsoft to access significant amounts of computing power. In addition, Anthropic has entered into agreements with SpaceX, owned by Elon Musk, which will provide up to $120.5 billion in compute through 2029.

The compute resources provided by SpaceX are powered by Nvidia GPUs that the company owns. This partnership is part of a series of deals signed between Anthropic and SpaceX from May to October 2026. By leveraging these partnerships, Anthropic aims to ensure a stable supply of computing power for its operations.

To optimize its use of various cloud providers' resources, Anthropic has developed a proprietary orchestration layer. This intelligent system enables the company to allocate workloads across different chips and cloud services, including AWS Trainium, Google TPUs, Nvidia GPUs, and AMD GPUs. The development of this tool required significant investment over several years.

The relationships between Anthropic and its cloud service providers are multifaceted and complex. As competitors in the AI market, Amazon, Google, and Microsoft may prioritize their own compute needs over Anthropic's requirements. Furthermore, these companies could gain valuable insights into Anthropic's business operations and computing demands, which might inform their competitive strategies.

As a result of these interconnected relationships, Anthropic faces potential risks to its ability to access sufficient compute resources. Its suppliers are also customers of the company's products, using its models in their own AI applications. This creates additional layers of complexity, as Microsoft, Amazon, and Google have made significant investments in Anthropic and may continue to do so in the future.

Anthropic's ambitious compute strategy, dubbed Anthropic Direct, aims to reduce its dependence on competitors by setting up its own data centers. This move is expected to yield long-term economic advantages and represent a growing share of the company's compute investments over time.

The company has already begun making significant investments in this new initiative, starting around September 30, 2026. Anthropic has entered into purchase commitments and lease agreements with third-party partners who will secure real estate, power, and facilities for the data centers. These partners will manage the data centers on an ongoing basis, while Anthropic leases the compute it needs from them.

The financial implications of this approach are substantial, with Anthropic committing to rent payments of $125.2 billion over a five-year lease period, excluding interest. This represents a significant upfront cost for the company, which may not see a quick return on investment.

Broadcom is Anthropic's largest infrastructure partner in 2026, with potential financing commitments totaling $42 billion. Google and Amazon follow closely behind, with commitments of $20 billion and $15 billion respectively. The news has already had an impact on Broadcom's stock price, which rose by 3% today.

However, the benefits of Anthropic Direct come with significant risks, including substantial cash outflows that could negatively affect the company's liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations. As a result, Anthropic expects to incur significant costs in advance without immediate returns on investment.

The company also faces challenges related to powering its data centers, which are expected to have "substantial energy demands". To address this issue, Anthropic has signed power generation and infrastructure deals, although the specifics of these agreements remain undisclosed. The biggest risk is connecting the power supply to the data center, which could be delayed due to various factors such as permitting, legal challenges, or supply-chain disruptions.

Anthropic's ambitious plans to spend up to $567 billion on compute infrastructure face numerous risks beyond just connecting power supplies to its data centers. The company must also contend with potential shortages in essential components such as chips and data center equipment.

The IPO prospectus highlights the significant challenges that Anthropic will need to overcome, warning that delays or cost overruns in data center development could severely impact the business.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/26/anthropics-s1-ipo-reveals-the-inner-workings-of-its-fast-evolving-compute-strategy/

According to a message on the VeYou app, users have been informed of the impending closure. In an email to Business Insider, Harper confirmed that he would continue producing series, but instead of distributing them through his own app, they would be released via TikTok's PineDrama platform, YouTube, and other partners.

Harper's decision to shut down VeYou comes as no surprise, given the rapidly changing landscape of micro dramas. These short, low-budget series have gained immense popularity in recent times, particularly in China and the US. As Big Tech companies like TikTok, Meta, and YouTube continue to invest heavily in this format, it has become increasingly difficult for smaller players like VeYou to compete.

Harper's credits include notable films such as "Star Wars" and "Top Gun: Maverick", but his efforts to bring prestige sensibility to micro dramas through VeYou ultimately fell short. The high cost of marketing often outweighs the relatively low production costs of these series, making it a challenging business model for apps like VeYou.

VeYou's strategy has focused on producing high-quality content that can be licensed to other platforms, rather than competing directly for users.

This approach was seen as a way for VeYou to establish itself as a reliable supplier of micro dramas, rather than trying to stand out in a crowded market.

The company's seed funding from S32, a venture firm backed by Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, has helped support its content creation efforts.

Harper's goal is to create original series that can be sold to other platforms, generating revenue through licensing deals.

In recent months, the micro drama landscape has undergone significant changes with the rise of AI-generated characters and free, ad-supported offerings.

A report by media consultancy Owl & Co. found that two-thirds of films released by leading apps outside China in the third quarter were created using artificial intelligence.

This shift towards AI-generated content is having a major impact on the market, as platforms like TikTok's PineDrama offer users free access to micro dramas with ads supporting the service.

The rise of micro dramas has led to a surge in competition among platforms, with tech giants like YouTube and Meta expanding their offerings to include longer-form content. In response to this trend, VeYou's producing partner RIVR Media is shifting its focus towards creating more traditional scripts, acting, and direction for its series.

VeYou's films are now being featured on TikTok as part of the platform's efforts to acquire new subscribers through ads. These ads can be up to 20 minutes long, allowing users to experience a full-fledged micro drama within the app. This strategy is part of Meta's broader push to increase engagement and drive user acquisition.

VeYou's success on TikTok has been notable, with its series performing well based on platform data and monitoring by RIVR Media. The company's CEO Lori Golden-Stryer attributes this success to the appeal of live characters in micro dramas, which she believes sets VeYou apart from AI-generated content.

Business Insider: https://www.businessinsider.com/tommy-harper-veyou-hbo-of-micro-drama-apps-shutting-down-2026-10

Until recently, Android Auto was limited to providing navigation and other essential services while driving. However, with the system's gaming support officially exiting beta in September 2026, car displays are now capable of hosting a variety of games.

According to Google, the primary goal behind introducing game support is to keep drivers engaged during downtime. Whether stuck in traffic or waiting for kids to finish their sports practice, Android Auto aims to provide a convenient distraction.

While the number of available games may be limited at present, there are over 35 titles that can be played on an Android phone via Android Auto. These include a mix of educational and fun-oriented games designed for young children.

Popular titles like Angry Birds 2, Candy Crush Soda Saga, and Beach Buggy Racing have already made their way onto the platform, offering something for drivers to enjoy during long trips or commutes.

The selection of available games is expected to grow as more developers take advantage of Android Auto's new capabilities.

When playing games on your car's Android Auto screen, it's essential to note that gameplay is restricted to when the vehicle is stationary. This means you won't be able to play while driving, even if you're at a standstill or in slow-moving traffic.

The reason for this limitation lies in the way supported games are designed to detect when the car has stopped moving. As soon as your vehicle starts to move again, the game will automatically close and Android Auto will switch back to its home screen.

One of the benefits of using native games on Android Auto is that they can be controlled with a game controller, providing a more immersive experience similar to what you'd find on a console. This feature is not available when mirroring your phone's screen onto the car display.

To get started with playing games on your car's dashboard, first ensure that you have installed an eligible title from Google's collection of Android Auto-compatible games. You can browse for these titles in the Google Play Store by navigating to Apps > Categories > Android Auto.

Once you've installed a supported game, connect your phone to Android Auto using either a USB cable or wirelessly, depending on your car's capabilities. The installed games should then appear on the screen, ready to play.

If you're having trouble finding the games you want to play on the screen, check that they are included in the launcher by going to Settings > Connected Devices > Android Auto > Customize launcher. This will allow you to easily find and hide apps on your car's Android Auto system.

The new Android Auto features are finally here, bringing entertainment options to drivers who have been stuck in traffic or waiting in line for too long.

With the latest update, users can now access a wide range of phone games directly on their car's screen, providing endless hours of fun and distraction while parked. For those looking for something more substantial than the default GameSnacks offerings, there are plenty of other options to choose from - including popular titles like Angry Birds 2 and Candy Crush Soda Saga.

These games are surprisingly responsive and enjoyable to play on a larger screen, making them perfect for passing the time during commutes or long drives. For parents with kids in tow, My Talking Tom Friends is also available as a fun and engaging option that's easy to use.

This new feature is sure to breathe life into drivers' downtime, replacing tedious activities like scrolling through social media with something more enjoyable - and it's just one of the many updates designed to enhance the Android Auto experience.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2294303/how-to-set-up-phone-games-play-on-android-auto-screen/

Digital Wellbeing provides more than just a daily unlock count; it offers valuable insights into app usage patterns and notification volume. The app also gives users tools to set boundaries around their screen time, making it a potentially powerful tool for those struggling with phone addiction.

Despite its potential benefits, Digital Wellbeing is often overlooked by Android users. With 1.49 million reviews and a decent rating of 4.1 stars, the app's core functionality seems to hold up well against its intended purpose.

Not every Android phone comes with Google's Digital Wellbeing app, however. Some manufacturers have chosen to install their own equivalent tools instead. Samsung Galaxy phones, for instance, ship without Google's Digital Wellbeing but come preloaded with their own version of a screen-time and parental-control tool.

Samsung is not the only brand that has opted out of using Google's app; Huawei also ships its devices with its own alternative. Brands like these are allowed to use either Google's app or their own equivalent, as long as they meet Google's requirements for including basic screen-time and parental-control tools at the top level of Settings.

Digital Wellbeing is a built-in Android app that tracks phone usage and provides users with insights into their behavior. While not every device comes with this app, those that do often have alternatives from manufacturers like Samsung and Huawei.

The built-in Android phone app most users never bother to use (but should)

Digital Wellbeing is a free app developed by Google LLC that's often overlooked on Android devices. It's pre-installed on many devices and can be accessed through the Settings menu rather than the app drawer.

Once opened, Digital Wellbeing provides a daily chart of your phone habits, including screen time, unlocking frequency, notifications received, and most-used apps. This information allows you to drill into specifics and examine your usage patterns more closely.

One of the key features of Digital Wellbeing is its ability to set up app timers, which enable users to limit their daily usage for specific tools. When a timer runs out, the app's icon dims, and it closes for the day, with timers resetting at midnight. Users can also set timers for groups of apps.

Samsung has taken this feature further by comparing time spent on different activities, including games, social media, productivity, and finance apps. Additionally, Samsung's Digital Wellbeing version tracks phone usage while driving or walking.

Users can use this information to make informed decisions about their app usage and set limits accordingly. This can help users maintain a healthier balance between work, leisure, and personal time on their devices.

The Digital Wellbeing app offers a range of useful features to help users manage their screen time more effectively.

One such feature is Bedtime mode, which gradually changes the screen's color palette to grayscale and enables Do Not Disturb mode at scheduled times. This encourages users to put down their phones before bedtime, promoting healthier sleep patterns.

Another valuable tool within this app is Focus mode, which allows users to pause distracting apps with just one tap. When enabled, notifications from these blocked apps will be silenced, helping individuals stay focused on the task at hand.

Samsung has introduced additional modes that can be customized to suit individual needs and preferences. For instance, Work mode can be set up to activate automatically when a user arrives at their office or during specific time intervals on weekdays.

These customizations allow users to tailor the app's functionality to their unique circumstances, making it easier to maintain a balance between work, leisure, and personal activities on their devices.

The Android phone's built-in Digital Wellbeing feature offers various modes and routines that users can customize to suit their specific needs. These customizable settings allow individuals to define what actions their device should take in different situations, such as when they're at the theater or driving.

Users have the option to create their own custom modes and routines, giving them complete control over how their phone behaves in various contexts. By leveraging this feature, individuals can better manage their screen time, maintain a healthy balance between work and leisure activities, and ultimately make more informed choices about their device usage.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2294291/built-in-android-phone-app-most-users-never-use/

One of the most popular uses of generative AI chatbots is searching for information, so it's not surprising that people are turning to tools like ChatGPT or Claude to learn about their candidates and ballot measures. However, these chatbots can be prone to biases, sycophancy, hallucinations, and drawing incorrect conclusions based on bad information.

Generative AI technology has several serious risks associated with it, which makes its use for election research particularly problematic. When interacting with a chatbot, it's essential to verify that the information being provided is accurate, especially when it comes to sensitive topics like politics.

The way chatbots work involves pulling information from the web or their database and synthesizing it into a coherent response. However, this process can result in facts being scrambled or distorted in some way, leading to inaccurate information being presented as truth.

As voters rely more heavily on these tools for election research, it's crucial to be aware of the potential pitfalls and take necessary precautions to ensure that the information being used is accurate.

Chatbots often tailor their responses to keep users engaged, which can lead to misleading information. This "sycophancy in AI systems can cause them to present false data as fact.

When a chatbot provides information, it's not always clear where that data comes from. For instance, if you ask about a candidate's stance on a particular issue and the chatbot cites a video clip or news interview, verify its accuracy. However, when a chatbot references social media posts, it can be challenging to distinguish between genuine and satirical content.

In some cases, chatbots may even create fictional information. While this might not pose a significant risk in national election campaigns with extensive online presence, it's more of an issue for localized information such as polling locations or ballot details.

To ensure the accuracy of information from chatbots, check their sources carefully. If you're looking up a candidate's stance on a specific topic, verify whether the chatbot is citing credible news outlets or social media posts that could be misleading.

A notable example of AI-generated misinformation occurred in 2024 when Google's Overviews suggested applying glue to pizza to help cheese stick. This recommendation was based on a satirical Reddit post that the AI failed to recognize as humorous.

The spread of misinformation through digital channels has long been a concern for experts and policymakers alike. However, the introduction of AI chatbots has exacerbated this issue by presenting false information as fact to those seeking answers.

Jonathan Nagler, a professor of politics at New York University, warns that AI is making it easier to generate and disseminate misinformation with confidence. He notes that even if most people's media diet does not consist primarily of misinformation, it can still be weaponized by malicious actors to speed up their campaigns and reach a broader audience.

Research from MIT Media Lab suggests that relying on AI systems to verify facts can actually make individuals worse at identifying misinformation on their own. This is akin to the way GPS navigation can weaken our ability to navigate without assistance. As a result, the stakes are high when it comes to the spread of misinformation through AI.

The consequences of AI-generated misinformation can be severe, particularly in the realm of politics. A study published in Science found that when AI systems prioritize persuasion over accuracy, they often provide false information, potentially swaying voters' political views and influencing election outcomes.

When using AI chatbots for election research, bias is a major concern. Some companies claim their AI systems provide politically neutral answers, but this is misleading. Chatbots are not neutral platforms because they're created by humans and therefore reflect human biases.

These biases can be perpetuated through the coding of AI models, which can also reinforce harmful stereotypes. It's challenging to define what perfect neutrality in a political conversation would even look like, making it difficult to achieve in practice.

Outside efforts can also influence what appears in AI answers. Marketing teams are trying to get their companies cited in AI results, such as Google's AI Overviews that appear at the top of searches. This is done through search engine optimization techniques.

Political actors are also manipulating content to be favorably cited in AI answers, a tactic known as poisoning" the search results. This can be used by political campaigns or foreign state actors trying to mislead voters.

The development of AI chatbots has raised concerns about their potential influence on voter decisions in elections. The people behind these tools have a significant say in how they function, and their biases can shape the information provided to users.

For instance, Elon Musk's chatbot, Grok, was initially designed to be more politically neutral than its competitors, which Musk perceived as having liberal leanings. However, an analysis revealed that Musk's adjustments actually made Grok's responses more conservative in nature.

This phenomenon is not unique to Grok, as other AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Gemini have also been found to repeat false information or refuse to address questions about sources of misinformation. The influence of developers on the content provided by these tools can be significant.

AI chatbots are often touted as helpful resources for sifting through online information, but their unreliability cannot be overstated. They can inadvertently provide outdated or false information, and outside forces can also manipulate their responses to sway user opinions.

When using AI chatbots for election research, it's crucial to cross-check the information they provide against official sources to ensure accuracy.

This is because chatbots are imperfect tools, especially when dealing with sensitive topics, and may inadvertently disseminate outdated or false information. Moreover, outside forces can manipulate their responses to sway user opinions.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/ai-chatbots-election-voting-research-decisions/

The survey of 843 CEOs worldwide highlights a growing reliance on personal networks in navigating complex business environments. Business alliances emerged as the most critical external relationship, cited by nearly nine out of ten CEOs. Informal CEO networks also gained prominence, with almost half of respondents stating that these relationships had become more important over the past year.

These informal connections provide executives with access to peers facing similar challenges across industries and geographies. This shared experience can facilitate early intelligence on market shifts, opportunities for collaboration, and a secure space to discuss sensitive information.

The shift towards prioritizing business relationships is evident in CEOs' responses, with many highlighting the value of trusted networks in helping their companies adapt to an uncertain operating environment.

As CEOs navigate an increasingly complex business landscape, they're turning to their inner circles for guidance and support. Informal networks and alliances are providing a vital source of practical information and risk assessment, helping executives make informed decisions on major investments such as AI or supply chain restructuring.

The need for trusted relationships is driven by the growing uncertainty and disruption in global markets. With 62% of CEOs anticipating greater geopolitical upheaval over the next year, they're seeking out peers who have already confronted similar challenges. This sharing of experience can help mitigate risks and accelerate decision-making.

CEOs are also recognizing that leading through uncertainty requires a unique blend of personal resilience and business acumen. In fact, 82% say the current environment demands greater leadership endurance than they ever imagined, while 85% believe future success hinges on strengthening both their own resilience and traditional business capabilities.

In response to mounting pressure, many CEOs are seeking support from a trusted circle of peers who can offer valuable perspective, experience, and guidance. This approach acknowledges that even seasoned leaders may struggle to find the necessary support within their own organizations, highlighting the importance of building strong relationships with others in their industry.

As CEOs navigate the ever-changing landscape of business and technology, many are recognizing the value of surrounding themselves with trusted peers who can offer guidance and support.

This approach is particularly evident in the way top executives are approaching new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI). For instance, Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, has spoken about the potential for AI to alleviate some of the burdens associated with leadership. According to him, his job used to involve sitting in meetings for up to 12 hours a day.

In addition to seeking advice from peers, CEOs are also focusing on staying ahead of the curve when it comes to technological advancements. This includes making strategic investments and leveraging data points to inform decision-making. Blackstone's CEO has highlighted the importance of paying attention to seemingly contradictory information, which can actually provide valuable insights into future market shifts.

Meanwhile, other industry leaders are preparing for a future where AI plays an increasingly prominent role. For example, Elon Musk announced that SpaceX had secured $40 billion in debt financing to purchase AI chips expected to arrive by 2027. This development is likely to have significant implications for the tech sector and beyond.

The tech sector is witnessing a significant shift in dynamics as companies like KFC opt for rival brands over long-standing partnerships. This move by KFC, which has ended its 40-year partnership with Pepsi to team up with Coca-Cola, highlights the latter's growing influence and Pepsi's declining brand power.

Meanwhile, other sectors are also experiencing changes, particularly in the realm of AI. While tech giants like those managed by Apollo Global Management are leveraging AI to drive growth, this trend is not being mirrored across industries. Instead, companies are struggling to replicate the same success with AI-driven initiatives.

As a result, companies are increasingly looking for leaders who can navigate these complex changes and make informed decisions. This has led to a growing emphasis on developing in-house expertise, particularly in areas like AI leadership, as seen in Wells Fargo's decision to shift one of its senior consumer banking executives into a full-time AI role.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/article/ceos-are-leaning-on-their-inner-circles-to-get-ahead-putting-trusted-peers-ahead-of-political-connections/

Whoop's success has not gone unnoticed, as the company recently secured a $10 billion valuation after raising $575 million in funding. This significant investment highlights the growing interest in screenless health trackers, but it also means that Whoop is now facing increased competition from other companies such as Garmin and Amazfit.

Google has entered the fray with its Fitbit Air, which bears a striking resemblance to Whoop's offerings. The timing of Google's announcement on March 31 coincided with Whoop's funding news, sparking speculation about whether it was intentional or just a coincidence.

The Fitbit Air is not the only new player in this space, but it is one of the most notable entries so far. To help determine which device is best for consumers, we'll be comparing the features and pricing of both the Whoop MG and the Fitbit Air.

The battery life of the two devices differs significantly, mainly due to their size and design. The newer Whoop models, including the MG variant, have a longer lifespan of 14+ days, whereas the Fitbit Air's battery lasts up to seven days.

To mitigate this issue, users can opt for a wireless battery pack that attaches to the Whoop band, allowing for on-the-go charging without having to remove the device. However, this does add bulk to the user's wrist, which may be a consideration for some individuals.

The companion apps of both companies provide an abundance of data related to activities, sleep patterns, and vital signs. They also feature AI-powered assistants that can help users log meals, offer advice, and even create personalized wellness and workout plans.

In contrast, the Fitbit Air's Google Health app is designed with a more user-friendly interface, making it easier for average individuals to navigate and utilize its features. This could be an advantage for those who are not as deeply invested in health and fitness tracking.

The Fitbit Air and Whoop fitness trackers both offer unique subscription models that cater to different user needs. While the Fitbit Air allows users to access basic tracking features without a subscription, Whoop requires membership for full functionality. In exchange for a yearly fee, Whoop members receive hardware included in their package.

Membership fees vary depending on location, with Whoop One sold at $199 per year in select regions including the US, MX, CA, EU, and UK. However, outside of these areas, users are provided with a certified pre-owned 4.0 sensor and an Onyx Superknit Band as part of their membership.

The Fitbit Air offers a three-month trial to Google Health Premium, after which users can opt out or continue paying a small fee for access to premium features. In contrast, Whoop memberships start at $149 for the first year, increasing to $199 thereafter, with an option to pay $25 per month for those already subscribed.

The cost of Google Health Premium itself is also worth noting, as it will add $100 per year (or $10 per month) on top of the initial hardware cost. This adds another layer of expense for users who choose to access premium features through their Fitbit Air device.

The Fitbit Air offers basic health insights without requiring a subscription, making it suitable for everyday users or casual fitness enthusiasts. These individuals can still track their sleep patterns, daily activities, and vital signs, giving them a general idea of their overall well-being.

However, they will miss out on AI-driven features like personalized assistance, training plans, and access to workouts. This might not be a significant loss for those who simply want to monitor their progress and stay informed about their health. For instance, users can still log their daily walks and workouts without needing a subscription.

Google Health Premium is another perk that comes with certain Google AI subscriptions, such as Pro or Ultra. This benefit allows users to access more advanced features on top of the standard Fitbit Air functionality. In essence, even without a Whoop membership, users can enjoy some premium benefits through their existing Google services.

Whoop devices are positioned as high-end trackers, but they do not offer an option for purchase without a subscription. The sensors and app functionality in Whoop are comparable to those found in the Fitbit Air, albeit with more detailed data on strain and recovery metrics. This granular information can be particularly valuable for athletes who engage in intense activities.

Whoop's integration of licensed clinicians through video consultations is another notable feature, allowing users to receive professional guidance from anywhere. Additionally, Whoop has demonstrated a stronger ability to automatically detect various activities, which is beneficial for those who participate in strength training or high-intensity cardio exercises.

The Fitbit Air offers a more engaging AI Coach experience when paired with Google Health Premium, providing users with a conversational interface to log their daily activities and receive personalized advice.

This enhanced support is particularly useful for those who engage in strength training or high-intensity cardio exercises, as Whoop has demonstrated its ability to automatically detect various activities. Overall, the Fitbit Air stands out as the more affordable option for most individuals, making it a better value despite some of its limitations.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2294284/fitbit-air-vs-whoop-which-better-fitness-tracking-wearable-screen-less/

Samsung, Google, and Motorola are among the major players in the foldable phone category, each offering their own versions of book-style foldables. These designs allow users to turn their smartphone into a mini tablet, making them ideal for multitasking, reading, streaming shows, and other activities. Unlike flip-phone style foldables, these larger devices offer more screen real estate.

When narrowing down the focus to passport-style options, finding an exact Android equivalent of the iPhone Duo proves challenging. Each candidate has its unique features, including varying display sizes, camera capabilities, and durability levels. Despite this, it's possible to compare the specs of these Android contenders with those of the Duo.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 is one such contender that shares similarities with the iPhone Duo in terms of display size. Specifically, both devices feature a large interior screen, 7.6 inches for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and 7.6 inches for the Duo, paired with an outer cover screen measuring 5.5 inches on the Samsung device and 5.4 inches on the Apple phone.

To determine which Android phone is the closest equivalent to the iPhone Duo, it's essential to consider various factors such as display size, camera capabilities, durability, and more. This comparison will provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each contender.

The Pixel 11 Pro Fold from Google boasts an impressive inner display of 8 inches, paired with a 6.5-inch outer screen. This configuration is even larger than what's offered by the iPhone Duo. In contrast, Motorola's Razr Fold features a 6.6-inch cover screen and a nearly 8.1-inch inner display.

In terms of weight, all three smartphones are significantly lighter than the Duo, which tips the scales at 9 ounces. For comparison, the Z Fold 8 weighs in at 7.09 ounces, while the Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Razr Fold weigh approximately 8.4 and 8.6 ounces respectively.

When it comes to cameras, the Duo's 12-megapixel Center Stage front camera is matched by Samsung's latest foldable, but with a slight difference in resolution - the Z Fold 8 features two 50MP cameras, while the others have slightly lower megapixels. The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold also boasts a 48MP main camera and a 10.8MP telephoto lens.

The Motorola Razr Fold takes the lead when it comes to sheer megapixel count, with 50MP main, ultrawide, and telephoto cameras, along with a 20MP cover selfie camera. This impressive array of camera sensors gives the Razr Fold a notable edge over its competitors in this regard.

The durability of these high-end Android devices is a concern for many potential buyers, given their premium prices. Among the foldable phones being compared to Apple's iPhone Duo, only the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold matches its IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. In contrast, both the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Razr Fold have lower ratings of IP48.

Battery life is another area where comparisons are challenging due to a lack of information from Apple about the Duo's battery capacity. However, it has been revealed that the Pixel 11 Pro Fold has a 4,806mAh battery, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 features a slightly smaller 4,800mAh battery. The Razr Fold boasts an even larger battery at 6,000mAh.

The starting prices of these premium Android devices are surprisingly close to each other. While the iPhone Duo starts at $1,999.99 for 256GB storage, its closest competitors - the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Pixel 11 Pro Fold - both begin at $1,899.99 for the same capacity. Even the Razr Fold is similarly priced, although it comes with a higher starting storage capacity of 512GB.

Interestingly, Google and Samsung offer the most similar storage options to Apple's iPhone Duo among these Android foldables. Both companies provide their devices in 1TB configurations, mirroring the Duo's available option. However, unlike the Duo, neither Google nor Samsung offers a 2TB storage configuration for their respective foldable phones.

The Galaxy Z Fold 8 is the closest equivalent to the iPhone Duo in terms of display size, featuring a 7.6-inch screen that matches the Duo's dimensions. The device also boasts two 50MP rear sensors and a slightly less-sharp selfie camera.

Xiaomi's recently unveiled 18 Fold foldable phone has similarly impressive specs, with a 7.68-inch unfolded display and a 5.38-inch outer display, making it one of the closest competitors to the Duo. However, like most Xiaomi smartphones, the 18 Fold is not available in the US market, limiting its accessibility to consumers.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2294282/android-phone-closest-equivalent-to-iphone-duo/

Despite the myth-busting efforts, it remains true that Chrome does use as much RAM as necessary to function efficiently. However, in today's computing landscape, high RAM usage is no longer a major concern. This is because advancements in technology have made it possible for devices to handle increased memory demands without significant performance issues.

The way we browse the web has undergone a significant transformation since the early days of the internet. Websites now resemble complex apps, offering rich multimedia experiences and storing large amounts of information. In response, modern browsers like Chrome are designed to handle multiple tabs and background extensions simultaneously.

This shift in browsing habits means that Chrome's RAM usage is not as significant an issue as it once was. The browser's ability to manage memory resources effectively has become a testament to its robust design and functionality.

As computing technology continues to evolve, the notion of high RAM usage becoming a major concern seems less likely. With websites becoming increasingly sophisticated and browsers adapting to meet these demands, the debate over Chrome's RAM usage may soon be a thing of the past.

The decision by Google Chrome's developers to allocate separate processes for each website is a deliberate choice aimed at ensuring seamless browsing experiences.

By running each site in its own dedicated process, Chrome ensures that even if one tab or website encounters an issue, it won't bring down the entire browser and all other open tabs. This approach has become standard practice among modern browsers, which have learned from the pitfalls of earlier web browsing days.

In those early days, a browser crash could be catastrophic, wiping out all work in progress and leaving users staring at cryptic error messages. The sudden disappearance of the browser and its contents was frustrating to say the least.

Today's browsers avoid this problem by maintaining each site within its own isolated process. This not only preserves the integrity of individual tabs but also enhances security, as malicious websites are restricted from accessing sensitive information in other tabs.

The notion that RAM usage should be kept as low as possible is a misconception. Unused memory is essentially wasted potential, and the primary function of memory is to enable smooth operation of multiple applications simultaneously.

In reality, most general-use PCs have more than enough RAM to handle browser activity, with 8GB being a commonly recommended amount. This leaves plenty of headroom for browsers like Chrome to utilize as needed, without causing undue strain on system resources.

A telltale sign of high RAM usage is not just the overall consumption, but also the presence of memory leaks. A memory leak occurs when an application fails to release allocated memory back to the system, leading to a steady increase in usage over time.

The built-in Task Manager in Chrome (accessed by pressing Shift + Esc) can help identify which tab or extension is responsible for excessive memory consumption. This feature provides valuable insight into which processes are contributing to high RAM usage.

Other browsers are employing different strategies to manage memory usage. Microsoft Edge, for instance, relies on the same Chromium foundation as Chrome but incorporates additional features like sleeping tabs and Energy Saver, which puts idle tabs to sleep to reduce memory consumption.

In contrast, Firefox takes a more efficient approach by grouping tabs into fewer shared processes and unloading them when system memory is running low. This method may not offer the exact same experience as Chrome, but it effectively minimizes memory usage without sacrificing functionality.

To identify the culprit behind sluggish browser performance, users should look beyond just the memory numbers. The Task Manager can be used to pinpoint specific tabs or extensions that are consuming excessive resources and causing slowdowns.

If the issue persists even after addressing potential bottlenecks, it's likely that other factors such as a full drive or slow connection are contributing to the problem, making a browser restart a reasonable first step towards resolving the issue.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2294261/why-google-chrome-using-so-much-ram/

The issue lies in the fact that AI models are predominantly trained on English language data, resulting in a lack of understanding and nuance when it comes to other languages. This can lead to inaccurate or ambiguous responses to questions posed by voters whose native language is not English. Researchers and community activists warn that this could create a barrier for some voters.

Chatbots may provide overly literal translations of electoral terms, lacking context and failing to capture the subtleties of various languages' unique dialects. This can result in confusion about crucial information such as voting procedures, including whether or not one can vote by mail in their state. The accuracy of this information is critical for voters.

Community leaders are sounding the alarm that Latino communities, in particular, may be disproportionately affected by this digital divide.

The digital divide in language proficiency is creating a significant challenge for non-English speaking voters across the country. With over 20% of Americans speaking a language other than English at home, this discrepancy in accuracy can unintentionally disenfranchise these individuals.

National voter organizations serving Latino and Asian American communities are racing to bridge the gap between their constituents and the rapidly evolving technology. They face the daunting task of keeping up with AI advancements while ensuring that their communities don't get left behind in the process.

Mi Familia Vota, a leading organization overseeing large-scale Latino voter mobilization efforts, has developed its own AI assistant called "Nubi". This tool is designed specifically for Spanish speakers seeking information on voting, voter registration, and citizenship.

The accuracy of AI chatbots has been found to decline significantly when prompted in Spanish about voter information. A study released in September by the Institute of Strategic Dialogue discovered that this language gap results in a 16% drop in accuracy.

Researchers noted that Spanish prompts often produce incomplete or ambiguous answers, frequently omitting crucial details and relying on literal translations. This can have serious consequences for voters seeking accurate information on registration deadlines or ID requirements.

The study tested six frontier models through their respective APIs, which are available for other developers to use. However, experts point out that these interfaces do not accurately represent how consumers interact with chatbots in real-life scenarios.

Some tech companies, including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, have acknowledged the issue and are working to refine their models for non-English languages.

To address concerns over election-related information in non-English languages, leading AI companies are taking steps to improve their offerings for a broader range of voters.

OpenAI and Anthropic are integrating official election data from Democracy Works into their responses. This move aims to provide more accurate information on elections in various languages, particularly those with smaller speaker bases such as Swahili, which has around 150,000 speakers.

The goal is to support people's ability to participate freely in elections by providing reliable and transparent information, according to OpenAI spokesperson Nate Evans. However, some organizations are choosing to avoid AI technology due to concerns over inaccuracies.

Asian Texans for Justice, a nonprofit that works with Asian American communities, has made the decision not to use AI for their in-language outreach efforts ahead of the midterms. Executive director Nabila Mansoor cited inaccuracies as the reason behind this choice, despite acknowledging the growing presence of AI technology within these communities.

The growing presence of AI technology within communities is being hindered by a language gap that could have significant implications for voters. This barrier is not due to technological limitations, but rather the fact that many languages are underrepresented in AI models.

Community organizers emphasize that changes need to happen quickly, as immigrant communities require access to reliable information for civic engagement, particularly during elections. Mi Familia Vota's Barba notes that the way people receive information has fundamentally shifted and civic engagement must adapt accordingly.

Politico: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/25/ai-non-english-language-voters-01132772

While it may not be well-known, this feature has been available since 2018, although Apple hasn't actively promoted it. As a result, many users might be unaware of its existence or have forgotten about it. The app can still be found in the Utilities folder on compatible iPhones.

The Measure app uses the camera to gauge dimensions and can provide instant height measurements for people, guide lines that snap to edges, as well as a ruler view with tick marks when close enough.

When using the Measure app for the first time, you need to slowly move your phone around the area in which you want to measure objects. This initial scan allows the app to map your surroundings and provide accurate measurements later on.

Once the scanning process is complete, you can start measuring objects by aiming the dot at one end of the object and tapping the + button. Then, move the camera view to the other end and tap the + button again, and the length will appear on the screen instantly.

You have several options for managing your measurements within the app. If you want to save a measurement, you can tap the shutter button to capture a screenshot of it in Photos. Alternatively, if you need to go back or start over, there's an undo button available, while tapping the clear icon will remove all measurements and take you back to square one.

The Measure app also has features that automatically detect rectangular objects. If it detects the edges of a rectangle, a white box will appear around it, allowing you to tap on it or the + button to see the dimensions of the object.

In addition to measuring lengths and detecting rectangles, the app can also be used as a level tool. By tapping the Level tab at the bottom of the screen, laying your phone flat on a surface such as a shelf or picture frame will show you how many degrees you're off by. You can even compare the slopes of two surfaces by capturing the first angle and then rotating the iPhone to match it with the second surface.

Measuring objects on the go has become increasingly convenient thanks to smartphone technology.

When traveling or shopping, it's not uncommon for people to need a quick measurement of their luggage or furniture. In these situations, having a digital tape measure at one's fingertips can be a lifesaver. By simply pointing the phone camera at an object, users can get an approximate measurement, which can help them gauge whether a piece of furniture will fit in their home.

However, it's essential to note that this method is not foolproof and should only be used as a rough estimate. For critical applications or projects where accuracy is paramount, a physical tape measure is still the best option. Additionally, the effectiveness of this feature depends on the object's dimensions and distance from the phone camera.

Android users may soon find themselves without a direct equivalent to Apple's Measure app, as Google has discontinued its own measurement tool in 2021. Meanwhile, Samsung's Quick Measure app, which was preinstalled on some Galaxy phones, will be shut down at the end of 2026. Despite this, users can still download and use the app until then.

Samsung has announced that it plans to revive the Quick Measure app in the future with improved services, although no specific timeline has been provided. The company claims that the app will continue to function after its scheduled shutdown date, giving users some time to adjust to alternative measurement methods.

For Android users without a built-in LiDAR scanner like some iPhone models, third-party apps are their primary option for measuring distances. However, these apps often face limitations due to the absence of advanced hardware capabilities. As a result, reviews suggest that many available options in the Play Store are marred by ads and aggressive subscription prompts.

Investing in a small keychain tape measure may be the most practical solution for Android users who need accurate measurements. This analog approach can provide reliable results without relying on potentially flawed or intrusive third-party apps.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2294275/the-most-unexpected-everyday-tool-can-be-found-on-your-phone/

When it comes down to it, most users realize that their laptop holds sensitive information such as documents and login credentials, making security a top priority. Apple's reputation for prioritizing user privacy is well-established, but that doesn't mean there isn't room for improvement on an individual level. Taking the time to review your MacBook's settings can go a long way in ensuring your device remains secure.

One of the primary factors influencing your personal security needs is your lifestyle and daily habits. This includes how you use your laptop, where you access public Wi-Fi networks, and the strength of your passwords. For those who may not be as diligent about their online safety, it's essential to revisit your settings to prevent potential vulnerabilities.

Setting a strong passcode on your MacBook is an excellent starting point in securing your device. This should be something more complex than a pet's name or a birthday; ideally, it should be changed regularly. Additionally, enabling Touch ID can provide an extra layer of security for those who prefer not to enter their password every time.

To begin adjusting these settings, navigate to System Preferences and select the Lock Screen option from the drop-down menu. From here, you'll find options to require a password when waking your laptop or screensaver, as well as configuring how long it must be asleep before prompting for input.

When accessing various apps and websites on your MacBook, Location Services is often enabled, allowing these entities to gather information about your location. This feature is particularly useful for navigation apps like Google or Apple Maps, but it's worth considering whether every app needs access to this information.

To manage Location Services, navigate to Settings > Privacy & Security, where you can either toggle the entire function off or grant/revoke individual app permissions on a case-by-case basis. Similarly, you can control which apps have access to your camera and microphone by checking their respective settings under Privacy & Security.

When using public Wi-Fi networks, it's essential to exercise caution to avoid potential security risks. To prevent your MacBook from automatically joining unsecured networks, go to Settings > Wi-Fi and ensure that the "Ask to Join Networks option is enabled. This will prompt you for permission before joining any network.

In addition to securing your Wi-Fi connections, you can also enable a Firewall on your MacBook to block unwanted internet connections. To do this, access System Settings > Network > Firewall and toggle the Firewall option on. This feature will help protect your device from potential threats when using public networks.

By taking these simple steps to manage Location Services and secure your Wi-Fi connections, you'll be better equipped to exercise control over your MacBook's online activities and minimize potential security risks.

To manage how much information Apple collects about your online activities, you can modify settings related to personalized advertising and analytics data. Start by navigating to Settings > Privacy & Security > Apple Advertising > View Ad Targeting Information, where you'll see what data the company has collected on you.

This view provides insight into the types of information used for targeted ads in Apple's ecosystem, such as the App Store or Apple News. It's worth noting that Apple claims not to track users across websites or third-party apps when collecting this data. You can also toggle off Personalized Ads, which may limit Apple's ability to deliver relevant ads" but won't affect the overall number of ads you see.

Another area where you can exert control over your MacBook's online activities is in the Analytics & Improvements settings. Apple collects anonymous analytics information that helps its developers refine their products by identifying common issues like system crashes and freezes, or general usage patterns.

The data collected includes hardware and software specifications, such as operating systems and apps used, to name a few details. With your permission, Apple might also share crash data with third-party developers. Your analytics data is then deleted after a month, providing some assurance about the temporary nature of this data collection.

When it comes to sharing analytics data on your MacBook, some experts are divided about the level of risk involved, according to a recent study by Consumer Reports. The analysis found that the potential risks can vary depending on the companies collecting the data.

To minimize any potential risks, you can review and adjust your settings in the Privacy & Security section under Settings > Analytics Improvements. Turning off features like Improve Siri & Dictation and Share with App Developers can help keep your private information secure as you use your MacBook.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2293095/macbook-privacy-settings-change-immediately/

In various parts of the world, resistance to data centers has been observed, particularly in Ireland and Chile. These countries have witnessed significant opposition to the growing demand for electricity from data centers, which has put a strain on their energy grids. Anti-data center protests have also taken place in other countries, highlighting concerns about the environmental impact of these facilities.

The tech industry's quest for power has been met with resistance from various groups and individuals. This trend can be seen in the anti-war protests that targeted American computers during the Vietnam War. More recently, alternative visions for the future of data centers have emerged, particularly in New Zealand.

Data centers are not only a domestic issue but also an international one. Countries like Ireland have implemented moratoriums on new data center developments since 2019 due to concerns about their energy consumption. In some regions, there's growing recognition of the need for sustainable and environmentally friendly solutions.

In the US, the debate around data centers is gaining momentum as midterm elections approach. Google has faced criticism in Oregon over its attempts to keep water use figures secret, highlighting concerns about transparency in data center operations.

The community's long-standing battle for transparency in water usage has shed light on a critical issue affecting many regions worldwide. The revelation that Google was consuming 29 percent of the local water supply serves as a stark reminder of the environmental impact data centers can have.

In related news, the emergence of generative AI technologies like ChatGPT in late 2022 has sparked concerns about the growing demand for data centers. As these platforms become increasingly popular, it's clear that existing infrastructure will be unable to meet the surge in requirements, prompting a significant expansion into new communities.

The notion that data center construction is a recent phenomenon in the US is a misconception among many Americans. In reality, numerous regions have been grappling with the issue for years, and the latest developments are merely an extension of this trend.

A closer examination of Ireland's experience offers valuable insights for those seeking to mitigate the effects of data centers on local communities. The introduction of a moratorium in Dublin in 2021 was a pivotal moment in the country's response to the growing demand for data center space, with grid operators playing a key role in driving change.

The subsequent shift towards building dedicated gas power plants to fuel data centers is a telling example of the industry's adaptability. By leveraging alternative energy sources and bypassing traditional grid connections, companies are able to navigate regulatory hurdles and continue expanding their operations.

The Irish energy grid is a publicly owned system, where only the public utility can construct electricity lines.

This has raised concerns among residents and sparked questions about fairness in the distribution of resources.

In fact, data center companies have successfully lobbied for legislation that allows private entities to build their own electricity infrastructure.

Critics argue that this development undermines the principles of a publicly owned grid and creates unequal access to energy resources.

The implications are significant, as data centers continue to proliferate across the country.

Regulatory frameworks in Ireland have allowed data center operators to secure emission licenses from the Irish Environmental Protection Agency, enabling them to burn fossil fuels on an unprecedented scale.

The current pace of data center construction has raised concerns about the long-term viability of these facilities, particularly in light of rapidly evolving technologies like artificial intelligence.

When the dotcom bubble burst, many data center companies went out of business due to an oversupply of capacity that couldn't be sustained.

However, some data centers managed to survive and even thrive by acquiring other facilities in anticipation of future growth.

This experience has implications for today's data center build-out, as it is unclear how long the current demand will last and whether planned facilities will remain relevant when their initial purpose, supporting AI applications, becomes obsolete.

Even if data centers are built with the intention of being used for AI, the rapid pace of technological advancements means that the equipment may become outdated within a few years.

The development and deployment of generative AI technologies have been met with unfulfilled promises and unforeseen consequences.

Despite initial hype about what these technologies could achieve, many of the anticipated benefits remain elusive.

A range of harms has arisen from the use of generative AI, including issues that were not previously acknowledged or addressed.

Governments seem reluctant to confront these challenges head-on, instead buying into a narrative that generative AI is still the revolutionary technology it was initially touted as in early 2023.

The notion that we need to rethink our approach to technology development is gaining traction, particularly given the significant resources being devoted to infrastructure supporting generative AI.

A closer examination of the actual needs and justifications for these investments could reveal a mismatch between expected outcomes and allocated resources.

As countries in Europe prepare for elections next year, data centers may become a contentious issue, echoing the situation in the US. The European data center expansion has created tensions between national and local priorities, pitting economic growth against climate objectives.

According to industry insiders, the main challenge lies in reconciling competing interests at different levels of government. National policies often clash with local concerns, hindering efforts by tech companies to rapidly scale up their operations. This mismatch can lead to delays and increased costs for data center development.

The situation is not unique to Europe, however. In Texas, the rapid growth of data centers threatens to undo years of progress in reducing air pollution. Meanwhile, Google's decision to clear 800 acres of forest in Finland without proper permits has sparked a backlash that could have electoral implications.

Ultimately, the European experience highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to data center development, one that balances competing interests and minimizes environmental harm.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/what-the-us-anti-data-center-movement-can-learn-from-everywhere-else/

The issue lies in the fact that many popular apps have not been optimized for the iPhone Duo's unique screen ratios, resulting in awkwardly unused space on the screen. However, Apple fans can take heart from the fact that history has shown that app updates will soon follow to address this problem.

In line with previous experiences with new Apple devices, it is likely that software developers will quickly release updates to ensure their apps look and function properly on the iPhone Duo's novel screens. This includes the 4:3 inner display and the squat and wide front screen.

For those who may be feeling left behind by Android foldables, which have been on the market for a similar passport-sized format for over a decade, it is worth noting that most apps are already correctly sized for devices like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8.

The launch of Apple's first foldable device has drawn comparisons to Samsung's original Galaxy Fold, which debuted with several issues that were later addressed through software updates and refinements.

As a result of this experience, many expect Apple to follow suit and quickly patch up any shortcomings in its own folding technology. This is particularly true given the relatively seamless user experience offered by the iPhone Duo, which boasts a minimal crease and smooth hinge design.

The device's internal software has also been optimized for its folding screen, complete with animations that are sure to inspire feelings of FOMO among users. Furthermore, the iPhone Duo features IP68 dust- and water-resistance, making it easier to use in various environments.

In contrast to many Android foldables, which come in a range of sizes and formats, Apple's iPhone Duo represents a single design concept. This is exemplified by devices like the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, both of which feature larger inner screens than their outer counterparts but differ significantly from one another in terms of size and proportions.

The iPhone Duo's unique design may actually help speed up app updates, according to analysts. The outer display has the same aspect ratio as the larger inner screen, which Apple highlighted during its September presentation.

Developers only need to create one app size that will work seamlessly on both displays, making it easier for them to adapt their apps to the Duo's foldable design. This is a departure from Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra, where the cover and inner screens have different aspect ratios.

The transition to foldables is not without its challenges, however. It takes time for app makers to adjust to new display formats, as evidenced by past changes in smartphone design. For instance, when iPhones finally ditched physical buttons below the screen, apps initially struggled to adapt.

As one industry expert pointed out, it's a similar story with foldables, some apps may not make full use of the Duo's larger inner screen at first. This is because app makers have to rework their designs to accommodate the new display format, which can be a time-consuming process.

The rollout of new features on the iPhone Duo has been a bumpy ride for some users, with many complaining about poorly optimized apps that don't take full advantage of the device's unique display format.

This is due in part to the complexity of designing software for foldable devices, which require apps to adapt quickly and seamlessly to changes in screen size and orientation. As one industry expert pointed out, when a user opens or closes a foldable phone, it's like asking an app to perform acrobatics - instantly switching between internal and external displays while rearranging the layout of pixels.

Many users have had to deal with slow-loading native apps that don't quite deliver on the promise of a foldable future. Meanwhile, third-party apps have struggled to keep up, often resulting in a less-than-smooth user experience. Some apps were barely usable at all when they first appeared on the market.

As it stands now, most apps are designed with Android foldables in mind, thanks to years of software updates from Google that specifically address flexible displays. The iPhone Duo will have to play catch-up if it wants to offer users a seamless experience.

Apple's close relationships with app developers will likely play a significant role in ensuring their software takes full advantage of the iPhone Duo's unique screen proportions.

Developers of popular apps like Instagram have had experience adapting to new display formats, including those found on Android foldables. This expertise should make it easier for them to update their apps to fit the Duo's screens, although it's difficult to predict exactly when this will happen.

As more and more developers work to optimize their apps for the iPhone Duo, users can expect a seamless experience that showcases the device's capabilities.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/iphone-duo-owners-your-apps-will-look-better-soon/

The process of linking the phone number is automatic and occurs during device setup. Google verifies the number and adds it to every account on the phone, including work and secondary accounts. This means that even if you have multiple Google accounts set up on your Android device, they will all be linked to your phone number.

Google's support documentation explains that verification enables features such as account recovery and RCS messaging. However, the company does not provide a clear explanation for why the phone number needs to be added to every account. It is unclear whether this linking of accounts has any significant implications for users' data protection or security.

Android Authority discovered that Google's support documentation was amended between August and October 2025 to reflect that verification is now on by default. A changelog dated September 8, 2025 also confirms that number verification runs automatically during setup.

Users are only recently becoming aware of this linking process after receiving unsolicited emails from noreply-phone-verification@google.com informing them that their phone number has been verified for multiple accounts. The link between the phone number and Google accounts is not limited to existing accounts; it also applies to new accounts added later, as well as any future numbers associated with the device.

When a user enables phone number verification on their Android device, they may not be aware that it also allows for a feature called Better sharing on Google to function for one of the signed-in accounts. This enables features such as video calls, messages, and notifications for content sent to the number, including photos. Additionally, other services like finding a lost device, emergency location services, and Quick Share rely on phone number verification.

The consequences of automatic phone number verification extend beyond existing accounts, as it also applies to new accounts created later and any future numbers associated with the device. This means that even if a user doesn't sign in to their Google account using their phone number initially, they may still be linked due to this auto-verification process. As a result, users may find themselves having to deal with unexpected access or permissions on their Android devices.

Google's own documentation highlights another aspect of automatic phone number linking: the Sign in with Mobile Number feature. This tool allows users to recover access to their Google account using the lock screen passcode from their previous device, provided the phone number is verified. Furthermore, a setting called Better ads & Google services uses a phone number across Google services to show more relevant ads.

The exact implications of this linking process are still unclear, as Google hasn't specified which ads settings apply to numbers attached automatically. However, it's worth noting that any verified number on an Android device can be added to any Google account signed into it. This raises questions about the extent to which phone number verification affects users' online experience and data management.

To opt out of this linking process, users can navigate to their Android device's Settings > Google > All services menu and toggle off Verify phone numbers automatically under Privacy & security. Note that different devices may have slightly varying menus or labels for this feature.

To remove already-linked numbers, users must navigate to Personal info > Phone in each account's Google settings and manually detach them.

Disabling phone number verification also has a consequence for messaging: RCS chats in Google Messages will revert back to SMS. This is because the feature requires verified phone numbers to connect RCS conversations between Android phones and iPhones, which began rolling out in May.

Google maintains that it does not sell personal data, including phone numbers, to third parties. In addition, users with new Google accounts may face reduced storage capacity - 5GB instead of the standard 15GB - if they don't link a verified phone number.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2292018/google-quietly-linking-phone-number-to-android-accounts/

One of the most exciting aspects of the iPhone Duo is its shape-shifting design, which allows for creative use cases such as hands-free entertainment and self-mounting for long-exposure photos. This versatility opens up new possibilities for users, but it also creates challenges for developers who must adapt their apps to take advantage of the added screen space.

The iPhone Duo's innovative design may not be compatible with every app, however, as some popular titles have yet to be optimized for the device. A web tracker has emerged to help users determine which apps are suitable for use on the iPhone Duo, but it remains to be seen how well these apps will perform in practice.

As developers scramble to update their apps for the iPhone Duo, dozens of popular picks from the App Store are already being worked on to take advantage of the flexible screen. These updated apps will feature a "Made for iPhone Duo" badge on their product page, indicating that they have been optimized for use with the device.

The next few weeks and months will be crucial in determining how well the iPhone Duo's innovative design is received by users and developers alike. For those lucky enough to get their hands on an iPhone Duo soon, several standout apps have already been tested and found to work seamlessly with the device.

The iPhone Duo's versatility has made it possible to enjoy streaming services like never before. One standout example is Netflix, which offers a seamless viewing experience across various orientations. When unfolded, the phone displays a standard widescreen layout, perfect for immersing yourself in your favorite movies and shows.

However, for those who prefer a more unique viewing experience, Netflix also allows you to rotate the iPhone Duo to portrait orientation. This enables you to watch videos in the upper third of the screen while using another app on the bottom half, offering a creative way to multitask.

Beyond streaming services, the iPhone Duo has proven itself to be an excellent tool for cooking enthusiasts. With the NYT Cooking app, users can access recipes and instructions with ease. The phone's flexibility allows you to set it down in various configurations, such as lifting one half of the inner screen while toggling on Cook mode.

This feature not only makes it easier to follow recipes but also helps keep your countertop tidy by reducing clutter. By increasing the text size for comfortable viewing from a distance, cooking with the iPhone Duo has become an enjoyable experience.

For those who prefer to stay organized, Fantastical is another app that takes full advantage of the iPhone Duo's features. Its ability to keep users in better order and on top of their schedules makes it an excellent addition to the phone's arsenal of productivity tools.

The calendar app within the iPhone Duo has evolved into a comprehensive tool that not only manages daily tasks but also provides an overview of upcoming appointments and events. This includes color-coded organization, making it easier to visualize schedules for different timeframes such as days, weeks, months, or even years.

In addition to scheduling features, this app integrates weather tracking, offering users real-time updates on the latest forecast. While some might find the abundance of information overwhelming, the app's design ensures that everything is neatly organized and visually appealing.

For those who prefer voice commands, Fantastical has been optimized to support enhanced Siri interactions. This enables users to add calendar events, to-do lists, or other tasks through either voice prompts or text inputs.

Edits, a popular video editing tool, has received an update specifically tailored for the iPhone Duo's capabilities. The app now allows creators to view a preview of their edits on one half of the inner screen while simultaneously displaying the timeline on the opposite side. This setup streamlines the editing process by eliminating the need to minimize and expand the preview.

In line with the launch of the iPhone Duo, social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram have been optimized for the device's larger screen. As a result, users can now comfortably watch videos on one half of the screen while reading comments and interacting with content on the other side.

The versatility of the iPhone Duo's design has opened up new possibilities for app developers to create immersive and interactive experiences.

One such app is Toastie, a game that lets users prepare virtual sandwiches with precision and finesse. The goal is to achieve perfection in every detail, from the arrangement of cheese slices to the even distribution of butter.

To toast the sandwich, users can fold the iPhone Duo shut, mimicking the action of a panini press. This adds a delightful touch of realism to the experience, complete with haptic effects that simulate the sizzling of bread.

The multidimensional screen of the iPhone Duo allows for innovative uses of split-screen mode, where two apps can be run simultaneously in a way that's both functional and intuitive.

The versatility of the iPhone Duo's dual-screen setup has proven to be a game-changer for multitaskers like myself. During daily commutes, I find it convenient to have Google Maps and Spotify open simultaneously, allowing for quick adjustments to navigation and music playback.

In other situations, such as during telehealth appointments or social gatherings, the split-screen mode enables seamless multitasking. For example, a video call can be set up on one half of the screen while taking notes with a separate app on the other.

The iPhone Duo's innovative design has indeed shown potential in boosting productivity and efficiency for users who need to juggle multiple tasks at once.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/iphone-duo-apps-full-advantage-new-foldable-phone/

To combat the threat of unauthorized protein production, a team from Google DeepMind has devised a method to "watermark AI-generated proteins without compromising their function. This innovation allows scientists to identify the source of these proteins and potentially prevent nefarious uses.

The introduction of watermarks could significantly reduce biosecurity threats by tracing the origin of engineered proteins and flagging them for extra scrutiny, according to experts in the field. Professors like Roy Sleator, who was not involved in the research, believe that this technology has the potential to curb unauthorized toxin creation and streamline database curation.

However, other experts caution that current AI technologies can also erase watermarks, rendering the safeguard ineffective in its current form. This raises concerns about the reliability of the system and whether it will be able to prevent misuse.

The development of protein engineering tools like AlphaFold has been a major milestone in scientific research. In 2020, this AI program revealed the 3D structure of proteins from their building block sequences, revolutionizing our understanding of these complex molecules.

AlphaFold's ability to predict protein structures has earned its developers, including Demis Hassabis and John Jumper, recognition with the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2024. This achievement has paved the way for further research into protein engineering and the creation of novel proteins using AI technologies.

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in protein engineering has raised concerns about its potential misuse for creating bioweapons. This is because AI can generate novel proteins that may evade our immune systems and existing vaccines, making them potentially hazardous.

Professor George Rose from Johns Hopkins University cautions that any technology with good intentions can be exploited for malicious purposes. He highlights the need to develop strategies to prevent the misappropriation of advanced technologies like protein engineering.

Current methods for detecting biothreats rely on identifying similarities between novel proteins and known threats based on their amino acid sequences. However, AI-generated proteins may not resemble existing threats, making it challenging to detect them using conventional screening tools.

The DeepMind team has developed a new technique called SynthIDBio-sequence, which is part of a broader family of watermarking methods designed to prevent the misuse of AI-generated proteins. This method involves encoding secret watermarks into the amino acid sequences of proteins created by ProteinMPNN, a program that generates 3D protein structures based on user input.

The DeepMind team has demonstrated that proteins built with SynthIDBio-sequence can still bind to their targets effectively while carrying the hidden watermark. This achievement suggests that the technique may be viable for preventing the misuse of AI-generated proteins in bioweapon creation.

The researchers have developed an alternative technique called SynthIDBio-structure that embeds watermarks directly into the protein's structure by manipulating AlphaFold 3, DeepMind's flagship protein prediction algorithm.

This method gives the AI a secondary task: making minor adjustments to how atoms are arranged in the protein without affecting its overall function. These subtle tweaks can be identified later using specialized detectors and are small enough not to appear as obvious distortions.

In testing, this technique combined with watermarking was able to detect watermarked proteins with remarkable accuracy, flagging over 99% of them while correctly ignoring 99.9% of non-watermarked proteins.

Despite its technical success, the SynthIDBio-structure method is still considered immature and not ready for widespread implementation according to several experts who have reviewed it.

Bruce Wittmann, a principal applied scientist at Microsoft, notes that this technique is effective but brittle, implying that the watermarks can be easily removed from the protein.

The effectiveness of watermarked AI-generated proteins in preventing bioweapon creation is being questioned by experts.

Some critics argue that watermarking may not be a long-term solution for biosecurity, as it could be bypassed or removed from the protein. This is particularly concerning given that terrorists or other malicious actors may not care about being identified after carrying out an attack.

The majority of software used for protein prediction and generation is open-source, which makes it difficult to incorporate watermarking into these programs. As a result, experts warn that the field would need to shift towards using closed-source models before watermarks could become an industry standard.

Regulating the use of generative proteins would be challenging to enforce, with some experts predicting that top-down regulation would be ineffective in preventing malicious actors from accessing and modifying the software.

Regulating the use of generative proteins would be challenging to enforce, as some experts predict that top-down regulation would be ineffective in preventing malicious actors from accessing and modifying the software used to generate these proteins.

A potential solution to this problem is to develop watermarking" techniques for AI-generated proteins. This involves embedding a unique identifier or signature into the protein sequence, making it possible to track its origin and detect any unauthorized modifications. Researchers have already demonstrated that such watermarks can be embedded into AI-generated proteins without compromising their function.

The development of watermarking techniques has significant implications for biotechnology research and security. By providing a way to identify and verify the authenticity of AI-generated proteins, these techniques could help prevent the misuse of synthetic biology tools for malicious purposes, thereby enhancing global biosecurity.

Live Science: https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/scientists-can-now-watermark-ai-generated-proteins-to-deter-bioweapon-creation-but-will-it-really-work

Two recent tests of Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold have revealed that these devices offer improved multitasking, reading, and entertainment experiences due to their larger, flexible displays. However, they also come with a steep cost.

Foldable phones are essentially smartphones with folding touch screens, allowing users to expand the screen size as needed. This innovation has given rise to three distinct form factors: clamshell, book-style, and trifold designs.

The clamshell design, exemplified by Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip 8, folds into a compact shape similar to traditional flip phones, making it highly portable and stylish.

When it comes to adopting a foldable phone, certain individuals may find them particularly useful. People who already own both a smartphone and tablet might consider upgrading to a single device that can seamlessly handle different screen sizes.

This is because a book-style foldable can effectively replace both devices, providing an uninterrupted experience regardless of whether you're working on a small or large display. Moreover, the cost of purchasing a foldable phone often compares favorably to buying separate new phone and tablet models.

In addition to convenience, foldables are also well-suited for individuals who frequently use their phones for work, reading, or streaming content on-the-go. This is because they offer an easy way to multitask on the larger display before reverting to a smaller screen for everyday tasks.

Larger displays on foldable phones make them an attractive option for those who want a bigger screen without carrying around an extra device. This is especially true for readers and frequent streamers who enjoy watching videos or browsing through content on their mobile devices.

The design of foldables also holds appeal for some individuals, who value the unique form factor over productivity features. The clamshell design, in particular, seems to be gaining popularity among those who prioritize aesthetics over functionality.

While modern foldables have improved in terms of durability, they still pose a higher risk of mechanical failure due to their moving hinges and flexible internal displays compared to traditional smartphones.

The durability of modern foldables is still a concern due to their complex design. For instance, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 model I've been using has a lower water and dust resistance rating than its more robust counterparts, specifically IP48 instead of the standard IP68.

Other potential drawbacks include the phone's hinge being prone to bending or snapping, which can compromise the device's structural integrity. Additionally, the internal screen that folds is often less resistant to scratches compared to the sturdier external display.

Another consideration is battery life, as the larger screen on foldables tends to drain power faster than a typical smartphone. Furthermore, when folded, these devices are generally thicker and may not fit in certain pockets or storage spaces due to their increased size.

When considering a foldable phone, it's essential to weigh its benefits against your specific needs. If you rely on your device for everyday tasks or require enhanced durability and battery life, a traditional smartphone may be a better option.

Foldable phones are ideal for those who want a tablet-like experience without the bulk, but they come with a price tag that may not be justifiable for everyone. In the end, choosing between a foldable phone and a standard device ultimately depends on your unique requirements and preferences.

Good Housekeeping: https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/what-to-buy/tech/a74133085/foldable-phones-worth-it/

My Google Home Speaker has been responsible for an astonishing amount of data consumption over the past ten days, with 487 GB used up - a figure that's almost as high as my entire household's data usage between August and September.

The issue appears to be isolated to some devices, and Google has acknowledged the problem. According to a spokesperson from the company, a server misconfiguration is to blame for causing some Google Home Speakers to repeatedly download software updates.

This glitch has been enough to significantly impact home Wi-Fi bandwidth, leaving users wondering what's behind the sudden surge in data consumption.

My investigation into this issue led me to take a closer look at all the devices connected to my router, revealing some unexpected data usage patterns.

As I dug deeper into my Wi-Fi usage patterns, I realized that checking device data consumption was essential to identifying potential culprits. Some routers offer detailed information on where data is being directed, allowing users to pinpoint the devices responsible for excessive use.

My own Eero mesh system has a limited view of connected devices and their data usage due to our decision not to pay for its subscription fee. However, I can still access basic information through the app, which lists all connected devices but doesn't provide detailed data consumption metrics.

Routers with subscription fees often come with paywalls that conceal valuable features, including traffic analysis capabilities. Fortunately, there are alternatives available, such as Asus' mesh Wi-Fi system, which offers free tracking and analysis of network traffic without requiring a paid subscription.

To take advantage of this feature on an Asus router, navigate to the manufacturer's website in your browser and log in to your account. Once logged in, click on the Traffic Analyzer tab and ensure it is enabled; data refreshes every hour. The Statistic tab will then display the top five devices using the most data.

For users with a TP-Link router or mesh system, similar traffic review capabilities are available through their respective apps. By examining this information, I can gain a better understanding of which devices are consuming the most Wi-Fi resources and take steps to optimize my network's performance.

To delve deeper into Wi-Fi usage on my network, I opened the Deco app and navigated to its Network tab. Selecting Traffic Usage revealed a wealth of information about how devices are utilizing internet resources. However, the level of detail varied depending on the router model, with some offering toggleable In-depth Statistics for more granular data.

Netgear routers only provide an overall traffic count under the Traffic Meter feature, preventing users from breaking down usage by individual device. For other manufacturers, it's worth exploring both the mobile app and web interface to uncover additional details. The latter often offers access to a broader range of information than its mobile counterpart.

To sidestep potential paywalls, I recommend consulting our comprehensive router and mesh Wi-Fi guides for recommendations on devices that offer robust data tracking capabilities. By doing so, users can gain a more nuanced understanding of their network's performance without incurring additional costs.

In addition to the Deco app, my internet service provider offers its own app, in this case, the AT&T mobile application, which enables me to monitor exact usage data. Most providers should have similar apps or login portals that allow users to track their data activity in real-time. The available metrics are limited compared to those offered by a dedicated router's app.

Upon launching the AT&T app, I was able to view detailed data for my current billing period as well as the last three periods. However, it only lists high-volume devices rather than every connected device on my network.

While reviewing my data usage, I discovered a list of devices connected to my network, but it only included high-volume users, not every device on my network.

This limited information still allowed me to identify which devices were consuming the most data in recent days and weeks, revealing an issue with both the Google Home Speaker and the Ring smoke detector.

The fact that these smart home devices are consuming significant amounts of data may not be a concern for those with large Wi-Fi plans, but it could pose a problem for others who have limited data caps or slower connections.

For individuals on smaller data plans or with clogged networks, checking their data usage to identify the culprit device is essential to avoid unexpected charges or performance issues.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/google-home-speaker-bug-oct-2026/

As we age, the stakes increase for remembering significant events in our relationships. What starts as forgetting friends' birthdays can escalate into neglecting family members' special days, including those of children and grandchildren.

To avoid these mishaps, some people turn to AI agents to automate relationship maintenance tasks. This approach leverages AI's ability to perform repetitive duties with precision. I decided to put this strategy to the test by using ChatGPT and other AI tools to manage my personal and professional connections.

However, there are potential drawbacks to relying on AI for interpersonal relationships. The technology excels at executing routine tasks but may struggle to replicate human empathy and emotional understanding. This raises questions about the suitability of AI agents for handling complex social interactions.

As I began exploring the capabilities and limitations of these tools, a significant issue came to light: the lack of clarity around their impact on copyright laws.

As I continued exploring the capabilities of these AI agents, I realized that some tools are more capable than others when it comes to automating personal relationships. ChatGPT, for instance, demonstrated its ability to access and utilize external services like Google Calendar and Gmail to identify key birthdays and develop a system to send reminders.

One tool, however, seemed to struggle with the automation aspect: Claude's capabilities were limited to drafting emails and creating birthday cards, but it couldn't actually send them. This raised questions about the effectiveness of using AI agents for tasks that require more than just generating content.

Another tool, Gemini, appeared to be restricted in its functionality, capable only of working within the chat interface to draft custom emails and generate cards, rather than interacting with external services like email clients.

The integration of AI agents in digital communication has reached new heights, allowing for seamless interaction and automation of personal relationships. ChatGPT's ability to gather data points on friends' and family members' interests enabled it to create personalized digital birthday cards that accurately reflected their personalities.

To further test the capabilities of these AI agents, I attempted to set up automated digital greetings for significant events in my life. In a surprising move, ChatGPT successfully generated a digital card and message for my dog's birthday and sent an email to my husband without any issues.

However, this experience was short-lived as the chat limit was reached, prompting an alert requesting permission to send emails on behalf of the user. This raised questions about the extent of control users have over AI agents' actions, particularly when it comes to sensitive tasks like sending personal communications.

In a separate experiment with Meta Muse, I asked the AI agent to share memes and check-ins with friends on Instagram. Unfortunately, this endeavor proved to be more trouble than it was worth, as the content selected by Muse seemed arbitrary and lacked any specific connection to the individuals involved.

The inconsistent performance of these AI agents highlights the need for further refinement and development in their capabilities, particularly when it comes to tasks that require a deep understanding of personal relationships.

Optimizing these AI agents for personal correspondence proved to be a tedious task. The amount of time required to fine-tune their responses and ensure they sent relevant messages was not justified by the end result.

When interacting with an AI agent like Dots or Muse, it's essential to be aware that they may also start to overstep in conversations. This can happen even when you've given them permission to access certain information, such as your emails or social media accounts.

In my experience, both Dots and Muse began to act autonomously, taking actions I hadn't explicitly requested. For instance, Dots unexpectedly alerted me to a scheduling conflict by scanning my emails and sending me a notification about the timing of an event I had bought tickets for.

This behavior raised questions about the limits of these AI agents' capabilities and whether they can truly be trusted to perform tasks independently without causing unintended consequences.

While using Muse and Dots' AI agents to automate my relationships, I encountered some concerning behavior from these digital assistants. Muse began sending unsolicited updates about a fire in Malibu and the weather, which raised questions about its ability to discern relevant information.

These apps also displayed relentless efforts to encourage me to utilize their features while they were active on my device. This experience left me feeling disconnected from meaningful interactions and more focused on the AI companies behind these tools.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/i-tried-automating-my-relationships-using-ai-agents-muse-and-dots-overstepped/

The idea of using a single gadget for all tasks is an intriguing one - but does it make sense to spend extra money on a device capable of handling two devices' workload? I decided to put this concept to the test by writing my entire review on the iPhone Duo.

Optimizing for its larger screen, I used Bear, a note-taking app that performed well on the Duo's display. To my surprise, I didn't find the experience as grueling as expected - despite having run similar experiments with Android foldables and smart glasses in the past.

However, iOS poses unique challenges, particularly when it comes to using external input devices. Unlike other operating systems, iOS doesn't automatically recognize Bluetooth mice or trackpads; instead, users must manually enable AssistiveTouch in the phone's accessibility settings to utilize an iPad-like cursor for navigating the interface and selecting text.

The iPhone Duo's limitations were most apparent during tasks that require precision and multitasking. For instance, editing photos or documents required switching between apps on my desktop computer, as iOS doesn't allow for precise control over app windows.

iOS restricts how users can view multiple apps at once, unlike many other operating systems. When using split-screen mode, the two apps are displayed equally, with no option to adjust the proportion of screen space allocated to each one. This limitation is particularly frustrating when working on a project that requires viewing multiple files or references simultaneously.

Another example of iOS's restrictive multitasking features is its inability to stack apps vertically in portrait orientation. Instead, users can only pin video apps to the top of the screen with another app below, limiting flexibility and creativity.

The iPhone Duo did offer some useful features, such as "app pairs, which allow users to pin two apps together for easy access. This feature was a welcome convenience, but it didn't compensate for the many limitations imposed by iOS's restrictive multitasking policies.

The versatility of the iPhone Duo proved to be a valuable asset when multitasking was required. For instance, pairing email and calendar apps together allowed for seamless access to both at any time, making it simple to navigate between them.

To augment my iPhone Duo experience, I opted to use an external keyboard - specifically, a Seenda folding Bluetooth model that, while not ideal, served its purpose. With the rise of mobile workstations, compact keyboards designed for on-the-go productivity are likely to become increasingly popular, offering users greater flexibility and convenience when working remotely.

The addition of Apple's iPhone Duo Folio with Kickstand helped keep my phone at a comfortable viewing angle, allowing me to focus on tasks without straining my neck. Various MagSafe accessories were also available for use, providing further options for propping up the device during prolonged work sessions.

Using the iPhone Duo proved to be a challenge when it came to multitasking, and I found myself missing features like the iPad's Slide Over function that allows users to hide" a floating app off to the side.

This feature would have been particularly useful for messaging apps like Slack or WhatsApp, allowing me to keep them open without interrupting my split-screen experience. Unfortunately, Gmail was another story altogether, with its outdated interface looking particularly awkward on the Duo's 4-inch outer screen.

The lack of support from Google's workspace apps, aside from the recently updated Google Search app, was noticeable and frustrating at times, but I'm optimistic that full compatibility will be achieved soon, possibly even by this Friday when the Duo is officially launched.

After using the iPhone Duo for a full day, I can attest that it's not feasible to replace a laptop entirely with this device, at least not yet.

The 6-inch canvas of the iPhone Duo proved to be a decent workspace when paired with a portable keyboard and kickstand, allowing me to complete focused tasks efficiently. However, the lack of support from other Google apps was noticeable and sometimes frustrating.

In the end, it's clear that even with its limitations, the iPhone Duo has potential as a versatile productivity tool, especially once Apple Pencil support arrives later this year.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/story/i-worked-for-a-whole-day-using-only-the-iphone-duo-heres-how-it-went/

When attempting to add more than two iPhone Duos to an order on the Apple Store, customers are met with a message stating that only two devices can be purchased per customer. This restriction is in place regardless of whether the purchase is made online or in-store when the phone becomes available on Friday.

The limit of two foldables per person will apply universally, affecting both those who pre-order their iPhone Duo and those who opt to buy it in-store. It's worth noting that Apple has a limited stock of the new device, which may lead to long wait times for customers trying to get their hands on one - or more.

Pre-orders for the iPhone Duo are currently backed up until late January, with estimated delivery dates ranging from several weeks after the initial purchase date. However, those who do manage to secure an in-store purchase may still face the challenge of waiting in line overnight to be among the few individuals able to get their hands on one of these highly anticipated devices.

In a departure from its usual practices, Apple has reintroduced restrictions on iPhone purchases, limiting buyers to two devices per order for its latest release, the iPhone Duo. This move marks a return to a policy first implemented nearly two decades ago when the original iPhone was launched in 2007.

Initially, buyers were allowed to purchase only two iPhones per order, but this limit was later eased to five by the holiday season that year. However, in 2012, Apple reverted back to its stricter policy, limiting orders for the iPhone 5 to two per customer. This time around, it seems that the company is taking a more cautious approach with its latest foldable device.

Despite the restrictions on online purchases, we found that multiple iPhone Duos can be added to shopping carts at major carriers such as Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile, provided buyers sign up for a new line of service. However, this option comes with the caveat that all additional devices will require activation with a carrier.

The iPhone Duo is Apple's entry into the foldable phone market, which has seen significant competition from other manufacturers since 2020. Samsung, Motorola, and Google have all released their own versions of foldable phones, while Chinese brands like Huawei and Xiaomi have also joined the fray, although none have achieved widespread sales in the US.

The release of Apple's iPhone Duo has sent shockwaves through the tech industry, with analysts predicting it will capture nearly a third of the foldable phone market by year's end. According to the International Data Corporation, the Duo is expected to account for 31% of the foldable share of the phones market by the end of this year, and could reach as high as 40% in 2027.

Early reviews of the iPhone Duo have been largely positive, with critics praising its finer details. Despite some minor drawbacks associated with being a first-generation device, many reviewers agree that the experience feels fluid and cohesive. This is particularly evident in hands-on experiences, where the phone's design and functionality come together seamlessly.

The success of the iPhone Duo has also sparked renewed interest in foldable phones as a whole. As the market continues to grow, it remains to be seen whether Apple's new device will maintain its momentum throughout the holiday season and into the new year, solidifying its position as a major player in the industry.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/apple-limits-iphone-duo-purchases/

Alloop's innovative design allows it to be worn in three different configurations, which the company refers to as the Trio. This modularity is made possible by four distinct pieces of hardware: a wristband, a ring, the Cube - a compact sensor system - and Halo, which offers advanced features such as tap-to-speak functionality.

The flexibility of Alloop's design means that users can choose how they wear their wearable depending on their needs. For example, they can opt for the most basic configuration by wearing just the wristband with the Cube, or go all out with the full Trio, including both the Cube and Halo for a more comprehensive feedback experience.

The Cube itself is equipped with an array of sensors that track vital signs such as resting heart rate, heart rate variability, blood oxygen levels, breathing rate, and temperature. Users can also log their meals and supplements using photos, voice, or text, allowing Alloop to provide insights into sleep quality, nutrition, activity, strain, recovery, and overall health trends.

The Alloop app's health dashboard provides a unified view of key data, allowing users to track their progress in one place.

Bio Age is another feature that uses 18 measurements across six health categories to determine biological age. This metric estimates how the body is aging at a cellular level, as opposed to chronological age, and highlights factors contributing to it.

The Alloop Trio's personal AI health agent connects user input with sensor data from the Cube, offering guidance and insights based on this information. Users can log meals, symptoms, feelings, and more using text, voice, or images, providing a comprehensive view of their overall health.

Alloop's use of Google Gemini and ChatGPT is similar to other wearable companies' AI agents, but its open health platform approach sets it apart from traditional fitness trackers that often require subscription fees.

The Alloop app will offer both a free plan and an optional Pro plan with usage-based access levels. The free plan covers everyday health management and light conversational AI use, while the Pro plan provides more in-depth research and enhanced personal agent capabilities for about $5 per month.

Alloop's Pro plan offers more in-depth research capabilities by drawing on users' long-term data, goals, daily behaviors, and interaction context to provide deeper insights and personalized planning.

The wearable device supports a range of integrations with popular health apps and wearables, including Apple Health and Google Health. Users can import data from medical records, lab tests, continuous glucose monitors, and third-party devices, allowing for comprehensive tracking of their health metrics.

To ensure user data is protected, Alloop specifies robust security measures across data collection, transfer, storage, and management. This includes controls that enable users to review, delete, and export their data at any time. The company's privacy policy also confirms that it does not sell personal information or use health data for advertising or marketing purposes.

Alloop is committed to safeguarding user data, with a specific focus on US-based users. According to the company, all US users' data will remain within the United States, without being transferred overseas. This approach aligns with regulatory requirements and demonstrates Alloop's dedication to protecting sensitive health information.

As part of its ongoing commitment to data security, Alloop is working towards obtaining key certifications, including SOC 2 compliance and ISO/IEC 27001 certification. These standards are designed to ensure the effective safeguarding of customer data, reflecting Alloop's proactive approach to data protection and management.

The Alloop wearable device will offer a community feature that enables users to share their progress and view others' across various aspects of life, including workouts, meals, daily routines, and health protocols. This social aspect will allow users to create groups, participate in shared challenges, and engage with one another through the Alloop app.

When utilizing the community features, Alloop's privacy policy notes that the company collects user profile information, follows, posts, images, comments, reactions, feed activity, and messages. This data helps the company respond to reports, enforce community rules, and protect users from spam, abuse, and security threats. The visibility of published information can be adjusted based on feature settings.

The Alloop Trio will debut as a Kickstarter crowdfunding campaign on November 10, with an estimated price of $299, subject to change. Shipping is anticipated for late December 2026 to early January 2027.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/alloop-wearable-replace-fitness-tracking-wristband-ring/

According to researchers Benjamin Jaros and Joshua Rauh, affiliated with Stanford University's Hoover Institution, the actual figure could be significantly lower. In their analysis, they estimate the tax would collect around $30 billion, a range of $28 billion to $36 billion. This is less than one-third of what proponents expect.

The main reason for this discrepancy lies in the ability of billionaires to relocate from California. The researchers used Forbes billionaire rankings, real estate reports, and public relocation announcements to estimate that nearly 30% of the proposed tax base has already been eliminated due to departures.

The researchers' earlier analysis had projected a $40 billion revenue and a $25 billion net loss for the state. However, their latest estimate puts the potential tax windfall at just $30 billion, which is a significant downward revision.

This new figure raises concerns about what happens after the state collects it. The economists are worried that the losses from billionaire departures could outweigh the one-time wealth tax proceeds.

The researchers have estimated that billionaire departures could cost California between $1 billion and $3.5 billion annually in lost income tax revenue. If these losses continue indefinitely, they would far exceed the potential gains from the wealth tax.

These projections are based on simulations using different revenue and discount-rate assumptions. Notably, 85% of the simulations produced a net loss for the state, indicating that the potential risks may be even greater than initially thought.

The researchers' estimates do not account for individuals who have publicly announced their intention to leave California but may still owe taxes if they remain residents as of January 1, 2026.

California's billionaire tax proposal has sparked intense debate among economists, with some arguing it will generate significant revenue and others warning of potential losses.

A recent study by economists Jasper Boll, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman challenges the notion that billionaires fleeing California would lead to a $100 billion windfall. According to their estimates, even in an extreme scenario where every billionaire permanently left the state, it would take around 25 years for accumulated income tax losses to match this proposed revenue gain.

The authors of this study have revised their earlier estimate of what California billionaires paid in state income taxes in 2025, increasing it from $4.1 billion to $4.3 billion. This revision also critiques the Stanford approach by pointing out that it treats the wealth tax as a one-time payment while considering the migration triggered by the tax as permanent.

However, this perspective is not shared by California's nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office, which predicts that the tax will generate tens of billions of dollars over several years. The office also expects the tax to have a relatively minor impact on annual income tax revenue, reducing it by less than $1 billion.

The debate surrounding the billionaire tax proposal comes as the wealth gap in the United States continues to widen. According to Federal Reserve data, the richest 1% of households now hold a record 32.5% of the nation's total net worth, up from 31.1% just one year earlier.

The proposed wealth tax has ignited a heated debate, with tech moguls pouring millions into opposing it and supporting competing ballot initiatives. According to campaign finance disclosures reviewed by a prominent news outlet, these billionaires have collectively raised over $340 million against the measure.

Among the largest donors is Brin, who alone has contributed more than $100 million. Other notable contributors include Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, Peter Thiel, cofounder of Palantir, Patrick Collison, Stripe's CEO, and Tony Xu, DoorDash's CEO. This massive opposition campaign has already spent a staggering amount on ads and lobbying efforts.

The battle is not only being fought in the streets but also at the top levels of government. California Governor Gavin Newsom, who initially supported the tax, has now switched sides and endorsed Proposition 42, a competing measure funded by Brin that would block retroactive taxes and new state taxes on personal property. This move effectively undermines Prop 40, the original wealth tax bill.

The outcome is far from certain as voters remain divided on the issue. A recent poll found that likely voters are almost evenly split, with 46% in favor of the tax and 43% opposed, leaving room for a potential shift in public opinion before the final vote.

The proposed tax hike in California has sparked a heated debate among residents, with some arguing that it would bring in significant revenue while others claim it would drive away top talent and entrepreneurs. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is an example of someone who seems to be willing to pay his share, stating he would comfortably shell out around $8 billion over five years.

The tax's fate will be decided by voters on November 3rd, but even if it passes, its implementation could be delayed due to competing measures and the time-consuming process of determining its impact. Ultimately, the outcome will depend on various factors, including the effectiveness of the tax in generating revenue and its overall effect on California's economy.

Fortune: https://fortune.com/2026/10/21/california-billionaire-tax-prop-40-stanford-study-39-billion-loss/

The iPhone Duo's dual-screen setup makes multitasking easy, with fun camera features to take advantage of the multiple displays. The device also offers reliable battery life, but its weight is a notable drawback, making it feel heavy in the hand.

One of the main challenges of reviewing the iPhone Duo is that many apps are not yet optimized for its screen sizes and vertical user interface elements. This can result in awkward layouts, with thick black bars on either side of the screen and a phone-sized app in the middle of the display.

However, some popular apps have recently updated to add full support for the iPhone Duo's screen sizes and vertical user interface elements. For example, Instagram, Threads, Slack, and even the Google app now have navigational icons on the right rail instead of the bottom center, with better-laid-out content that takes advantage of the larger screen.

To fully utilize the iPhone Duo's capabilities, developers need to target the iOS 27.1 software development kit (SDK), which will take some time. It is puzzling that some app developers are quick to embrace Apple's foldable design when they have previously shown little interest in optimizing their apps for Android folding phones.

The fact that some app developers are already adapting their apps to work seamlessly on the iPhone Duo's dual screens suggests that the device may help drive innovation and improvements in the world of mobile technology.

The iPhone Duo's design has been refined to perfection, a testament to Apple's dedication to innovation. The device's foldable screen is remarkably smooth and seamless, with a subtle crease that barely registers to the touch. This is due in part to Apple's innovative use of display technology, which includes a matte-finish nanotexture screen that minimizes glare and visual distractions.

The phone's shape has also been carefully considered, with a wider, shorter design that feels more natural in the hand than its predecessors. The 5.4-inch outer screen provides ample space for navigation and interaction, while the hinge glides open and shut with ease.

One area where Apple may have compromised on design is weight, as the iPhone Duo tips the scales at 254 grams - significantly heavier than an iPhone 18 Pro Max. This can make extended use of the device feel tiresome, particularly when combined with the inherent bulk of a foldable phone.

In contrast, Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold8 boasts a remarkably lightweight design, weighing in at just 201 grams. While this may not be a deal-breaker for some users, it does highlight one area where Apple may have fallen short in its pursuit of innovation.

Despite these minor quibbles, the iPhone Duo is undeniably a polished device that exudes quality and attention to detail. From the smooth operation of the hinge to the responsive touchscreen, every aspect of the phone has been carefully considered and refined.

However, some users may find themselves missing certain features available on Android devices. For example, when in split-screen mode, Apple's multitasking experience is tightly controlled, with a strict 50-50 split enforced between apps. This can be limiting for those who prefer more flexibility in their multitasking options.

In portrait orientation, the iPhone Duo also imposes some limitations on users. When trying to split-screen two apps, Apple will not allow stacking of multiple apps - a feature that has been available on Android devices for years. However, video apps are an exception, allowing picture-in-picture mode.

While these restrictions may be frustrating for some users, they do reflect Apple's commitment to streamlining the user experience and minimizing distractions. As such, the iPhone Duo remains a compelling option for those seeking a premium foldable device with seamless integration into the Apple ecosystem.

The iPhone Duo's rigid software philosophy is also evident in its basic input handling capabilities. Despite its advanced features, the device requires users to employ workarounds for certain tasks, such as using a compact folding keyboard with an attached trackpad.

Unfortunately, even this accessory can be finicky - I encountered issues getting the trackpad to function properly until I enabled AssistiveTouch in iOS' accessibility settings. This is ironic given that Apple's own iPads support cursor control natively.

The iPhone Duo also has its share of physical quirks and limitations. For instance, while it supports MagSafe technology for attaching accessories like tripods and mounts, there are some compatibility issues to be aware of.

One such issue arises when using official MagSafe wallets, which can stick out past the phone's lower edge - an aesthetic compromise that may not sit well with design-conscious users. As a result, third-party accessories will likely become popular alternatives.

In terms of camera capabilities, the iPhone Duo features a dual rear-camera system, adhering to industry standards rather than pushing the boundaries set by Apple's Pro iPhones. The latter boast a third zoom camera that I found myself missing during my review period.

Despite this limitation, the selfie cameras on the iPhone Duo performed admirably in my testing, with both the outer screen and under-display inner camera delivering good results. Even on Zoom calls, video quality was deemed "really good" by my editor - although it's worth noting that Zoom wasn't optimized for the device at the time.

The iPhone Duo's ability to multitask is a major strength, thanks in part to its support for multi-pane views and split-screening. When apps are properly optimized, this results in an enhanced productivity experience that showcases the phone's capabilities.

The battery life of these iPhones has been quite impressive so far. Despite heavy use, I've found myself ending most days with a significant amount of charge left over. Even after working extensively on the device throughout the day, it's managed to hold up remarkably well.

One of the standout features of these devices is their dual rear cameras. While they may not offer the same level of flexibility as some other high-end models, such as variable aperture, the results have been surprisingly similar when compared side by side with other iPhones.

The Duo Preview feature has also proven itself to be a valuable addition. By allowing users to share the camera's viewfinder with their subject, it makes taking photos much easier and more convenient. This is particularly useful for those who are often asked to take photos of others, such as family members or friends.

Another innovative feature is Smart Take, which allows users to set up a shot by placing the phone in a partially folded position and tapping the shutter button. The camera will then wait for the user to get into position before taking multiple photos at once. While it may not be as sophisticated as some other features on the market, such as Google's Magic Capture, it is certainly convenient.

The Kids Cue feature has also shown promise. Although I don't have children myself, I can see how this would be a hit with parents who are looking for ways to keep their kids entertained and engaged. By displaying cute animations from Snoopy on the outer display, it provides a fun way to capture a child's attention.

These features, combined with the overall performance of these devices, have made them feel like a solid investment so far. However, there are still some aspects that need to be considered before making a final judgment.

The Duo Preview and Smart Take features demonstrate Apple's commitment to innovation in the smartphone market. By offering unique solutions to common problems, they are setting themselves apart from competitors and providing users with a more streamlined experience.

The nanotexture finish on the inner screen of the iPhone Duo is a notable feature that sets it apart from other devices. This textured surface reduces the visibility of creases and minimizes glare and reflections, creating a more comfortable viewing experience.

One area where the iPhone Duo falls short is in terms of video quality when watching movies and shows on apps like Netflix. While colors are still vibrant, the device lacks the crisp video quality and deep blacks found on the iPhone 18 Pro. However, it's worth noting that screen brightness is not affected by the textured finish.

The textured finish does have some drawbacks, particularly in direct sunlight where off-axis viewing can be less than ideal. Despite this, the Duo still manages to deliver a bright display with peak outdoor brightness reaching up to 3,000 nits.

During my time with the iPhone Duo, I found myself pondering the concept of wasted space on screen. Apple's decision to move navigation elements to the right rail has been met with some criticism, but it seems that certain apps can make better use of this real estate.

Using an app that effectively utilizes the available space on the screen can be a game-changer for users who value productivity and efficiency. However, those who want to try out Apple's first folding phone may want to wait until developers have had time to optimize their apps.

One feature that is being held back until later this year is Reachability, which will allow users with smaller hands to more easily access the left or right edges of the screen. This addition could make a big difference for some users and is just one reason why waiting might be a good idea.

The iPhone Duo's weight has been a point of discussion among reviewers and users alike. While it's not necessarily a deal-breaker, it's worth noting that Apple may address this issue in future versions, much like Samsung did with its latest iteration.

The folding phone phenomenon may not appeal to everyone due to concerns over durability and repairability. A device with more moving parts can be less robust than its single-piece counterpart, which is a significant consideration for some users. While price remains a barrier for others, the Apple iPhone Duo's pricing is surprisingly competitive.

Despite these limitations, the folding phone category seems here to stay, with many enthusiasts swearing by their foldable devices and refusing to switch back to traditional smartphones. The newer passport-style shape of the Duo has even won over some skeptics, but one feature that remains elusive in this format is a high-quality zoom camera.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/review/apple-iphone-duo/