The app's user-friendly interface allows for easy tracking, with features such as copying and pasting previously logged meals to speed up day-to-day entries. However, the app's reliance on a database contributed by users means that some entries may not be entirely accurate. A checkmark symbol indicates verified nutrition information, which can be relied upon.

The free version of MyFitnessPal offers numerous useful features, including logging meals and tracking calorie intake. Users also have access to barcode scanning capabilities to quickly input packaged foods' nutritional data. However, the premium membership adds additional benefits such as VIP support and an ad-free experience.

While many users find the app's database to be comprehensive, some inaccuracies may arise due to user contributions. To ensure accuracy, look for entries marked with a checkmark symbol, indicating verified nutrition information has been provided.

MyNetDiary is another popular food- and fitness-tracking app that offers a clean and easy-to-use interface alongside a robust food database. This allows users to set daily calorie targets and track various aspects of their health, including weight, activity levels, and hydration.

The upgraded version of this app unlocks advanced features that make tracking easier and more efficient. One such feature is custom nutrient tracking, which allows users to monitor their intake of specific nutrients in greater detail than before. This includes more precise monitoring of macronutrients like carbohydrates, proteins, and fats.

The AI meal scanner is another significant upgrade, enabling users to take a photo of their plate and have the app automatically identify different components, including toppings and sauces. This feature significantly speeds up the logging process and makes it more convenient for users to track their daily intake.

The app's core functionality combines WeightWatchers' Points system with a digital tracking platform that includes a comprehensive food database and recipe tools. Unlike some other apps that focus solely on calorie counting, this one assigns Points to foods based on their nutritional profiles, encouraging users to stay within a daily budget. This approach promotes a more balanced diet by taking into account various factors beyond just calorie intake.

The app's reliance on AI-powered features is a significant departure from its earlier incarnation. The food scanner and AI recipe importer work together to automate much of the tracking process, making it easier for users to maintain consistency in their diet. This shift towards automation also enables users to build healthier habits more easily.

A paid membership is required to access the full range of features, even though the app itself can be downloaded for free. While some users may find this requirement off-putting, others will appreciate the added convenience and functionality that comes with upgrading to a premium account.

The app's premium features offer users a range of tools to enhance their tracking experience. In addition to the core features available in the free version, Noom Weight allows users to scan barcodes on food packaging, streamlining the logging process.

This feature is particularly useful for those who prefer not to manually search for foods or take photos using the "Snap It tool. By scanning a barcode, users can quickly and easily log their intake, saving time and effort in the long run.

The premium version also integrates seamlessly with popular fitness platforms, including Apple Health and Fitbit. This integration enables users to access a more comprehensive view of their overall health and wellness, combining data from multiple sources into a single dashboard.

While some users may find this requirement off-putting, others will appreciate the added convenience and functionality that comes with upgrading to a premium account. For those invested in long-term behavior change, Noom's focus on psychology-based lessons and coaching support can be a valuable asset in achieving their goals.

As part of its comprehensive approach, Noom delivers daily educational content, including short lessons and practical advice from experts in the field of nutrition and fitness. This feature helps users stay engaged with their tracking plan and motivated to make sustainable lifestyle changes.

Cronometer's emphasis on accuracy sets it apart from other apps that allow users to submit nutrition information freely without verification.

This approach makes a noticeable difference for those trying to closely monitor their nutrient intake or track specific health goals, such as managing chronic conditions or optimizing athletic performance.

While the app is designed for precise tracking, its free version still offers a robust set of features, including calorie and macronutrient tracking, micronutrient analysis, and a barcode scanner for easy data entry.

The basic version's limitations become apparent when users want more detailed insights into their nutrient intake or need to track specific health metrics over time.

Upgrading to the Gold subscription adds extra features like ad-free use, custom charts, recipe importing, and fasting timers, which can be particularly useful for those who require a high level of tracking precision.

The app's Life Score feature provides a comprehensive overview of daily habits by analyzing 16 key metrics, including nutrition and activity levels.

This score is calculated weekly and offers users a visual snapshot of their overall progress, allowing them to identify areas for improvement and track their progress over time.

A simple yet effective interface makes it easy to navigate the app's features, while its extensive international food database ensures that users can accurately log a wide range of global cuisines.

The app also allows users to identify verified foods by looking for blue badges next to entries in the database.

Yazio stands out from other apps with its impressive collection of recipes and structured meal inspiration.

This nutrition and intermittent fasting app guides users into structured fasting schedules tailored to their lifestyle and preferences, making it an ideal choice for beginners.

A key feature of this app is its AI meal photo scanner, which generates a nutrition score" after analyzing the user's food photos, providing instant feedback on how to improve the quality and balance of their meals. Unlike some other apps that focus heavily on calorie counting or restricting certain food groups, Simple emphasizes overall meal quality and healthier eating patterns.

The app offers both free and premium versions, with the free version including core fasting tools and the AI scanner, while a premium subscription unlocks more personalized plans and expert guidance.

Good Housekeeping: https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/what-to-buy/g28245675/best-food-tracking-apps/

The new features include the ability to track blood pressure trends without requiring a traditional cuff, as well as monitoring pulse rates during sleep or wakefulness. Additionally, users will have access to insights into their metabolic health, although this does not involve direct measurement of insulin or glucose levels.

To derive these insights, Google's algorithm analyzes a range of metrics including heart rate, activity level, and sleep patterns. This data is then used to identify changes in metabolic health over time. Users who meet the eligibility criteria will find these features available within the Health tab of their Fitbit app.

The new features are exclusively available to users with a Google Health Premium subscription, which costs $100 annually. In return for this fee, subscribers gain access to advanced sleep tracking and a broader selection of health-tracking capabilities beyond those offered by standard devices.

Eligible users who have worn their device for at least five days will be able to view the new insights in the Health tab of their app, providing them with a more detailed understanding of their overall health.

The new feature uses machine learning algorithms to analyze a user's biometric data, such as heart rate and skin conductance, in addition to demographic information. This multimodal approach enables the device to assess metabolic patterns without requiring direct access to blood glucose levels.

Fitbit users who exhibit elevated insulin resistance will receive notifications prompting them to take further action. Furthermore, users can integrate their Abbott continuous glucose monitors into the Google Health app for enhanced glucose monitoring capabilities.

The development of this feature marks a significant step towards achieving non-invasive glucose tracking, although it falls short of the accuracy offered by traditional continuous glucose monitors. Nonetheless, the multimodal model demonstrates progress in leveraging wearable data to inform health insights.

Google's decision to expand these Health Guardian features beyond its flagship Pixel Watches makes the technology more accessible to budget-conscious users who own lower-end Fitbit models. This move could potentially reach a broader audience with varying healthcare needs and financial constraints.

The concept of non-invasive glucose monitoring has been around for years, and many tech companies have been racing to develop their own versions. This technology would allow people to track their blood sugar levels without having to prick their fingers.

Google appears to be making significant strides in this area by incorporating insulin resistance trends into its latest Fitbit devices. This feature uses algorithmic AI, rather than needles and blood, which brings the company closer to developing a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) that is non-invasive.

This development could potentially revolutionize diabetes management for millions of people worldwide, offering a more convenient and less painful alternative to traditional methods.

ZDNet: https://www.zdnet.com/tech/fitbit-glucose-patterns-blood-pressure-health-features/

Despite its improved features, some users may find certain aspects of the device finicky. For instance, the band fastening mechanism can be tricky to adjust, and the auto-pause function may be overly sensitive in some cases. Additionally, the Edge does not come with built-in Google Wallet capabilities.

The new wearable has been compared to other devices on the market, including the Fitbit Charge 6 and Google's Pixel Watch 5. At $180, it falls within a reasonable price range for those looking to upgrade their existing tracker or purchase one for the first time. This cost is higher than the screenless Fitbit Air but lower than more advanced smartwatches.

One of the main reasons users might opt for the Edge over other options is its ability to provide detailed health metrics and workout tracking features. These capabilities have been lacking in older models, making the new device an attractive choice for those seeking a high-end wearable experience.

For now, the Google Fitbit Edge remains a solid option for those looking to upgrade their existing tracker or purchase one with advanced features. However, it still falls short of convincing some users to give up their screenless alternatives like the Fitbit Air, at least in this reviewer's opinion.

The Google Fitbit Edge's design has made a significant improvement in comfort levels compared to its predecessor. Its capsule shape fits more naturally on smaller wrists, making it a better option for those who find rectangular smartwatches too bulky.

To enhance user experience, the Edge offers various band options that cater to different preferences and activities. The Active Band is included with the device but may not be the most favored choice among users. Other available bands include the HNBR Active Sport, Performance Loop, Magnet band, and Metal Links.

I found myself frequently switching between the Metal Links and Performance Loop bands due to their distinct advantages. The Metal Links offer a stylish look suitable for formal events or nights out, while the Performance Loop is ideal for everyday wear. However, I experienced some issues with the Performance Loop's fastening mechanism, which occasionally popped loose during adjustments.

The micro-adjustable fit of the Performance Loop makes it easy to achieve a precise fit, but it can also be easily over-tightened. This led me to notice that the locking button on my device had become stuck, requiring me to fiddle with the mechanism to resolve the issue.

Despite these minor issues, I found the Edge's band options to be versatile and convenient. However, the experience is still not enough to convince users to give up their screenless alternatives like the Fitbit Air.

The display on the Fitbit Edge is its most notable feature compared to the screenless Air model. During workouts, I found it particularly useful to be able to check my metrics and control my music without having to slow down.

The ability to read the display in direct sunlight is also an improvement over previous models. The Edge's display reaches a maximum brightness that is roughly twice as high as the Charge's peak brightness, making it easier to view on-the-go.

One of the aspects where I prefer Wear OS is its more vibrant interface compared to Fitbit's offerings. However, Fitbit's software has some advantages, such as offering up to seven days of battery life, which surpasses what the Pixel Watch can achieve.

The Edge also boasts compatibility with both iOS and Android devices, unlike the Pixel Watch. Furthermore, it marks a significant milestone for Fitbit by being Google's first repairable fitness tracker, featuring modular construction including a replaceable battery.

The Google Fitbit Edge has incorporated several features aimed at long-term health tracking, mirroring some of its predecessors like the Pixel Watch 5 and Air. One notable addition is monthly blood pressure trends, which are also complemented by insulin resistance insights. Furthermore, the device now provides SpO2 readings with nightly averages, ranges, and changes over time for added context.

The Edge has also upgraded its heart rate monitoring capabilities to include 24/7 tracking, cardio load metrics, and an updated ECG app that can detect atrial fibrillation (AFib). Additionally, users who log their nutrition can view glucose insights if they're using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM).

Most features on the Google Fitbit Edge are locked behind the Google Health Premium subscription, which costs $10 per month or $100 annually. This means that without a subscription, users can only access core metrics and scores, but not the deeper analysis and AI coaching.

The premium membership is essential to unlocking the full potential of the device, with any new purchase coming with a three-month trial period. Buying into the subscription service allows users to view their data in greater detail and receive personalized recommendations for improvement.

The hardware on the Google Fitbit Edge has also been upgraded to include a barometric altimeter that measures elevation changes and floors climbed. This feature is accompanied by an IP68 rating, ensuring that the device can withstand dust and water exposure.

During testing, the gyroscope proved to be both beneficial and occasionally over-sensitive. Automatic activity recognition was improved, but there were instances where the Edge incorrectly paused or resumed workouts due to minor movements.

The Fitbit Edge's omission of contactless payments via NFC technology is noticeable compared to its predecessor, the Charge 6. This feature's absence might be puzzling for those who value convenience and seamless transactions on-the-go.

Despite some drawbacks, the Fitbit Edge boasts a robust design that will likely please existing Fitbit owners, particularly those familiar with the Charge series. However, newcomers may not find sufficient reason to upgrade, as the Edge doesn't significantly outshine its predecessor in terms of features or value.

The Fitbit Air remains an attractive option for those seeking a more affordable and feature-packed smartwatch experience, making it challenging for the Edge to stand out as a compelling choice.

Wired: https://www.wired.com/review/google-fitbit-edge/

Whoop's success has not gone unnoticed, as the company recently secured a $10 billion valuation after raising $575 million in funding. This significant investment highlights the growing interest in screenless health trackers, but it also means that Whoop is now facing increased competition from other companies such as Garmin and Amazfit.

Google has entered the fray with its Fitbit Air, which bears a striking resemblance to Whoop's offerings. The timing of Google's announcement on March 31 coincided with Whoop's funding news, sparking speculation about whether it was intentional or just a coincidence.

The Fitbit Air is not the only new player in this space, but it is one of the most notable entries so far. To help determine which device is best for consumers, we'll be comparing the features and pricing of both the Whoop MG and the Fitbit Air.

The battery life of the two devices differs significantly, mainly due to their size and design. The newer Whoop models, including the MG variant, have a longer lifespan of 14+ days, whereas the Fitbit Air's battery lasts up to seven days.

To mitigate this issue, users can opt for a wireless battery pack that attaches to the Whoop band, allowing for on-the-go charging without having to remove the device. However, this does add bulk to the user's wrist, which may be a consideration for some individuals.

The companion apps of both companies provide an abundance of data related to activities, sleep patterns, and vital signs. They also feature AI-powered assistants that can help users log meals, offer advice, and even create personalized wellness and workout plans.

In contrast, the Fitbit Air's Google Health app is designed with a more user-friendly interface, making it easier for average individuals to navigate and utilize its features. This could be an advantage for those who are not as deeply invested in health and fitness tracking.

The Fitbit Air and Whoop fitness trackers both offer unique subscription models that cater to different user needs. While the Fitbit Air allows users to access basic tracking features without a subscription, Whoop requires membership for full functionality. In exchange for a yearly fee, Whoop members receive hardware included in their package.

Membership fees vary depending on location, with Whoop One sold at $199 per year in select regions including the US, MX, CA, EU, and UK. However, outside of these areas, users are provided with a certified pre-owned 4.0 sensor and an Onyx Superknit Band as part of their membership.

The Fitbit Air offers a three-month trial to Google Health Premium, after which users can opt out or continue paying a small fee for access to premium features. In contrast, Whoop memberships start at $149 for the first year, increasing to $199 thereafter, with an option to pay $25 per month for those already subscribed.

The cost of Google Health Premium itself is also worth noting, as it will add $100 per year (or $10 per month) on top of the initial hardware cost. This adds another layer of expense for users who choose to access premium features through their Fitbit Air device.

The Fitbit Air offers basic health insights without requiring a subscription, making it suitable for everyday users or casual fitness enthusiasts. These individuals can still track their sleep patterns, daily activities, and vital signs, giving them a general idea of their overall well-being.

However, they will miss out on AI-driven features like personalized assistance, training plans, and access to workouts. This might not be a significant loss for those who simply want to monitor their progress and stay informed about their health. For instance, users can still log their daily walks and workouts without needing a subscription.

Google Health Premium is another perk that comes with certain Google AI subscriptions, such as Pro or Ultra. This benefit allows users to access more advanced features on top of the standard Fitbit Air functionality. In essence, even without a Whoop membership, users can enjoy some premium benefits through their existing Google services.

Whoop devices are positioned as high-end trackers, but they do not offer an option for purchase without a subscription. The sensors and app functionality in Whoop are comparable to those found in the Fitbit Air, albeit with more detailed data on strain and recovery metrics. This granular information can be particularly valuable for athletes who engage in intense activities.

Whoop's integration of licensed clinicians through video consultations is another notable feature, allowing users to receive professional guidance from anywhere. Additionally, Whoop has demonstrated a stronger ability to automatically detect various activities, which is beneficial for those who participate in strength training or high-intensity cardio exercises.

The Fitbit Air offers a more engaging AI Coach experience when paired with Google Health Premium, providing users with a conversational interface to log their daily activities and receive personalized advice.

This enhanced support is particularly useful for those who engage in strength training or high-intensity cardio exercises, as Whoop has demonstrated its ability to automatically detect various activities. Overall, the Fitbit Air stands out as the more affordable option for most individuals, making it a better value despite some of its limitations.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2294284/fitbit-air-vs-whoop-which-better-fitness-tracking-wearable-screen-less/

The Fitbit Air is an affordable wearable that competes directly with Whoop's high-end offerings, but without the added cost of a screen. In contrast, the Fitbit Edge features a built-in display and positions itself as a mid-range option between Google's budget-friendly Fitbits and its more expensive Pixel Watch 5.

One key difference between the two devices is their price point: the Air costs $99, while the Edge retails for $179. Despite this disparity, both wearables offer AI-powered features that are not available on older Fitbit models, making them attractive options for those who want advanced tracking capabilities without breaking the bank.

Google Health Premium is required to unlock these AI tools in full, but otherwise, the Air and Edge seem like solid choices for anyone looking to upgrade their fitness tracking setup. However, it's worth noting that they are not completely interchangeable devices, with distinct features and design differences that set them apart.

The inclusion of a screen on the Fitbit Edge is just one aspect that sets it apart from its non-screened counterpart. Other subtler differences may also make the Edge a more appealing option for certain users, but these distinctions will be explored in greater detail as we continue to examine the features and capabilities of each device.

The design differences between the Fitbit Edge and Air are more than just skin deep. While both devices share a similar purpose, their form factors set them apart in terms of user interaction. The Fitbit Air relies heavily on the Google Health app for data viewing and settings adjustments, requiring minimal direct contact with the device.

In contrast, the Fitbit Edge offers more interactive capabilities, thanks to its 1.34-inch oval-shaped AMOLED touchscreen display and a new mechanical side button. This added functionality makes it easier to navigate and control various aspects of the device without needing to constantly check the Google Health app.

The physical size difference between the two devices is also notable, with the Edge measuring 1.54 x 1.01 x 0.46 inches, making it slightly larger than the Air. This increased visibility can be attributed in part to the Edge's always-on screen functionality, which allows users to view essential information at a glance.

One of the key differentiators between the two devices lies in their sensor configurations. While both feature optical heart rate sensors, only the Fitbit Edge includes electrical sensors necessary for ECG readings and an altimeter for calculating elevation. The Edge also boasts an ambient light sensor, which helps calibrate its screen brightness to suit various environments.

The battery life of the two devices is expected to be similar, with Google claiming both can last seven days on a single charge. However, this estimate changes when the always-on feature is enabled on the Fitbit Edge. In such cases, the device's battery life is reduced to around two days, prompting the company to provide faster charging capabilities.

To compensate for the reduced battery life, the Fitbit Edge offers rapid charging, capable of replenishing its battery to 100 percent in just 90 minutes. Additionally, a short 15-minute charge can extend its battery life by up to one day, providing users with greater flexibility and convenience.

The Fitbit Edge and Air share many similarities when it comes to their features and functionality. However, there are some key differences between the two devices that set them apart from one another.

One area where the two wearables diverge is in terms of additional sensors and capabilities. The Edge, with its built-in display, offers features like ECG readings, floor tracking, and live workout metrics on the screen. These extras rely on the presence of a screen and the ability to run Google's lightweight Fitbit OS.

The Air, on the other hand, lacks these advanced features due to its lack of a display. However, it can still track various health metrics such as activity levels, heart rate, and sleep patterns. This is because many of these features don't rely on specific sensors but rather on the data collected by Google's Health Guardian.

The Edge's screen also enables users to view more detailed information about their health data directly on the device. Additionally, it can receive notifications from a connected phone and even run a simplified version of Google Maps.

This difference in capabilities may be a deciding factor for some users who prioritize the extra features offered by the Edge over the sleeker design of the Air.

The design difference between the Fitbit Edge and Air models may appeal to different users. The Fitbit Air has a more discreet approach, relying solely on sensors and a companion app for data viewing, making it less obtrusive.

This contrast is stark when compared to the Fitbit Edge, which is designed to be more prominent. While not a full-fledged smartphone like the Pixel Watch, its features may make it harder to ignore, depending on individual preferences. Ultimately, this distinction will be a key consideration for those choosing between these two devices.

Engadget: https://www.engadget.com/2287042/fitbit-edge-vs-air-differences-compared/

The Fitbit Edge is priced at $179 and offers a balance between features and price, falling somewhere in the middle of the company's wearable lineup. It boasts a color screen, built-in GPS, and various health sensors, similar to what you'd find in more expensive smartwatches.

In terms of design, the Edge is notable for its slim and lightweight profile, which allows it to last up to a week on a single charge. This makes it an attractive option for those who want a smartwatch that won't weigh them down or require constant recharging.

The concept behind the Fitbit Edge isn't new; previous models like the Inspire and Charge have paired simple screens with health and fitness tracking capabilities, working seamlessly with both iOS and Android devices. However, this latest release represents an evolution of these ideas, combining features from across Google's wearable lineup.

The Fitbit Edge is available for preorder on Monday and will go on sale on October 27, giving potential buyers a chance to experience it firsthand and determine whether it hits the sweet spot in terms of form and function.

The Fitbit Edge's display is a major upgrade over its predecessor, boasting a 1.34-inch color AMOLED screen that's 46% larger than what's found in the Charge 6.

This expanded display also comes with an always-on option, allowing users to keep track of essential information without having to manually turn it on every time.

The Edge's design is also notable for its sleek and modern aesthetic, which draws inspiration from other popular smartwatches like the Air and Pixel Watch 5.

The device will be available in a range of stylish color combinations, including Obsidian, Fog, Olive, and Canyon, with interchangeable options such as a performance loop, magnetic band, and metal links.

A special edition model featuring basketball legend Stephen Curry is also being offered, but it comes at an additional $50 cost.

The Fitbit Edge has a few notable omissions compared to other smartwatches on the market. Notably, it lacks a built-in microphone and speaker, which means users can't take calls directly from their wrist.

In terms of health and fitness tracking, the Edge draws heavily from the company's expertise in this area. It features built-in GPS and an altimeter, allowing for more accurate distance tracking during outdoor activities. This is a departure from the Fitbit Air, which relies on a connected phone for GPS data.

The Edge also boasts advanced heart rate monitoring capabilities, with Google claiming that its readings are 40% more accurate than those of the Charge 6. This increased accuracy could be particularly useful for athletes or individuals who rely on precise heart rate data during exercise.

During workouts, users can view metrics like pace and heart rate zones directly on their wrist, a feature that was notably absent from the Fitbit Air. Additionally, the Edge allows users to broadcast live heart rate data to compatible exercise equipment, providing an added layer of functionality for gym-goers.

The Edge comes equipped with three months of Google Health Premium, which unlocks features like AI-powered coaching and advanced health trend tracking. This includes monthly blood pressure and insulin resistance monitoring through Health Guardian, a feature that will also be rolled out to the Fitbit Air at some point in the future.

The Fitbit Edge's battery life is a significant advantage over other smartwatches on the market. According to Google, the device can last up to seven days on a single charge when using the raise to wake setting. However, this estimate drops to two days if you prefer an always-on display.

This discrepancy highlights one of the key trade-offs for users who want an always-on display. While having a screen that's constantly visible may be convenient, it comes at the cost of reduced battery life. For some users, this might not be a deal-breaker, but for others, it could be a significant consideration.

The charging time for the Fitbit Edge is also worth noting. A full charge takes around 90 minutes, which can be a drawback for users who need to recharge their device quickly. On the other hand, five minutes on the charger gets you about a day's worth of battery life, making it possible to top up your device when you're in a hurry.

One potential benefit of the Fitbit Edge is its compatibility with other devices. Google has confirmed that users can seamlessly switch between the Edge and other Fitbit devices, such as the Air, without disrupting their health data. This could make it easier for users to choose the right device for each situation, rather than being tied to a single model.

The Fitbit Edge has made a significant design change by incorporating a user-replaceable battery, allowing users to extend its lifespan and reduce electronic waste.

This move towards repairability is in line with Google's own approach, as seen with the Pixel Watch 4, which was redesigned without adhesives to facilitate easier repairs. Even those who consider themselves novice DIY enthusiasts can attempt repairs on certain devices.

The use of a replaceable battery could be particularly beneficial for smaller and less expensive trackers like the Edge, where battery degradation over time is more noticeable. This change can help users get more value out of their device and reduce the need for frequent replacements.

While the $179 price tag may seem steep compared to other Fitbit models, such as the Air, it's actually a relatively affordable option when considering more advanced smartwatches like the Pixel Watch or Samsung's Galaxy Watch. The Edge offers a range of features that are typically found in higher-end devices.

For those who prioritize fitness tracking and don't require additional features like contactless payments, the Edge may be an attractive choice at this price point. It provides a balance between capabilities and cost, making it a viable option for users who want more than basic functionality but aren't ready to commit to a premium smartwatch.

Ultimately, the Fitbit Edge's unique combination of features and repairability makes it a compelling option for those looking for a device that can adapt to their changing needs without breaking the bank.

CNET: https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fitbit-edge-google-first-look/

One of the major complaints about the Pixel Watch 5 was its thickness, which stood out on the wrist due to its bulky design. At 12.3 mm thick, it was noticeably thicker than other smartwatches like the Galaxy Watch (8.6 mm) and Apple Watch Series (9.7 mm). This made it less appealing as a fashion accessory.

Google's new Fitbit Edge has taken note of these concerns and is now available with a slimmer design. Measuring 11.5 mm in thickness, it is indeed thinner than the Pixel Watch 5 and offers more features without sacrificing style.

The Fitbit Edge seems to be a combination of the best qualities from previous Google wearables, including the Pixel Watch 5 and the screenless Fitbit Air. It has a design that's similar to the Fitbit Air but with the added feature of a touchscreen display.

The Fitbit Edge has several features in common with its predecessor, the three-year-old Charge 6. One notable similarity is its thickness of 11.2 mm and a seven-day battery life when the always-on display is disabled. However, these specs don't reveal significant differences between the two devices.

When the always-on display feature is enabled on the Fitbit Edge, its battery life drops to just two days. This means that users who want to keep their display constantly lit will need to charge their device more frequently.

In a departure from the Charge model, the Fitbit Edge includes an additional side button for easy access to workouts and information. This feature is reminiscent of Apple's Action Button. Furthermore, sleep tracking has been improved by 15% in the new device.

The Fitbit Edge features a vibrant hybrid OLED screen protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. This display allows users to view workout details, health metrics, and other messages from their phone, including incoming texts and Google Maps directions. The device also syncs with the user's phone for notifications.

The price of the Fitbit Edge has sparked some debate among tech enthusiasts, with many wondering if it's worth the extra $20 compared to the Fitbit Charge. The device boasts several upgrades, but some are questioning whether these features justify the increased cost.

One of the key concerns is that two of the Edge's most significant improvements - sleep tracking accuracy and repairability - rely on software rather than hardware. This raises questions about what exactly justifies the higher price point. If the added expense doesn't translate to tangible, hardware-based upgrades, then it may be difficult for some users to justify the extra cost.

Despite these concerns, the Fitbit Edge is now available for pre-order and will hit stores on October 27.

ZDNet: https://www.zdnet.com/tech/googles-new-fitbit-edge-solves-my-biggest-gripe-with-the-pixel-watch/