During the Natural Resources Subcommittee listening to, Gohmert appeared to draw a connection between the moon and Earth’s orbit and solar flares to climate change. In questioning US Forest Service Associate Deputy Chief Jennifer Eberlien, Gohmert requested if the National Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management might change the orbits of the moon and Earth, making a remark that some noticed as an try to argue that climate change needs to be seen as a pure phenomenon moderately than man-made.

“I was informed by the immediate past director of NASA that they have found that the moon’s orbit is changing slightly and so is the Earth’s orbit around the sun,” Gohmert stated.

“We know there’s been significant solar flare activity. And so, is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM (Bureau of Land Management) can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously, that would have profound effects on our climate,” the congressman requested Eberlien.

Eberlien responded that she “would have to follow up with you on that one, Mr. Gohmert.”

Facts First: Gohmert’s comment makes little sense. The insinuation that solar flares and orbital exercise trigger or significantly contribute to the climate change seen at this time is totally incorrect. Greenhouse gases produced by people are the first driver of the earth’s speedy warming.

Gohmert’s workplace didn’t reply to NCS’s requests to make clear his remarks, which had been broadly mocked on Twitter.
Brian Brettschneider, a climate scientist and professor on the University of Alaska Fairbanks, wrote tersely, “We cannot change the Earth’s or Moon’s orbit. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.”
“The ‘science-y sounding’ reasons most politicians use to reject climate change are not primarily due to lack of education or knowledge,” Katharine Hayhoe, climate scientist and co-director of the Climate Center at Texas Tech University, wrote on Twitter. “No: they are deliberately manufactured and offered as palatable excuses to hide the real problem: solution aversion. They don’t want to fix it.”

Everything Gohmert asserted has been debunked by NASA.

In an article written by NASA, the company notes — citing the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — that the “scientific consensus is that long and short-term variations in solar activity play only a very small role in Earth’s climate.”

The article additionally notes that the warming pushed by greenhouse gases produced by people is “50 times greater than the slight extra warming coming from the Sun itself over that same time interval.”

The concept that the altering of the Earth’s and moon’s orbits can be a serious contributor to climate change is inaccurate.

As NASA notes in an article on the orbital cycles of the Earth, the cycles “cannot account for the current period of rapid warming.”

These cycles happen over tens to lots of of hundreds of years. Meanwhile, NASA says, “Scientists are confident Earth’s recent warming is primarily due to human activities — specifically, the direct input of carbon dioxide into Earth’s atmosphere from burning fossil fuels.”

NCS’s Ryan Nobles and Brandon Miller contributed to this text.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js



Sources

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *