Both earlier than the riot and instantly afterward, Stefanik made false claims in regards to the conduct of the election in among the states Biden received. And in earlier remarks, she amplified baseless claims that there have been main “irregularities” with each voting and election software program.
Stefanik didn’t match Trump’s incendiary language in regards to the election being “rigged” or “stolen.” But utilizing barely extra clever rhetoric, she aided his damaging marketing campaign to undermine confidence within the end result.
Here’s a have a look at a few of Stefanik’s election-related phrases and actions between early December and early January. Her workplace declined to touch upon the document for this text.
Endorsed lawsuit to overturn the election
In December, Stefanik was one among 126 House Republicans
to signal on to an amicus transient in assist of a Republican lawsuit
that requested the Supreme Court to toss out Biden’s win.
The unsuccessful lawsuit, which was filed by the lawyer basic of Texas, requested the courtroom to reject the election leads to Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin, all of which have been received by Biden.
on the time that she believed state officers had violated the Constitution by making modifications to election processes with out approval from state legislatures. She stated in an interview
on Newsmax that aired in December: “This lawsuit was not about overturning the election, it was about standing up for the Constitution and protecting the election integrity and election security.”
Whatever its rationale, the lawsuit did search to overturn the election.
Voted to reject Biden electoral votes after Capitol riot
On January 6, Stefanik was one of 147 Republicans
to vote towards certifying Biden’s electoral votes from a minimum of one state.
Earlier that day, prior to the storming of the Capitol, Stefanik had instructed constituents in an open letter
that she deliberate to object to certifying Biden’s wins in all 4 of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin. But after the violence, Republicans ended up holding last votes on the certification of solely two states, Pennsylvania and Arizona; Stefanik voted
to reject Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania however to certify Biden’s win in Arizona.
Endorsed baseless issues about “voting irregularities”
In a video assertion she posted on January 4, Stefanik said
that “tens of millions of Americans are rightly concerned that the 2020 election featured unprecedented voting irregularities.” She additionally stated these Americans are rightly involved about “a fundamental lack of ballot integrity and ballot security.”
Stefanik’s wording right here was artful. Rather than declare herself that there have been widespread irregularities and an absence of poll integrity, she invoked different Americans’ issues about widespread irregularities and an absence of poll integrity. Nonetheless, she not solely repeated these baseless issues however groundlessly prompt Americans have been appropriate to have them.
Alluded to false claims about Dominion
and numerous allies falsely claimed that Trump votes have been stolen by voting merchandise created by the corporate Dominion Voting Systems. Stefanik didn’t go that far — however in a December 1 interview
on Newsmax, she vaguely prompt that there have been “irregularities” associated to Dominion.
Given how shut the election was in key states, Stefanik stated, “we need to make sure that every vote is counted. But we also need to highlight any of the irregularities. I have concerns about the software, the fact that Dominion software …” She trailed off, then stated each Democrats and Republicans have “raised issues” about “making sure that we have the integrity of the counting process.”
Stefanik did not clarify her issues about Dominion software program, nor what “issues” she was claiming Democrats had raised. Regardless, there isn’t any foundation for claims that there have been points with the software program’s “integrity” within the 2020 election.
“There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised,” the Trump administration’s personal election safety officers from the Department of Homeland Security said
in a November assertion they issued together with different election safety officers from outdoors the federal authorities.
Made false declare about votes within the Atlanta space
In the open letter on January 6, Stefanik wrote that, in Georgia, “more than 140,000 votes came from underage, deceased and otherwise unauthorized voters — in Fulton County alone.”
This is simply false. Nearly two months earlier than Stefanik’s letter was revealed, journalists had already debunked
claims that there might need been 132,000 ineligible voters who forged ballots in Fulton County, which comprises most of Atlanta. It’s not clear if Stefanik was referring to these identical claims or to another story, however she was flawed regardless.
“The Georgia Secretary of State’s office knows the age of everyone who voted because they had to be registered in order to vote, and there were no underage voters,” Ari Schaffer, spokesman for Republican Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, stated in a Wednesday electronic mail to NCS. “Across the state, we discovered solely 2 votes credited to useless voters. The suggestion that one fourth
of all ballots forged in Fulton County in November have been unlawful is ludicrous.”
Made false declare about Georgia’s voter verification
In her January 6 speech
to Congress, Stefanik claimed that Raffensperger “gutted signature matching for absentee ballots and, in essence, eliminated voter verification required by state election law.”
What counts as “gutted” is subjective, however Stefanik’s broader declare is clearly incorrect: Raffensperger didn’t get rid of signature matching for the 2020 election, a lot much less get rid of “voter verification” extra broadly — “in essence” or in any other case. Georgia’s absentee voters did have their signatures verified in the 2020 election
, and its in-person voters had their photograph identification verified. A subsequent audit
discovered that the elections division in suburban Cobb County, which Biden received by about 14 proportion factors, “had a 99.99% accuracy rate in performing correct signature verification procedures.”
Stefanik was seemingly referring to a March 2020 authorized settlement Raffensperger endorsed
to settle a Democratic lawsuit. The settlement stated that a minimum of three members of a county elections workers want to be concerned in a call to reject an absentee poll over a signature matching difficulty. And it required that, if a rejection does happen, the voter have to be shortly contacted in order that they have an opportunity to repair the issue.
Raffensperger wrote in a January 6 letter
to Georgia members of Congress that the share of Georgia absentee ballots rejected for signature points in 2020, 0.22%, was “actually slightly higher” than the 0.2% fee within the 2018 election, earlier than the settlement settlement.
Stefanik is entitled to criticize the Georgia signature system; Georgia Republicans replaced it
in 2021 with a non-signature ID system for verifying absentee voters. But she was incorrect when she prompt that Georgia didn’t confirm voters in any respect in 2020.
Amplified baseless declare about ballots in Michigan
In the January 6 speech, Stefanik additionally amplified baseless allegations about ballot-counting in Michigan. She claimed, for instance, that signed Michigan affidavits documented “unconstitutional irregularities” like “the illegal counting of late ballots.”
There isn’t any proof that Michigan counted ballots that arrived after the state receipt deadline of 8 p.m. on election evening. Though some Republicans claimed that viral images
confirmed somebody bringing late-arriving ballots right into a counting heart in Detroit, these pictures really confirmed a news photographer bringing in camera equipment
The workplace of Democratic Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson says
on its web site that 3,328 ballots have been rejected within the state as a result of they arrived after the 8 pm deadline. “Any ballot that arrived” after the deadline, “even if postmarked prior to Election Day, was not counted,” the workplace says
Many of the Michigan affidavits cited by Trump’s authorized workforce contained claims that have been debunked, revealed a lack of understanding
of how the counting course of works, or didn’t even purport to describe fraud.