'Elvis' review: Baz Luhrmann's frenetic style overwhelms Austin Butler's showstopping role as Elvis Presley


Luhrmann’s most pertinent credit embody the visually placing musical “Moulin Rouge!,” which provides apparent stylistic parallels. Yet using the rambunctious, surreal points of that 2001 romantic fantasy clashes with the calls for of a biographical movie, drowning the substance with fast-paced and frenetic modifying that blunts the emotion of Butler’s spot-on efficiency, which has been embraced by Presley’s family and could be a showstopper if solely given room to breathe.
Although Elvis Presley’s life has been documented in quite a lot of tasks, the primary precedent right here appears to be a 1993 TV film, “Elvis and the Colonel,” which targeted on the connection between the star and his supervisor/handler Col. Tom Parker, casting Beau Bridges as the latter. A colourful and shadowy determine, Parker’s management prompted allegations of significant monetary shenanigans that have been solely uncovered after Presley’s loss of life in 1977.

Here, Luhrmann (who shares script credit score with three others, almost a decade after his final movie “The Great Gatsby”) makes the near-fatal error of primarily telling the story from Parker’s viewpoint. That locations the emphasis on a closely made-up Hanks — adopting an accent that may at greatest be described as punishing — who serves as the narrator and straight addresses the viewers.

“I am the man who gave the world Elvis Presley,” Parker boasts, including, “Me and Elvis, we was partners.”

Austin Butler as Elvis Presley in director Baz Luhrman's 'Elvis.'

“Elvis” thus kicks off on the important part when Parker comes into Presley’s life as he is regionally launching his singing profession. But Parker’s body of reference has much less to do with music — certainly, he is largely detached to that — than carnival points of interest, nearly salivating when he identifies the highly effective impact that Elvis’ gyrations have on females within the crowd.

While that also leaves room to chart Presley’s spectacular rise regardless of the artistic {and professional} shackles that Parker positioned upon him, Luhrmann’s narrative strategy would not actually develop the characters, together with, to a level, Presley himself. Scenes race by so rapidly that even Elvis’ spouse Priscilla (Olivia DeJonge), dad and mom (Helen Thomson and “Moulin Rouge!” alum Richard Roxburgh) and posse of Memphis friends are name-checked however barely register, regardless of a film that runs greater than 2 ½ hours.

Where does the time go? Much of it’s dedicated to meticulously replicating Presley’s performances, together with an in depth presentation of his acclaimed 1968 NBC particular, which provides Butler’s unerring mimicry a possibility to shine. But efforts to contextualize Presley’s journey with occasions such as the devastating assassinations of the ’60s and race relations are obscured by the narrative blur, which is not helped by glib dialogue like Parker saying, “Is it my fault the world changed?”

At a minimal, the movie helps rekindle an appreciation of Presley’s expertise that may have many dusting off greatest-hits collections and buzzing these traditional tunes. Yet as spectacular as it’s to see Butler approximate the King belting out one thing like “Suspicious Minds,” “Elvis,” the film, finally winds up caught in a lure totally of its personal making.

“Elvis” premieres June 24 in US theaters, and is being launched by Warner Bros., like NCS, a unit of Warner Bros. Discovery. It’s rated PG-13.



With information from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.