Belgian Minister of Health Frank Vandenbroucke sought to reassure the nation in regards to the AstraZeneca vaccine, following a resolution to briefly pause administering it to these aged 18 to 55.
“There is no doubt about that it is a good vaccine. It protects against the disease,” he stated. But he cautioned that it does have uncomfortable side effects, “like any vaccine.”
The resolution by Belgium to droop utilizing AstraZeneca got here after a discovering by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that there was a “possible link” between the AstraZeneca vaccine and “very rare cases of blood clots” however that the advantages of the vaccine proceed to out weigh the dangers.
“There is no doubt that if you have the choice between vaccination with AstraZeneca or no vaccination, you should get vaccinated immediately with AstraZeneca,” Vandenbroucke emphasized during an interview on VRT Radio 1 Wednesday.
Following the advice of Belgium’s Superior Health Council, Vandenbroucke said the country would now, “use AstraZeneca for the somewhat older people and use the other vaccines earlier for the younger people.”
He added that this was only possible, “Because we now have the luxurious of selecting from a number of vaccines and we will unfold the danger with out impacting our vaccination technique.”
On the information offered by the EMA to a digital assembly of European Health Ministers Vandenbroucke stated, “We found that EMA actually still had homework,” including he was not the one Minister to have raised this concern.
“We are not so happy that the EMA has not taken the analysis a little further, namely what is the best choice between the different vaccines for the different age groups
Last month Belgium had decided to continue its vaccination campaign for all people aged over 18 with the AstraZeneca vaccine, while other European countries suspended using the vaccine over blood-clotting concerns pending an investigation by the EMA.
Asked why Belgium had continued when others hadn’t, Vandenbroucke said: “If we had then decided not to use the vaccine anymore, we would have had to turn the campaign upside down. Fortunately we did not do that then, because that would certainly have cost lives.”