By Reuters
(NCS) — Anthropic advised a San Francisco federal judge on Friday that it has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a class-action lawsuit from a gaggle of authors who accused the bogus intelligence firm of utilizing their books to practice its AI chatbot Claude with out permission.
Anthropic and the plaintiffs in a courtroom submitting requested U.S. District Judge William Alsup to approve the settlement, after saying the settlement in August with out disclosing the phrases or quantity.
“If approved, this landmark settlement will be the largest publicly reported copyright recovery in history, larger than any other copyright class action settlement or any individual copyright case litigated to final judgment,” the plaintiffs stated within the submitting.
The proposed deal marks the primary settlement in a string of lawsuits in opposition to tech corporations together with OpenAI, Microsoft and Meta Platforms over their use of copyrighted materials to practice generative AI techniques.
Writers Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber and Kirk Wallace Johnson filed the class action in opposition to Anthropic last year. They argued that the corporate, which is backed by Amazon and Alphabet, unlawfully used thousands and thousands of pirated books to educate its AI assistant Claude to reply to human prompts.
The writers’ allegations echoed dozens of different lawsuits introduced by authors, information retailers, visible artists and others who say that tech corporations stole their work to use in AI coaching.
The corporations have argued their techniques make truthful use of copyrighted materials to create new, transformative content material.
Alsup ruled in June that Anthropic made truthful use of the authors’ work to practice Claude, however discovered that the corporate violated their rights by saving greater than 7 million pirated books to a “central library” that will not essentially be used for that function.
A trial was scheduled to start in December to decide how a lot Anthropic owed for the alleged piracy, with potential damages ranging into the tons of of billions of {dollars}.
The pivotal fair-use query remains to be being debated in different AI copyright instances. Another San Francisco judge listening to the same ongoing lawsuit in opposition to Meta ruled shortly after Alsup’s decision that utilizing copyrighted work with out permission to practice AI can be illegal in “many circumstances.”
The-NCS-Wire
™ & © 2025 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.